Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

01.11.2011 | original article

Craniofacial differences between skeletal Class II and skeletal Class I malocclusions according to vertical classification

verfasst von: Ulas Oz, Meliha Rubenduz

Erschienen in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine morphological differences among Class II, division 1 (Class II,1) subjects with different rotation models according to mandibular plane inclination and to compare these with normal subjects.

Methods

The study consisted of 132 subjects (99 Class II,1 and 33 Class I control group). The Class II,1 group included subjects who had ANB (point A-nasion-point B) angles greater than 4° with an overjet equal to or greater than 5 mm. Based on the SN/Go-Gn (cranial base anterior length/gonion-gnathion) angle, subjects were divided into three different rotation models as hypodivergent, normodivergent and hyperdivergent. Variance analysis (ANOVA) was used to assess the presence of differences between groups (p < 0.05).

Results

There was no statistical difference among the three groups in Class II,1 malocclusion according to upper face height (N-ANS), total mandibular size (Cd-Pg) and mandibular corpus size (Go-Gn) (p > 0.05). Although the ramus (Cd-Go) was significantly shorter in the Class II,1 hyperdivergent group (p < 0.05), the hypodivergent group had similar ramus heights compared with controls.

Conclusions

Class II groups showed a similar increase in the ANB angle in spite of a different vertical rotation type. This study concludes that future Class II studies should divide subjects into subgroups according to hypodivergent, neutral and hyperdivergent phenotypes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson D, Popovich F. Lower cranial height vs. craniofacial dimension in angle Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1983;53(3):253–60.PubMed Anderson D, Popovich F. Lower cranial height vs. craniofacial dimension in angle Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1983;53(3):253–60.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:502–9.PubMedCrossRef Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:502–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Stahl F, McNamara JA Jr. Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:148–54.PubMedCrossRef Baccetti T, Stahl F, McNamara JA Jr. Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:148–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bacon W, Eiller V, Hildwein M, Dubois G. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:224–28.PubMed Bacon W, Eiller V, Hildwein M, Dubois G. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:224–28.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Betzenberger D, Ruf S, Pancherz H. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: a comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:27–32.PubMed Betzenberger D, Ruf S, Pancherz H. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: a comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:27–32.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara ES. Class II malocclusions: diagnostic and clinical considerations with and without treatment. Semin Orthod. 2006;12:11–24.CrossRef Bishara ES. Class II malocclusions: diagnostic and clinical considerations with and without treatment. Semin Orthod. 2006;12:11–24.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Vorhies B, Bayati P. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:55–66.PubMed Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Vorhies B, Bayati P. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:55–66.PubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:9–34.PubMedCrossRef Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:9–34.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Blair ES. A cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the skeletal morphology of Class I, Class II, Div. 1, and Class II, Div. 2 (angle) malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1954;24:106–19. Blair ES. A cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the skeletal morphology of Class I, Class II, Div. 1, and Class II, Div. 2 (angle) malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1954;24:106–19.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CH, Wong WW. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:619–26.PubMedCrossRef Chung CH, Wong WW. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:619–26.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Craig CE. The skeletal patterns characteristic of Class I and Class II division 1 malocclusions in normalateralis. Angle Orthod. 1951;21:44–56.PubMed Craig CE. The skeletal patterns characteristic of Class I and Class II division 1 malocclusions in normalateralis. Angle Orthod. 1951;21:44–56.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dibbets JMH. Morphological associations between the angle classes. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:111–18.PubMedCrossRef Dibbets JMH. Morphological associations between the angle classes. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:111–18.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Drelich RC. A cephalometric study of untreated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1948;18:70–75. Drelich RC. A cephalometric study of untreated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1948;18:70–75.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Greulich WW, Pyle IS. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. California: Stanford University Press, Stanford; 1959. Greulich WW, Pyle IS. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. California: Stanford University Press, Stanford; 1959.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:470–77.PubMed Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:470–77.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkin GB, Houston WJB, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:250–55.PubMed Hopkin GB, Houston WJB, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:250–55.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter S. The vertical dimension of the face and skeletodental retrognathism. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:586–95.PubMedCrossRef Hunter S. The vertical dimension of the face and skeletodental retrognathism. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:586–95.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Isaacson JR, Speidal TM, Worms FW. Extreme variations in vertical facial growth and associated variations in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:219–29.PubMed Isaacson JR, Speidal TM, Worms FW. Extreme variations in vertical facial growth and associated variations in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:219–29.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod. 2001;28:211–5.PubMedCrossRef Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod. 2001;28:211–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Järvinen S. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles. Br J Orthod. 1984;11:209–13.PubMed Järvinen S. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles. Br J Orthod. 1984;11:209–13.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Keski-Nisula K, Keski-Nisula L, Makela P, Torkko TM, Varrela J. Dentofacial features of children with distal occlusions, large overjets, and deepbites in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:292–99.PubMedCrossRef Keski-Nisula K, Keski-Nisula L, Makela P, Torkko TM, Varrela J. Dentofacial features of children with distal occlusions, large overjets, and deepbites in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:292–99.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177–202.PubMed McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177–202.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nair R, Deguchi TS, Li X, Katashiba S, Chan YH. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12:9–13.PubMedCrossRef Nair R, Deguchi TS, Li X, Katashiba S, Chan YH. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12:9–13.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:103–16.PubMedCrossRef Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:103–16.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein T, Yoon-Tarlie C. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited) - Part 1: characteristics of size, form and position. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:320–32.PubMedCrossRef Rothstein T, Yoon-Tarlie C. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited) - Part 1: characteristics of size, form and position. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:320–32.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sassouni V, Nanda S. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:801–23.CrossRef Sassouni V, Nanda S. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:801–23.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sayin ÖM, Türkkahraman H. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:656–60.PubMed Sayin ÖM, Türkkahraman H. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:656–60.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker B, Misholovich DJ. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:398–408.PubMedCrossRef Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker B, Misholovich DJ. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:398–408.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod. 1964;34:75–93. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod. 1964;34:75–93.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? Angle Orthod. 1985;55:127–38.PubMed Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? Angle Orthod. 1985;55:127–38.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl F, Bacccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:125–37.PubMedCrossRef Stahl F, Bacccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:125–37.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Standerwick RG. Not all Class II patients alike. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:573–9.CrossRef Standerwick RG. Not all Class II patients alike. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:573–9.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Openbite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:337–58.CrossRef Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Openbite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:337–58.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanabe Y, Taguchi Y, Noda T. Relationship between cranial base structure and maxillofacial components in children aged 3–5 years. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:175–81.PubMedCrossRef Tanabe Y, Taguchi Y, Noda T. Relationship between cranial base structure and maxillofacial components in children aged 3–5 years. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:175–81.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulgen M. Cephalometric study of no anomaly showing well compensated hyper- and hypodivergent cases. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1984;45:348–59.PubMedCrossRef Ulgen M. Cephalometric study of no anomaly showing well compensated hyper- and hypodivergent cases. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1984;45:348–59.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Varrela J. Early developmental traits in Class II malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:375–77.PubMedCrossRef Varrela J. Early developmental traits in Class II malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:375–77.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Craniofacial differences between skeletal Class II and skeletal Class I malocclusions according to vertical classification
verfasst von
Ulas Oz
Meliha Rubenduz
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2011
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1867-2221
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-223X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-011-0021-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Welche Verletzungen an Mund und Zähnen auf Missbrauch und Vernachlässigung hindeuten

