Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Correlation between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Zengrui Zhang, Jingyu Mu, Jing Wei, Haoming Geng, Chunmeng Liu, Wenhua Yi, Yue Sun, Junguo Duan

Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

Refractive errors are one of the most common ocular conditions among children and adolescents, with myopia showing an increasing prevalence and early onset in this population. Recent studies have identified a correlation between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline from January 1, 2012, to May 1, 2023. Various ocular biometric parameters were summarized under different refractive states, including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal curvature (CC), Corneal curvature radius (CR),axial length-to-corneal radius ratio (AL/CR ratio), choroidal thickness (ChT), retinal thickness (RT), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), and retinal blood density (VD). The differences in these parameters among different refractive states were analyzed using Stata software with fixed or random-effects models, taking into account the assessed heterogeneity level.

Results

This meta-analysis included a total of 69 studies involving 128,178 eyes, including 48,795 emmetropic eyes, 60,691 myopic eyes, 13,983 hyperopic eyes, 2,040 low myopic eyes, 1,201 moderate myopic eyes, and 1,468 high myopic eyes. The results of our study demonstrated that, compared to the control group (emmetropic group), the myopic group and low, moderate, and high myopic groups showed significant increases in AL, AL/CR ratio, and ACD, while the hyperopic group exhibited significant decreases. Compared to the control group, the myopic group had a significantly increase for CC, while CR, CCT, perifoveal RT, subfoveal ChT, foveal ChT, parafoveal ChT, perifoveal (except nasal) ChT, and pRNFL (except temporal) significantly decreased. Compared to the control group, the hyperopic group had a significantly increase for subfoveal ChT, foveal ChT, parafoveal ChT, perifoveal ChT, and nasal pRNFL. Compared to the control group, the low and moderate myopic groups had a significantly decreases for the CCT, parafoveal RT (except nasal), perifoveal RT (except nasal), and pRNFL (except superior and temporal). Compared to the control group, the high myopic group had a significantly increase for CR, while LT, perifoveal ChT (except nasal), parafoveal RT, perifoveal RT, and pRNFL (except temporal) had significant decreased.

Conclusion

The changes of ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents are closely related to refractive errors. Ocular biometric parameters devices, as effective non-invasive techniques, provide objective biological markers for monitoring refractive errors such as myopia.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12886-023-03222-7.
Zengrui Zhang and Jingyu Mu contributed equally to the work presented here and should therefore be regarded as equivalent authors.
The original version of this article was revised: ‘Fig. 1 has been updated’
A correction to this article is available online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12886-023-03245-0.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Uncorrected refractive errors represent the second leading cause of global blindness, with myopia being the most common type. In recent years, the prevalence of myopia has been rapidly increasing worldwide, and there was a concerning trend of myopia onset at younger ages. The prevalence of myopia in children and adolescents, particularly in East Asia (ranging from 60 to 73%), was significantly higher compared to North America (42%), Europe (40%), South America and Africa (both less than 10%), and other economically disadvantaged regions (less than 5%) [1, 2]. It was estimated that by the year 2050, the prevalence of myopia among children and adolescents will reach approximately 84% in China [3]. Additionally, it was projected that around 50% of the global population will experience some degree of myopia, with a worldwide high myopia prevalence of about 9.8% [4]. The progression of myopia into high myopia (HM) can lead to various changes in the fundus of the eye, including leopard spot pattern, tilted optic disc, arcuate atrophy of the peripapillary region, posterior staphyloma, choroidal thinning, and impaired retinal microcirculation [57]. These fundus changes in HM can give rise to severe complications such as cataracts, glaucoma, vitreous opacity, retinal detachment, and macular hole [8]. Moreover, HM can progress into pathological myopia (PM) through dynamic changes in the eyeball. PM was considered one of the primary causes of irreversible vision impairment and blindness worldwide [9].
Previous studies found correlations between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters such as AL, CC, AL/CR ratio, LT, ACD, CCT, ChT, and RT. Specifically, there was a clear correlation between the degree of myopia and AL, CC, and AL/CR ratio, while the relationship between other parameters and myopia was still under debate, and further research is needed to explore and summarize this aspect. Ocular biometric parameters devices, including IOL Master, Lenstar LS900, Optical coherence tomography (OCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), operate on the principle of optical interference measurement. They emit a beam of light and record the reflected signal to generate cross-sectional images, providing detailed information about the microstructure and morphology of ocular tissues. The IOLMaster 700 utilizes Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) technology, while the IOLMaster 500 uses traditional optical interference measurement principles. SS-OCT was an advanced optical coherence tomography technique that offers higher resolution and deeper insights into ocular structures. OCT was a non-invasive imaging modality that provides cross-sectional and high-resolution images of the retina and choroid, allowing for the measurement of their thickness [10]. Ocular biometric parameters can aid in the early detection of refractive errors in children and adolescents. Ocular biometric parameters provided numerical values that assess refractive power and offer information about ocular health and structure. For example, measuring corneal curvature and thickness can evaluate the health of the cornea, measuring AL can assess eyeball growth, and measuring RT and ChT can evaluate the fundus status of myopia complications. This information was crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the refractive states and ocular health in children and adolescents.
The existing literature on ocular biometric parameters includes studies on different age groups and refractive states, leading to inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between these parameters and refractive errors. Children and adolescents were in a critical period of growth and development, yet there was a lack of comprehensive summaries specifically focused on this population. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature spanning nearly 11 years to gather research findings on the relationship between ocular biometric parameters and refractive errors in children and adolescents. We then performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the changes in ocular biometric parameters in myopic and hyperopic groups compared to the control group. In conclusion, ocular biometric parameters play a crucial role in the early screening, diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring of refractive errors in children and adolescents.

Methods

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), plausible design for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The study protocol was developed and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration No. CRD42023416640).

Search strategy

A computerized search was conducted in the following five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline, covering the period from January 1, 2012, to May 1, 2023. The search aimed to collect relevant studies on the relationship between refractive errors and ocular biometric measurements in children and adolescents. References of the included studies were also traced to supplement the literature search. The search strategy involved a combination of controlled vocabulary (subject headings) and free-text terms. The search keywords included: Refractive errors: myopia (nearsightedness); refractive error (refractive disorder, ametropia); hyperopia (farsightedness, hypermetropia); emmetropia (emmetropias); refractive status. Study population: primary school; middle school; secondary school; high school; teenagers (adolescent, teen, youth, adolescent); child; children; preschool child (preschool children); children and adolescents; Ocular biometric measurements: axial length (axial lengths, eye axial length, eye axial); corneal curvature; keratometry; corneal curvature radius (CR),axial length-to-corneal radius ratio (AL/CR ratio); len thickness(LT); central corneal thickness(CCT); anterior chamber depth (ACD); pupil diameter(PD); vitreous length(VL); anterior chamber depth; peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL); retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL); ganglion cell complex(GCC); ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL); macular thickness; foveal; choroidal thickness(ChT); choroidal blood flow(ChBF); vessel density of choriocapillaris; choroidal layer.

Inclusion criteria

1) Children and adolescents aged 3–23 years;2) Study types: for cross-sectional studies: children and adolescents, regardless of the presence of myopia; for case-control studies: the case group consists of children and adolescents clinically diagnosed with myopia or hyperopia, while the control group consists of children and adolescents with normal vision; for cohort studies: children and adolescents who either develop or do not develop myopia during the study period;3) The instruments all adopt the principle of optical interferometry measurement; 4) Myopia is defined and classified based on spherical equivalent (SE) when the eye’s accommodation is relaxed: (1) myopia: SE <-0.50 D; (2) low myopia: SE ≤ -0.50 D and > -3.00 D; (3) moderate myopia: SE ≤ -3.00 D and > -6.00 D; (4) high myopia: SE ≤ -6.00 D; (5) emmetropia: SE ≤ 0.50 D and > -0.50 D; (6) hyperopia: SE > 0.50 D.)

Exclusion criteria

(1) Review articles; (2) Duplicate publications; (3) Case reports with fewer than three patients; (4) Studies without a control group; (5) Studies not related to refractive errors and ocular biometric measurements; (6) Studies involving participants with any systemic or ocular diseases.

Outcome measures

Axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal curvature (CC), corneal curvature radius (CR),axial length-to-corneal radius ratio (AL/CR ratio), choroidal thickness (ChT), retinal thickness (RT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), retinal blood flow density (VD), ganglion cell layer (GCL).

Literature screening and data extraction

Two reviewers independently screened the identified literature and extracted data. In case of any discrepancies, a third party was consulted to assist in the decision-making process. Any missing information was attempted to be obtained by contacting the authors. During the literature screening process, the reviewers first read the titles and abstracts to exclude obviously irrelevant studies. Subsequently, the full texts of the remaining articles were further reviewed to determine final inclusion. The extracted data included the following: 1)Basic information of included studies: study title, first author, journal of publication, publication date, etc.; 2)Baseline characteristics of study participants: sample size in each group, age, gender, etc.; 3)Instrument and equipment models and manufacturers used in the studies; 4)Key elements of bias risk assessment; 5)Outcome measures of interest and corresponding measurement data. The data extraction process aimed to collect comprehensive and relevant information from the included studies. The reviewers cross-checked their findings to ensure accuracy and minimize errors.

Bias risk assessment of included studies

Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies and cross-checked the results. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used by two reviewers to assess the risk of bias in case-control and cohort studies, while the bias risk assessment criteria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) were used to evaluate cross-sectional studies.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using Stata 16.0 software for meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-square test. If the heterogeneity among the included studies was not statistically significant (P > 0.1, I² < 50%), a fixed-effects model was used to combine the effect sizes. Conversely, if significant heterogeneity was observed, a random-effects model was used for the effect size estimation. All eye biometric parameters were treated as continuous variables, and the weighted mean was used as the effect size. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for differences. Subgroup analysis (such as instrument type, country, etc.) or sensitivity analysis was conducted to address substantial clinical heterogeneity, or descriptive analysis was performed. The publication bias of outcome measures with ≥ 10 included studies was assessed using Egger’s test.

Results

Study selection

As shown in Fig. 1, a total of 69 studies were included in this Meta-analysis. The preliminary literature search identified 7791 articles. After automatic and manual removal of duplicate articles, 4515 articles remained. These articles were then screened based on their titles and abstracts, resulting in the exclusion of 2809 articles. The remaining 467 articles were further screened by reading the full text. Among them, 97 articles were excluded as they did not include a control group of participants with normal vision, 273 articles were excluded due to age criteria not meeting the inclusion criteria, 8 articles were excluded because the grading criteria for myopia did not align with the predefined criteria for this Meta-analysis, 7 articles were excluded as full-text could not be found, 8 articles were excluded as they involved participants with other underlying diseases, 2 articles were excluded as they were duplicate publications, and 3 articles were excluded due to equipment not meeting the requirements. Oner V et al. [11]used ultrasound biometry (Micropach Model 200P, Sonomed, Lake Success, NY, USA) for AL measurement, so AL was excluded in this study, while the pRNFL measurement in that study used Cirrus HD SD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec), so it was included in this Meta-analysis. Chang, Xuejia et al. [12]did not mention the type of instrument used for AL measurement, so AL was excluded in this study, while the ChT measurement using SS-OCT/OCTA examination was included in this Meta-analysis.
Table 1
Characteristics of Population
Author
Year
Region
Age
eye
Mydriasis
Type of study
Device
Outcome measures
Study Quality
Oner V [11]
2013
Turkey
5 ~ 16
94
Yes
cross-sectional
Cirrus HD SD-OCT
pRNFL
7
Chang, Xuejia [12]
2022
China
6 ~ 12
43
yes
cross-sectional
SS-OCT/OCTA
SFCT,ChT
6
Ji FT [13]
2022
China
3~18
53
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;SD-OCT
AL,CR,CT
6
Ya Shi [14]
2021
China
19.73 ± 2.18
230
Yes
cross-sectional
Optical low-coherence reflectometry (Aladdin; Topcon, Japan)
AL,ACD,CCT,LT,GCC
7
Xiaoyan Bian [15]
2021
China
11~18
444
N/A
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,CC
6
Bueno-Gimeno, Inmaculada [16]
2018
Spain
6~17
199
Yes
cross-sectional
IOLMaster;VisanteOCT;
Cirrus HD-OCT
AL,CCT,RNFL
8
Sun, Yunyun [17]
2021
China
20 ± 1.4
7650
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900
AL,CR,AL/CR,CCT,
LT,ACD
9
Yi Zha [18]
2018
China
6~12
154
No
cross-sectional
IOL Master; SD-OCT
AL,ChT,SFCT,RT
6
Sheng Ye [19]
2019
China
6~15
482
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900
AL,AL/CR,CCR,ACD,
LT,CCT
8
Li,L [20]
2018
China
3~18
66,071
No
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL
7
Bayrakceken K [21]
2023
Turkey
12~18
68
Yes
case-control
Nidek AL-Scan;
OCTA Nidek’s RS300
AL,ChT,GCC
6
Kristian Lundberg [22]
2018
Denmark
14~17
307
N/A
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900;SD-OCT
AL,ChT
7
Ashutosh Jnawalia [23]
2020
America
6~15
53
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900;SD-OCT
AL,CR,ACD,LT,
pNRFL,RT
8
Bulut, Asker [24]
2016
Turkey
5~17
117
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900;Cirrus HD-OCT
AL,ChT
6
Cui, Dongmei [25]
2021
China
24.03 ± 1.95
92
Yes
case-control
IOL Master
AL
5
Jan Willem Lodewijk Tideman [26]
2018
Netherlands
9
2408
Yes
cohort design
LenStar device
AL,AL/CR,CR
7
Xiangui He [27]
2015
China
6~12
3922
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,AL/CR,CR
8
Yulin Tao [28]
2022
China
1~21
494
Yes
cross-sectional
NIDEK CO LTD AL-Scan
AL,CC,ACD,CCT
6
Shuyu Xiong [29]
2017
China
6~19
3001
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL
7
Wen Long, MD [30]
2019
China
4~6
216
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,CC,ACD,CCT
5
Tideman,W [31]
2017
Netherlands
6~9
2408
Yes
cross-sectional
LenStar device
AL,AL/CR
7
Li,Yan [32]
2022
China
6~12
4806
Yes
cohort design
IOL Master
AL,AL/CR,CR,ACD
6
Shi-Ming Li [33]
2016
China
14
1890
Yes
cross-sectional
LenStar device
AL,ACD,LT
7
Li-Li Lu [34]
2022
China
8~12
418
N/A
case-control
IOL Master
AL,CC,CCT
7
Dogan,Mehmethan [35]
2019
Turkey
6~16
150
Yes
cross-sectional
LenStar LS900
AL,CC,ACD,CCT,LT
5
Dayi,O [36]
2022
Turkey
3~14
344
Yes
cross-sectional
NIDEK CO LTD AL-Scan
AL,AL/CR,CR,ACD
4
PEIYAO JIN [37]
2016
China
7~13
276
Yes
cross-sectional
IOLMaster;SS-OCT
SFCT,ChT
7
Geun Young Lee [38]
2017
Korea
6~12
89
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;Spectralis OCT
AL,ChT
6
Veysel Aykut [39]
2013
Turkey
5~15
120
N/A
cross-sectional
IOLMaster;Optovue OCT
pRNFL,AL
5
Herrera, Laura [40]
2015
Spain
4~16
93
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master; Spectralis OCT
AL,SFCT
7
Liang Lv [41]
2022
China
7~13
71
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master; Spectralis OCT
RT,AL,VD
6
Lee,Jacky W.Y. [42]
2015
Hong Kong, China
4~18
201
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;
Heidelberg SD-OCT
pRNFL,AL
8
Xiang,Z [43]
2021
China
3~12
131
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL master
AL,CC,CCT,ACD,LT
7
zhao zhi [44]
2018
China
6~12
1091
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL master
AL,CC,AL/CR,CR
9
Jiangnan He [45]
2019
China
17~23
760
N/A
cross-sectional
Topcon Aladdin;SS-OCT
AL,ACD,LT,CCT
8
Xiaolei Wang [46]
2021
China
15~17
78
N/A
case-control
RTVue-XR OCT
pRNFL,AL
7
Li, Junmeng [47]
2021
China
8~16
86
Yes
case-control
IOL Master
AL
5
Guan,X.H [48]
2020
China
12~18
145
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL
6
Lin,TaiNan [49]
2021
China
6~17
204
N/A
cross-sectional;case-control
IOL Master;Cirrus HD-OCT
pRNFL,AL
8
Liu,Y.T. [50]
2021
China
6~18
230
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;RTVue-XR OCT
RT,AL,VD
5
Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno [51]
2017
Spain
6~17
199
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;Cirrus HD-OCT
RT,AL,pRNFL
8
Jingfeng Mu [52]
2022
China
8~18
300
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,AL/CR
7
Li,K.R [53]
2019
China
3~16
605
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,CR,AL/CR
8
Qian,Yu [54]
2021
China
4~10
106
N/A
case-control
IOL Master;SS-OCT
AL
5
Wenner,Yaroslava [55]
2018
Germany
6~15
63
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;
HRT II (Heidelberg)
pRNFL/AL
7
Sasaki,Kozue [56]
2022
Japan
6~12
60
Yes
case-control
IOL Master;OCTA
RT,AL
5
Wan-Peng Wang [57]
2013
China
5~12
1626
N/A
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL,CC,ACD
5
Duan,Fang [58]
2019
China
17~23
87
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900
AL,ACD
6
Gupta,Preeti [59]
2015
Singapore
17~22
648
Yes
case-control
IOL Master
AL,CR,ACD
8
Gupta,Preeti [60]
2017
Singapore
18~22
603
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL/CR
8
Lu Xiaoli [61]
2022
China
5~18
90
N/A
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900
CC
7
Ya Zhang [62]
2021
China
3~6
8801
N/A
cross-sectional
IOL Master
AL/CR
6
Hashemi, Hassan [63]
2022
Iran
6~12
4731
Yes
cross-sectional
Lenstar LS900
ACD
7
Wang,Jing [64]
2018
China
6~18
1321
Yes
cross-sectional
FD-OCT
ACD
6
Junjie Deng [65]
2018
China
9~16
340
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master;SS-OCT
ChT
6
Li,Shufeng [66]
2021
China
9~13
58
N/A
cohort design
SS-OCT
ChT,VD
7
Liu,Wei-Qin [67]
2019
China
6~10
260
N/A
cross-sectional
HD-OCT
ChT
7
Chun On Lee [68]
2021
Hong Kong, China
6~8
114
Yes
cohort design
SD-OCT
ChT,RT
6
Jyoti Matalia [69]
2018
India
5~17
113
Yes
cross-sectional
RTVue-XR OCT
ChT,RT
8
Tao Li [70]
2016
China
7~15
193
Yes
cross-sectional
Cirrus HD-OCT
ChT,RT
6
Xia ZheRen [71]
2013
China
5~14
129
N/A
case-control
Heidelberg SD-OCT
ChT,pRNFL
7
Gordon S.K.Yau [72]
2015
China
4~18
168
Yes
cross-sectional
Heidelberg SD-OCT
RT
6
Qin Zhu [73]
2021
China
14~18
95
N/A
cross-sectional
IOL Master;
RTVue-XR OCTA
RT,AL,ACD,LT,VD
8
Deng,Junjie [74]
2018
China
8~15
2964
Yes
cross-sectional
IOL Master; SS-OCT
RT,GCC
7
Yi Zha [75]
2017
China
18 ± 7.95
271
 N/A
cross-sectional
Heidelberg SD-OCT
pRNFL
6
Guo,H.M. [76]
2015
China
8~17
165
Yes
case-control
Cirrus HD OCT
pRNFL
6
Meng-Tian Kang MD [77]
2016
China
7
1811
Yes
cross-sectional
iVue-100 OCT
pRNFL
8
Xiaolei Wang [78]
2021
China
7
2505
Yes
cross-sectional
iVue-100 OCT
pRNFL,GCL
8
Othman, S. F. [79]
2012
Malaysia
19~24
63
Yes
cross-sectional
Stratus OCT 3000
RT
6
* N/A:not available

