Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally [
1,
2]. Four million people are estimated to die annually from diabetes and its complications worldwide [
3], with middle- and low-income countries experiencing the highest burden [
2,
4]. In Africa, non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including T2DM, place a significant financial burden on individuals, families, and economies of countries, including direct (e.g., cost of medication, hospital bills, and admission) and indirect costs (e.g., caring for the sick and loss of productivity due to work absenteeism). Projections from 2019 to 2045 suggest a rapid global increase in the prevalence of diabetes, with sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) being the continent recording the highest growth over the period [
4], with a 143% increase compared to Western Pacific (31%), South East Asia (74%), Europe (15%), South and Central America (55%) [
4].
The progressive increase of the T2DM burden among the African population has been attributed to a rapid increase in urbanisation and food market globalisation that are associated with changes in traditional lifestyle risk factors (e.g., increased obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity) that are potentially modifiable [
5]. However, the association between these traditional risk factors and both T2DM and pre-diabetes can vary considerably by age and sex among different populations [
6‐
10] with significant implications for prevention and treatment strategies [
7,
9]. For example, while younger women of childbearing age are more likely to develop diabetes than younger men (due to gestational diabetes), the risk is greater for older men than women [
9,
11,
12].
Sex differences in the association between NCDs risk factors and T2DM have been reported in different populations and ethnicities [
7,
8,
13,
14] with some of these traditional risk factors having stronger associations with T2DM in men, and others in women. A tri-ethnic prospective study showed that insulin resistance and central obesity among Indian Asians and African Caribbean populations accounted for a twofold greater incidence in women, but not men [
15]. Various prospective studies among European populations demonstrated a positive association between body mass index (BMI) and T2DM only in men [
6], only in women [
16], and in both men and women [
7,
8,
10]. Other prospective studies demonstrated risk factors such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical inactivity during leisure time to be associated with T2DM development in women only [
7,
8], while elevated systolic blood pressure, regular smoking, and high daily alcohol intake predicted the development of T2DM in men only [
7].
Although the association between T2DM and traditional risk factors can be modified by age and sex in various populations [
7,
11], such studies among the African populations are scarce [
9,
10]. This is despite the rapidly rising T2DM rates within the continent [
4]. Given that sex and age differences in the association between risk factors and T2DM may have implications for both clinical decision making and preventive health strategies, this study assesses whether sex and age modify the associations between potentially modifiable risk factors [including BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist to height ratio (WHtR), waist to hip ratio (WHR), diet, smoking, alcohol, and high blood pressure (HBP)] and both T2DM and pre-diabetes among adults from five West African countries.
Results
Table
1 summarises the socio-demographic characteristics of study participants. Of the 15,520 respondents analysed, 44% were males and 56% were females. The mean and median age of the total sample was 40.4 years and 38 years respectively. The age group with the largest number of participants was between 24 and 34 years (38%) and the lowest was between 55 and 64 (17%) years. The BMI (kg/m
2) of females was significantly higher than that of males (mean in females = 25.7, mean in males = 23.5,
p < 0.001) and males were more physically active than females (
p < 0.001). The smoking and alcohol intakes of males were significantly higher than those of females (smoking,
p < 0.001 and alcohol consumption, p < 0.001).
