Correction: BMC Public Health 22, 763 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13129-5
Anzeige
In the original publication of this article there was an error in some of the excel formulas and they pulled from the wrong data.
This caused errors in the below locations:
-
Result section
-
Discussion section
-
Table 5, 6 and 7
This doesn’t have a large impact on the results/conclusions, as the cell values were correct, it was the reporting of the percentages. There was no real consistency among the values across the various influencer types and their use in the captions and images, so the interpretation of the results remain the same.
The original article has been updated to correct these errors. The affected sections are shown in Additional file 1 (yellow highlight).
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.