Characteristics of studies

Table 1 summarizes the basic characteristics of the 69 included studies. Among them, there were 56 cross-sectional studies, 4 cohort studies, and 10 case-control studies. In Lin T’s [49]study, both cross-sectional and case-control study designs were used, for the assessment of bias risk, this study was scored according to the criteria for cross-sectional studies. Based on the geographical regions of the included populations, 50 studies were conducted in East Asia, 3 in Southeast Asia, 1 in South Asia, and 15 in Europe and America.

Study quality

The quality assessment of cross-sectional studies was performed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) scoring system (Table 1). The quality assessments of cohort and case-control studies were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scoring system (Table 1). The majority of the articles eceived scores ranging from 4 to 8, indicating moderate quality. These articles met the quality requirements for comparing ocular biometric parameters in this meta-analysis.
Table 2
Differences in ocular biometric measurements between myopic eyes and controls
Variables
Overall Effect
 
Heterogeneity
  
 
Mean Difference [95% CI]
p value
I2,%
Q test
Egger’s test
AL
1.139 [1.029, 1.250]
< 0.001
96
724.53
0.081
AL/CR
0.134[ 0.089, 0.178 ]
< 0.001
99.6
2142.52
-
CC
0.253[ 0.089, 0.417 ]
0.003
0
6.14
-
CR
-0.046[ -0.058, -0.035]
< 0.001
37.8
11.25
-
ACD
0.127[0.074, 0.181]
< 0.001
94.8
248.61
0.982
CCT
-2.954[-5.128, -0.780]
0.008
40.9
11.85
-
LT
-0.028[-0.093, 0.038]
0.41
94.5
109.48
-
subfoveal choroidal thickness
-42.075[-54.698, -29.452]
< 0.001
73.1
40.96
0.71
foveal choroidal thickness
     
Superior
-54.382[ -70.494,-38.270]
< 0.001
47.9
3.84
-
Inferior
-50.184[-65.683,-34.685]
< 0.001
38.2
3.24
-
Nasal
-47.683[ -67.054,-28.312]
< 0.001
88.5
34.65
-
Temporal
-37.624[ -53.042,-22.207]
< 0.001
58.1
9.55
-
Parafoveal choroidal Thickness
     
mean
-41.959 [-52.608,-31.309]
< 0.001
0
0.34
-
Superior
-29.331[-47.266,-11.396]
0.001
86.6
52.29
-
Inferior
-27.462 [-48.031,-6.893]
0.009
88.8
62.43
-
Nasal
-24.440[ -42.301,-6.579]
0.007
92.7
109.89
-
Temporal
-31.591[-46.043,-17.140]
< 0.001
76.7
34.33
-
Perifoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
-17.520 [-31.685,-3.354]
0.015
78.4
18.5
-
Inferior
-16.940 [-30.291,-3.590]
0.013
69.8
13.25
-
Nasal
-13.221 [-30.414, 3.971]
0.132
72.8
14.7
-
Temporal
-17.356 [-26.192,-8.520]
< 0.001
56.1
11.4
-
Foveal retinal thickness
-1.005 [-4.128, 2.118]
0.528
49.5
5.94
-
Perifoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-7.721[-9.039,-6.404]
< 0.001
10.6
2.24
-
Inferior
-8.185[-12.470, -3.900]
< 0.001
65.6
5.82
-
pRNFL
     
mean
-3.560[-5.370, -1.751]
0.001
54.7
13.25
-
Superior
-2.713[-4.961,-0.464]
0.018
15.7
3.56
-
Inferior
-7.339[-13.978,-0.700]
0.03
85.8
21.1
-
Nasal
-4.487[-7.407,-1.566]
0.003
51
8.17
-
Temporal
-0.942 [-2.456,0.572]
0.223
0
2.19
-
Parafoveal GCL
     
Superior
-1.053[-2.883, 0.778]
0.26
69.1
9.72
-
Inferior
-0.814[-2.295, 0.668]
0.282
50.7
6.09
-
Parafoveal superficial vessel density
0.193[-2.378, 2.765]
0.883
93.5
30.96
-
Table 3
Differences in ocular biometric measurements between hyperopia eyes and controls
Variables
Overall Effect
 
Heterogeneity
  
 
Mean Difference [95% CI]
p value
I2,%
Q test
Egger’s test
AL
-1.126[-1.276,-0.976]
< 0.001
96.2
652.95
< 0.001
AL/CR
-0.086 [-0.103,-0.068]
< 0.001
94.7
151.5
-
CC
0.139[-0.183,0.462]
0.397
74.4
27.68
-
CR
0.008[ -0.004,0.021]
0.183
21.3
6.35
-
ACD
-0.166[-0.229, -0.103]
< 0.001
95.8
286.98
0.179
CCT
-2.529 [ -9.007,3.948]
0.444
69.4
22.86
-
LT
-0.090 [ -0.393,0.213]
0.559
99.5
813.59
-
subfoveal choroidal thickness
21.801[ 12.492, 31.110 ]
< 0.001
0
4.51
-
Parafoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
22.654 [13.611,31.696]
< 0.001
0
2.34
-
Inferior
17.432[8.112,26.751]
< 0.001
0
1.73
-
Nasal
24.893[15.513,34.274]
< 0.001
44.1
8.94
-
Temporal
14.991[5.605,24.377]
0.002
0
3.46
-
Perifoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
18.192[9.698,26.687]
< 0.001
0
0.12
-
Inferior
17.332[8.440,26.224]
< 0.001
0
2.01
-
Nasal
20.249 [11.103,29.395 ]
< 0.001
0
0.94
-
Temporal
15.158 [6.579,23.737]
0.001
0
0.38
-
Foveal retinal thickness
-0.268[-11.578,11.041]
0.963
89.3
27.96
-
pRNFL
     
mean
1.997[1.146,2.849]
< 0.001
44.2
8.97
-
Superior
-9.679[-43.288, 23.930]
0.572
99.5
575.63
-
Inferior
4.658[-0.091,9.408]
0.055
52.1
6.27
-
Nasal
8.465[0.612,16.319]
0.035
81.7
16.39
-
Temporal
0.562 [-2.156,3.280]
0.685
51.4
6.17
-
Parafoveal GCL
     
Superior
0.456[-0.909, 1.821]
0.512
74.5
7.84
-
Inferior
-0.641[-2.627, 1.345]
0.527
87.4
15.82
-
Table 4
Differences in ocular biometric measurements between low myopic eyes and controls
 
Overall Effect
 
Heterogeneity
  
 
Mean Difference [95% CI]
p value
I2,%
Q test
Egger’s test
AL
0.780[ 0.677,0.882]
< 0.001
73
44.47
0.888
AL/CR
0.101[0.096, 0.106]
< 0.001
0
0.99
-
CC
0.158[ -0.003, 0.319]
0.055
0
0.87
-
CR
0.000 [-0.072, 0.073]
0.995
74.2
7.75
-
ACD
0.125[ 0.071,0.179]
< 0.001
87
23.02
-
CCT
-2.629[ -5.247,-0.012]
0.049
0
1.06
-
subfoveal choroidal thickness
-0.961[-4.687, 2.766 ]
0.613
55.5
9
-
Parafoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
1.839 [-5.974,9.651]
0.645
67.8
9.32
-
Inferior
-4.833 [-13.535,3.868]
0.276
72.4
10.88
-
Nasal
-2.829 [-12.781,7.124]
0.577
97.2
14.42
-
Temporal
-3.067 [-10.399, 4.265]
0.412
65.1
8.58
-
Foveal retinal thickness
-0.961[-4.687,2.766]
0.613
55.5
9
-
Parafoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-2.754[-4.300,-1.208]
< 0.001
0
2.17
-
Inferior
-3.067 [ -4.543,-1.591]
< 0.001
0
3.65
-
Nasal
-1.263 [-7.508,4.982]
0.692
65.4
8.67
-
Temporal
-3.825[-6.818,-0.832 ]
0.012
19.3
3.72
-
Perifoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-4.412[-5.785, -3.040]
< 0.001
32.5
5.92
-
Inferior
-4.817[-7.934,-1.700]
< 0.001
36
4.69
-
Nasal
-1.951[-4.984,1.082]
0.207
24.2
3.96
-
Temporal
-4.326[-7.007,-1.645]
0.002
25.9
4.05
-
pRNFL
     
mean
-1.953[-3.265,-0.642]
0.003
0
3.44
-
Superior
-2.793 [-12.242,6.656]
0.562
81.3
10.7
-
Inferior
-7.471[-9.947,-4.995]
< 0.001
0
0.84
-
Nasal
-4.287[-6.098,-2.476]
< 0.001
0
3.6
-
Temporal
1.726[-0.504,3.955]
0.129
0
2.47
-
Table 5
Differences in Ocular Biometric measurements between moderate myopic eyes and controls
Variables
Overall Effect
 
Heterogeneity
  
 
Mean Difference [95% CI]
p value
I2,%
Q test
Egger’stest
AL
1.887[1.717,2.057]
< 0.001
87.4
87.36
0.184
AL/CR
0.241[ 0.236,0.246]
< 0.001
39.9
3.33
-
K
0.286[ 0.077,0.496 ]
0.007
0
2.9
-
CR
-0.045[ -0.109,0.019]
0.168
60.5
5.03
-
ACD
0.213[0.120, 0.305]
< 0.001
95.2
62.41
-
CCT
-4.788 [-7.406,-2.170]
< 0.001
0
0.2
-
subfoveal choroidal thickness
-13.701[-34.808,7.406]
0.203
94.5
54.96
-
Parafoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
-8.803 [-24.000,6.394]
0.256
91.8
36.41
-
Inferior
-13.178 [-32.999,6.644]
0.193
96.3
80.26
-
Nasal
-12.643 [-30.887,5.600]
0.174
95
59.59
-
Temporal
-9.687 [-28.358,8.983]
0.309
95.5
67.41
-
Foveal retinal thickness
3.101[-9.374, 15.576]
0.626
90.2
30.54
-
Parafoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-5.474[-7.258,-3.689]
< 0.001
21.4
3.81
-
Inferior
-7.070[-8.781,-5.358]
< 0.001
36.1
4.7
-
Nasal
-3.412[-12.967,6.143]
0.484
79.5
4.88
-
Temporal
-3.680 [-10.531,3.170]
0.292
60.8
5.1
-
Perifoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-6.337 [-10.339,-2.336]
0.002
58.6
7.24
-
Inferior
-7.802[-13.676,-1.928]
0.009
79.5
14.63
-
Nasal
-3.536[-7.640,0.568]
0.091
0
0.68
-
Temporal
-6.051[-10.207,-1.896]
0.004
0
0.24
-
pRNFL
     
mean
-5.420[-6.644,-4.195]
< 0.001
14.1
6.98
-
Superior
-8.112[-20.377,4.152]
0.195
85.2
13.55
-
Inferior
-16.274[-17.754,-14.795]
< 0.001
0
1.43
-
Nasal
-5.010[-8.817,-1.204]
0.01
67
12.11
-
Temporal
3.510[-0.634,7.653]
0.097
60.2
10.05
-
Table 6
Differences in Ocular Biometric measurements between high myopic eyes and controls
Variables
Overall Effect
 
Heterogeneity
  
 
Mean Difference [95% CI]
p value
I2,%
Q test
Egger’stest
AL
2.960[2.707,3.213]
< 0.001
95.2
311.48
0.878
AL/CR
0.390[ 0.384,0.397 ]
< 0.001
0
1.45
-
CR
-0.112 [-0.136,-0.088]
< 0.001
0
2.1
-
ACD
0.240[0.179,0.302]
< 0.001
85.2
47.22
-
CCT
-3.103 [ -11.360, 5.155]
0.461
58.6
7.25
-
LT
-0.046[-0.084,-0.007]
0.021
50.7
6.09
-
subfoveal choroidal thickness
-73.537[-185.604,38.530]
0.198
99.7
732.44
-
Parafoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
-58.187[-129.723,13.349]
0.111
99.5
658.95
-
Inferior
-74.587 [-160.889,11.714]
0.09
99.7
895.9
-
Nasal
-78.070 [-178.352,22.211]
0.127
99.8
1240.94
-
Temporal
-69.541 [-146.560,7.478]
0.077
99.7
985.43
-
Perifoveal choroidal Thickness
     
Superior
-50.978 [-99.215,-2.740]
0.038
99.3
414.01
-
Inferior
-69.488[-136.514,-2.462]
0.042
99.3
413.15
-
Nasal
-65.692 [-150.461,19.078]
0.129
99.7
1158.28
-
Temporal
-57.418[-102.447,-12.388]
0.012
99.2
378.08
-
Average macular retinal thickness
-9.631 [-10.311,-8.951]
< 0.001
0
1.97
-
Foveal retinal thickness
2.723 [-1.372, 6.817]
0.192
0
1.96
-
Parafoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-7.867[-9.783,-5.951]
< 0.001
0
1.38
-
Inferior
-10.505[-12.459,-8.550]
< 0.001
0
0.66
-
Nasal
-6.387[-10.715,-2.059]
0.004
0
0.001
-
Temporal
-7.796[-11.982,-3.610]
0.001
0
0.63
-
Perifoveal retinal Thickness
     
Superior
-14.150[-16.053,-12.247]
< 0.001
0
2.09
-
Inferior
-17.482[-19.402,-15.563]
< 0.001
0
2.39
-
Nasal
-11.465[-16.260,-6.670]
< 0.001
0
1
-
Temporal
-14.961[-19.014,-10.907]
< 0.001
27.1
2.74
-
pRNFL
     
mean
-10.689[-12.988,-8.390]
< 0.001
53.6
12.92
-
Superior
-18.679[-22.223,-15.134]
< 0.001
0
1.52
-
Inferior
-22.827[-26.916,-18.738]
< 0.001
13.6
2.32
-
Nasal
-12.314[-18.549,-6.080]
< 0.001
86.5
29.67
-
Temporal
4.949 [-1.787,11.686]
0.15
84.4
25.61
-
Parafoveal superficial vessel density
-0.417[-1.786, 0.951]
0.55
16.6
2.4
-

Axial length (AL)

In the comparison of AL, a total of 49 articles were included, encompassing 39,758 emmetropic eyes. Studies that did not classify myopia levels contributed a total of 52,424 myopic eyes. Among the studies that classified myopia levels, there were 4,462 low myopic eyes, 3,777 moderate myopic eyes, 2,565 high myopic eyes, and 8,274 hyperopic eyes. The Meta-analysis indicated that compared to the control group, the average AL was significantly longer in the myopic group, with a mean difference of 1.139 mm (95% CI, 1.029 to 1.250 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S1; Table 2). In contrast, compared to the control group, the average AL was significantly shorter in the hyperopic group, with a mean difference of -1.126 mm (95% CI, -1.276 to -0.976 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S2; Table 3). Furthermore, compared to the control group, the average AL was significantly longer in the low, moderate, and high myopic groups, with mean differences of 0.780 mm (95% CI, 0.677 to 0.882 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S3; Table 4), 1.887 mm (95% CI, 1.717 to 2.057 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S4; Table 5), and 2.960 mm (95% CI, 2.707 to 3.213 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S5; Table 6), respectively.