Table 1
Participant Characteristics
Age (years) | 40.77 ± 11.8 | 40.03 ± 11.5 | 40.36 ± 11.6 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.47 ± 5.9 | 25.74 ± 7.9 | 24.76 ± 7.18 |
BMI (%) |
Normal | 4867 (73.7) | 4625 (55.4) | 9,504 (63.4) |
Overweight | 1276 (19.3) | 2.029 (24.3) | 3315 (22.1) |
Obese | 463 (7.0) | 1697 (20.3) | 2177 (14.5) |
WC (%) |
Normal | 5850 (87.7) | 3233 (39.2) | 9084 (60.9) |
Elevated | 824 (12.3) | 5015 (60.8) | 5839 (39.1) |
WHR (%)a |
Normal | 2595 (58.6) | 2059 (34.4) | 4655 (44.7) |
Elevated | 1832 (41.4) | 3921 (65.6) | 5753 (55.3) |
WHtR (%) |
Normal | 4716 (72.1) | 3296 (40.8) | 8021 (54.7) |
Elevated | 1825 (27.9) | 4782 (59.2) | 6630 (45.3) |
Physical activity (%) |
Low | 1151 (17.2) | 2192 (25.2) | 3359 (21.8) |
Medium | 489 (7.3) | 852 (9.8) | 1348 (8.7) |
High | 5063 (75.5) | 5.643 (65.0) | 10,719 (69.5) |
Fruit per week (%) |
0–13 | 4738 (79.3) | 6200 (79.8) | 10,954 (79.6) |
14 + | 1240 (20.7) | 1573 (20.2) | 2814 (20.4) |
Vegetable per week (%) |
0–13 | 3658 (70.9) | 4811 (70.3) | 8486 (70.6) |
14 + | 1502(29.1) | 2030 (29.7) | 3533 (29.4) |
Current smokers (%) |
No | 5419 (80.1) | 8617 (98.6) | 14,067 (90.5) |
Yes | 1348 (19.9) | 121 (1.4) | 1,471 (9.5) |
Alcohol (%) |
Every day | 696 (10.7) | 300 (3.5) | 996 (6.6) |
5–6 time per week | 263 (4.1) | 137 (1.6) | 400 (2.7) |
1-4time per week | 1592 (24.6) | 1393 (16.4) | 2985 (19.9) |
< 1 time per week | 505 (7.8) | 801 (9.4) | 1306 (8.7) |
Never | 3430 (52.9) | 5891 (69.1) | 9353 (62.2) |
Profession (%) |
Employed | 5654 (83.8) | 5522 (63.5) | 11,201 (72.4) |
Unemployed | 1093 (16.2) | 3173 (36.5) | 4275 (27.6) |
Education (%) |
None | 3068 (45.7) | 4953 (57.0) | 8028 (52.0) |
Primary | 1309 (19.5) | 1462 (16.8) | 2773 (18.0) |
Secondary/Tertiary | 2344 (34.9) | 2279 (26.2) | 4638 (30.0) |
Blood Pressure (%)b |
Normal | 4251 (73.0) | 5053 (73.1) | 9333 (73.1) |
Hypertension | 1568 (27.0) | 1856 (26.9) | 3429 (26.9) |
The RRs and 95% CIs of the association between the traditional risk factors and both T2DM and IFG are shown in Table
2. Except for alcohol, and fruit and vegetable consumption, all traditional risk factors showed positive associations with T2DM and IFG both in the crude and adjusted analyses. As expected, associations were mostly stronger between the traditional risk factors and T2DM compared to IFG. The analysis shows that the risk of T2DM increases with increasing age. The highest RR associated with T2DM was recorded among 55 to 64 years old [RR: 4.77, 95% CI: (3.77, 6.04)]. In contrast, for IFG the highest RR was recorded among participants who were obese, as defined by BMI [RR: 2.10, 95% CI: (1.70, 2.59)]. Physical inactivity was strongly associated with both T2DM [RR: 2.02 95% CI (1.68 2.42) and IFG [RR: 1.87, 95% CI (1.87, 2.24)] in the adjusted analyses.
