The PathMate2 study is one of the first randomized controlled trials assessing the short and long-term effects of a novel mobile application, which aims to encourage healthy lifestyle choices in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
The PathMate2 gamified intervention did not result in a sustained significant change of BMI-SDS. However, it achieved significant and lasting improvements of body fat and physical capacities during the whole 12 months of the study and a high app user engagement. The CON group, having a standardized BCI with more on-site visits, reduced significantly their BMI-SDS and waist-to-height ratio after 5.5 months. Nevertheless, these changes were not sustained up to 12 months after study start. Controls also improved their physical capacities in the long term, without significant group differences.
Attrition rates, adherence to therapy and adverse events
Attrition rates observed in childhood obesity management programs, mainly in the USA, are reported to reach 27 to 73% [
38], while the dropout rates of multi-professional BCI in group setting for children and adolescents in Switzerland range between 10 and 20% [
6]. Despite an extensive preliminary assessment and a signed informed consent, but in accordance with the above numbers, 24% of our subjects withdraw between the recruitment and the start of the study. However, 94% of the eligible PM patients who started the study also completed it. Moreover, half of the PM participants were still using the App daily after half a year, in contrast to the high dropout rates reported in digital health interventions with adherence dropping after a few weeks [
39,
40]. The high adherence rate seen in the PM group may be explained by the daily encouragement through a peer-appealing conversational agent with real-time feedback, the rewarding game system, the competition with peers and the low threshold of communication with HCP. During the first 5.5 months of the study the CON group also showed a high compliance with 100% attendance at hospital appointments and 85% of the eligible CON patients completing the study. This high adherence to therapy could be attributed to the structured BCI and to the personal counseling from childhood obesity specialists.
The total smartphone app usage time (including PM app), which was 16.2 min per day during the 5.5-month app intervention, remains (even with max. value of 88.6 min per day) clearly below the 2 h and 42 min reported among 13- to 18-year-olds in the U.S. [
41]. Additionally, as the most frequently used app was YouTube, we can argue that our app did not promote mobile gaming addictions.
Primary and secondary outcomes
According to international data [
42] only 2% of adolescents exhibit healthy lifestyle behaviours; hence, in pediatric obesity treatment, learning to adopt a sustainable healthy lifestyle is a key goal. In this sense, our study investigated whether a novel smartphone application can support adolescents in adopting long-lasting healthier habits while avoiding yo-yo effects [
43]. Although body mass index can only indirectly indicate a healthy behaviour, we have chosen it, in form of BMI-SDS corrected for sex and age, as our primary outcome, as it is the most widely used parameter of measuring obesity.
In the whole cohort, we observed a small but significant improvement in BMI-SDS (− 0.09) after 5.5 months of intervention, and changes were maintained up to one year (− 0.12). These findings suggest that the individual multi-component BCI was effective, similarly to previous studies in various settings and age groups (BMI-SDS change from − 0.06 to − 0.13SD [
3]). Interestingly, the number of contact hours in our study was much lower than the 26 h found to be effective through comprehensive and intensive BCI [
44]. As a significant decrease in BMI-SDS and waist-to-height ratio were found in the control group only, we conclude, in line with prior work [
44], that an intensive personalized behavioural intervention can result in a greater short-term reduction in weight status than a mobile health app program. However, in our study, the effects on BMI-SDS were not maintained at one-year in controls, which may be explained by the wide variations of the CON results and/or the dropout of some patients showing large changes in BMI-SDS from T0 to T1 (two control patients, who dropped out before T2, had a BMI-SDS decrease of − 0.74 at T1, which was larger than that of the entire control group of − 0.37). Nevertheless, the last observation carried forward analysis did not present different results with regard to BMI-SDS (only applied for the primary outcome, Additional file
10). Another explanation for the non-significant BMI-SDS change after one year could be that only two contact hours with HCP between 5.5 and 12 months after study start (maintenance phase) were probably insufficient in order to maintain behavioural changes.
During the intervention, changes in physical capacities and body composition were similar to previous studies [
6,
45]. In both groups, we found similar improvements after 5.5 and 12 months in strength measures and agility. The significant improvement of muscular strength, as seen in our study, is of critical importance in improving overall health of adolescents with obesity as well as their comfort in daily life, thus increasing their autonomy [
46]. The 6-min-run-test (aerobic fitness) is generally highly and negatively correlated with BMI-SDS [
47]; this may explain, why in our study only controls (
n = 12) showed an improvement in 6-min-run-test at T1 but not at T2. Although balance in obese children has previously been described as impaired [
48], our patients showed optimal balance scores already at baseline. The PM intervention resulted in increased muscle mass at 5.5 months and a reduced percentage of fat mass throughout the study. As no correlations between changes in physical capacities and muscle mass were found in our study, it could be argued that the significant increase in muscle mass in both groups could also be a consequence of a synchronized pubertal growth. However, more than two thirds of the participants had a Tanner stage of 4 or 5, and thus had already passed the pubertal stage, when a maximum increase in muscle mass can be expected [
49,
50].