Corneal curvature(CC)

In the comparison of CC, a total of 9 articles were included. These articles comprised 1364 emmetropic eyes and 1678 myopic eyes, 736 low myopic eyes, 292 moderate myopic eyes, 79 high myopic eyes, and1361 hyperopic eyes. The Meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, the myopic group had a significantly larger average CC with a mean difference of 0.253 D (95% CI, 0.089 to 0.417 D; p < 0.001; Fig S6; Table 2). Compared to the control group, the moderate myopic group had a significantly larger average CC with a mean difference of 0.286 D (95% CI, 0.077 to 0.496 D; p = 0.007; Fig S7 Table 5). There were no significant differences in the average CC differences between the control group and the hyperopic and low myopic groups (P > 0.05). However, the high myopic group was only included in two studies, and due to the limited number of articles, the CC for this group was not calculated.

AL/CR ratio

In the comparison of AL/CR ratio among different refractive groups, a total of 11 studies were included. These studies included 9,771 emmetropic eyes, 16,061 myopic eyes, 3,168 low myopic eyes, 3,083 moderate myopic eyes, 916 high myopic eyes, and 6,203 hyperopic eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the myopic group had a significantly higher average AL/CR ratio, with a mean difference of 0.134 (95% CI, 0.089 to 0.178; p < 0.001; Fig S8; Table 2). Compared to the control group, the hyperopic group had a significantly lower average AL/CR ratio, with a mean difference of -0.086 (95% CI, -0.103 to -0.068; p < 0.001; Fig S9; Table 3). Compared to the control group, the low, moderate and high myopic groups all showed significantly higher average AL/CR ratios, with mean differences of 0.101 (95% CI, 0.096 to 0.106; p < 0.001; Fig S10; Table 4), 0.241 (95% CI, 0.236 to 0.246; p < 0.001; Fig S11; Table 5), and 0.390 (95% CI, 0.384 to 0.397; p < 0.001; Fig S12; Table 6).

Corneal curvature radius (CR)

In the comparison of CR among different refractive groups, a total of 12 studies were included. These studies comprised 5,272 emmetropic eyes, 10,299 myopic eyes, 3,091 low myopic eyes, 2,993 moderate myopic eyes, 1,922 high myopic eyes, and 5,512 hyperopic eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the mean CR in the myopic group significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.046 (95% CI, -0.058 to -0.035; p < 0.001; Fig S13; Table 2). Similarly, compared to the control group, the mean CR values in the high myopic group significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.112 (95% CI, -0.136 to -0.088; p < 0.001; Fig S14; Table 6). There were no significant statistical differences (P > 0.05) in the mean CR differences between the emmetropic group and the hyperopic and low myopic groups. However, the moderate myopic group was included in only 2 studies [17, 53], and due to the limited number of studies, this value was not calculated.

Anterior chamber depth(ACD)

In the comparison of ACD, a total of 19 articles were included. Among them, there were 3,161 emmetropic eyes, 5,289 hyperopic eyes, 11,177 myopic eyes, 3,482 low myopic eyes, 3,300 moderate myopic eyes, and 1,838 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the average ACD in the myopic group significantly increased, with a mean difference of 0.127 mm (95% CI, 0.074 to 0.181 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S15; Table 2). In contrast, compared to the control group, the average ACD in the hyperopic group significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.166 mm (95% CI, -0.229 to -0.103 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S16; Table 3). Furthermore, when compared to the control group, the average ACD in the groups with low, moderate and high myopic all significantly increased, with mean differences of 0.125 mm (95% CI, 0.071 to 0.179 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S17; Table 4), 0.213 mm (95% CI, 0.120 to 0.305 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S18; Table 5), and 0.240 mm (95% CI, 0.179 to 0.302 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S19; Table 6), respectively.

Lens thickness(LT)

In the comparison of LT, a total of 9 articles were included. Among them, there were 1,457 emmetropic eyes, 829 hyperopic eyes, 8,249 myopic eyes, 2,881 low myopic eyes, 3,099 moderate myopic eyes, and 1,195 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the average LT in the high myopic group significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -0.046 mm (95% CI, -0.084 to -0.007 mm; p < 0.001; Fig S20; Table 6). There was no significant statistical difference (P > 0.05) in the average LT difference between the myopic and hyperopic groups compared to the emmetropic group. However, the low and moderate myopic groups were only included in two articles [17, 45], and due to the limited number of studies, the mean differences for those groups were not calculated.

Central corneal thickness(CCT)

In the comparison of CCT, a total of 10 articles were included. Among them, there were 1,315 emmetropic eyes, 1,052 hyperopic eyes, 7,592 myopic eyes, 2,940 low myopic eyes, 3,123 moderate myopic eyes, and 1,172 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to the control group, the average CCT in the myopic group significantly decreased, with a mean difference of -2.954 μm (95% CI, -5.128 to -0.780 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S21; Table 2). Compared to the control group, both the low and moderate myopic groups showed a significant thinning of average CCT, with mean differences of -2.629 μm (95% CI, -5.247 to -0.012 μm; p = 0.049; Fig S22; Table 4) and − 4.788 μm (95% CI, -7.406 to -2.170 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S23; Table 5), respectively. There was no significant statistical difference (P > 0.05) in the average CCT difference between the hyperopic group and the high myopic group compared to the control group.

Subfoveal choroidal thickness(SFCT)

In the measurement of SFCT, a total of 15 articles were included. These articles comprised 787 myopic eyes, 1054 emmetropic eyes, 338 hyperopic eyes, 330 low myopic eyes, 190 moderate myopic eyes, and 574 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis showed that the SFCT of myopic eyes was significantly lower than that of the control group (weighted mean difference [WMD], -42.075 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -54.698 to -29.452 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S24; Table 2). The SFCT of hyperopic eyes was significantly higher than that of the control group (WMD, 21.801 μm; 95% CI, 12.492 to 31.110 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S25; Table 3). There was no significant difference in SFCT between low myopia (Table 3), moderate myopia (Table 4), and high myopia (Table 5) compared to the control group (p > 0.05).

Foveal choroidal thickness

A total of 5 studies were included in the measurement of foveal choroidal thickness, including 300 myopic eyes, 498 emmetropic eyes, and 32 hyperopic eyes. The meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, the myopic group had significantly thinner for foveal choroidal thickness in the temporal, nasal, superior, and inferior regions, the mean differences were − 37.624 μm (95% CI, -53.042 to -22.207 μm; p < 0.001; Fig SS26; Table 2), -47.683 μm (95% CI, -67.054 to -28.312 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S27; Table 2), -54.382 μm (95% CI, -70.494 to -38.270 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S28; Table 2), and − 50.184 μm (95% CI, -65.683 to -34.685 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S29; Table 2), respectively.

Parafoveal choroidal thickness

In the measurement of parafoveal choroidal thickness, a total of 14 studies were included, consisting of 528 myopic eyes, 723 emmetropic eyes, 306 hyperopic eyes, 263 low myopia eyes, 190 moderate myopia eyes, and 639 high myopia eyes. The meta-analysis shows that compared to the control group, patients with myopia (Table 1) have significantly thinner for parafoveal choroidal thickness in the average, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal regions, the mean differences were − 41.959 μm (95% CI, -52.608 to -31.309 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S30; Table 2), -29.331 μm (95% CI, -47.266 to -11.396 μm; p = 0.001; Fig S31; Table 2), -27.462 μm (95% CI, -48.031 to -6.893 μm; p = 0.009; Fig S32; Table 2), -24.440 μm (95% CI, -42.301 to -6.579 μm; p = 0.007; Fig S33; Table 2), and − 31.591 μm (95% CI, -46.043 to -17.140 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S34; Table 2), respectively. In comparison to the control group, the hyperopia (Table 2) have significantly thicker for parafoveal choroidal thickness in superior, inferior, nasal and temporal regions, the mean differences were 22.654 μm (95% CI, 13.611 to 31.696 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S37; Table 3), 17.432 μm (95% CI, 8.112 to 26.751 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S36; Table 3), 24.893 μm (95% CI, 15.513 to 34.274 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S37; Table 3), and 14.991 μm (95% CI, 5.605 to 24.377 μm; p = 0.002; Fig S38; Table 3), respectively. There were no significant differences for parafoveal choroidal thickness in superior, inferior, nasal and temporal regions between the groups with low, moderate and high myopia when compared to the control group (p > 0.05).

Perifoveal choroidal thickness

In the measurement of perifoveal choroidal thickness in the superior and inferior nasal and temporal regions, a total of 7 studies were included, comprising 404 myopic eyes, 390 emmetropic eyes, 221 hyperopic eyes, 158 low myopic eyes, 106 moderate myopia eyes, and 639 high myopia eyes. Meta-analysis results indicate that compared to the control group, the myopic group showed a significant thinning for perifoveal choroidal thickness in the superior, inferior, and temporal regions, the average differences were − 17.520 μm (95% CI, -31.685 to -3.354 μm; p = 0.015; Fig S39; Table 2), -16.940 μm (95% CI, -30.291 to -3.590 μm; p = 0.013; Fig S40; Table 2), and − 17.356 μm (95% CI, -26.192 to -8.520 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S41; Table 2), respectively. On the other hand, the hyperopic group showed a significant thickening for perifoveal choroidal thickness in the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal regions, the average differences were 18.192 μm (95% CI, 9.698 to 26.687 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S42; Table 3), 17.332 μm (95% CI, 8.440 to 26.224 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S43; Table 3), 20.249 μm (95% CI, 11.103 to 29.395 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S44; Table 3), and 15.158 μm (95% CI, 6.579 to 23.737 μm; p = 0.001; Fig S45; Table 3), respectively. In the high myopic group had a significant thinning for perifoveal choroidal thickness in the superior, inferior, and temporal regions, with average differences of -50.978 μm (95% CI, -99.215 to -2.740 μm; p = 0.036; Fig S46; Table 6), -69.488 μm (95% CI, -136.514 to -2.462 μm; p = 0.042; Fig S47; Table 6), and − 57.418 μm (95% CI, -102.447 to -12.388 μm; p = 0.012; Fig S48; Table 6), respectively. There were no significant differences for perifoveal choroidal thickness in the nasal region between the myopic and control groups (p > 0.05). Only two studies included the low and moderate myopic groups [65, 71], and due to the limited number of studies, the value was not calculated.

Average macular retinal thickness

The average macular retinal thickness was measured in a total of 6 studies, including 156 myopic eyes, 333 emmetropic eyes, 154 hyperopic eyes, 112 low myopic eyes, 91 moderate myopic eyes, and 133 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis indicates that compared to the control group, the high myopic group shows a significant thinning for average macular retinal thickness, with a mean difference of -9.631 μm (95% CI, -10.311 to -8.951 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S49; Table 6). Only two studies were included for both the myopic and hyperopic groups [51, 72],The low and moderate myopic groups were also only included two studies [50, 70], due to the limited number of studies available, the numerical calculation for these groups is not performed.

Foveal retinal thickness

In the measurement of foveal retinal thickness, a total of 9 studies were included. These articles comprised 289 myopic eyes, 499 emmetropic eyes, 243 hyperopic eyes, 234 myopic eyes, 98 moderate myopic eyes, and 79 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in foveal retinal thickness between the myopic, hyperopic, low, moderate and high myopic groups compared to the control group.

Parafoveal retinal thickness

A total of 7 studies were included in the measurement of parafoveal retinal thickness, including 1,612 myopic eyes, 760 emmetropic eyes, 1,100 hyperopic eyes, 1,036 mild myopic eyes, 529 moderate myopic eyes, and 327 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, the low myopic group had significant thinning for parafoveal retinal thickness in the superior, inferior, and temporal regions, with mean differences of -2.754 μm (95% CI, -4.300 to -1.208 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S50; Table 4), -3.067 μm (95% CI, -4.543 to -1.591 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S51; Table 4), and − 3.825 μm (95% CI, -6.818 to -0.832 μm; p = 0.012; Fig S52; Table 4), respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the nasal region (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the moderate myopic group showed significant thinning for parafoveal retinal thickness in the superior and inferior quadrants, with mean differences of -5.474 μm (95% CI, -7.258 to -3.689 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S53; Table 5) and − 7.070 μm (95% CI, -8.781 to -5.358 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S54; Table 5), respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the nasal and temporal regions (P > 0.05).Compared to the control group, the high myopic group showed significant thinning in the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal regions, with mean differences of -7.867 μm (95% CI, -9.783 to -5.951 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S55; Table 6), -10.505 μm (95% CI, -12.459 to -8.550 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S56; Table 6), -6.387 μm (95% CI, -10.715 to -2.059 μm; p = 0.004; Fig S57; Table 6), and − 7.796[-11.982, -3.610] µm (95% CI, -11.982 to -3.610 μm; p = 0.001; Fig S58; Table 6), respectively. Only two studies [37, 74] were included for the myopic and hyperopic groups, and due to the limited number of studies, the values were not calculated.

Perifoveal retinal thickness

A total of 8 studies were included in the measurement of perifoveal retinal thickness, involving 1,633 myopic eyes, 788 emmetropic eyes, 1,100 hyperopic eyes, 1,036 low myopia eyes, 529 moderate myopic eyes, and 327 high myopic eyes. Meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, the myopic group had significant thinning for perifoveal retinal thickness in the superior and inferior regions, with mean differences of -7.721 μm (95% CI, -9.039 to -6.404 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S59; Table 2) and − 8.185 μm (95% CI, -12.470 to -3.900 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S60; Table 2).Compared to the control group, the low myopic group showed significant thinning for perifoveal retinal thickness in the superior, inferior and temporal regions, with mean differences of -4.412 μm (95% CI, -5.785 to -3.040 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S61; Table 4), -4.817 μm (95% CI, -7.934 to -1.700 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S62; Table 4), and − 4.326 μm (95% CI, -7.007 to -1.645 μm; p = 0.002; Fig S63; Table 4), respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the nasal region(P > 0.05).Compared to the control group, the moderate myopic group showed significant thinning for perifoveal retinal thickness in the superior, inferior and temporal regions, with mean differences of -6.337 μm (95% CI, -10.339 to -2.336 μm; p = 0.002; Fig S64; Table 5), -7.802 μm (95% CI, -13.676 to -1.928 μm; p = 0.009; Fig S65; Table 5), and − 6.051 μm (95% CI, -10.207 to -1.896 μm; p = 0.004; Fig S66; Table 5), respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the nasal region (P > 0.05).Compared to the control group, the high myopic group showed significant thinning in the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal perifoveal retinal thickness, with mean differences of -14.150 μm (95% CI, -16.053 to -12.247 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S67; Table 6), -17.482 μm (95% CI, -19.402 to -15.563 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S68; Table 6), -11.465 μm (95% CI, -16.260 to -6.670 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S69; Table 6), and − 14.961 μm (95% CI, -19.014 to -10.907 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S70; Table 6), respectively. Only two studies [37, 74]were included for the hyperopic group, and due to the limited number of studies, the values were not calculated.

Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(pRNFL)

A total of 13 studies were included in the measurement of pRNFL, involving 479 myopic eyes, 857 emmetropic eyes, 1,771 hyperopic eyes, 354 low myopic eyes, 269 moderate myopic eyes, and 217 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis results showed that compared to the control group, the myopic group were significantly thinner for pRNFL thicknesses in the average, superior, inferior, and nasal regions,the mean differences were − 3.560 μm (95%CI, -5.370 to -1.751 μm; p = 0.001; Fig S71; Table 2), -2.713 μm (95%CI, -4.961 to -0.464 μm; p = 0.018; Fig S72; Table 2), -7.339 μm (95%CI, -13.978 to -0.700 μm; p = 0.03; Fig S73; Table 2), and − 4.487 μm (95%CI, -7.407 to -1.566 μm; p = 0.003; Fig S74; Table 2), respectively. There was no significant difference for pRNFL thickness in the temporal in the myopic group compared to the control group (p > 0.05). In contrast, compared to the control group, the hyperopic group were significantly thicker for pRNFL thicknesses in the average and nasal, the mean differences were 1.997 μm (95%CI, 1.146 to 2.849 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S75; Table 3) and 8.465 μm (95%CI, 0.612 to 16.319 μm; p = 0.035; Fig S76; Table 3), respectively. There were no significant differences for pRNFL thicknesses in the superior, inferior, and temporal regions in the hyperopia group compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Compared to the control group, low myopia exhibited significant thinning for pRNFL thicknesses in average, inferior, and nasal regions, the mean differences were − 1.953 μm (95%CI, -3.265 to -0.642 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S77; Table 4), -7.471 μm (95%CI, -9.947 to -4.995 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S78; Table 4), and − 4.287 μm (95%CI, -6.098 to -2.476 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S79; Table 4), respectively. There were no significant differences for pRNFL thicknesses in superior and temporal in the low myopic group compared to control group (p > 0.05).Similarly, compared to the control group, moderate myopic group showed significant thinning for pRNFL thicknesses in average, inferior, and nasal regions, the mean differences were − 5.420 μm (95%CI, -6.644 to -4.195 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S80; Table 5), -16.274 μm (95%CI, -17.754 to -14.795 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S81; Table 5), and − 5.010 μm (95%CI, -8.817 to -1.204 μm; p = 0.01; Fig S82; Table 5), respectively. There were no significant differences pRNFL thicknesses in superior and temporal regions between the moderate myopic group and the emmetropic group (p > 0.05).In the high myopic group, there was significant thinning for pRNFL thicknesses in average, superior, inferior, and nasal regions compared to the control group. The mean differences were − 10.689 μm (95%CI, -12.988 to -8.390 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S83; Table 6), -18.679 μm (95%CI, -22.223 to -15.134 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S84; Table 6), -22.827 μm (95%CI, -26.916 to -18.738 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S85; Table 6), and − 12.314 μm (95%CI, -18.549 to -6.080 μm; p < 0.001; Fig S86; Table 6). However, there were no significant differences in temporal pRNFL in the high myopic group compared to the control group (p > 0.05).

