nach oben

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Erschienen in:

08.12.2023 | Review

Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review

verfasst von: Blanca Novillo-Del-Álamo, Alicia Martínez-Varea, Mar Nieto-Tous, José Morales-Roselló

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 4/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to assess if women living in deprived areas have worse perinatal outcomes than those residing in high-income areas.

Methods

Datasets of PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and stillbirth) in deprived and non-deprive areas.

Results

A total of 46 studies were included. The systematic review of the literature revealed a higher risk for adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, small for gestational age, and stillbirth in deprived areas.

Conclusion

Deprived areas are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. More multifactorial studies are needed to assess the weight of each factor that composes the socioeconomic gradient of health in adverse perinatal outcomes.

World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1

Marmot M, Bell R (2012) Fair society, healthy lives. Public Health 126(Suppl 1):S4–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.014CrossRefPubMed

Curtis LJ (2018) An economic perspective on the causal explanations for the socioeconomic inequalities in health. Rev Panam Salud Publica 42:e53. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marmot M (2004) Status syndrome. Significance 1:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.xMathSciNetCrossRef

Barker DJ, Thornburg KL (2013) Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta 34(10):841–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.063CrossRefPubMed

Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Buklijas T (2010) A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis 1(1):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174409990171CrossRefPubMed

Wadhwa P, Buss C, Entringer S, Swanson J (2009) Developmental origins of health and disease: brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod Med 27(5):358–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chan CCH, Stirling PHC, Lam WL (2022) The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on congenital hand differences: a retrospective cohort study. Hand Surg Rehabil 41(2):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2021.12.005CrossRefPubMed

de Graaf JP, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Inequalities in perinatal and maternal health. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25(2):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835ec9b0CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kingdon C, Roberts D, Turner MA, Storey C, Crossland N, Finlayson KW, Downe S (2019) Inequalities and stillbirth in the UK: a meta-narrative review. BMJ Open 9(9):e029672. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Vos AA, Posthumus AG, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA, Denktaş S (2014) Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(8):727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12430CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sheikh J, Allotey J, Kew T, Fernández-Félix BM, Zamora J, Khalil A, Thangaratinam S, IPPIC Collaborative Network (2022) Effects of race and ethnicity on perinatal outcomes in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 2 198 655 pregnancies. Lancet 400(10368):2049–2062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01191-6. (Erratum in: Lancet. 2023;401(10371):104)CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, Webster K, Muller P, Hawdon J, Khalil A, Harris T, van der Meulen J, National Maternity and Perinatal Audit Project Team (2021) Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study. Lancet 398(10314):1905–1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01595-6. (Erratum in: Lancet. 2021;398(10314):1874)CrossRefPubMed

14.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R (2008) Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 371(9606):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Wilcox AJ, Cortese M, McConnaughey DR, Moster D, Basso O (2021) The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category. Eur J Epidemiol 36(10):985–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00810-zCrossRefPubMed

17.

Nakano L, Adult-Onset Y (2020) Diseases in low birth weight infants: association with adipose tissue maldevelopment. J Atheroscler Thromb 27(5):397–405. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17039CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Management of Stillbirth (2020) Obstetric care consensus No, 10. Obstet Gynecol 135(3):e110–e132. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003719. (Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(5):1030)CrossRef

19.

Beyerlein A, Lack N, Maier W (2020) Associations of area-level deprivation with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Bavaria, Germany: results from a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 15(7):e0236020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

de Graaf JP, Ravelli AC, de Haan MA, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Living in deprived urban districts increases perinatal health inequalities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26(5):473–481. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.735722CrossRefPubMed

21.

Liu N, Wen SW, Katherine W, Bottomley J, Yang Q, Walker MC (2010) Neighbourhood family income and adverse birth outcomes among singleton deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(11):1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34711-9CrossRefPubMed

22.

