Background
Agent | Frontline | Relapsed and refractory | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | ||
Proteasome inhibitors | Carfilzomib (K) | ENDURANCE (NCT01863550): KRD versus VRD, similar PFS, 34.6 mon versus 34.4 mon, increased toxicity | NCT01998971: DKD (ORR 84%) | X-171-003-A1 (NCT00511238): single arm, ORR 23.7%, mOS 15.6 mon | 1. ASIPRE (NCT01080391): KRD versus RD, better ORR (87.1 vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001), PFS (26.3 mon vs. 16.7 mon, p = 0.001) and 2-year OS (73.3% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.04) | ||
2. ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866): KD versus RD, better PFS (18.7 vs. 9.4 mon), ORR (77% vs. 63%), VGPR (54.3% vs. 26.8%) and CR (12.5% vs. 6.2%) | |||||||
Ixazomib | 1. TOURMALINE-MM3 (NCT02181413): Ixazomib versus placebo, better median PFS (26.5 mon vs. 21.3 mon) | 1. TOURMALINE-MM1 (NCT01564537): IRD versus RD, better PFS (20.6 mon vs. 14.7 mon), similar AEs | |||||
2. TOURMALINE-MM4 (NCT02312258): Ixazomib versus placebo, better median PFS (17.4 mon vs. 9.4 mon), better TTP (17.8 mon vs. 9.6 mon), similar AEs (91% vs. 82%) | 2. NCT01564537: IRD versus RD, better PFS (6.7 mon vs. 4.0 mon) and median OS (25.8 mon vs. 15.8 mon) | ||||||
3. TOURMALINE-MM2 (NCT01850524): IRD versus RD, ongoing | |||||||
4. US MM-6: switching from BTZ-based to Ixazomib-based, similar ORR (62% vs. 65%), improved CR rate (4% to 22%) | |||||||
2. OPTIMISMM(NCT 01,734,928): Pom + TZ + DEX versus BTZ + DEX, better PFS (11.2 mon vs. 7.1 mon) | |||||||
3. PomDe + CTX versus PomD: better ORR (64.7% vs. 38.9%) | |||||||
Alkylating Agents | Bendamustine | Ben + BTZ + DEX (BBD): Overall response 91%, CR 9% | BenP versus MP: better CR (32% vs. 13%) | Ben + Ixazomib + DEX: VGPR 11%, PR 50%, mPFS 5.2 mon, OS 23.2 mon | |||
Bcl-2 inhibitors | Venetoclax | NCT01794507: Ven + BTZ + DEX: ORR 67%, VGPR 42% | 1. STORM (NCT02336815): single arm, ORR 21% | 1. BELLINI (NCT02755597): Ven + BTZ + DEX versus BTZ + DEX, suspended (safety issue) | |||
2. NCT02899052: Ven + KD, single arm, ORR 78%, VGPR 56% | 2. CANOVA (NCT03539744): Ven + DEX versus Ven + Pom + DEX, ongoing | ||||||
XPO-1 inhibitors | Selinexor | STOMP (NCT02343042): SVD, ORR 63%, median PFS 9 mon | STORM (NCT02336815): Sd, ≥ PR 26%, mDOR 4.4 mon, median PFS 3.7 mon, and mOS 8.6 mon | BOSTON (NCT03110562): SVD versus VD, better PFS (13.93 mon versus 9.46 mon), ORR (76.4% versus 26.3%) | |||
Kinesin spindle protein inhibitors | Filanesib | (NCT00821249: Filanesib vs. Filanesib + DEX, similar PR rate (16% vs. 15%) | |||||
Melflufen | 1. HORIZON (NCT02963493): single arm, ORR 30%, VGPR 11%, PR 18%, CBR 40% | ||||||
2. O-12-M1 (NCT01897714): Melflufen + DEX, ORR 31%, CBR 49% |
Agent | Trial ID | Intervention | Disease type | Target | Efficacy data | Adverse event | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monoclonal antibodies | Daratumumab (Dara) | NCT01985126 SIRIUS | Single agent | RRMM | CD38 | ORR 30.4%, mOS 20.5 mon | Grade 3 or 4 AEs:fatigue (3%), anemia (24%), thrombocytopenia (19%), neutropenia (12%), back pain (3%) | [42] |
NCT02136134 CASTOR | Dara + BTZ + DEX versus BTZ + DEX | RRMM | CD38 | Better PFS (16.7 mon versus 7.1 mon, p < 0.0001), better ORR (83.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.0001) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: thrombocytopenia (45.3% vs. 32.9%), anemia (14.4% vs. 16.0%), neutropenia (12.8% vs. 4.2%) | [43] | ||