Ganglion cell layer (GCL)

A total of 4 studies were included in the measurement of GCL, involving 1,795 myopic eyes, 1,096 emmetropic eyes, and 2,956 hyperopic eyes. The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences for parafoveal GCL in the superior and inferior regions between the myopic, hyperopic groups and emmetropic group (P > 0.05).Regarding perifoveal GCL and GCL+ (ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer), only two studies [37, 74] were included, and due to the limited number of studies, the values were not calculated.

Retinal vessel density

A total of six studies were included in the measurement of retinal vessel density, involving 232 emmetropic eyes, 243 myopic eyes, and 76 high myopic eyes. The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant statistical differences in parafoveal superficial vessel density between the myopic and high myopic groups compared to the control group (P > 0.05).For parafoveal deep vessel density, only two studies [50, 73]were included, and due to the limited number of studies, the values were not calculated.

Subgroup analysis

To investigate the heterogeneity sources, we performed subgroup analyses based on pre-specified variables, including study type, instrument/device used, geographical region of the study population, whether mydriasis was induced, and the utilization of the ETDRS grid. These subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of variation among the included studies and to assess whether the observed differences in the results could be attributed to these specific factors. By examining the subgroups based on these variables, we aimed to identify any potential sources of heterogeneity and gain a better understanding of the factors that may influence the outcomes of the studies (Table S1).

Study type

Comparing to the control group, the average AL of myopic group showed a significant increase in cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies (all p < 0.01) (Fig SS87).Comparing to the control group, the average AL of hyperopia showed a significant decrease in cross-sectional studies, cohort studies and case-control studies (all p < 0.01) (Fig S88).Comparing to the control group, low and moderate myopic group exhibited a significant increase in average AL in cross-sectional and case-control studies (all p < 0.001) (Fig S89, Fig S90).Comparing to the control group, high myopic group showed a significant increase in average AL in cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies (all p < 0.01) (Fig S91). Comparing to the control group, myopic group exhibited a significant decrease in average SFCT in cross-sectional and cohort studies (all p < 0.01) (Fig S92). Comparing to the control group, myopic group showed a significant reduction in average parafoveal ChT (temporal and nasal) in cross-sectional and cohort studies (all p < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in case-control studies (Fig S93, Fig S94S).These findings suggest that different study types demonstrate consistent trends in the relationship between refractive errors (myopia and hyperopia) and ocular parameters such as AL, subfoveal ChT, and parafoveal ChT.

Instrument/device

The subgroup analysis based on the type of equipment used yielded the following results: Comparing to the control group, the average AL of the myopic group showed a significant increase in Carl Zeiss Meditec IOL Master, Haag-Streit AG Lenstar LS900, Lam eris Ootech LenStar device, and NIDEK CO LTD AL-Scan (all p < 0.001) (Fig S95).Comparing to the control group, the average AL of the hyperopic group showed a significant decrease in Carl Zeiss Meditec IOL Master, Haag-Streit AG Lenstar LS900, Lam eris Ootech LenStar device, and NIDEK CO LTD AL-Scan (all p < 0.01) (Fig S96).Comparing to the control group, the average AL of the high myopic group showed a significant increase in Carl Zeiss Meditec IOL Master, Haag-Streit AG Lenstar LS900, and Topcon Aladdin (all p < 0.001) (Fig S97S). Comparing to the control group, the average ACD showed significant differences in myopic and hyperopic groups in Haag-Streit AG Lenstar LS900 (p < 0.001), while no statistical significance was observed in Carl Zeiss Meditec IOL Master and NIDEK CO LTD AL-Scan (Fig S98, Fig S99S).Comparing to the control group, the average SFCT of the myopic group showed a significant decrease in Heidelberg SD-OCT, SS-OCT (DRI OCT-1 Atlantis, Topcon), SVision Imaging SS-OCT/OCTA (all p < 0.001), while no statistical significance was observed in Heidelberg Spectralis OCT (Fig S100).Comparing to the control group, the average parafoveal ChT (temporal and nasal) of the myopic group showed a significant decrease in Heidelberg SD-OCT, SS-OCT (DRI OCT-1 Atlantis, Topcon) (all p < 0.05) (Fig S101, Fig S102).

ETDRS grid usage

Subgroup analysis was conducted based on studies that utilized ETDRS macular imaging and studies that did not utilize ETDRS. The results of the analysis were as follows: In studies that utilized ETDRS macular imaging, the average parafoveal ChT(temporal and nasal) of myopic group was significantly smaller compared to the control group (p = 0.001) (Fig S103).In studies that did not utilize ETDRS macular imaging, the difference between myopic and the emmetropic group was statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Fig S104).These findings suggest that the use of ETDRS macular imaging in studies provides more precise and significant differences in parafoveal ChT between myopic and control group. In studies that did not utilize ETDRS, the differences observed were still statistically significant, indicating a consistent association between myopia and parafoveal ChT.

Geographical region

Subgroup analysis was based on the geographic regions of the study populations. Compared to the control group, the myopic group showed a significant increase for average AL in East Asia, Europe and America, and West Asia (all p < 0.001) (Fig S105). In contrast, the hyperopic group exhibited a significant decrease in average AL compared to the control group in East Asia, Europe and America, and West Asia (all p < 0.001) (Fig S106). The low myopic group demonstrated a significant increase for average AL compared to the control group in East Asia, Europe and America (all p < 0.001) (Fig S107). Similarly, the high myopic group showed a significant increase for average AL compared to the control group in East Asia and Southeast Asia (all p < 0.001) (Fig S108). Regarding average ACD, myopic group exhibited a significant increase compared to the control group in East Asia, Europe and America and West Asia (all p < 0.01) (Fig S109). The hyperopic group, on the other hand, demonstrated a significant decrease for average ACD compared to the control group in East Asia, Europe and America and West Asia (all p < 0.01) (Fig S110). In terms of average SFCT, the myopic group exhibited a significant decrease compared to the control group in East Asia and West Asia(all p < 0.01), while the difference was not statistically significant in Europe and America (Fig S111). Regarding the average parafoveal ChT (temporal and nasal), myopic group showed a significant decrease in East Asia (p < 0.001), while the difference was not statistically significant in West Asia (Fig S112, Fig S113).

Mydriasis

Subgroup analyses were performed based on whether mydriasis was induced. Compared to the control group, the myopic group showed a significant increase for average AL in the mydriasis, non-mydriasis and unspecified subgroup (all p < 0.001) (Fig S114). The hyperopia group exhibited a significant decrease in average AL compared to the control group in the mydriasis and unspecified subgroup (all p < 0.001) (Fig S115). In terms of average AL, the low, moderate and high myopic groups demonstrated a significant increase compared to the control group in the mydriasis and unspecified subgroup (all p < 0.001) (Fig S116, Fig S117, Fig S118). Regarding average SFCT, the myopic group showed a significant decrease compared to the control group in the mydriasis, non-mydriasis and unspecified subgroup (all p < 0.001) (Fig S119). Regarding the average parafoveal ChT (temporal and nasal), myopia exhibited a significant decrease in the mydriasis subgroup (p < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the unspecified subgroup (Fig S120, Fig S121).

Publication bias

In the comparison of average AL between patients with myopia and the emmetropic group, the asymmetry of the funnel plot and significant results from the Egger’s test (p < 0.001; Fig S122; Table 3) indicate the presence of publication bias in the meta-analysis, which could have an impact on our pooled analysis results. To assess the stability and extent of the influence of publication bias on our meta-analysis results, we conducted a sensitivity analysis. We systematically excluded studies that were heavily influenced by publication bias (Fig S123) and performed analyses using different statistical models. Encouragingly, the results of the sensitivity analysis showed that even when considering publication bias, our pooled analysis results remained stable and did not undergo significant changes. This suggests that publication bias did not have a significant impact on our main conclusions. The remaining funnel plots and Egger’s tests of the included studies did not indicate any apparent publication bias (the interpretation of Egger’s test primarily depends on the p-value, where p < 0.05 is generally considered indicative of publication bias, Fig S124-S130).