Timmermans S, Bonsel GJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Mackenbach JP, Steyerberg EW, Raat H, Verbrugh HA, Tiemeier HW, Hofman A, Birnie E, Looman CW, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA (2011) Individual accumulation of heterogeneous risks explains perinatal inequalities within deprived neighbourhoods. Eur J Epidemiol 26(2):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9542-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Gonthier C, Estellat C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Blondel B, Alfaiate T, Schmitz T, Oury JF, Mandelbrot L, Luton D, Ravaud P, Azria E (2017) Association between maternal social deprivation and prenatal care utilization: the PreCARE cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1310-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Lelong A, Jiroff L, Blanquet M, Mourgues C, Leymarie MC, Gerbaud L, Lémery D, Vendittelli F (2015) Is individual social deprivation associated with adverse perinatal outcomes? Results of a French multicentre cross-sectional survey. J Prev Med Hyg 56(2):E95–E101PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Hesselman S, Wikström AK, Skalkidou A, Sundström-Poromaa I, Wikman A (2019) Neighborhood deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes in Sweden: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(8):1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13582CrossRefPubMed

26.

Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Field DJ (2009) Socioeconomic inequalities in survival and provision of neonatal care: population based study of very preterm infants. BMJ 339:b4702. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4702. (Erratum in: BMJ. 2009;339:b5196)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Janevic T, Stein CR, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Mason SM, Herring AH (2010) Neighborhood deprivation and adverse birth outcomes among diverse ethnic groups. Ann Epidemiol 20(6):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Klumper J, Ravelli ACJ, Roos C, Abu-Hanna A, Oudijk MA (2022) Deprived neighborhoods and spontaneous preterm birth: a national cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 274:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.012CrossRefPubMed

29.

Dassios T, Refaey M, Kametas N, Bhat R, Greenough A (2018) Adverse neonatal outcomes and house prices in London. J Perinat Med 47(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0397CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bertens LCM, Burgos Ochoa L, Van Ourti T, Steegers EAP, Been JV (2020) Persisting inequalities in birth outcomes related to neighbourhood deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health 74(3):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213162CrossRefPubMed

31.

Smeeton NC, Rona RJ, Dobson P, Cochrane R, Wolfe C (2004) Assessing the determinants of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths using routinely collected data in an inner city area. BMC Med 2:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-2-27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Luo ZC, Kierans WJ, Wilkins R, Liston RM, Mohamed J, Kramer MS, British Columbia Vital Statistics Agency (2004) Disparities in birth outcomes by neighborhood income: temporal trends in rural and urban areas, British Columbia. Epidemiology 15(6):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000142149.34095.88CrossRefPubMed

33.

Janghorbani M, Stenhouse E, Millward A, Jones RB (2006) Neighborhood deprivation and preterm birth in Plymouth. UK J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500363428CrossRefPubMed

34.

Garcia-Subirats I, Pérez G, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Ruiz-Muñoz D, Salvador J (2012) Neighborhood inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes in an urban setting in Spain: a multilevel approach. J Urban Health 89(3):447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9648-4. (Erratum in: J Urban Health. 2012;89(5):872. Muñoz, Dolores Ruiz [corrected to Ruiz-Muñoz, Dolores])CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Agyemang C, Vrijkotte TG, Droomers M, van der Wal MF, Bonsel GJ, Stronks K (2009) The effect of neighbourhood income and deprivation on pregnancy outcomes in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 63(9):755–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.080408CrossRefPubMed

36.

Spencer N, Bambang S, Logan S, Gill L (1999) Socioeconomic status and birth weight: comparison of an area-based measure with the Registrar General’s social class. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:495–498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Dibben C, Sigala M, Macfarlane A (2006) Area deprivation, individual factors and low birth weight in England: is there evidence of an “area effect”? J Epidemiol Community Health 60(12):1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.042853CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Collingwood Bakeo A, Clarke L (2006) Risk factors for low birthweight based on birth registration and census information, England and Wales, 1981–2000. Health Stat Q Summer(30):15–21

39.

Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Johansson SE, Li X, Winkleby M (2011) Mothers, places and small for gestational age births: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child 96(4):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.180042CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rajmil L, Taylor-Robinson D, Gunnlaugsson G, Hjern A, Spencer N (2018) Trends in social determinants of child health and perinatal outcomes in European countries 2005–2015 by level of austerity imposed by governments: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of routinely available data. BMJ Open 8(10):e022932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022932CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Minion SC, Krans EE, Brooks MM, Mendez DD, Haggerty CL (2022) Association of driving distance to maternity hospitals and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 140(5):812–819. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004960CrossRefPubMed

42.