Table 2
Association between modifiable risk factors and both T2DM and IFG in five countries from West Africa (n = 15,520)
Sex |
Male | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Female | 1.01 (0.87, 1.19) | 0.87 | 1.06 (0.89, 1.25) | 0.51 | 1.01 (0.86, 1.18) | 0.91 | 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) | 0.4 |
Age (years) |
25–34 | Reference | Reference | Reference | | Reference |
35–44 | 1.98 (1.55, 2.51) | < 0.001 | 2.15 (1.69, 2.75) | < 0.001 | 1.10 (0.90, 1.34) | 0.35 | 1.19 (0.98, 1.46) | 0.09 |
45–54 | 2.56 (2.00, 3.26) | < 0.001 | 2.96 (2.31, 3.79) | < 0.001 | 1.19 (0.96, 1.47) | 0.12 | 1.32 (1.06, 1.65) | 0.013 |
55–64 | 4.04 (3.21, 5.07) | < 0.001 | 4.77 (3.77, 6.04) | < 0.001 | 1.21 (0.97, 1.51) | 0.09 | 1.34 (1.07, 1.69) | 0.011 |
BMI (kg/m2) |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | | Reference |
Overweight | 1.86 (1.54, 2.25) | < 0.001 | 1.66 (1.36, 2.03) | < 0.001 | 1.29 (1.06, 1.58) | 0.01 | 1.23 (1.00 1.51) | 0.05 |
Obese | 2.54 (2.08, 3.11) | < 0.001 | 1.96 (1.57, 2.45) | < 0.001 | 2.29 (1.89, 2.78) | < 0.001 | 2.10 (1.70, 2.59) | < 0.001 |
WC |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Elevated | 2.71 (2.30, 3.20 | < 0.001 | 2.70 (2.20, 3.32) | < 0.001 | 1.52 (1.30, 1.78) | < 0.001 | 1.54 (1.27, 1.88) | 0.001 |
WHtR |
Normal | Reference | | Reference | | Reference | | |
Elevated | 2.75 (2.32, 3.27) | < 0.001 | 2.14 (1.77, 2.59) | < 0.001 | 1.64 (1.40, 1.93) | < 0.001 | 1.55 (1.30, 1.85) | < 0.001 |
WHRa |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Elevated | 1.81(1.50, 2.18) | < 0.001 | 1.52 (1.24, 1.85) | < 0.001 | 1.20 (1.00, 1.44) | 0.47 | 1.23 (1.01, 1.49) | 0.04 |
Physical activity |
High | Reference | Reference | | Reference | Reference |
Medium | 2.16 (1.69, 2.78) | < 0.001 | 1.63 (1.26, 2.12) | < 0.001 | 2.06 (1.62, 2.62) | < 0.001 | 1.74 (1.36, 2.23) | < 0.001 |
Low | 2.35 (1.98, 2.80) | < 0.001 | 2.02 (1.68, 2.42) | < 0.001 | 2.10 (1.76, 2.50) | < 0.001 | 1.87 (1.56, 2.24) | < 0.001 |
Fruit per week |
14 + | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
0–13 | 1.17 (0.93, 1.46) | 0.179 | 1.33 (1.05, 1.67) | 0.02 | 1.21 (0.97, 1.46) | 0.09 | 1.24 (0.99, 1.55) | 0.06 |
Vegetables per week (%) |
14 + | Reference | | Reference | | Reference | Reference |
0–13 | 0.77 (0.64, 0.94) | 0.01 | 0.85 (0.69, 1.03) | 0.1 | 1.07 (0.87, 1.31) | 0.53 | 1.09 (0.88, 1.34) | 0.42 |
Current smoker |
No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 1.38 (1.08, 1.77) | 0.01 | 1.71 (1.31, 2.24) | < 0.001 | 1.01 (0.83, 1.40) | 0.57 | 1.24 (0.94, 1.64) | 0.13 |
Alcohol |
Never | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
< 1 time per week | 0.45 (0.32, 0.65) | < 0.001 | 0.40 (0.28, 0.58) | < 0.001 | 0.61 (0.45, 0.83) | < 0.001 | 0.56 (0.41, 0.77) | < 0.001 |
1-4time per week | 0.52 (0.41, 0.66) | < 0.001 | 0.50 (0.39, 0.63) | < 0.001 | 0.53 (0.42, 0.67) | < 0.001 | 0.53 (0.42, 0.67) | < 0.001 |
5–6 times per week | 0.67 (0.40, 1.14) | 0.14 | 0.67 (0.40, 1.15) | 0.15 | 0.44 (0.23, 0.84) | 0.012 | 0.46 (0.24, 0.86) | 0.02 |
Every day | 0.41 (0.27, 0.62) | < 0.001 | 0.35 (0.22, 0.54) | < 0.001 | 0.52 (0.36, 0.76) | < 0.001 | 0.54 (0.37, 0.79) | 0.001 |
Blood pressureb |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Hypertension | 2.18 (1.83, 2.60) | < 0.001 | 1.56 (1.29, 1.90) | < 0.001 | 1.18 (1.00, 1.41) | 0.034 | 1.08 (0.89, 1.30) | 0.42 |
The interactions with both age and sex for the association between the traditional risk factors and T2DM and IFG are presented in Table
3. The associations between most traditional risk factors and both T2DM and IFG did not vary according to either age or sex. However, a statistically significant interaction with age was observed for the associations between hypertension and T2DM, WHtR and T2DM, and WHR and IFG.