Discussion

Ocular biometric parameters parameters (AL, CC, AL/CR ratio, ACD, LT, RT, ChT, pRNFL, etc.) were crucial for the early diagnosis, prevention and treatment of refractive errors in children and adolescents. Regular ocular biometric parameters during childhood and adolescence can help identify refractive errors and facilitate the timely implementation of appropriate prevention, control measures and treatment to maintain visual health. This article presented a meta-analysis that summarizes the comparative results of ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents with different refractive states and a control group over the past 11 years. The results indicated that, compared to the control group, the myopic group exhibited significantly increased in AL, CC, AL/CR ratio, and ACD, while CR, CCT, Perifoveal RT, subfoveal ChT, foveal ChT, Parafoveal ChT, Perifoveal (except Nasal) ChT, and pRNFL (except Temporal) were significantly decreased. Compared to the control group, the hyperopic group showed significantly increased in subfoveal ChT, foveal ChT, Parafoveal ChT, Perifoveal ChT, and pRNFL (except Superior, Inferior, Temporal), along with significantly decreased measurements in AL, AL/CR ratio, and ACD. Furthermore, compared to the control group, the low and moderate myopic groups exhibited significantly increased in AL, AL/CR, and ACD, while CCT, Parafoveal RT (excluding nasal, and temporal in the moderate myopic group), Perifoveal RT (excluding nasal), and pRNFL (except superior, temporal) were significantly decreased. Additionally, the CC significantly increased in the moderate myopic group. Lastly, compared to the control group, the high myopic group displayed significantly increased in AL, AL/CR, CR, and ACD, while measurements of LT, Perifoveal ChT (except Nasal), Parafoveal RT, Perifoveal RT, and pRNFL (except Temporal) were significantly decreased. In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis confirmed a close association between changes in ocular biometric parameters and refractive states in children and adolescents.
The AL is closely associated with the development of myopia, especially during the growth and development process in children and adolescents when the AL often undergoes significant changes. If the growth of AL exceeds the eye’s focal point, it can lead to myopia [80].Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated a negative correlation between refractive error and AL in children and adolescents. The correlation coefficient was notably higher in patients with moderate to high myopia compared to those with low hyperopia or normal vision [8183],our meta-analysis results were consistent with the findings mentioned above. The elongation of AL can lead to changes in the shape of the eyeball, including alterations in corneal curvature [84],thinning of the sclera [8587],choroidal [8890]and structural changes in the retina [91, 92],these corresponding changes can further exacerbate the degree of myopia and increase the risk of complications associated with high myopia, such as retinal detachment, retinal holes, optic disc detachment, choroidal neovascularization, glaucoma, and macular atrophy [8891].Therefore, the increase in AL played a critical role in the pathological process of myopia development.
The relevant studies indicated that the degree of myopia was closely related to the average CC, with a negative correlation between AL and CC [84, 93, 94].This was also roughly consistent with the results of our meta-analysis. As the AL increases, the CC tends to flatten to compensate for the longer eye axis, while, this corneal compensation diminishes when the AL exceeds 28 mm [84, 95].Some researchers indicated that the coordination and scaling between CC and AL are determined by common genetic variations [96], and environmental factors may play a role in modulating these components during the coordinated growth in refractive errors. While growth of AL played a primary role in myopia progression, changes in CC were also an important factor in the regulation of refractive status, and both factors collectively influence the development and progression rate of myopia.
The AL/CR ratio was considered as an alternative indicator for refractive errors in the condition of ciliary muscle paralysis, it can be used to assess the risk and progression patterns of myopia. Grosvenor and Scott [97]were the first to propose the correlation between AL/CR ratio and refractive error. They found that even small changes in AL/CR can lead to significant changes in refractive error. This was consistent with the results of our meta-analysis, where higher degrees of myopia were associated with larger differences in AL/CR ratio compared to the control group. Moreover, the correlation between refractive errors and AL/CR ratio was significantly stronger than the individual correlations between refractive errors and AL or CR [98]. A cutoff value of AL/CR ratio > 3 has been identified as a high-risk indicator for the progression from normal vision to myopia, and a higher AL/CR ratio was considered to be associated with a greater likelihood of myopia occurrence. The diagnostic value of AL/CR ratio for myopia was high (> 90%). Therefore, in children who cannot undergo cycloplegia, AL/CR ratio can be used as a diagnostic criterion for myopia [99].In summary, AL/CR ratio can help predict the progression of myopia in children and adolescents, providing a strong basis for early intervention and management of myopia.
Related research found that myopic eyes have lower crystalline lens power, that partially compensate their longer axial length indicating that the change in myopia degree corresponding to a 1 mm increase in AL cannot be a fixed value [33].Additionally, researchers from Taiwan and Singapore found that children with thinner LT are more prone to myopia [100, 101].Shih et al. [102]conducted a survey involving 11,656 students aged 7 to 18 and found that the myopic group had the smallest LT compared to the hyperopic and emmetropic groups. These findings were consistent with the results of our meta-analysis, which showed that LT were decreased in low, moderate and high myopia compared to the control group. During normal eye growth, there should be a balance between the refractive components, including the cornea and the crystalline lens, and the AL. The crystalline lens compensated for the growth of the AL by becoming thinner, flatter, and reducing its power to maintain refractive errors [103, 104].However, in this study, there was no statistically significant difference in LT values between the hyperopic group and the emmetropic group, which could be attributed to factors such as a smaller sample size, study design, and implementation methods. In conclusion, the relationship between myopia degree and lens thickness still requires further investigation in future studies.
The ACD was an important component of AL. Relevant research has found that in young individuals, the ACD varies with diopter changes in youngster. As individuals progress from hyperopia to high myopia, the ACD gradually increases [105]. This was consistent with the results of our meta-analysis. When compared to the control group, the hyperopic group showd a significant decrease in ACD, while the myopic and high myopic groups show a significant increase in ACD. Furthermore, as the diopter increases, the difference in ACD also increases. Data suggested that eyes with longer AL (and higher myopia) have deeper ACDs and thinner LT. Among myopic patients, the deeper ACD may be a result of geometric scaling during the period of AL growth [106].In addition, a shallow anterior chamber was an important risk factor for primary angle-closure glaucoma, and measuring ACD may play a role in screening for primary angle-closure glaucoma in the population [107].
Some studies found a positive correlation between CCT and spherical equivalent (SE) [108], while others have observed thinner CCT in individuals with myopia [109]. Additionally, there were studies suggesting no correlation between CCT and SE [110112]. Our meta-analysis indicated that compared to the emmetropia group, the myopic, low and moderate myopia groups show a significant decrease in CCT, while the hyperopic and high myopia groups show no statistically significant differences. Additionally, Zhou P et al. [113] found a negative correlation between CCT and the progression rate of myopia and the rate of AL elongation. Children with thinner CCT tended to have a faster progression rate of myopia and AL growth, this may be due to the pathological thinning of CCT caused by the elongation of AL [114]. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in CCT values between the high myopic group and the emmetropic group. This finding may be related to the inclusion of Bueno-Gimeno et al.‘s study [16], which had a small sample size and showed contradictory results compared to other studies. Therefore, CCT may be a potential risk factor for myopia or a consequence of myopia development. Further research was needed to validate these findings.
The choroid was located between the sclera and the retina, and it was a highly vascularized structure that supplies approximately 80% of the blood to the retina. Increasing evidence suggested that the choroid plays a significant role in regulating eye growth and the development of myopia [115].Numerous animal experiments have indicated that compared to emmetropic eyes, the ChT was thinner in myopic eyes and thicker in hyperopic eyes [116118].Clinical studies have also discovered that the ChT in myopic eyes was significantly reduced compared to emmetropic and hyperopic eyes [29, 37, 119, 120], some researchers found that the subfoveal ChT in progressive myopic children dramatically decreases over time, whereas in non-myopic children, the subfoveal ChT increased significantly over time [121, 122].Gupta et al. [60]also observed that high myopic eyes exhibit a significant thinning of ChT, which was correlated with decreased vascular and stromal components. Previous studies showed that the administration of vasodilators (such as sildenafil) significantly increases choroidal blood flow perfusion and ChT in patients [123], while intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs (such as bevacizumab) decreases choroidal blood flow perfusion and ChT [124]. It can be inferred that choroidal blood flow perfusion may regulate ChT, thereby playing an important role in the occurrence and development of myopia [125]. Additionally, increasing choroidal blood flow perfusion can alleviate scleral hypoxia, thereby inhibiting myopia progression [126]. Furthermore, studies have indicated that ChT thinning was a structural characteristic of myopia and ChT was negatively correlated with AL, suggesting that changes in choroidal thickness may serve as predictive biomarkers for long-term AL growth [127], Our meta-analysis results indicated that compared to the emmetropic group, the myopic group exhibits significantly reduced values in subfoveal ChT, foveal ChT, and parafoveal ChT, while the hyperopic group shows significantly increased values in these parameters. Our findings were consistent with relevant studies. In myopia, the nasal and inferior ChT was smaller than in other regions [128130], and the average thickness of the subfoveal ChT decreases horizontally from the temporal to nasal region [29], In our study, the myopic group showed smaller differences in nasal and inferior foveal ChT compared to the temporal and superior regions. In myopia, the thinning of the ChT in the foveal region was more pronounced than in the surrounding areas [29, 127130], which was consistent with the findings of our study. Compared to the emmetropic group, the myopic group exhibited a significantly larger difference in foveal ChT than in parafoveal ChT and perifoveal ChT. In comparison to emmetropic and hyperopic eyes, myopic eyes have the greatest ChT, which gradually decreases in low, moderate and high myopia (p < 0.001) [120], This finding was also consistent with the results of this study, although the inclusion of a limited number of studies on low to high myopia in this research may reflect similar outcomes. The correlation between ChT and AL changes in children and adolescents after the onset of myopia is inconsistent, with moderate to high myopic children showing a more pronounced association than children with low myopia [131],suggesting a compensatory mechanism of physiological ChT thinning in early myopia that counteracts the AL elongation. However, this compensatory effect diminishes as myopia progresses [29], suggesting a compensatory mechanism of physiological ChT thinning in early myopia that counteracts the axial elongation. However, this compensatory effect diminished as myopia progresses [122].
Relevant studies indicated that RT may also be associated with refractive errors and axial length. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared to the emmetropic group, the high myopic group exhibits a thinning of average macular RT. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in the nasal differences of parafoveal RT and perifoveal RT in the low and moderate myopia groups, and the temporal difference in parafoveal RT in the moderate myopia group was also not statistically significant. However, statistically significant differences were observed in the differences of parafoveal RT and perifoveal RT in various regions for myopia and high myopia groups compared to the emmetropic group. Compared to the emmetropic group, low and moderate myopia showed significant thinning in all four regions of parafoveal and perifoveal RT (except for the nasal/temporal regions). However, the magnitude of this effect was smaller in patients with low and moderate myopia compared to those with high myopia, suggesting a potential relationship between the severity of myopia and the RT of these regions. A study indicated that non-neuronal tissues (such as glial tissue) in the nasal side of the RNFL in healthy myopic eyes increase with age, which may be a potential factor contributing to the stable nasal RT of the macular region in this population [132].
Myopia often have a longer AL, which can cause traction and compression in the macular region, leading to a thinning of the RT in the macular area [133]. Our meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences in foveal RT between the myopia, hyperopia and low to high myopia group compared to the emmetropic group. Studies showed that thinner foveal RT was not associated with a faster rate of AL growth in youngest [134, 135].Other research indicated that foveal RT was mostly unaffected by AL, while myopic AL growth is associated with thinning of the retinal thickness in the equatorial and pre-equatorial regions [136]. However, some scholars also found that foveal RT increases with AL and myopia degree, while parafoveal RT decreases with AL [133, 137]. Therefore, the relationship between foveal RT and AL/myopia degree was still debated. In some studies involving youngest, it was observed that parafoveal and perifoveal RT significantly decreases with AL [138140], which was consistent with the findings of this study. This may be because the peripheral retina lacks blood vessels and nerve fibers, making it less resistant to traction and stretching. Thus, the reduction in peripheral RT may be a response to counteract the traction force exerted on the entire retina, thereby maintaining the thickness of the central retina [133, 141]. Similarly, Lim et al. [137] also noted that retinal thinning in myopic eyes was more commonly observed in the peripheral region. Some researchers [142] proposed that AL growth occurs through the formation of additional Bruch’s membrane (BM) in the equatorial and post-equatorial regions, leading to a decrease in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) density and retinal thinning in that were. Moreover, other studies indicated that there was no association between macular RT and AL [143, 144]. In summary, the relationship between RT and AL in children and adolescents remains controversial. However, RT still held significance in the context of myopia in this population, providing valuable information and guidance for early diagnosis, mechanism research, treatment evaluation, and prevention strategies.
The inner retina consists of RNFL, GCL, IPL, and inner nuclear layer (INL). The relevant studies indicated that the thickness of the pRNFL was closely associated with the development and progression of refractive errors. Most studies found that RNFL thickness tends to decrease with an increase in AL and myopic refractive error, ranging from low to high myopia [145150]. In high myopic patients, the pathological elongation of AL may lead to significant damage to the retinal nerve fibers, resulting in a decrease in the thickness of the RNFL [132]. These research findings were consistent with the results of our meta-analysis. When compared to the emmetropic group, the myopic group, including low, moderate and high myopia, showed significant thinning in average pRNFL thickness and thickness in various regions (except for the temporal region in the myopic and high myopic groups and the superior and temporal regions in the low to moderate myopic group). Conversely, the hyperopic group exhibited a significant increase in average pRNFL thickness and nasal region thickness. Kausar et al.‘s study analysis revealed a negative correlation between the superior and nasal regions, as well as the nasal, superonasal, inferiornasal, inferior, and inferonasal regions of the average RNFL thickness and AL. However, this relationship was eliminated by applying the correction of magnification using Littmann’s formula [151]. However, not all studies have corrected for the inherent magnification effect of OCT imaging. The literature data we included in our analysis were extracted after applying magnification correction. Additionally, myopic eyes were at an increased risk of developing glaucoma, and high myopic eyes are prone to optic nerve damage, making glaucomatous changes in myopic eyes difficult to detect [152].However, some studies found that the BMO-MRW parameter, BMO-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), which refers to the minimum distance between the BMO and the internal limiting membrane, showed greater sensitivity than pRNFL thickness measurements in the early detection of glaucoma [153] can also be applied in the diagnosis of glaucoma in myopic eyes, showing similar sensitivity (90% specificity) compared to average RNFL thickness. In non-glaucomatous but myopic eyes, it also demonstrated fewer misdiagnoses compared to average RNFL thickness [154156].
Our study indicated that there were no significant differences in temporal pRNFL thickness between the myopic, hyperopic, low to high myopic groups, and the control group when compared to other quadrants, in addition, the temporal pRNFL thickness in myopia was even thicker. Related studies have also found that temporal RNFL thickness tends to increase with the development of myopia. This change may be related to the redistribution of RNFL during the myopic AL growth process and the unique structure of the temporal macular bundle [157, 158].Some researchers have also discovered that a decrease in the region between the temporal superior and temporal inferior RNFL bundles is an independent factor associated with myopia. As the refractive error of myopia increases, the temporal superior and temporal inferior RNFL bundles tend to cluster towards the temporal side, resulting in a smaller angle between them and thickening of the temporal RNFL, while other regions of the RNFL thin out [159], Therefore, this study suggested that the reduction in the angle between the RNFL bundles may be related to changes in the shape of the myopic eyeball. Due to the elongation of the posterior region in myopic eyes and an increase in vertical curvature, the eyeball exhibits symmetric or asymmetric anterior-posterior elongation and posterior protrusion. Consequently, the distribution of RNFL bundles adapts to the changes in the shape of the eyeball. Therefore, a thorough analysis of the distribution characteristics and functional changes of the RNFL in myopia can lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of myopia and enhance the diagnostic capabilities for other neuro-ophthalmic diseases.
GCC was also defined as the combination of three innermost retinal layers, including RNFL, GCL, and IPL [160]. Due to the similar reflectivity of the GCL and inner plexiform layer (IPL) and their distinguishability only in the central foveal region, the thickness of these two layers was typically measured and reported together as GCL+ (ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer) [161]. Numerous studies reported a decrease in the thickness of GCC/GCL + in myopic patients, which was consistent with the results of our meta-analysis. This may be attributed to the thinning of the retina caused by AL growth, leading to decreased vascular density and ultimately resulting in the loss of ganglion cells [162].Thinning of GCL + may also indicate reduced blood supply within the retina, which could lead to hypoxia and further exacerbate myopia [163]. Furthermore, studies suggested remodeling of the macular GCL + due to ganglion cell loss in glaucoma, and the thickness of macular GCL + can be used as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for glaucoma in combination with pRNFL thickness [164].However, our study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in parafoveal GCL differences between the myopic and hyperopic groups compared to the emmetropic group, which could be attributed to the limited number of included references. Therefore, further investigation was needed to explore the relationship between GCL/GCL + and refractive error.