Dawson P, Auvray B, Jaye C, Gauld R, Hay-Smith J (2022) Social determinants and inequitable maternal and perinatal outcomes in Aotearoa New Zealand. Womens Health (Lond) 18:17455065221075912. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455065221075913CrossRefPubMed

43.

Brown H, Jesurasa A, Bambra C, Rankin J, McNaughton A, Heslehurst N (2021) Assessing the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and area-level deprivation in Wales 2014–2019: a national population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 11(11):e052330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Oxford Languages dictionary. https://languages.oup.com/

45.

Abel GA, Barclay ME, Payne RA (2016) Adjusted indices of multiple deprivation to enable comparisons within and between constituent countries of the UK including an illustration using mortality rates. BMJ Open 6(11):e012750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Labbe E, Blanquet M, Gerbaud L, Poirier G, Sass C, Vendittelli F, Moulin JJ (2015) A new reliable index to measure individual deprivation: the EPICES score. Eur J Public Health 25(4):604–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku231CrossRefPubMed

47.

Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 30 Oct 2020

48.

Bonet M, Smith LK, Pilkington H, Draper ES, Zeitlin J (2013) Neighbourhood deprivation and very preterm birth in an English and French cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Gray R, Bonellie SR, Chalmers J, Greer I, Jarvis S, Williams C (2008) Social inequalities in preterm birth in Scotland 1980–2003: findings from an area-based measure of deprivation. BJOG 115(1):82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01582.xCrossRefPubMed

50.

Taylor-Robinson D, Agarwal U, Diggle PJ, Platt MJ, Yoxall B, Alfirevic Z (2011) Quantifying the impact of deprivation on preterm births: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS

51.

Beard JR, Lincoln D, Donoghue D, Taylor D, Summerhayes R, Dunn TM, Earnest A, Morgan G (2009) Socioeconomic and maternal determinants of small-for-gestational age births: patterns of increasing disparity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(5):575–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340902818170CrossRefPubMed

52.

Delpisheh A, Kelly Y, Rizwan S, Brabin BJ (2006) Socio-economic status, smoking during pregnancy and birth outcomes: an analysis of cross-sectional community studies in Liverpool (1993–2001). J Child Health Care 10(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493506062553CrossRefPubMed

53.

Henrotin JB, Vaissière M, Etaix M, Dziurla M, Radauceanu A, Malard S, Lafon D (2017) Deprivation, occupational hazards and perinatal outcomes in pregnant workers. Occup Med (Lond) 67(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw148CrossRefPubMed

54.

Barry Y, Le Strat Y, Azria E, Gorza M, Pilkington H, Vandentorren S, Gallay A, Regnault N (2022) Ability of municipality-level deprivation indices to capture social inequalities in perinatal health in France: a nationwide study using preterm birth and small for gestational age to illustrate their relevance. BMC Public Health 22(1):919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13246-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Best KE, Seaton SE, Draper ES, Field DJ, Kurinczuk JJ, Manktelow BN, Smith LK (2019) Assessing the deprivation gap in stillbirths and neonatal deaths by cause of death: a national population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 104(6):F624–F630. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316124CrossRefPubMed

56.

Luque-Fernández MÁ, Lone NI, Gutiérrez-Garitano I, Bueno-Cavanillas A (2012) Stillbirth risk by maternal socio-economic status and country of origin: a population-based observational study in Spain, 2007–08. Eur J Public Health 22(4):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr074CrossRefPubMed

57.

Bambang S, Spencer NJ, Logan S, Gill L (2000) Cause-specific perinatal death rates, birth weight and deprivation in the West Midlands, 1991–93. Child Care Health Dev 26(1):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00152.xCrossRefPubMed

58.

de Graaf JP, Ravelli AC, Wildschut HI, Denktaş S, Voorham AJ, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA (2008) Perinatale uitkomsten in de vier grote steden en de prachtwijken in Nederland [Perinatal outcomes in the four largest cities and in deprived neighbourhoods in The Netherlands]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152(50):2734–2740PubMed

59.