NCT02076009 POLLUX | Dara + Len + DEX versus Len + DEX | RRMM | CD38 | Better PFS (not reached versus 17.5 mon, p < 0.0001), and ORR (92.9% vs. 76.4%, p < 0.0001) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (51.9% vs. 37%), anemia (12.4% vs. 19.6%), thrombocytopenia (12.7% vs. 13.5%), lymphopenia (5.3% vs. 3.6%) | [44] | ||
NCT03158688 CANDOR | Dara + Carfilzomib + DEX versus Carfilzomib + DEX | RRMM | CD38 | Better ORR (84.3% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.004) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: thrombocytopenia (24% vs. 16%), hypertension (18% vs. 13%), anemia (17% vs. 15%), pneumonia (13% vs. 9%), neutropenia (9% vs. 6%) | [46] | ||
NCT02195479 ALCYONE | Dara + Melphalan + Prednisone versus BTZ + Melphalan + Prednisone | NDMM | CD38 | Better PFS (36.4 mon vs. 19.3 mon, p < 0.0001) and OS (78% vs. 67.9%) | Neutropenia (49.7% vs. 52.5%), thrombocytopenia (48.8% vs. 53.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (28.3% vs. 34.2%), anemia (28% vs. 37.6%) | [47] | ||
NCT02252172 MAIA | Dara + Len + DEX versus Len + DEX | NDMM | CD38 | Better PFS (not reached vs. 33.8 mon, p < 0.0001) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (50.0% vs. 35.3%), anemia (11.8% vs. 19.7%), lymphopenia (15.1% vs. 10.7%), pneumonia (13.7% vs. 7.9%) | [48] | ||
NCT02874742 GRIFFIN | Dara + Len + BTZ + DEX versus Len + BTZ + DEX | NDMM | CD38 | Improved ORR (99% vs. 92%, p = 0.01), sCR (42.4% vs. 32%, p = 0.068), ≥ VGPR (91% vs. 73%, p = 0.001), ≥ CR (52% vs. 42%) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (41.4% vs. 21.6%), lymphopenia (23.2% vs. 21.6%), thrombocytopenia (16.2% vs. 8.8%), leukopenia (16.2% vs. 6.9%), pneumonia (8.1% vs. 10.8%) | [49] | ||
NCT02541383 CASSIOPEA | Dara + BTZ + Thalidomide + DEX versus BTZ + Thalidomide + DEX | NDMM | CD38 | Better sCR rate (29% versus 20%, p = 0.001), ≥ CR (39% vs. 26%, p < 0.0001), MRD negativity (64% vs. 44%, p < 0.0001), PFS rate of 18 mon (93% vs. 85%, p < 0.0001) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (28% vs. 15%), lymphopenia (17% vs. 10%), stomatitis (13% vs. 16%) | [8] | ||
Elotuzumab (Elo) | NCT02654132 ELOQUENT-3 | Elo + Pomalidomide + DEX versus Pomalidomide + DEX | RRMM | SLAMF7 | Better PFS (10.3 mon vs. 4.7 mon), ORR (53% vs. 26%) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (13% vs. 27%), anemia (10% vs. 20%), hyperglycemia (8% vs. 7%) | [53] | |
NCT01478048 | Elo + BTZ + DEX versus BTZ + DEX | RRMM | SLAMF7 | Better PFS (9.7 mon vs. 6.9 mon), ORR (66% vs. 63%, ≥ VGPR (36% vs. 27%) | No additional clinically significant AEs occurred. Grade 1/2 infusion reaction rate was low | [54] | ||
NCT 02,272,803 | Elo + Len + DEX versus Len + DEX | NDMM | SLAMF7 | ORR (88% vs. 74%), ongoing | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (18% vs. 7%), leukopenia (15% vs. 0%). Any-grade infections (73% vs. 62%) | [55] | ||
NCT01668719 SWOGS1211 | Len + BTZ + DEX with versus without Elo (maintenance therapy) | NDMM | SLAMF7 | Similar PFS (31 mon vs. 34 mon, p = 0.449), ongoing | Fatigue (100%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (83%), edema (83%), lymphopenia (66%), leukopenia (50%) | |||
NCT02495922 GMMG-HD6 | Elo + BTZ + Len + DEX (induction therapy) | NDMM | SLAMF7 | Similar ORR (82.4% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.35), similar ≥ VGPR (58.3% vs. 54.0%, p = 0.35) | Ongoing | [58] | ||