Previous studies found that in highly myopic eyes, there was a reduction in the peripapillary perfusion (including blood flow index and vessel density) compared to emmetropic eyes, but not in the parafoveal area [46]. It has also been observed that despite the decrease in vessel density, the overall retinal perfusion is maintained, indicating that the reduction in vessel density may be associated with AL elongation (mechanical stretching) rather than vascular loss [165168].Shimada, Net al. discovered that retinal blood flow decreases and retinal vessel diameter narrows in high myopic eyes [168]. This study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in parafoveal superficial vessel density differences between the myopic and high myopic groups compared to the emmetropic group, which could be attributed to the limited number of included references. Therefore, further research was needed to investigate the relationship between retinal blood flow density and refractive error.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current research findings indicated differences in ocular biometric parameters between children and adolescents with myopia, hyperopia, and emmetropic groups. These parameters include AL, CC,CR,AL/CR,LT, ACD, CCT, ChT, RT, RNFL,et al. Therefore, ocular biometric parameters were considered advantageous as potential biomarkers for evaluating refractive errors in children and adolescents. In the future, further longitudinal prospective studies can validate whether ocular biometric parameters can serve as early risk indicators for refractive errors and vision-threatening diseases.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM and Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM for their help and support in our investigations.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, Lanca C, Saw SM. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, Lanca C, Saw SM. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezegwui IR, Oguego NC, Okoye OI, Maduka-Okafor FC, Udeh N, Aghaji AE, Okoye O, Nwobi E, Umeh-Aneji C, Onwasigwe EN, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment in school children in Enugu South-East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(3):380–6.PubMedCrossRef Ezegwui IR, Oguego NC, Okoye OI, Maduka-Okafor FC, Udeh N, Aghaji AE, Okoye O, Nwobi E, Umeh-Aneji C, Onwasigwe EN, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment in school children in Enugu South-East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(3):380–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB, PREVALENCE AND TIME TRENDS OF MYOPIA IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS IN CHINA. A systemic review and Meta-analysis. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2020;40(3):399–411.PubMedCrossRef Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB, PREVALENCE AND TIME TRENDS OF MYOPIA IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS IN CHINA. A systemic review and Meta-analysis. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2020;40(3):399–411.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.PubMedCrossRef Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang L, Pan CW, Ohno-Matsui K, Lin X, Cheung GC, Gazzard G, Koh V, Hamzah H, Tai ES, Lim SC, et al. Myopia-related fundus changes in Singapore adults with high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(6):991–999e991.PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Pan CW, Ohno-Matsui K, Lin X, Cheung GC, Gazzard G, Koh V, Hamzah H, Tai ES, Lim SC, et al. Myopia-related fundus changes in Singapore adults with high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(6):991–999e991.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu H, Guan Y, Wei G, Li N. The relationship between choroidal thickness and axis length and corneal curvature in high myopia. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2022;38(7):1999–2004. Lu H, Guan Y, Wei G, Li N. The relationship between choroidal thickness and axis length and corneal curvature in high myopia. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2022;38(7):1999–2004.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan YN, Wang YX, Yang Y, Xu L, Xu J, Wang Q, Yang JY, Yang X, Zhou WJ, Ohno-Matsui K, et al. Ten-year progression of myopic Maculopathy: the Beijing Eye Study 2001–2011. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(8):1253–63.PubMedCrossRef Yan YN, Wang YX, Yang Y, Xu L, Xu J, Wang Q, Yang JY, Yang X, Zhou WJ, Ohno-Matsui K, et al. Ten-year progression of myopic Maculopathy: the Beijing Eye Study 2001–2011. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(8):1253–63.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikuno Y, OVERVIEW OF THE COMPLICATIONS OF HIGH MYOPIA. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2017;37(12):2347–51.PubMedCrossRef Ikuno Y, OVERVIEW OF THE COMPLICATIONS OF HIGH MYOPIA. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2017;37(12):2347–51.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P. Epidemiology and Disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):9–25e12.PubMedCrossRef Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P. Epidemiology and Disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):9–25e12.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhende M, Shetty S, Parthasarathy MK, Ramya S. Optical coherence tomography: a guide to interpretation of common macular Diseases. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(1):20–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bhende M, Shetty S, Parthasarathy MK, Ramya S. Optical coherence tomography: a guide to interpretation of common macular Diseases. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(1):20–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Öner V, Özgür G, Türkyilmaz K, Şekeryapan B, Durmus M. Effect of axial length on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(2):265–72.PubMedCrossRef Öner V, Özgür G, Türkyilmaz K, Şekeryapan B, Durmus M. Effect of axial length on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(2):265–72.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang X, Li M, Lv L, Yan X, Liu Y, Zhu M, Wang J, Wang P, Xiang Y. Assessment of Choroidal Vascularity and Choriocapillaris Blood Perfusion after Accommodation in Myopia, Emmetropia, and Hyperopia groups among children. Front Physiol. 2022;13:854240.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chang X, Li M, Lv L, Yan X, Liu Y, Zhu M, Wang J, Wang P, Xiang Y. Assessment of Choroidal Vascularity and Choriocapillaris Blood Perfusion after Accommodation in Myopia, Emmetropia, and Hyperopia groups among children. Front Physiol. 2022;13:854240.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji FT, Wang H, Wang ZM, Dai W, Wang Q, Li YR, Liao RF. Comparison and correlation of choroidal parameters in children and adolescents with different refractive status. Int Eye Sci. 2022;22(10):1682–6. Ji FT, Wang H, Wang ZM, Dai W, Wang Q, Li YR, Liao RF. Comparison and correlation of choroidal parameters in children and adolescents with different refractive status. Int Eye Sci. 2022;22(10):1682–6.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi Y, Ye L, Chen Q, Hu G, Yin Y, Fan Y, Zhu J, He J, Zheng Z, Zou H et al. Macular Vessel Density Changes in young adults with high myopia: a longitudinal study. Front Med 2021, 8. Shi Y, Ye L, Chen Q, Hu G, Yin Y, Fan Y, Zhu J, He J, Zheng Z, Zou H et al. Macular Vessel Density Changes in young adults with high myopia: a longitudinal study. Front Med 2021, 8.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bian X, Guo Y, Guo S, Zhang S, Zhang G, Liu L, Yang Y, Liu J. Strehl ratio and myopia in Chinese adolescents: the Tuyou County Pediatric Eye (TYPE) study. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:1541–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bian X, Guo Y, Guo S, Zhang S, Zhang G, Liu L, Yang Y, Liu J. Strehl ratio and myopia in Chinese adolescents: the Tuyou County Pediatric Eye (TYPE) study. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:1541–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bueno-Gimeno I, Gene-Sampedro A, Pinero-Llorens DP, Lanzagorta-Aresti A, Espana-Gregori E. Corneal biomechanics, retinal nerve Fiber layer, and Optic Disc in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(12):1474–82.PubMedCrossRef Bueno-Gimeno I, Gene-Sampedro A, Pinero-Llorens DP, Lanzagorta-Aresti A, Espana-Gregori E. Corneal biomechanics, retinal nerve Fiber layer, and Optic Disc in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(12):1474–82.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Y, Wei S, Li S, Cao K, Hu J, Yang X, Lin C, An W, Guo J, Li H, et al. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: the Anyang University Students Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(6):621–7.PubMedCrossRef Sun Y, Wei S, Li S, Cao K, Hu J, Yang X, Lin C, An W, Guo J, Li H, et al. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: the Anyang University Students Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(6):621–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zha Y, Zhuang J, Du Y, Cai J, Zheng H. Evaluation of peripapillary choroidal distribution in children by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. BMC Ophthalmol 2018, 18. Zha Y, Zhuang J, Du Y, Cai J, Zheng H. Evaluation of peripapillary choroidal distribution in children by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. BMC Ophthalmol 2018, 18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye S, Liu S, Li W, Wang Q, Xi W, Zhang X. Associations between anthropometric indicators and both refraction and ocular biometrics in a cross-sectional study of Chinese schoolchildren. Bmj Open 2019, 9(5). Ye S, Liu S, Li W, Wang Q, Xi W, Zhang X. Associations between anthropometric indicators and both refraction and ocular biometrics in a cross-sectional study of Chinese schoolchildren. Bmj Open 2019, 9(5).
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Bian SL, Lin J. Current situation of refractive status and axial length in children and adolescents aged 3–18 years in Qingyang District of Chengdu. Int Eye Sci. 2021;21(2):325–30. Li L, Bian SL, Lin J. Current situation of refractive status and axial length in children and adolescents aged 3–18 years in Qingyang District of Chengdu. Int Eye Sci. 2021;21(2):325–30.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayrakceken K. Comparison of retinal microvascular vascular density between adolescents with and without simple myopia using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Eurasian J Med. 2023;55(1):54–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bayrakceken K. Comparison of retinal microvascular vascular density between adolescents with and without simple myopia using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Eurasian J Med. 2023;55(1):54–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundberg K, Vestergaard AH, Jacobsen N, Suhr Thykjær A, Søgaard Hansen R, Goldschmidt E, Peto T, Halekoh U, Wedderkopp N, Grauslund J. Choroidal thickness and myopia in relation to physical activity – the CHAMPS Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(4):371–8.PubMedCrossRef Lundberg K, Vestergaard AH, Jacobsen N, Suhr Thykjær A, Søgaard Hansen R, Goldschmidt E, Peto T, Halekoh U, Wedderkopp N, Grauslund J. Choroidal thickness and myopia in relation to physical activity – the CHAMPS Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(4):371–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jnawali A, Mirhajianmoghadam H, Musial G, Porter J, Ostrin LA. The optic nerve head, lamina cribrosa, and nerve fiber layer in non-myopic and myopic children. Exp Eye Res 2020, 195. Jnawali A, Mirhajianmoghadam H, Musial G, Porter J, Ostrin LA. The optic nerve head, lamina cribrosa, and nerve fiber layer in non-myopic and myopic children. Exp Eye Res 2020, 195.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bulut A, oner V, Buyuktarakci S, Kaim M. Associations between choroidal thickness, axial length and spherical equivalent in a paediatric population. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99(4):356–9.PubMedCrossRef Bulut A, oner V, Buyuktarakci S, Kaim M. Associations between choroidal thickness, axial length and spherical equivalent in a paediatric population. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99(4):356–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui D, Hou X, Li J, Qu X, Yu T, Song A. Relationship between peripapillary choroidal thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer in young people with myopia. J Int Med Res 2021, 49(7). Cui D, Hou X, Li J, Qu X, Yu T, Song A. Relationship between peripapillary choroidal thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer in young people with myopia. J Int Med Res 2021, 49(7).
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, Jaddoe VWV, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, Klaver CCW. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):301–9.PubMedCrossRef Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, Jaddoe VWV, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, Klaver CCW. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):301–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat He X, Zou H, Lu L, Zhao R, Zhao H, Li Q, Zhu J. Axial Length/Corneal Radius ratio: Association with refractive state and role on myopia detection combined with visual acuity in Chinese schoolchildren. PLoS ONE 2015, 10(2). He X, Zou H, Lu L, Zhao R, Zhao H, Li Q, Zhu J. Axial Length/Corneal Radius ratio: Association with refractive state and role on myopia detection combined with visual acuity in Chinese schoolchildren. PLoS ONE 2015, 10(2).
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tao Y, Cheng X, Ouyang C, Qu X, Liao W, Zhou Q, Ouyang J. Changes in ocular biological parameters after cycloplegia based on dioptre, age and sex. Sci Rep 2022, 12(1). Tao Y, Cheng X, Ouyang C, Qu X, Liao W, Zhou Q, Ouyang J. Changes in ocular biological parameters after cycloplegia based on dioptre, age and sex. Sci Rep 2022, 12(1).
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong S, He X, Deng J, Lv M, Jin J, Sun S, Yao C, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Choroidal Thickness in 3001 Chinese children aged 6 to 19 years using swept-source OCT. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45059.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xiong S, He X, Deng J, Lv M, Jin J, Sun S, Yao C, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Choroidal Thickness in 3001 Chinese children aged 6 to 19 years using swept-source OCT. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45059.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Long W, Zhao Y, Hu Y, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhao W, Yang X, Cui D, Trier K. Characteristics of corneal biomechanics in Chinese Preschool Children with different refractive status. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1395–9.PubMedCrossRef Long W, Zhao Y, Hu Y, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhao W, Yang X, Cui D, Trier K. Characteristics of corneal biomechanics in Chinese Preschool Children with different refractive status. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1395–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tideman W, Polling JR, Jaddoe V, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, Klaver C. Axial length growth curves and the risk of myopia in European children and adults. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2017, 58(8). Tideman W, Polling JR, Jaddoe V, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, Klaver C. Axial length growth curves and the risk of myopia in European children and adults. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2017, 58(8).
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Xing Y, Jia C, Ma J, Li X, Zhou J, Zhao C, Zhang H, Wang L, Wang W et al. Beijing Pinggu Childhood Eye Study: the baseline refractive characteristics in 6-to 12-Year-old Chinese primary school students. Front Public Health 2022, 10. Li Y, Xing Y, Jia C, Ma J, Li X, Zhou J, Zhao C, Zhang H, Wang L, Wang W et al. Beijing Pinggu Childhood Eye Study: the baseline refractive characteristics in 6-to 12-Year-old Chinese primary school students. Front Public Health 2022, 10.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S-M, Iribarren R, Kang M-T, Li H, Li S-Y, Liu L-R, Sun Y-Y, Meng B, Zhan S-Y, Rozema JJ et al. Corneal Power, anterior segment length and Lens Power in 14-year-old Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Sci Rep 2016, 6. Li S-M, Iribarren R, Kang M-T, Li H, Li S-Y, Liu L-R, Sun Y-Y, Meng B, Zhan S-Y, Rozema JJ et al. Corneal Power, anterior segment length and Lens Power in 14-year-old Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Sci Rep 2016, 6.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu L-L, Hu X-J, Yang Y, Xu S, Yang S-Y, Zhang C-Y, Zhao Q-Y. Correlation of myopia onset and progression with corneal biomechanical parameters in children. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(5):1548–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lu L-L, Hu X-J, Yang Y, Xu S, Yang S-Y, Zhang C-Y, Zhao Q-Y. Correlation of myopia onset and progression with corneal biomechanical parameters in children. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(5):1548–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan M, Elgin U, Sen E, Tekin K, Yilmazbas P. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(2):335–40.PubMedCrossRef Dogan M, Elgin U, Sen E, Tekin K, Yilmazbas P. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(2):335–40.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dayi O, Bulut E, Karadag M, Bulut H. Ocular biometry characteristics and its relationship with age, gender, spherical equivalent in Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(5):569–75.PubMedCrossRef Dayi O, Bulut E, Karadag M, Bulut H. Ocular biometry characteristics and its relationship with age, gender, spherical equivalent in Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(5):569–75.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin P, Zou H, Zhu J, Xu X, Jin J, Chang TC, Lu L, Yuan H, Sun S, Yan B, et al. Choroidal and Retinal Thickness in Children with different refractive status measured by swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:164–76.PubMedCrossRef Jin P, Zou H, Zhu J, Xu X, Jin J, Chang TC, Lu L, Yuan H, Sun S, Yan B, et al. Choroidal and Retinal Thickness in Children with different refractive status measured by swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:164–76.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee GY, Yu S, Kang HG, Kim JS, Lee KW, Lee J-H. Choroidal Thickness Variation according to refractive error measured by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in Korean Children. Korean J Ophthalmology: KJO. 2017;31(2):151–8.PubMedCentralCrossRef Lee GY, Yu S, Kang HG, Kim JS, Lee KW, Lee J-H. Choroidal Thickness Variation according to refractive error measured by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in Korean Children. Korean J Ophthalmology: KJO. 2017;31(2):151–8.PubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Aykut V, Oner V, Tas M, Iscan Y, Agachan A. Influence of axial length on Peripapillary retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in children: a study by RTVue Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38(12):1241–7.PubMedCrossRef Aykut V, Oner V, Tas M, Iscan Y, Agachan A. Influence of axial length on Peripapillary retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in children: a study by RTVue Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38(12):1241–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera L, Perez-Navarro I, Sanchez-Cano A, Perez-Garcia D, Remon L, Almenara C, Caramello C, Cristobal JA, Pinilla I, CHOROIDAL THICKNESS AND VOLUME IN A HEALTHY PEDIATRIC POPULATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH AGE. AXIAL LENGTH, AMETROPIA, AND SEX. Retin-J Retin Vitr Dis. 2015;35(12):2574–83. Herrera L, Perez-Navarro I, Sanchez-Cano A, Perez-Garcia D, Remon L, Almenara C, Caramello C, Cristobal JA, Pinilla I, CHOROIDAL THICKNESS AND VOLUME IN A HEALTHY PEDIATRIC POPULATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH AGE. AXIAL LENGTH, AMETROPIA, AND SEX. Retin-J Retin Vitr Dis. 2015;35(12):2574–83.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lv L, Li M, Chang X, Zhu M, Liu Y, Wang P, Xiang Y. Macular Retinal Microvasculature of Hyperopia, Emmetropia, and myopia in children. Front Med 2022, 9. Lv L, Li M, Chang X, Zhu M, Liu Y, Wang P, Xiang Y. Macular Retinal Microvasculature of Hyperopia, Emmetropia, and myopia in children. Front Med 2022, 9.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JWY, Yau GSK, Woo TTY, Yick DWF, Tam VTY, Lai JSM. Retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in Myopic, emmetropic, and Hyperopic Children. Med (Baltim) 2015, 94(12). Lee JWY, Yau GSK, Woo TTY, Yick DWF, Tam VTY, Lai JSM. Retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness in Myopic, emmetropic, and Hyperopic Children. Med (Baltim) 2015, 94(12).
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiang Z, Lin Q, Xu Y, Qiang J, Qian Y, Zou H. Analysis of lens power and its influencing factors in children aged 3–12 years. Zhonghua Shiyan Yanke Zazhi/Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology. 2021;39(6):550–6. Xiang Z, Lin Q, Xu Y, Qiang J, Qian Y, Zou H. Analysis of lens power and its influencing factors in children aged 3–12 years. Zhonghua Shiyan Yanke Zazhi/Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology. 2021;39(6):550–6.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Z, Wu Y, Liu X, Zhang L, Meng N, Lyu L, Zhou X, Shi C. Status of refractive development and its influencing factors among 6–12 years old children in the downtown of Zhenjiang city. Zhonghua Shiyan Yanke Zazhi/Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology. 2020;38(12):1071–7. Zhao Z, Wu Y, Liu X, Zhang L, Meng N, Lyu L, Zhou X, Shi C. Status of refractive development and its influencing factors among 6–12 years old children in the downtown of Zhenjiang city. Zhonghua Shiyan Yanke Zazhi/Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology. 2020;38(12):1071–7.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat He J, Chen Q, Yin Y, Zhou H, Fan Y, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Association between retinal microvasculature and optic disc alterations in high myopia. Eye. 2019;33(9):1494–503.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef He J, Chen Q, Yin Y, Zhou H, Fan Y, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Association between retinal microvasculature and optic disc alterations in high myopia. Eye. 2019;33(9):1494–503.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Kong X, Jiang C, Li M, Yu J, Sun X. Is the peripapillary retinal perfusion related to myopia in healthy eyes? A prospective comparative study. Bmj Open 2016, 6(3). Wang X, Kong X, Jiang C, Li M, Yu J, Sun X. Is the peripapillary retinal perfusion related to myopia in healthy eyes? A prospective comparative study. Bmj Open 2016, 6(3).
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Zhu L, Zhu R, Lu Y, Rong X, Zhang Y, Gu X, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Ren Q et al. Automated Analysis of Choroidal Sublayer Morphologic Features in myopic children using EDI-OCT by Deep Learning. Translational Vis Sci Technol 2021, 10(13). Li J, Zhu L, Zhu R, Lu Y, Rong X, Zhang Y, Gu X, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Ren Q et al. Automated Analysis of Choroidal Sublayer Morphologic Features in myopic children using EDI-OCT by Deep Learning. Translational Vis Sci Technol 2021, 10(13).
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan XH, Zhang MM. Evaluation of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in myopic juveniles. Int Eye Sci. 2020;20(12):2054–9. Guan XH, Zhang MM. Evaluation of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in myopic juveniles. Int Eye Sci. 2020;20(12):2054–9.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin T, Su L, Lin J, Qiu H. Study on the Optic nerve Fiber layer thickness and changes in Blood Flow in Myopic Children. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:3287–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lin T, Su L, Lin J, Qiu H. Study on the Optic nerve Fiber layer thickness and changes in Blood Flow in Myopic Children. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:3287–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu YT, Lei YQ, Tian M, Tang M, Duan CX, Lyu HB. Comparison of macular vascular density and retinal thickness in children with different degrees of myopia. Int Eye Sci. 2021;21(5):789–95. Liu YT, Lei YQ, Tian M, Tang M, Duan CX, Lyu HB. Comparison of macular vascular density and retinal thickness in children with different degrees of myopia. Int Eye Sci. 2021;21(5):789–95.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Bueno-Gimeno I, Espana-Gregori E, Gene-Sampedro A, Carlos Ondategui-Parra J, Zapata-Rodriguez CJ. Variations of OCT measurements corrected for the magnification effect according to axial length and refractive error in children. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences 2018, 11(1). Bueno-Gimeno I, Espana-Gregori E, Gene-Sampedro A, Carlos Ondategui-Parra J, Zapata-Rodriguez CJ. Variations of OCT measurements corrected for the magnification effect according to axial length and refractive error in children. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences 2018, 11(1).
