nach oben

Dysphagia

Erschienen in:

07.02.2022 | Original Article

Cross-cultural Adaption, Validation and Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: EAT-10

verfasst von: Leila Ghelichi, Mohadeseh Hashemian, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Maryam Tarameshlu

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The eating assessment tool (EAT-10) is a self-reported questionnaire to assess the patient’s perception of swallowing difficulties. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and determine validity and reliability of the Persian version of the EAT-10 (P-EAT-10) in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. The EAT-10 was translated into Persian language and cross-culturally adapted. One hundred patients with dysphagia (mean age ± SD = 44.44 ± 14.69 years) participated. The test–retest reliability (time interval = 7 days) was assessed in 50 patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were analyzed. The Persian version of functional oral intake scale (FOIS-P) was also recorded to assess construct validity. One hundred healthy subjects completed the P-EAT-10 for clinical validity. Factor analysis was performed to determine the P-EAT-10 structure. There were no missing responses and floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α 0.91). Item–total correlations exceeded acceptable standard of 0.3 for the all items (0.62–0.83). The test–retest reliability was excellent [(ICC)_agreement 0.96]. The SEM and SDC were 2.61 and 7.23, respectively. Construct validity was confirmed by a significant correlation between the P-EAT-10 and FOIS-P scores (r = 0.84). Clinical validity was supported by a significant discrimination between patients and healthy subjects (t = 29.97, P < 0.001). Factor analysis indicated 2 components for the P-EAT-10. The P-EAT-10 is a valid and reliable tool and can be used in clinic and research for the assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in Persian-speaking patients.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Roden DF, Altman KW. Causes of dysphagia among different age groups: a systematic review of the literature. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2013;46:965–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.008.CrossRef

Kertscher B, Speyer R, Fong E, Georgiou AM, Smith M. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the Netherlands: a telephone survey. Dysphagia. 2015;30(2):114–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9584-z.CrossRefPubMed

Bloem BR, Lagaay AM, van Beek W, Haan J, Roos RA, Wintzen AR. Prevalence of subjective dysphagia in community residents aged over 87. BMJ. 1990;300:721–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6726.721.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tarameshlu M, Azimi AR, Ghelichi L, Ansari NN. Prevalence and predictors of dysphagia in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;26(31):133. https://doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.133.CrossRef

Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312201109.CrossRefPubMed

Kalf JG, de Swart BJ, Bloem BR, Munneke M. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18(4):311–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.11.006.CrossRefPubMed

García-Peris P, Parón L, Velasco C, de la Cuerda C, Camblor M, Bretón I, Herencia H, Verdaguer J, Navarro C, Clave P. Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr. 2007;26(6):710–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.006.CrossRefPubMed

Hashemian M, Khorasani B, Tarameshlu M, Haghani H, Ghelichi L, Nakhostin Ansari N. Effects of dysphagia therapy on swallowing dysfunction after total thyroidectomy. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;31(107):329–34. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2019.36233.2193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Tarameshlu M, Azimi AR, Jalaie S, Ghelichi L, Ansari NN. Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Persian version of the SWAL-QOL. Medicine. 2017;96(26):e7254. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007254.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Ansari NN, Tarameshlu M, Ghelichi L. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: diagnostic and evaluation strategies. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2020;10:15–28. https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S198659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Silbergleit AK, Schultz L, Jacobson BH, Beardsley T, Johnson AF. The dysphagia handicap index: development and validation. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9336-2.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Wallace KL, Middleton S, Cook IJ. Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral–pharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):678–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70137-5.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gonçalves MI, Remaili CB, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the eating assessment tool—EAT-10. Codas. 2013;25(6):601–4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013.05000012.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wakabayashi H, Kayashita J. Translation, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of10-item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Jjspen. 2014;29(3):871–6. https://doi.org/10.11244/jjspen.29.871.CrossRef

17.

Farahat M, Mesallam TA. Validation and cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(5):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442199.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Nogueira DS, Ferreira PL, Reis EA, Lopes IS. Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the European Portuguese eating assessment tool (P-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):511–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Möller R, Safa S, Östberg P. Validation of the Swedish translation of eating assessment tool (S-EAT-10). Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(7):749–53. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2016.1146411.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Gutiérrez-Achury AM, Ruales-Suárez K, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10spa) in Colombia. A blinded prospective cohort study. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):398–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9690-1.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, Karaduman AA. Reliability and validity of the Turkish eating assessment tool (T-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):644–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9723-9.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Abu-Ghanem S, Schechter M, Flesh-Eyni H, et al. Validation of the Hebrew version of the eating assessment tool-10 (H-EAT-10). Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(6):261–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484557.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Lechien JR, Cavelier G, Thill MP, et al. Validity and reliability of the French version of eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276:1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05429-1.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Krishnamurthy R, Balasubramanium RK, Hegde PS. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Kannada version of EAT 10. Dysphagia. 2020;35(6):962–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10094-2.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Järvenpää P, Kuuskoski J, Pietarinen P, et al. Finnish version of the eating assessment tool (F-EAT 10): a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure for dysphagia evaluation. Dysphagia. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10362-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Bakhtiyari J, Tohidast SA, Mansuri B, Azimi H, Ebadi A. The Persian version of the functional oral intake scale (FOIS-P): a validation study on stroke patients with dysphagia. Logop Phoniatr Vocol. 2021;16:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2021.1896778.CrossRef

27.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kristjansson EA, Desrochers A, Zumbo B. Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: a guide for practitioners. Can J Nurs Res. 2003;35:127–42.PubMed

29.

Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Streiner D. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST. Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86:94–9.CrossRef

32.

Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek AL. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:571–8.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, Hazelwood RJ, Martin-Harris B, Velozo C. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, Arslan SS, Speyer R. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9754-2.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hansen T, Kjaersgaard A. Item analysis of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01384-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Cross-cultural Adaption, Validation and Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: EAT-10
verfasst von: Leila Ghelichi
Mohadeseh Hashemian
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
Maryam Tarameshlu
Publikationsdatum: 07.02.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Dysphagia / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10405-1

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Cross-cultural Adaption, Validation and Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: EAT-10

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Food-Grade Activated Charcoal for Contrast-Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging of Aspiration: A Phantom Study

Effects of Craniocervical Flexion on Suprahyoid and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Activation in Different Exercises

Predictive Factors for Oral Intake Recovery After Acute Stroke: Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Inpatient Database

A Systematic Review of Swallowing Training Measures for Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients

Electrophysiological Measures of Swallowing Functions: A Systematic Review

New Radioprotective Device that can be Used for Fluoroscopic Exam: Possibility to Contribute to Staff Exposure Protection During VFSS

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Update HNO