Isatuximab (Isa) | NCT02990338 ICARIA-MM | Isa + Pomalidomide + DEX versus Pomalidomide + DEX | RRMM | CD38 | Better PFS (11.53 mon vs. 6.47 mon, p = 0.001), ORR (60.4% vs. 35.3%), high-risk patients still had benefit | ALL grades: infusion reactions (56% vs. 0%), respiratory infection (43% vs. 26%), diarrhea (39% vs. 29%), similar anemia and thrombocytopenia; grade 3 or 4 AEs (87% vs. 71%) | ||
NCT03275285 IKEMA | Isa + Carfilzomib + DEX versus Carfilzomib + DEX | RRMM | CD38 | Better PFS (NR vs. 17.5 mon, p = 0.0007), ORR (86.6% vs. 82.9%), ≥ VGPR (72.6% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.193) | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: (76.8 vs. 67.2%) | [62] | ||
MOR202 | NCT01421186 | MOR202 monotherapy versus MOR202 + DEX versus MOR202 + DEX + Pomalidomide versus MOR202 + DEX + Len | RRMM | CD38 | Ongoing, maximum tolerated dose was not reached | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: lymphopenia (38%), neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (30%) | [63] | |
Antibody−drug conjugates | GSK2857916 | NCT03525678 DREAMM-2 | Single agent | RRMM | BCMA | ORR 31% in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort and 34% in the 3.4 mg/kg cohort; mOS was not reached | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: keratopathy (27% in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort, 21% in the 3.4 mg/kg cohort), thrombocytopenia (20% and 33%), anemia (20% and 25%) | [68] |
Lorvotuzumab mertansine | NCT00346255 | Single agent | RRMM | CD56 | PR 5.7%; minor response 11.4%; SD 42.9%; mDOR 15.5 mon; PFS 6.5 mon | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: headache (5.4%), peripheral neuropathy (2.7%), neutropenia (2.7%) | [70] | |
BiTEs | AMG 420 | NCT02514239 | Single agent | RRMM | BCMA/CD3 | sCR: 5; VGPR:1; PR:1; ORR 70%; DOR: 5.6–10.4 mon | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: infections (28%), polyneuropathy (4%) | [96] |
CC-93269 | NCT03486067 | Single agent | RRMM | BCMA/CD3 | ORR 83.3% | Grade 3 or 4 AEs: neutropenia (52.6%), anemia (42.1%), infections (26.3%), thrombocytopenia (21.1%), 1 died of CRS | [97] |
Trial ID | Conductor (reagent) | No. of evaluable patients | No. of median prior lines | Outcome | PFS | CRS | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT02215967 | National Cancer Institute | 26 | 9.5 | sCR: 2; CR: 1; VGPR:7; PR: 5; SD: 10; PD: 1; ORR 81% | EFS 31 weeks | 2 G1, 7 G2, 3 G3, 1 G4 | [94] |
NCT02658929 | Bluebird bb2121 | 33 | 7 | sCR: 12; CR: 3; VGPR: 9; PR: 4; SD: 4; PD: 1; ORR 85% | 11.8 months | 23 G1–2, 2 G3 | [96] |
NCT03274219 | Bluebird bb21217 | 22 | 7 | ORR 83%; MRD negative: 10 at month 1 | NA | 5 G1, 7 G2, 1 G3 | [97] |
NCT03090659 | Nanjing Legend LCAR-B38M | 55 | 3 | CR: 39; VGPR: 3; PR: 8; SD: 4; PD: 1; ORR 88% | 20 months | 46 G1–2, 4 G3 | [98] |
NCT03090659 | Nanjing Legend LCAR-B38M | 17 | 4 | sCR: 13; VGPR: 2; SD:1; PD: 1; ORR 88.2% | 12 months | 10 G1–2, 6 G3, 1 G5 | [100] |
NCT03548207 | Legend Biotech JNJ-68284528 | 29 | 5 | sCR: 86%; PR: 3%; ORR 100% | 26/29 (90%) PFS at median 9-mon follow-up | 25 G 1–2, 1 G 3, 1 G5 | [102] |
NCT03430011 | Bristol JCARH125 | 62 | 6 | sCR + CR: 17; VGPR: 11; PR: 12; ORR 91% | NA | 53 G1–2, 2 G3–4 | [103] |
NCT03915184 | CARsgen Therapeutics CT053 | 13 | 4 | CR: 2; VGPR: 6; PR: 4; ORR 100% | NA | 1 G1, 1 G2, 1 G3 | [104] |
NA | Poseida Therapeutics MCARH171 | 11 | 6 | ORR 64%; median DOR: 106 days | NA | 4 G1–2, 2 G3 | [105] |
ChiCTR1800018137 | Nanjing Iaso Biotherapeutics CT103A | 9 | 4 | CR: 4; PR: 3; MR: 1; SD: 1; ORR 100% | NA | Cases were G0–2 | [106] |