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu J, Zeng D, Fan J, Liu M, Zhong H, Shuai X, Zhang S. The accuracy of the axial length and axial length/corneal radius ratio for myopia assessment among Chinese children. Front Pead 2022, 10. Mu J, Zeng D, Fan J, Liu M, Zhong H, Shuai X, Zhang S. The accuracy of the axial length and axial length/corneal radius ratio for myopia assessment among Chinese children. Front Pead 2022, 10.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Li KR, Li QL, Xu XZ, Jiang Q, Cai JH. Effect of axial length and corneal curvature radius and their ratio on refractive errors in children and adolescents. Int Eye Sci. 2019;19(10):1667–71. Li KR, Li QL, Xu XZ, Jiang Q, Cai JH. Effect of axial length and corneal curvature radius and their ratio on refractive errors in children and adolescents. Int Eye Sci. 2019;19(10):1667–71.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Qian Y, Ma Y, Lin Q, Xiang Z, Qiang J, Xu Y, Zou H. Retinal and choroidal changes in children with Moderate-to-High Hyperopia. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:9971564–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Qian Y, Ma Y, Lin Q, Xiang Z, Qiang J, Xu Y, Zou H. Retinal and choroidal changes in children with Moderate-to-High Hyperopia. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:9971564–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenner Y, Brauer V, Kunze K, Besgen V, Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Bertelmann T, Sekundo W. Comparison of Optic Disc parameters in Hyperopic and emmetropic eyes of healthy children with HRT and OCT. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2018;235(10):1129–37.PubMedCrossRef Wenner Y, Brauer V, Kunze K, Besgen V, Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Bertelmann T, Sekundo W. Comparison of Optic Disc parameters in Hyperopic and emmetropic eyes of healthy children with HRT and OCT. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2018;235(10):1129–37.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki K, Sasaki K, Hirota M, Hayashi T, Mizota A. Comparisons of size of foveal avascular zone area among children with posterior microphthalmos, high hyperopia, and normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2022;42(8):2599–607.PubMedCrossRef Sasaki K, Sasaki K, Hirota M, Hayashi T, Mizota A. Comparisons of size of foveal avascular zone area among children with posterior microphthalmos, high hyperopia, and normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2022;42(8):2599–607.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang WP, Zhou R, Zhang J, Ren WN, Li YT, Zhang WF. Correlation between diopters and refractive parameters among 5 to 12 years old school-age children of Lanzhou city. Int Eye Sci. 2013;13(11):2299–302. Wang WP, Zhou R, Zhang J, Ren WN, Li YT, Zhang WF. Correlation between diopters and refractive parameters among 5 to 12 years old school-age children of Lanzhou city. Int Eye Sci. 2013;13(11):2299–302.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Duan F, Yuan Z, Deng J, Wong YL, Yeo AC, Chen X. Choroidal Thickness and Associated Factors among adult myopia: a baseline report from a Medical University Student Cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019;26(4):244–50.PubMedCrossRef Duan F, Yuan Z, Deng J, Wong YL, Yeo AC, Chen X. Choroidal Thickness and Associated Factors among adult myopia: a baseline report from a Medical University Student Cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019;26(4):244–50.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta P, Saw S-M, Cheung CY, Girard MJA, Mari JM, Bhargava M, Tan C, Tan M, Yang A, Tey F, et al. Choroidal thickness and high myopia: a case-control study of young Chinese men in Singapore. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(7):E585–92.PubMedCrossRef Gupta P, Saw S-M, Cheung CY, Girard MJA, Mari JM, Bhargava M, Tan C, Tan M, Yang A, Tey F, et al. Choroidal thickness and high myopia: a case-control study of young Chinese men in Singapore. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(7):E585–92.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta P, Thakku G, Saw S-M, Tan M, Lim E, Tan M, Cheung CMG, Wong T-Y, Cheng C-Y. Characterization of Choroidal Morphologic and Vascular features in Young Men with High Myopia using spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;177:27–33.PubMedCrossRef Gupta P, Thakku G, Saw S-M, Tan M, Lim E, Tan M, Cheung CMG, Wong T-Y, Cheng C-Y. Characterization of Choroidal Morphologic and Vascular features in Young Men with High Myopia using spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;177:27–33.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu X, Zheng X, Lian L, Huang Y, Chuni L, Xia Y, Zhao W, Yu X. Comparative study of relative peripheral refraction in children with different degrees of myopia. Front Med 2022, 9. Lu X, Zheng X, Lian L, Huang Y, Chuni L, Xia Y, Zhao W, Yu X. Comparative study of relative peripheral refraction in children with different degrees of myopia. Front Med 2022, 9.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Su M, Liu H, Song Y, Liu J, Sun H, Wu X, Yang X, Qi L, Du F et al. Development of Refractive Parameters in 3-to 6-Year-Old Children and Its Application in Myopia Prediction and Intervention Guidance. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2021, 2021. Zhang Y, Su M, Liu H, Song Y, Liu J, Sun H, Wu X, Yang X, Qi L, Du F et al. Development of Refractive Parameters in 3-to 6-Year-Old Children and Its Application in Myopia Prediction and Intervention Guidance. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2021, 2021.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Anterior chamber depth measurement using Pentacam and Biograph in children. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(6):582–6.PubMedCrossRef Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Anterior chamber depth measurement using Pentacam and Biograph in children. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(6):582–6.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, He X, Xiong S, Zhou M, Wang M, Zou H, Xu X. Distribution of Anterior Chamber parameters in normal Chinese children and the Associated factors. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(4):357–63.PubMedCrossRef Wang J, He X, Xiong S, Zhou M, Wang M, Zou H, Xu X. Distribution of Anterior Chamber parameters in normal Chinese children and the Associated factors. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(4):357–63.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng J, Li X, Jin J, Zhang B, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X, Xie J, Wang L, Zhu S, et al. Distribution pattern of Choroidal Thickness at the posterior Pole in Chinese Children with Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(3):1577–86.PubMedCrossRef Deng J, Li X, Jin J, Zhang B, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X, Xie J, Wang L, Zhu S, et al. Distribution pattern of Choroidal Thickness at the posterior Pole in Chinese Children with Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(3):1577–86.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Pan Y, Xu J, Li X, Spiegel DP, Bao J, Chen H. Effects of physical exercise on macular vessel density and choroidal thickness in children. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1). Li S, Pan Y, Xu J, Li X, Spiegel DP, Bao J, Chen H. Effects of physical exercise on macular vessel density and choroidal thickness in children. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1).
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu W-Q, Wang D-D, Yang X-X, Pan Y-Y, Song X, Hou Y-S, Wang C-X. Topographic distribution features of the choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Chinese school-aged children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(9):1459–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Liu W-Q, Wang D-D, Yang X-X, Pan Y-Y, Song X, Hou Y-S, Wang C-X. Topographic distribution features of the choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Chinese school-aged children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(9):1459–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CO, Zhang X, Yuan N, Tang S, Chen LJ, Cheung CY, Yam JC. Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1). Lee CO, Zhang X, Yuan N, Tang S, Chen LJ, Cheung CY, Yam JC. Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1).
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Matalia J, Anegondi NS, Veeboy L, Roy AS. Age and myopia associated optical coherence tomography of retina and choroid in pediatric eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(1):77–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Matalia J, Anegondi NS, Veeboy L, Roy AS. Age and myopia associated optical coherence tomography of retina and choroid in pediatric eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(1):77–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Li T, Zhou X, Wang Z, Zhu J, Shen W, Jiang B. Assessment of Retinal and Choroidal Measurements in Chinese School-Age Children with Cirrus-HD Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS One 2016, 11(7). Li T, Zhou X, Wang Z, Zhu J, Shen W, Jiang B. Assessment of Retinal and Choroidal Measurements in Chinese School-Age Children with Cirrus-HD Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS One 2016, 11(7).
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia Z-r, Ying J-l, Zhang J, Zheng S-l. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in myopic children by three-dimensional OCT. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(45):3573–6.PubMed Xia Z-r, Ying J-l, Zhang J, Zheng S-l. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in myopic children by three-dimensional OCT. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(45):3573–6.PubMed
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Yau GSK, Lee JWY, Woo TTY, Wong RLM, Wong IYH. Central Macular Thickness in Children with Myopia, Emmetropia, and Hyperopia: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Biomed Research International 2015, 2015. Yau GSK, Lee JWY, Woo TTY, Wong RLM, Wong IYH. Central Macular Thickness in Children with Myopia, Emmetropia, and Hyperopia: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Biomed Research International 2015, 2015.
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu Q, Chen C, Yao J. Vessel Density and Retinal Thickness from Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography as New Indexes in Adolescent Myopia. J Ophthalmol 2021, 2021. Zhu Q, Chen C, Yao J. Vessel Density and Retinal Thickness from Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography as New Indexes in Adolescent Myopia. J Ophthalmol 2021, 2021.
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng J, He X, Zhang B, Xiong S, Zhu J, Wang L, Wang M, Xu X. Increased Vertical asymmetry of Macular Retinal layers in myopic Chinese children. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(2):225–35.PubMedCrossRef Deng J, He X, Zhang B, Xiong S, Zhu J, Wang L, Wang M, Xu X. Increased Vertical asymmetry of Macular Retinal layers in myopic Chinese children. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(2):225–35.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Zha Y, Zhuang J, Lin D, Feng W, Zheng H, Cai J. Evaluation of myopia on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2017;14(3):2716–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zha Y, Zhuang J, Lin D, Feng W, Zheng H, Cai J. Evaluation of myopia on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2017;14(3):2716–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo HM, Fan DS, Chen ZL. Clinical study on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of children and adolescent measured by OCT. Int Eye Sci. 2015;15(8):1405–8. Guo HM, Fan DS, Chen ZL. Clinical study on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of children and adolescent measured by OCT. Int Eye Sci. 2015;15(8):1405–8.
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang M-T, Li S-M, Li H, Li L, Li S-Y, Zhu B-D, Guo Y-Q, Meng B, Sun Y-Y, Ran A, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and its association with refractive error in Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(8):701–9.PubMedCrossRef Kang M-T, Li S-M, Li H, Li L, Li S-Y, Zhu B-D, Guo Y-Q, Meng B, Sun Y-Y, Ran A, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and its association with refractive error in Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(8):701–9.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Li S-M, Liu L, Li S, Li L, Kang M, Wei S, Wang N. Anyang Childhood Eye Study G: an analysis of macular ganglion cell complex in 7-year-old children in China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Transl Pediatr. 2021;10(8):2052–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang X, Li S-M, Liu L, Li S, Li L, Kang M, Wei S, Wang N. Anyang Childhood Eye Study G: an analysis of macular ganglion cell complex in 7-year-old children in China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Transl Pediatr. 2021;10(8):2052–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Othman SF, Sharanjeet K, Abd Manan F, Zulkarnain AI, Mohamad Z, Ariffin AE. Macular thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography in relation to degree of myopia, axial length and vitreous chamber depth in malay subjects. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(5):484–91.PubMedCrossRef Othman SF, Sharanjeet K, Abd Manan F, Zulkarnain AI, Mohamad Z, Ariffin AE. Macular thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography in relation to degree of myopia, axial length and vitreous chamber depth in malay subjects. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(5):484–91.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, Shipp M, Friedman NE, Kleinstein R, Walker TW, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2003;80(3):226–36.PubMedCrossRef Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, Shipp M, Friedman NE, Kleinstein R, Walker TW, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2003;80(3):226–36.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan Q, Wang H, Jiang Z. Axial length and its relationship to refractive error in Chinese university students. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(2):101470.PubMedCrossRef Fan Q, Wang H, Jiang Z. Axial length and its relationship to refractive error in Chinese university students. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(2):101470.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen T, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K, Jonasson F. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(4):361–6.PubMedCrossRef Olsen T, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K, Jonasson F. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(4):361–6.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato K, Kondo M, Takeuchi M, Hirano K. Refractive error and biometrics of anterior segment of eyes of healthy young university students in Japan. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kato K, Kondo M, Takeuchi M, Hirano K. Refractive error and biometrics of anterior segment of eyes of healthy young university students in Japan. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang XJ, Bao YZ. [Correlation between axial length and corneal curvature and spherical aberration]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017;53(4):255–9.PubMed Wang XJ, Bao YZ. [Correlation between axial length and corneal curvature and spherical aberration]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017;53(4):255–9.PubMed
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman RE, Flanagan JG, Rausch SM, Sigal IA, Tertinegg I, Eilaghi A, Portnoy S, Sled JG, Ethier CR. Dimensions of the human sclera: thickness measurement and regional changes with axial length. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90(2):277–84.PubMedCrossRef Norman RE, Flanagan JG, Rausch SM, Sigal IA, Tertinegg I, Eilaghi A, Portnoy S, Sled JG, Ethier CR. Dimensions of the human sclera: thickness measurement and regional changes with axial length. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90(2):277–84.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen TW, Aaberg SY, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF. Human sclera: thickness and surface area. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(2):237–41.PubMedCrossRef Olsen TW, Aaberg SY, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF. Human sclera: thickness and surface area. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(2):237–41.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiwara T, Imamura Y, Margolis R, Slakter JS, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(3):445–50.PubMedCrossRef Fujiwara T, Imamura Y, Margolis R, Slakter JS, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(3):445–50.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang IC, Shimada N, Tanaka Y, Nagaoka N, Moriyama M, Yoshida T, Ohno-Matsui K. Comparison of clinical features in highly myopic eyes with and without a Dome-shaped Macula. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1591–600.PubMedCrossRef Liang IC, Shimada N, Tanaka Y, Nagaoka N, Moriyama M, Yoshida T, Ohno-Matsui K. Comparison of clinical features in highly myopic eyes with and without a Dome-shaped Macula. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1591–600.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei WB, Xu L, Jonas JB, Shao L, Du KF, Wang S, Chen CX, Xu J, Wang YX, Zhou JQ, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):175–80.PubMedCrossRef Wei WB, Xu L, Jonas JB, Shao L, Du KF, Wang S, Chen CX, Xu J, Wang YX, Zhou JQ, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):175–80.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohsugi H, Ikuno Y, Oshima K, Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H. Morphologic characteristics of macular Complications of a dome-shaped macula determined by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):162–170e161.PubMedCrossRef Ohsugi H, Ikuno Y, Oshima K, Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H. Morphologic characteristics of macular Complications of a dome-shaped macula determined by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):162–170e161.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Caillaux V, Gaucher D, Gualino V, Massin P, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A. Morphologic characterization of dome-shaped macula in myopic eyes with serous macular detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):958–967e951.PubMedCrossRef Caillaux V, Gaucher D, Gualino V, Massin P, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A. Morphologic characterization of dome-shaped macula in myopic eyes with serous macular detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):958–967e951.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheiman M, Gwiazda J, Zhang Q, Deng L, Fern K, Manny RE, Weissberg E, Hyman L. Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature and its relationship to axial length in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET) cohort. J Optom. 2016;9(1):13–21.PubMedCrossRef Scheiman M, Gwiazda J, Zhang Q, Deng L, Fern K, Manny RE, Weissberg E, Hyman L. Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature and its relationship to axial length in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET) cohort. J Optom. 2016;9(1):13–21.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Benzir M, Afroze A, Zahan A, Naznin RA, Khanam A, Sumi SA, Haq MA, Lugova H, Haque M. A study linking axial length, corneal curvature, and Eye Axis with demographic characteristics in the emmetropic eyes of Bangladeshi people. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e29925.PubMedPubMedCentral Benzir M, Afroze A, Zahan A, Naznin RA, Khanam A, Sumi SA, Haq MA, Lugova H, Haque M. A study linking axial length, corneal curvature, and Eye Axis with demographic characteristics in the emmetropic eyes of Bangladeshi people. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e29925.PubMedPubMedCentral
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing S, Yi X, Lei Y, Hu L, Cheng W, Wen T, Liu X, Luo M. Prevalence and risk factors for myopia and high myopia: a cross-sectional study among Han and Uyghur students in Xinjiang, China. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics: The Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2022;42(1):28–35.CrossRef Jing S, Yi X, Lei Y, Hu L, Cheng W, Wen T, Liu X, Luo M. Prevalence and risk factors for myopia and high myopia: a cross-sectional study among Han and Uyghur students in Xinjiang, China. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics: The Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2022;42(1):28–35.CrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Guggenheim JA, Zhou X, Evans DM, Timpson NJ, McMahon G, Kemp JP, St Pourcain B, Northstone K, Ring SM, Fan Q, et al. Coordinated genetic scaling of the human eye: shared determination of axial eye length and corneal curvature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):1715–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guggenheim JA, Zhou X, Evans DM, Timpson NJ, McMahon G, Kemp JP, St Pourcain B, Northstone K, Ring SM, Fan Q, et al. Coordinated genetic scaling of the human eye: shared determination of axial eye length and corneal curvature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):1715–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Grosvenor T, Scott R. Role of the axial length/corneal radius ratio in determining the refractive state of the eye. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 1994;71(9):573–9.PubMedCrossRef Grosvenor T, Scott R. Role of the axial length/corneal radius ratio in determining the refractive state of the eye. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 1994;71(9):573–9.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahi-Nia T, Fotouhi A. Axial length to corneal radius of curvature ratio and refractive errors. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013;8(3):220–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahi-Nia T, Fotouhi A. Axial length to corneal radius of curvature ratio and refractive errors. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013;8(3):220–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Li SM, Wei S, Atchison DA, Kang MT, Liu L, Li H, Li S, Yang Z, Wang Y, Zhang F, et al. Annual incidences and progressions of Myopia and High Myopia in Chinese Schoolchildren based on a 5-Year Cohort Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(1):8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li SM, Wei S, Atchison DA, Kang MT, Liu L, Li H, Li S, Yang Z, Wang Y, Zhang F, et al. Annual incidences and progressions of Myopia and High Myopia in Chinese Schoolchildren based on a 5-Year Cohort Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(1):8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(7):2317–27.PubMedCrossRef Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(7):2317–27.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Saw SM, Tong L, Chua WH, Chia KS, Koh D, Tan DT, Katz J. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRef Saw SM, Tong L, Chua WH, Chia KS, Koh D, Tan DT, Katz J. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Shih YF, Chiang TH, Lin LL. Lens thickness changes among schoolchildren in Taiwan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2637–44.PubMedCrossRef Shih YF, Chiang TH, Lin LL. Lens thickness changes among schoolchildren in Taiwan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2637–44.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE, Frane SL, Lin WK, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3074–80.PubMedCrossRef Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE, Frane SL, Lin WK, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3074–80.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;47:86–106.PubMedCrossRef Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;47:86–106.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu G, Wu G, Du Z, Zhu S, Guo Y, Yu H, Hu Y. Distribution of White-to-White corneal diameter and Anterior Chamber depth in Chinese myopic patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:732719.PubMedCrossRef Xu G, Wu G, Du Z, Zhu S, Guo Y, Yu H, Hu Y. Distribution of White-to-White corneal diameter and Anterior Chamber depth in Chinese myopic patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:732719.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Muralidharan G, Martínez-Enríquez E, Birkenfeld J, Velasco-Ocana M, Pérez-Merino P, Marcos S. Morphological changes of human crystalline lens in myopia. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10(12):6084–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Muralidharan G, Martínez-Enríquez E, Birkenfeld J, Velasco-Ocana M, Pérez-Merino P, Marcos S. Morphological changes of human crystalline lens in myopia. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10(12):6084–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig T, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an east Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(2):257–63.PubMedCrossRef Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig T, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an east Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(2):257–63.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Zurück zum Zitat AlMahmoud T, Priest D, Munger R, Jackson WB. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1235–42.PubMedCrossRef AlMahmoud T, Priest D, Munger R, Jackson WB. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1235–42.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivannaboon S. Relationship between corneal thickness and level of myopia. J Med Association Thailand = Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2002;85(2):162–6. Srivannaboon S. Relationship between corneal thickness and level of myopia. J Med Association Thailand = Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2002;85(2):162–6.
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz S, Mena L, Rio-San Cristobal A, Martin R. Relationships between central and peripheral corneal thickness in different degrees of myopia. J Optom. 2014;7(1):44–50.PubMedCrossRef Ortiz S, Mena L, Rio-San Cristobal A, Martin R. Relationships between central and peripheral corneal thickness in different degrees of myopia. J Optom. 2014;7(1):44–50.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Obeidan S, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Amro SA. The relationship between central corneal thickness and degree of myopia among Saudi adults. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29(5):373–8.PubMedCrossRef Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Obeidan S, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Amro SA. The relationship between central corneal thickness and degree of myopia among Saudi adults. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29(5):373–8.PubMedCrossRef
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MJ, Liu YT, Tsai CC, Chen YC, Chou CK, Lee SM. Relationship between central corneal thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length. J Chin Med Association: JCMA. 2009;72(3):133–7.CrossRef Chen MJ, Liu YT, Tsai CC, Chen YC, Chou CK, Lee SM. Relationship between central corneal thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length. J Chin Med Association: JCMA. 2009;72(3):133–7.CrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou P, Wang DD, Fan L, Yang L, Zhao MW. Thin central corneal thickness may be a risk factor for myopia progression in children. J Ophthalmol. 2023;2023:3815863.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhou P, Wang DD, Fan L, Yang L, Zhao MW. Thin central corneal thickness may be a risk factor for myopia progression in children. J Ophthalmol. 2023;2023:3815863.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
114.