Schlechte Zähne und Verletzungen im Mundraum können erste Warnzeichen für Missbrauch und Vernachlässigung von Kindern sein. Die American Academy of Pediatrics hat eine Anleitung zum Umgang in Verdachtsfällen herausgegeben.

Biomarker-Test: Zähne überprüfen auf dem Weg zum Mars

Studie "Zahngesundheit und Stress bei Astronauten" untersucht Stressresistenz und den Level des Biomarkers aMMP-8 für Kollagenabbau bei der gesamten Crew während simulierter Mars-Mission.

11 Fragen, 11 Antworten: Ein FAQ zur Selbstständigkeit im Notdienst

Vertrags- und Poolärzte sind auch im Bereitschaftsdienst selbstständig – wenn sie bestimmte Bedingungen erfüllen. Es liegt jetzt an KVen (und Kassen), die Dienste dennoch attraktiv zu gestalten. Die Ärzte Zeitung gibt Antworten auf wichtige Fragen.

Neue GOP zur Abklärung der Narkosefähigkeit

  • 15.08.2024
  • EBM
  • Nachrichten

Vertragsärztinnen und Vertragsärzte können rückwirkend zum 1. Juli präanästhesiologische Untersuchungen abrechnen. Damit soll eine Regelungslücke geschlossen werden.

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.