Table 3
Interactions with age and sex for associations between potential modifiable risk factors and both T2DM and IFG in five West Africa countries (n = 15,520)
BMI |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Overweight | 1.08 (0.91, 1.28) | 0.37 | 0.97 (0.64, 1.43) | 0.89 | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.81 | 0.96 (0.64, 1.43) | 0.83 |
Obese | 1.05 (0.87, 1.26) | 0.63 | 0.68 (0.44, 1.08) | 0.1 | 0.88 (0.73, 1.05) | 0.16 | 0.88 (0.56, 1.36) | 0.55 |
WC |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Elevated | 1.01 (0.98, 1.31) | 0.13 | 0.79 (0.54, 1.17) | 0.24 | 0.95 (0.82, 1.09) | 0.44 | 0.80 (0.55, 1.19) | 0.26 |
WHtR |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Elevated | 1.23 (1.06, 1.44) | 0.007 | 1.15 (0.80, 1.67) | 0.46 | 0.95 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.5 | 1.00 (0.71, 1.41) | 0.99 |
WHRa |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Elevated | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 0.96 | 0.99 (0.67, 1.46) | 0.94 | 0.79 (0.67, 0.94) | 0.006 | 0.89 (0.61, 1.30) | 0.55 |
Physical activity |
High | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Medium | 0.98 (0.78, 1.21) | 0.83 | 1.32 (0.78, 2.28) | 0.31 | 0.87 (0.70, 1.08) | 0.21 | 0.89 (0.54. 1.47) | 0.66 |
Low | 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) | 0.85 | 1.22 (0.84, 1.77) | 0.29 | 0.93 (0.80, 1.09) | 0.38 | 0.85 (0.60, 1.23) | 0.39 |
Fruit per week |
14 + | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
0–13 | 1.01 (0.82, 1.4) | 0.93 | 0.93 (0.58, 1.48) | 0.76 | 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) | 0.87 | 0.81 (0.52, 1.28) | 0.36 |
Vegetable per week |
14 + | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
0–13 | 1.00 (0.82, 1.24) | 0.93 | 0.84 (0.56, 1.25) | 0.39 | 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) | 0.87 | 1.03 (0.67, 1.57) | 0.9 |
Smoking |
No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Yes | 0.86 (0.70, 1.07) | 0.18 | 1.30 (0.59, 2.87) | 0.52 | 1.02 (0.81, 1.29) | 0.18 | 1.02 (0.39, 2.66) | 0.97 |
Alcohol |
Never | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
< 1 time per week | 1.00 (0.72, 1.38) | 0.99 | 1.64 (0.74, 3.67) | 0.38 | 0.88 (0.66, 1.18) | 0.39 | 0.49 (0.25, 0.90) | 0.03 |
1-4time per week | 1.07 (0.87, 1.33) | 0.53 | 0.51 (0.31, 0.85) | 0.01 | 0.81 (0.65, 1.00) | 0.04 | 077 (0.48. 1.23) | 0.28 |
5–6 times per week | 0.73 (0.46, 1.16) | 0.18 | 0.31 (0.07, 1.40) | 0.21 | 0.87 (0.50, 1.52) | 0.62 | 0.23 (0.03, 1.88) | 0.17 |
Every day | 0.68 (0.46, 1.00) | 0.05 | 0.25 (0.06, 1.08) | 0.06 | 0.73 (0.53, 1.02) | 0.07 | 0.92 (0.40, 2.16) | 0.84 |
HBPb |
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Hypertension | 1.20 (1.01, 1.42) | 0.04 | 1.11 (0.77, 1.60) | 0.98 | 1.01 (0.86, 1.19) | 0.87 | 0.92 (0.64, 1.30) | 0.18 |
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effect of age and sex on the relationship between traditional diabetes risk factors and T2DM and IFG in West African countries. As expected, we found that the associations between all traditional risk factors, and both T2DM and IFG were significant, even after adjusting for age, sex, profession, and education. The general findings on the traditional risk factors were concordant with those of several previous studies among different population groups, including those from Nigeria [
10], Australia [
24], Asia, and European countries [
7,
8,
25,
26]. For most of the traditional risk factors examined, there was no evidence that associations varied according to either age or sex in the current study.