Manning D, Brewster B, Bundred P (2005) Social deprivation and admission for neonatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90(4):F337–F338. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.071530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Domínguez-Berjón MF, Pérez G, Gotsens M, Gènova R, Martín U, Ruiz-Ramos M, IMCRISES Project Working Group (2022) Socioeconomic inequalities in small-for-gestational-age births before and during the economic crisis: an ecologic study of trends in 13 Spanish cities. Int J Health Serv 52(1):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420923532CrossRefPubMed

61.

de Andrade L, Kozhumam AS, Rocha TAH, de Almeida DG, da Silva NC, de Souza Queiroz RC, Massago M, Rent S, Facchini LA, da Silva AAM, Staton CA, Vissoci JRN, Thomaz EBAF (2022) Impact of socioeconomic factors and health determinants on preterm birth in Brazil: a register-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22(1):872. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05201-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Bertin M, Viel JF, Monfort C, Cordier S, Chevrier C (2015) Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes in urban and rural contexts: a French mother–child cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 29(5):426–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12208CrossRefPubMed

63.

Poeran J, Maas AF, Birnie E, Denktas S, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population. Soc Sci Med 83:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.008CrossRefPubMed

64.

Urquia ML, Frank JW, Moineddin R, Glazier RH (2011) Does time since immigration modify neighborhood deprivation gradients in preterm birth? A multilevel analysis. J Urban Health 88(5):959–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9569-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Urquia ML, Frank JW, Glazier RH, Moineddin R (2007) Birth outcomes by neighbourhood income and recent immigration in Toronto. Health Rep 18(4):21–30PubMed

66.

Arechvo A, Nikolaidi DA, Gil MM, Rolle V, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH (2023) Incidence of stillbirth: effect of deprivation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 61(2):198–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26096CrossRefPubMed

67.

Poeran J, Denktas S, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA (2011) Urban perinatal health inequalities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24(4):643–646. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.511341CrossRefPubMed

68.

Marmot M (2020) Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. BMJ 368:m693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m693CrossRefPubMed

69.

Socedad Española de Fertilidad. Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020 y 2021—Informes estadísticos de Técnicas de Reproducción asistida 2020 y 2021. https://www.registrosef.com/public/docs/sef2020_IAFIV.pdf

70.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística Español. Estadística de nacimientos. Movimiento natural de la población. Resultados detallados nacimientos en 2020. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177007&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573002

71.

Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Committee Opinion No. 671. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e61–8

72.

Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 18:485–503CrossRefPubMed

73.

Schieve LA, Cohen B, Nannini A, Ferre C, Reynolds MA, Zhang Z et al (2007) A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J 11:517–525CrossRefPubMed

74.

Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wu D, Gao SY, You YP, Yang TB et al (2017) Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:285–301CrossRefPubMed

75.

Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 328:261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103:551–563CrossRefPubMed

77.

McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A, Knowledge Synthesis Group (2009) Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146:138–148CrossRefPubMed

78.

Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S (2016) Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 105(73–85):e1-6

79.

Kawwass JF, Badell ML (2018) Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol 132(3):763–772. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786CrossRefPubMed

80.

Sharma RS, Saxena R, Singh R (2018) Infertility & assisted reproduction: a historical & modern scientific perspective. Indian J Med Res 148(Suppl):S10–S14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_636_18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Cubbin C, Marchi K, Lin M, Bell T, Marshall H, Miller C, Braveman P (2008) Is neighborhood deprivation independently associated with maternal and infant health? Evidence from Florida and Washington. Matern Child Health J 12(1):61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0225-0CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review
verfasst von: Blanca Novillo-Del-Álamo
Alicia Martínez-Varea
Mar Nieto-Tous
José Morales-Roselló
Publikationsdatum: 08.12.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07300-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

Update Gynäkologie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

Analysis of patients with endometrial carcinoma using the ProMise classifier: a pilot study from India

Bioinformatics analysis of a disease-specific lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory network in recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA)

Positive results bias in randomized controlled trials in gynecologic oncology

Prioritized single vitrified blastocyst to be warmed between grades 3 or 4 blastocyst on day 5 transfer cycles

Diagnostic performance of additional imaging tests for staging purposes in a bicentric German series of low-risk early breast cancer patients

The role of the PLGF in the management of pregnancies complicated with fetal microsomia

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

Update Gynäkologie