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Wang L, Xu Y, Pang Z, Mu G. The influence of the choroid on the onset and development of myopia: from perspectives of choroidal thickness and blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(7):730–8.PubMedCrossRef Liu Y, Wang L, Xu Y, Pang Z, Mu G. The influence of the choroid on the onset and development of myopia: from perspectives of choroidal thickness and blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(7):730–8.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgerald ME, Wildsoet CF, Reiner A. Temporal relationship of choroidal blood flow and thickness changes during recovery from form deprivation myopia in chicks. Exp Eye Res. 2002;74(5):561–70.PubMedCrossRef Fitzgerald ME, Wildsoet CF, Reiner A. Temporal relationship of choroidal blood flow and thickness changes during recovery from form deprivation myopia in chicks. Exp Eye Res. 2002;74(5):561–70.PubMedCrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett MH, McFadden SA. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig. Vis Res. 2009;49(2):219–27.PubMedCrossRef Howlett MH, McFadden SA. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig. Vis Res. 2009;49(2):219–27.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu F, Zhou X, Jiang L, Fu Y, Lai X, Xie R, Qu J. Axial myopia induced by hyperopic defocus in guinea pigs: a detailed assessment on susceptibility and recovery. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89(1):101–8.PubMedCrossRef Lu F, Zhou X, Jiang L, Fu Y, Lai X, Xie R, Qu J. Axial myopia induced by hyperopic defocus in guinea pigs: a detailed assessment on susceptibility and recovery. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89(1):101–8.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin JW, Shin YU, Lee BR. Choroidal thickness and volume mapping by a six radial scan protocol on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(5):1017–23.PubMedCrossRef Shin JW, Shin YU, Lee BR. Choroidal thickness and volume mapping by a six radial scan protocol on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(5):1017–23.PubMedCrossRef
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CS, Cheong KX, Lim LW, Li KZ. Topographic variation of choroidal and retinal thicknesses at the macula in healthy adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(3):339–44.PubMedCrossRef Tan CS, Cheong KX, Lim LW, Li KZ. Topographic variation of choroidal and retinal thicknesses at the macula in healthy adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(3):339–44.PubMedCrossRef
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Fontaine M, Gaucher D, Sauer A, Speeg-Schatz C. Choroidal Thickness and Ametropia in children: a longitudinal study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(6):730–4.PubMedCrossRef Fontaine M, Gaucher D, Sauer A, Speeg-Schatz C. Choroidal Thickness and Ametropia in children: a longitudinal study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(6):730–4.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin P, Zou H, Xu X, Chang TC, Zhu J, Deng J, Lv M, Jin J, Sun S, Wang L, et al. LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN CHOROIDAL AND RETINAL THICKNESSES IN CHILDREN WITH MYOPIC SHIFT. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2019;39(6):1091–9.PubMedCrossRef Jin P, Zou H, Xu X, Chang TC, Zhu J, Deng J, Lv M, Jin J, Sun S, Wang L, et al. LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN CHOROIDAL AND RETINAL THICKNESSES IN CHILDREN WITH MYOPIC SHIFT. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2019;39(6):1091–9.PubMedCrossRef
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DY, Silverman RH, Chan RV, Khanifar AA, Rondeau M, Lloyd H, Schlegel P, Coleman DJ. Measurement of choroidal perfusion and thickness following systemic sildenafil (Viagra(®)). Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):183–8.PubMedCrossRef Kim DY, Silverman RH, Chan RV, Khanifar AA, Rondeau M, Lloyd H, Schlegel P, Coleman DJ. Measurement of choroidal perfusion and thickness following systemic sildenafil (Viagra(®)). Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):183–8.PubMedCrossRef
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamoto M, Matsuura T, Ogata N. Choroidal thickness and choroidal blood flow after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy. Opthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46(1):25–32.CrossRef Okamoto M, Matsuura T, Ogata N. Choroidal thickness and choroidal blood flow after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy. Opthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46(1):25–32.CrossRef
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang S, Zhang G, Zhou X, Xu R, Wang S, Guan Z, Lu J, Srinivasalu N, Shen M, Jin Z, et al. Changes in Choroidal Thickness and Choroidal Blood Perfusion in Guinea Pig Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(8):3074–83.PubMedCrossRef Zhang S, Zhang G, Zhou X, Xu R, Wang S, Guan Z, Lu J, Srinivasalu N, Shen M, Jin Z, et al. Changes in Choroidal Thickness and Choroidal Blood Perfusion in Guinea Pig Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(8):3074–83.PubMedCrossRef
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou X, Zhang S, Zhang G, Chen Y, Lei Y, Xiang J, Xu R, Qu J, Zhou X. Increased choroidal blood perfusion can inhibit form deprivation myopia in Guinea Pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(13):25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhou X, Zhang S, Zhang G, Chen Y, Lei Y, Xiang J, Xu R, Qu J, Zhou X. Increased choroidal blood perfusion can inhibit form deprivation myopia in Guinea Pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(13):25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CS, Cheong KX. Macular choroidal thicknesses in healthy adults–relationship with ocular and demographic factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(10):6452–8.PubMedCrossRef Tan CS, Cheong KX. Macular choroidal thicknesses in healthy adults–relationship with ocular and demographic factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(10):6452–8.PubMedCrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirata M, Tsujikawa A, Matsumoto A, Hangai M, Ooto S, Yamashiro K, Akiba M, Yoshimura N. Macular choroidal thickness and volume in normal subjects measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):4971–8.PubMedCrossRef Hirata M, Tsujikawa A, Matsumoto A, Hangai M, Ooto S, Yamashiro K, Akiba M, Yoshimura N. Macular choroidal thickness and volume in normal subjects measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):4971–8.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3586–93.PubMedCrossRef Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3586–93.PubMedCrossRef
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Devarajan K, Sim R, Chua J, Wong CW, Matsumura S, Htoon HM, Schmetterer L, Saw SM, Ang M. Optical coherence tomography angiography for the assessment of choroidal vasculature in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(7):917–23.PubMedCrossRef Devarajan K, Sim R, Chua J, Wong CW, Matsumura S, Htoon HM, Schmetterer L, Saw SM, Ang M. Optical coherence tomography angiography for the assessment of choroidal vasculature in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(7):917–23.PubMedCrossRef
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong S, He X, Zhang B, Deng J, Wang J, Lv M, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Changes in Choroidal Thickness Varied by Age and Refraction in Children and adolescents: a 1-Year longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:46–56.PubMedCrossRef Xiong S, He X, Zhang B, Deng J, Wang J, Lv M, Zhu J, Zou H, Xu X. Changes in Choroidal Thickness Varied by Age and Refraction in Children and adolescents: a 1-Year longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:46–56.PubMedCrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong D, Sung KR, Jo YH, Yun SC. Age-related physiologic thinning rate of the retinal nerve Fiber layer in different levels of myopia. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1873581.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jeong D, Sung KR, Jo YH, Yun SC. Age-related physiologic thinning rate of the retinal nerve Fiber layer in different levels of myopia. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1873581.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam DS, Leung KS, Mohamed S, Chan WM, Palanivelu MS, Cheung CY, Li EY, Lai RY, Leung CK. Regional variations in the relationship between macular thickness measurements and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(1):376–82.PubMedCrossRef Lam DS, Leung KS, Mohamed S, Chan WM, Palanivelu MS, Cheung CY, Li EY, Lai RY, Leung CK. Regional variations in the relationship between macular thickness measurements and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(1):376–82.PubMedCrossRef
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, Yang H, Xu L, Jonas JB. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e43172.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, Yang H, Xu L, Jonas JB. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e43172.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian F, Zheng D, Zhang J, Liu L, Duan J, Guo Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Sang Y, Zhang X, et al. Choroidal and Retinal Thickness and Axial Eye Elongation in Chinese Junior Students. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(9):26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tian F, Zheng D, Zhang J, Liu L, Duan J, Guo Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Sang Y, Zhang X, et al. Choroidal and Retinal Thickness and Axial Eye Elongation in Chinese Junior Students. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(9):26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas JB, Xu L, Wei WB, Pan Z, Yang H, Holbach L, Panda-Jonas S, Wang YX. Retinal thickness and axial length. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(4):1791–7.PubMedCrossRef Jonas JB, Xu L, Wei WB, Pan Z, Yang H, Holbach L, Panda-Jonas S, Wang YX. Retinal thickness and axial length. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(4):1791–7.PubMedCrossRef
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim MC, Hoh ST, Foster PJ, Lim TH, Chew SJ, Seah SK, Aung T. Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(3):974–8.PubMedCrossRef Lim MC, Hoh ST, Foster PJ, Lim TH, Chew SJ, Seah SK, Aung T. Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(3):974–8.PubMedCrossRef
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang YH, Kim YY. Macular thickness and volume of myopic eyes measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(5):492–8.PubMedCrossRef Hwang YH, Kim YY. Macular thickness and volume of myopic eyes measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(5):492–8.PubMedCrossRef
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng SC, Lam CS, Yap MK. Retinal thickness in myopic and non-myopic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(6):776–84.PubMedCrossRef Cheng SC, Lam CS, Yap MK. Retinal thickness in myopic and non-myopic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(6):776–84.PubMedCrossRef
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang Z, Shen M, Xie R, Qu J, Xue A, Lu F. Interocular evaluation of axial length and retinal thickness in people with myopic anisometropia. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(4):277–82.PubMedCrossRef Jiang Z, Shen M, Xie R, Qu J, Xue A, Lu F. Interocular evaluation of axial length and retinal thickness in people with myopic anisometropia. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(4):277–82.PubMedCrossRef
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakitani Y, Sasoh M, Sugimoto M, Ito Y, Ido M, Uji Y. Macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects with different axial lengths using optical coherence tomography. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2003;23(2):177–82.PubMedCrossRef Wakitani Y, Sasoh M, Sugimoto M, Ito Y, Ido M, Uji Y. Macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects with different axial lengths using optical coherence tomography. Retina (Philadelphia Pa). 2003;23(2):177–82.PubMedCrossRef
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas JB, Ohno-Matsui K, Panda-Jonas S. Myopia: anatomic changes and consequences for its etiology. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8(5):355–9.PubMedCrossRef Jonas JB, Ohno-Matsui K, Panda-Jonas S. Myopia: anatomic changes and consequences for its etiology. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8(5):355–9.PubMedCrossRef
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Ooto S, Hangai M, Tomidokoro A, Saito H, Araie M, Otani T, Kishi S, Matsushita K, Maeda N, Shirakashi M, et al. Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8769–79.PubMedCrossRef Ooto S, Hangai M, Tomidokoro A, Saito H, Araie M, Otani T, Kishi S, Matsushita K, Maeda N, Shirakashi M, et al. Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8769–79.PubMedCrossRef
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Otani T, Kishi S, Matsushita K, Maeda N, Shirakashi M, et al. Three-dimensional profile of macular retinal thickness in normal Japanese eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):465–73.PubMedCrossRef Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Otani T, Kishi S, Matsushita K, Maeda N, Shirakashi M, et al. Three-dimensional profile of macular retinal thickness in normal Japanese eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):465–73.PubMedCrossRef
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CY, Huang EJ, Kuo CN, Wu PL, Chen CL, Wu PC, Wu SH, King YC, Lai CH. The relationship between age, axial length and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the normal elderly population in Taiwan: the Chiayi eye study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0194116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen CY, Huang EJ, Kuo CN, Wu PL, Chen CL, Wu PC, Wu SH, King YC, Lai CH. The relationship between age, axial length and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the normal elderly population in Taiwan: the Chiayi eye study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0194116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Alasil T, Wang K, Keane PA, Lee H, Baniasadi N, de Boer JF, Chen TC. Analysis of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by age, sex, and race using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):532–41.PubMedCrossRef Alasil T, Wang K, Keane PA, Lee H, Baniasadi N, de Boer JF, Chen TC. Analysis of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by age, sex, and race using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):532–41.PubMedCrossRef
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Lee EJ, Kim TW. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profile in subjects with myopia measured using the Stratus optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(1):115–20.PubMedCrossRef Kim MJ, Lee EJ, Kim TW. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profile in subjects with myopia measured using the Stratus optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(1):115–20.PubMedCrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung CK, Mohamed S, Leung KS, Cheung CY, Chan SL, Cheng DK, Lee AK, Leung GY, Rao SK, Lam DS. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5171–6.PubMedCrossRef Leung CK, Mohamed S, Leung KS, Cheung CY, Chan SL, Cheng DK, Lee AK, Leung GY, Rao SK, Lam DS. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5171–6.PubMedCrossRef
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Huang J, Zou H, Xue W, Ma Y, He X, Lu L, Zhu J. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal Chinese students aged 6 to 17 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):7990–7.PubMedCrossRef Chen L, Huang J, Zou H, Xue W, Ma Y, He X, Lu L, Zhu J. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal Chinese students aged 6 to 17 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):7990–7.PubMedCrossRef
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu BD, Li SM, Li H, Liu LR, Wang Y, Yang Z, Li SY, Kang MT, Fu J, Qi YH, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in a population of 12-year-old children in central China measured by iVue-100 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):8104–11.PubMedCrossRef Zhu BD, Li SM, Li H, Liu LR, Wang Y, Yang Z, Li SY, Kang MT, Fu J, Qi YH, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in a population of 12-year-old children in central China measured by iVue-100 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):8104–11.PubMedCrossRef
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Kausar A, Akhtar N, Afzal F, Ali K. Effect of refractive errors/axial length on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) measured by Topcon SD-OCT. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2018;68(7):1054–9.PubMed Kausar A, Akhtar N, Afzal F, Ali K. Effect of refractive errors/axial length on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) measured by Topcon SD-OCT. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2018;68(7):1054–9.PubMed
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan NYQ, Sng CCA, Jonas JB, Wong TY, Jansonius NM, Ang M. Glaucoma in myopia: diagnostic dilemmas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(10):1347–55.PubMedCrossRef Tan NYQ, Sng CCA, Jonas JB, Wong TY, Jansonius NM, Ang M. Glaucoma in myopia: diagnostic dilemmas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(10):1347–55.PubMedCrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan BC, O’Leary N, AlMobarak FA, Reis ASC, Yang H, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Burgoyne CF. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):535–43.PubMedCrossRef Chauhan BC, O’Leary N, AlMobarak FA, Reis ASC, Yang H, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Burgoyne CF. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):535–43.PubMedCrossRef
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik R, Belliveau AC, Sharpe GP, Shuba LM, Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT. Diagnostic accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography and scanning laser tomography for identifying Glaucoma in myopic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1181–9.PubMedCrossRef Malik R, Belliveau AC, Sharpe GP, Shuba LM, Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT. Diagnostic accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography and scanning laser tomography for identifying Glaucoma in myopic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1181–9.PubMedCrossRef
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Rebolleda G, Casado A, Oblanca N, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. The new Bruch’s membrane opening - minimum rim width classification improves optical coherence tomography specificity in tilted discs. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2417–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rebolleda G, Casado A, Oblanca N, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. The new Bruch’s membrane opening - minimum rim width classification improves optical coherence tomography specificity in tilted discs. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2417–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Sastre-Ibañez M, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Rebolleda G, Cifuentes-Canorea P, Nieves-Moreno M, Morales-Fernandez L, Saenz-Frances F, Garcia-Feijoo J. Utility of Bruch membrane opening-based optic nerve head parameters in myopic subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(1):42–6.PubMedCrossRef Sastre-Ibañez M, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Rebolleda G, Cifuentes-Canorea P, Nieves-Moreno M, Morales-Fernandez L, Saenz-Frances F, Garcia-Feijoo J. Utility of Bruch membrane opening-based optic nerve head parameters in myopic subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(1):42–6.PubMedCrossRef
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai DC, Huang N, Hwu JJ, Jueng RN, Chou P. Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56(4):362–70.PubMedCrossRef Tsai DC, Huang N, Hwu JJ, Jueng RN, Chou P. Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56(4):362–70.PubMedCrossRef
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SH, Hong SW, Im SK, Lee SH, Ahn MD. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):4075–83.PubMedCrossRef Kang SH, Hong SW, Im SK, Lee SH, Ahn MD. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):4075–83.PubMedCrossRef
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung CK, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Mak HK, Lai G, Ye C, Lam DS. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: interpreting the RNFL maps in healthy myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7194–200.PubMedCrossRef Leung CK, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Mak HK, Lai G, Ye C, Lam DS. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: interpreting the RNFL maps in healthy myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7194–200.PubMedCrossRef
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, Varma R, Huang D. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2305–2314e2301.PubMedCrossRef Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, Varma R, Huang D. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2305–2314e2301.PubMedCrossRef
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Marziani E, Pomati S, Ramolfo P, Cigada M, Giani A, Mariani C, Staurenghi G. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer thickness in Alzheimer’s Disease using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(9):5953–8.PubMedCrossRef Marziani E, Pomati S, Ramolfo P, Cigada M, Giani A, Mariani C, Staurenghi G. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer thickness in Alzheimer’s Disease using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(9):5953–8.PubMedCrossRef
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MH, Lam AKC, Armitage JA, Hanna L, To CH, Gentle A. Impact of Axial Eye size on retinal microvasculature density in the Macular Region. J Clin Med 2020, 9(8). Khan MH, Lam AKC, Armitage JA, Hanna L, To CH, Gentle A. Impact of Axial Eye size on retinal microvasculature density in the Macular Region. J Clin Med 2020, 9(8).
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu B, Wang Y, Zhang P, Liu Y, Jia H, Wang F, Zhou M, Sun X. Evaluation of the association of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness and myopia in Chinese young adults. Eye. 2021;35(2):393–9.PubMedCrossRef Lu B, Wang Y, Zhang P, Liu Y, Jia H, Wang F, Zhou M, Sun X. Evaluation of the association of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness and myopia in Chinese young adults. Eye. 2021;35(2):393–9.PubMedCrossRef
164.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi YJ, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim DM. Glaucoma detection ability of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):2296–304.PubMedCrossRef Choi YJ, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim DM. Glaucoma detection ability of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):2296–304.PubMedCrossRef
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Min CH, Al-Qattan HM, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH, Kim YJ. Macular Microvasculature in High Myopia without pathologic changes: an Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(2):106–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Min CH, Al-Qattan HM, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH, Kim YJ. Macular Microvasculature in High Myopia without pathologic changes: an Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(2):106–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
166.
Zurück zum Zitat Li M, Yang Y, Jiang H, Gregori G, Roisman L, Zheng F, Ke B, Qu D, Wang J. Retinal Microvascular Network and Microcirculation assessments in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;174:56–67.PubMedCrossRef Li M, Yang Y, Jiang H, Gregori G, Roisman L, Zheng F, Ke B, Qu D, Wang J. Retinal Microvascular Network and Microcirculation assessments in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;174:56–67.PubMedCrossRef
167.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Sheikh M, Phasukkijwatana N, Dolz-Marco R, Rahimi M, Iafe NA, Freund KB, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Quantitative OCT angiography of the retinal microvasculature and the Choriocapillaris in myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(4):2063–9.PubMedCrossRef Al-Sheikh M, Phasukkijwatana N, Dolz-Marco R, Rahimi M, Iafe NA, Freund KB, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Quantitative OCT angiography of the retinal microvasculature and the Choriocapillaris in myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(4):2063–9.PubMedCrossRef
168.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada N, Ohno-Matsui K, Harino S, Yoshida T, Yasuzumi K, Kojima A, Kobayashi K, Futagami S, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M. Reduction of retinal blood flow in high myopia. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology = Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv fur Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2004;242(4):284–8.PubMedCrossRef Shimada N, Ohno-Matsui K, Harino S, Yoshida T, Yasuzumi K, Kojima A, Kobayashi K, Futagami S, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M. Reduction of retinal blood flow in high myopia. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology = Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv fur Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2004;242(4):284–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Zengrui Zhang
Jingyu Mu
Jing Wei
Haoming Geng
Chunmeng Liu
Wenhua Yi
Yue Sun
Junguo Duan
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03222-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Die überschießende Wundheilung in der filtrierenden Glaukomchirurgie ist ein zentraler Faktor für ein operatives Versagen. Nach der Einführung der Trabekulektomie in den 1960er-Jahren wurden viele Faktoren erkannt, die mit einer vermehrten …

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.