An important finding from the present study was that obesity as measured using BMI or WC was strongly associated with both T2DM and IFG in both sexes and across all age groups, confirming previous studies among populations of African origin [
10,
27], and others of Asian and Europid origin [
7,
15,
28]. One study by Lasky et al. [
9] among Ugandan subjects found a strong, direct relationship between BMI and the presence of T2DM among women only. This difference could be because, in the Lasky et al. study [
9], male subjects were primarily lean (defined as BMI < 20 kg/m
2) whereas, in the current study, male participants ranged from normal BMI to obese. Although some statistically significant interactions with age were observed for the associations between WHtR and T2DM and between WHR and IFG, their relevance in clinical or public health practice may be limited as these measures (i.e., complex ratios) of obesity are not commonly used.
In the present study, in both sexes, the stronger association between WC and WHtR with T2DM (compared to overall body fat as measured by BMI) in the adjusted models reinforces the importance of abdominal adiposity as an independent risk factor for the development of T2DM [
29,
30]. Although obesity, as defined by BMI, had the strongest association with IFG, this is a transition state before T2DM, and it may be the case that those classified as obese based on markers of central obesity spend less time in the IFG category [
20]. Of note, glycaemic profiles have been shown to differ by sex [
13,
31], with studies among populations from Mauritius and Australia finding impaired glucose tolerance to be more common in women (due to the greater glucose load taken relative to body size) and IFG more common in men [
13,
31]. The fact that an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was not used for diagnosis of T2DM or pre-diabetes in the current study means that the comparison of results with other studies that did use an OGTT should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, the thresholds used for defining obesity markers are not consistent across studies.
Overall, low physical activity in the present study was found to be associated with around a two-fold higher risk of both T2DM and IFG, among both sexes and age groups. Previous studies among African populations have reported similar findings independent of BMI [
32], as have studies from Portugal [
33], the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Finland [
28,
34]. In a study among European participants, however, low levels of leisure-time physical activity (e.g. swimming, jogging) were associated with incident diabetes among women only [
7]. Although the GPAQ used in this study did include an assessment of leisure-time physical activity, levels of leisure-time physical activity are consistently low across African countries [
32].
Our finding that hypertension was associated with T2DM and IFG among both sexes is in direct agreement with earlier studies in Kenya [
35] and Europe [
7]. In various European prospective cohort studies [
7,
36], however, a statistically significant association between systolic blood pressure and T2DM was only observed among men. Those findings have been ascribed to the fact that women with hypertension controlled their level of blood pressure better than men [
7], implying the importance of awareness and management of HBP among the West African populations [
37]
.
Furthermore, our finding of statistically significant interaction with age for the association between hypertension and T2DM can be ascribed to the evidence that hypertension increases with age and is also concordant with previous studies among different population groups [
38,
39]. For example, in a prospective study among the US population [
39], Lai et al. [
39], showed a positive interaction with age for the association between insulin sensitivity index and incident hypertension. Similar findings were reported among the Chinese population, in a study by Wan et al. [
38].
It is unclear, however, in the current study as in previous observational studies [
38,
39] if the associations observed are causal. Although a meta-analysis of prospective studies by Emodin et al. [
40] postulates that participants with elevated HBP are at increased risk of T2DM, longitudinal studies among populations from the UK [
41], China [
38], and the US [
42], showed that T2DM may be in the causal pathway of hypertension whereas the opposite was not likely. As such, a fine-grained longitudinal study examining the effect of age and the association between hypertension and T2DM is required to ascertain causality among the West African population.