In prior Swiss research, and in consistence with our results, systolic hypertension was present in 47.6% of children with obesity [
51]. In our study, we did not observe any change in 6-min run test at 12 months, which may explain the absence of change in blood pressure or pulse rate [
52].
The effectiveness of IT-mediated obesity interventions in improving health status in this age group remains uncertain, probably due to insufficient intervention duration, small sample size and short-term follow-up. In the 2018 meta-analysis of Ho et al. [
53], six RCTs of internet-based self-monitoring interventions revealed a small reduction of BMI or BMI z-score; however, the quality of evidence was low due to the risk of bias and imprecision. On the other hand, in the review of Chen and Wilkosz [
54] ten out of 14 studies evaluating the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for obese adolescents showed no effects on BMI or BMI z-score.
Only a few IT-supported interventions have, in line with our results, reported significant positive effects on the percentage of body fat [
55,
56], skeletal muscle mass [
55], as well as physical activity [
57,
58] and muscular fitness [
59].
In consideration of the study results, when access to a specialized childhood obesity management center is limited and the adolescent’s primary goal is the improvement of physical status and body composition, PathMate2 app could be a feasible option, if combined with individual counselling sessions. The PathMate2 app could also potentially be implemented in a follow-up program after an intensive obesity intervention. However, if the main focus of an obesity intervention is the reduction of BMI-SDS, the PathMate2 app intervention in its current form would probably be inadequate; in this case more contact hours with HCP and longer or repeated intermittent periods of app usage (longer than 6 months) would probably be needed in order to achieve a satisfactory BMI-SDS reduction.
Biofeedback and changes of stress parameters
With regard to acute stress response, subjects in our study exhibited significantly lower cortisol levels after the biofeedback relaxation exercises. These findings support the conclusions of prior research [
12,
13], that psychophysiological interventions could have a clinical utility in obesity therapy in lowering emotional stress connected with eating disorders.
The present study is, to our knowledge, the only one that has investigated the long-term effect of biofeedback training on obesity related stress response in adolescents. Our hypothesis that the adolescents with obesity who would be most successful in reducing the maladaptive response to chronic stress would also exhibit a decrease in BMI-SDS was not confirmed; however, we found a weak positive correlation between changes in chronic stress (TICS) and changes in waist circumference and BMI-SDS after 12 months. Similarly, the RCT of Emmanouil et al. [
60] found no changes in BMI-SDS after an eight-week stress management intervention program in Greek children and adolescents with obesity. Interestingly, baseline markers of acute and chronic stress in our patients, namely cortisol levels and TICS scale, were in the normal range and did not indicate a maladaptive stress response, at least not with the methods used. Although biochemical changes of stress parameters as well as a dysregulation of the cortisol metabolism [
61‐
64] can be found in patients with obesity, obesity is not always related to a hyperresponsive HPA axis and high cortisol levels [
61], and the large interindividual variation in glucocorticoid sensitivity [
65] could explain the normal cortisol levels in our patients with obesity.
Further research in a larger sample is therefore needed to prove the long-term effectiveness of biofeedback exercises on distress and obesity and identify the best candidates for psychophysiological intervention.
Prediction of therapy success (change in BMI-SDS)
In our study, we did not find any associations between therapy success and baseline characteristics. However, the two-year Swiss childhood obesity study (KIDSSTEP) [
6] as well as 2- to 5-year-follow-up German studies [
66,
67] in children with obesity after one-year-interventions showed that the decrease in BMI-z-score was the greatest in children before pubertal age and the smallest in adolescents above 14 years. This association could explain why in our participants, who had a median age of 13.6 years, the BMI-SDS decrease was not significant in the 12-month follow-up.
In the present study, changes in physical capacities were not associated with changes in BMI-SDS, waist circumference, muscle mass or fat mass. Likewise, Reichert et al. [
68] concluded that literature data offers only limited support for a causal link between physical activity and adiposity in adolescents; in children, however, the population-based longitudinal observation conducted by Metcalf et al. [
69] supported a reverse causality where physical inactivity appeared to be the result of fatness rather than its cause.
Limitations of the study
A limitation of this study is the small sample size due to the well-known recruitment difficulties related to this age group [
6,
70,
71] and potential obesity comorbidities (for example psychiatric diseases), the limited time and resources of the families, as shown in the swiss KIDSSTEP study [
6], and probably the lack of motivation in participating in a scientific study since the expenses of multi-component BCI in Switzerland are covered by health insurances. Therefore, and because adolescence is characterised by an increased reward-seeking behaviour [
72], we decided to reward the best five participants of each group. A potential selection bias due to the attractivity of the smartphone could explain the drop out of five patients after being randomized in the control group and signing the consent forms (Fig.
2, hypothesis: the “less motivated” CON dropped out while the “more motivated” CON chose to continue the study despite not getting into “the smartphone group”). The selection of motivated adolescents might be associated with a better compliance of the control group. Lastly, although co-operating psychologists recommend the use of Trierer Stress Inventar questionnaire to evaluate stress in adolescents from the age of 13 years, TICS is validated on a population above 16 years of age. Otherwise, all other outcome measures were based on objective and validated methods for the age group investigated.