Correction to: International Journal of Colorectal Disease (2022) 37:2185-2195
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04254-z
The original published version of the above article contained errors. The authors’ request that the following changes be noted [Bold text used to highlight corrected area].
Anzeige
1.
The data in the sections under Abstract and Results has been updated.
Abstract
Results The need for re-intervention with medication or surgery due to surgical or clinical recurrence increased over time. The recurrence rates in patients after ileocecal resection were lower than the rates under biologic therapy. The odds ratio for clinical recurrence under biologics versus after surgical treatment was 2.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53–4.08, p-value < 0.001). The odds ratio for surgical recurrence under biologics versus after surgery was 3.60 (95% CI 1.06–12.3, p-value 0.041).
Results
Overall evaluation
After 60 months, the surgical recurrence rates were 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06–0.19) in the surgery group and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.23–0.30) in the biologics group. There were no studies from the combination therapy group for the probability of recurrence after 60 months. The results of the two types of therapy, surgery and biologics, were statistically significant (Fig. 6); more than twice as many surgical recurrences occurred in the biologics group after 60 months as in the surgical group.
2.
Reference, Table and Figure citations of the sections ‘Statistical analysis, Clinical recurrence, Surgical recurrence, Overall evaluation and Discussion’ has been rearranged and corrected.
3.
Figure 1 caption has been corrected to “Fig. 1 Consort diagram showing number of studies evaluated for inclusion in this meta-analysis and the reasons for exclusion of studies”
4.
In Table 4, the data entry under the ‘Clinical recurrence’ column with the Characteristic ‘Biologics’ should have been 2.50 instead of 250.
5.
The figure caption for Figure S2 has been corrected. The Supplementary material was replaced by the new material.
The original article has been corrected.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.