In the current study, moderate drinking of alcohol was found to be protective for T2DM and IFG, which is consistent with previous studies [
43]. Heavy alcohol use, on the other hand, has previously been found to be associated with T2DM in both sexes and all age groups [
44,
45]. Almost 70% of women in the current sample have never drunk alcohol, with this being due to religious and cultural factors in West Africa [
46]. The low level of alcohol use in this study may mean that associations between consumption and glucose status may have little public health relevance in this population.
Smoking in this study was associated with T2DM and IFG and confirms earlier studies among South Africans and other populations [
47]. Though the association between smoking and T2DM and IFG did not vary by sex or age in this study, some previous studies among European populations [
6,
7] showed positive associations between cigarette smoking and incident diabetes in men only. An association was evident between cigarette smoking and incident diabetes in women however in the large American Nurses' Health Study [
16]. The difference in the prevalence of smoking among women in these two studies (much higher in the Nurses Health Study) may explain these findings [
6,
7]. As such, the low percentage of female smokers (1.4% of women and 19.9% of men) in the present study means it is challenging to assess sex-specific differences in associations with T2DM and pre-diabetes.
Finally, earlier studies on dietary patterns conducted in urban Ghana [
48] and Senegal [
49] showed that inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with an increased risk of T2DM. In this study, lower fruit intake was associated with increased prevalence of T2DM but the association with IFG was not statistically significant. The lower vegetable intake had opposite associations with T2DM and IFG although none were statistically significant. The simple diet recall questions used, limit the ability to generalise from these findings, but the results are consistent with previous evidence that fruit consumption alone is protective against T2DM [
50].
Study strengths and limitations
The current study has several strengths, including the large sample size from five different West African countries. This ensured greater statistical power to detect age and sex interaction effects between potentially modifiable traditional risk factors and both T2DM and IFG. The study, however, has several limitations, which need to be considered when interpreting the results. First, because the study is cross-sectional in design, results do not imply causal relationships between these traditional risk factors and T2DM. Secondly, only the traditional risk factors that were assessed in all five countries were analysed. Therefore, important risk factors, such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, could not be included in this analysis, though studies have shown this factor to interact with sex [
8]. Thirdly, since an OGTT was not used to define diabetes and pre-diabetes, the results may differ from those where this method was used, especially given the sex-specific impact of a glucose load due to differences in body size between males and females [
31]. Fourthly, fruit and vegetable consumption measures were not coded as per the WHO guidelines of five servings per day due to the low level of fruit and vegetable consumption in this sub-population and may constitute a limitation when compared to other studies. Lastly, the different years that the survey data were collected may have introduced some bias, however, this is not an important limitation for this study given the focus on associations between risk factors and health outcomes. These limitations notwithstanding, the findings from the current study have important policy implications.
Policy implications
Since the associations between the traditional risk factors and both T2DM and IFG appear to vary minimally based on age or sex, policies and interventions do not need to be tailored to different West African populations based on age or sex. This is particularly advantageous given the low-income context in West Africa, with population-wide interventions likely to be both more cost-effective and simpler to implement. While, in general, smoking and alcohol are more prevalent among men, obesity and physical inactivity are more prevalent among women in West Africa. Any policies targeting these risk factors should consider socio-cultural factors and beliefs [
51]. These may include i) the commonly held belief in much of Africa that being overweight is an outward manifestation of high socioeconomic standing, prosperity, and beauty, as well as good health among females and the preference for central obesity among some affluent men [
52,
53]; ii) the fact that physical activity among women is often discouraged in most countries as it is culturally considered to be undesirable and unattractive and associated with a masculine physique [
51], and iii) the fact that physical activity is usually not viewed through a health lens for men, but through the lens of sports [
54]. Policies should target the persistently low levels of awareness regarding the importance of fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as the globalisation of food markets, particularly concerning alcohol and tobacco industries. Globalisation has been shown to exacerbate the use and increased the ease of access to alcohol and tobacco use among young adults in Africa [
55].
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.