Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2024

01.12.2024 | Research

Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing common bile duct exploration

verfasst von: Ergin Erginoz, Kevser Sak, Haktan Ovul Bozkir, Emin Kose

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator is a risk stratification tool to help predict risks of postoperative complications, which is important for informed decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the calculator in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing common bile duct (CBD) exploration.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was completed for 305 patients that underwent open and laparoscopic CBD exploration at a single institution from 2010 to 2018. Patient demographics and preoperative risk factors were entered into the calculator, and the predicted complication risks were compared with observed complication rates. Brier score, C-statistic, and Hosmer–Lemeshow regression analysis were used to assess discrimination and calibration.

Results

The observed rate exceeded the predicted rate for any complication (35.1% vs. 21%), return to operating room (5.9% vs. 3.6%), death (3.3% vs. 1%), and sepsis (3% vs. 2.4%). The model performed best in predicting serious complication (Brier 0.087, C-statistic 0.818, Hosmer–Lemeshow 0.695), surgical site infection (Brier 0.068, C-statistic 0.670, Hosmer–Lemeshow 0.292), discharge to rehabilitation facility (Brier 0.041, C-statistic 0.907, Hosmer–Lemeshow 0.638), and death (Brier 0.028, C-statistic 0.898, Hosmer–Lemeshow 0.004). In multivariable analysis, there was no statistically significant predicted complication type that affected the type of surgery.

Conclusion

The calculator was accurate in predicting serious complication, surgical site infection, discharge to rehabilitation facility, and death. However, the model displayed poor predictive ability in all other complications that were analyzed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Park CH (2018) The management of common bile duct stones. Korean J Gastroenterol 71(5):260–263CrossRefPubMed Park CH (2018) The management of common bile duct stones. Korean J Gastroenterol 71(5):260–263CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CK, Hsu CN, Cho WR et al (2021) Increased risk of pyogenic liver abscess after endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment of choledocholithiasis. Infect Drug Resist 14:2121–2131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu CK, Hsu CN, Cho WR et al (2021) Increased risk of pyogenic liver abscess after endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment of choledocholithiasis. Infect Drug Resist 14:2121–2131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C et al (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27(11):4164–4170CrossRefPubMed Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C et al (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27(11):4164–4170CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Campagnacci R, Baldoni A, Baldarelli M et al (2010) Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step? Surg Endosc 24(3):547–553CrossRefPubMed Campagnacci R, Baldoni A, Baldarelli M et al (2010) Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step? Surg Endosc 24(3):547–553CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):1–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):1–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannas MP, Lee T, Forbes CM et al (2020) Predicting complications following radical cystectomy with the ACS NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator. World J Urol 38(5):1215–1220CrossRefPubMed Mannas MP, Lee T, Forbes CM et al (2020) Predicting complications following radical cystectomy with the ACS NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator. World J Urol 38(5):1215–1220CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–42 e1-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–42 e1-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Labott JR, Brinkmann EJ, Hevesi M et al (2021) The ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator is a poor predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing oncologic distal femoral replacement. Knee 33:17–23CrossRefPubMed Labott JR, Brinkmann EJ, Hevesi M et al (2021) The ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator is a poor predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing oncologic distal femoral replacement. Knee 33:17–23CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Houdek MT, Hevesi M, Griffin AM et al (2020) Can the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator predict postoperative complications in patients undergoing sacral tumor resection for chordoma? J Surg Oncol 121(6):1036–1041CrossRefPubMed Houdek MT, Hevesi M, Griffin AM et al (2020) Can the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator predict postoperative complications in patients undergoing sacral tumor resection for chordoma? J Surg Oncol 121(6):1036–1041CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Alzahrani SM, Ko CS, Yoo MW (2020) Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with early gastric cancer treated with laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 20(3):267–276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alzahrani SM, Ko CS, Yoo MW (2020) Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with early gastric cancer treated with laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 20(3):267–276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy MH, Singh P, Nayak R et al (2020) Can the American College of Surgeons risk calculator predict 30-day complications after spine surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45(9):621–628CrossRefPubMed McCarthy MH, Singh P, Nayak R et al (2020) Can the American College of Surgeons risk calculator predict 30-day complications after spine surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45(9):621–628CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyde LZ, Valizadeh N, Al-Mazrou AM, Kiran RP (2019) ACS-NSQIP risk calculator predicts cohort but not individual risk of complication following colorectal resection. Am J Surg 218(1):131–135CrossRefPubMed Hyde LZ, Valizadeh N, Al-Mazrou AM, Kiran RP (2019) ACS-NSQIP risk calculator predicts cohort but not individual risk of complication following colorectal resection. Am J Surg 218(1):131–135CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosmer DW, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 2013: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Hosmer DW, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 2013: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nattino G, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S (2020) Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: a modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Biometrics 76(2):549–560CrossRefPubMed Nattino G, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S (2020) Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: a modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Biometrics 76(2):549–560CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao V, Elfenbein DM, Pitt SC et al (2022) Evaluating discrimination of ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in thyroidectomy patients. J Surg Res 271:137–144CrossRefPubMed Hsiao V, Elfenbein DM, Pitt SC et al (2022) Evaluating discrimination of ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in thyroidectomy patients. J Surg Res 271:137–144CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hers TM, Van Schaik J, Keekstra N et al (2021) Inaccurate risk assessment by the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in aortic surgery. J Clin Med 10(22):5426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hers TM, Van Schaik J, Keekstra N et al (2021) Inaccurate risk assessment by the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in aortic surgery. J Clin Med 10(22):5426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Hulst HC, Dekker JWT, Bastiaannet E et al (2022) Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in older patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery. J Geriatr Oncol 13(6):788–795CrossRefPubMed van der Hulst HC, Dekker JWT, Bastiaannet E et al (2022) Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in older patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery. J Geriatr Oncol 13(6):788–795CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Merath K et al (2020) Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 24(3):551–559CrossRefPubMed Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Merath K et al (2020) Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 24(3):551–559CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad KG, Nelson BG, Deig CR et al (2016) ACS NSQIP risk calculator: an accurate predictor of complications in major head and neck surgery? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(5):740–742CrossRefPubMed Prasad KG, Nelson BG, Deig CR et al (2016) ACS NSQIP risk calculator: an accurate predictor of complications in major head and neck surgery? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(5):740–742CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Massoumi RL, Trevino CM, Webb TP (2017) Postoperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparison to the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator and the Tokyo guidelines. World J Surg 41(4):935–939CrossRefPubMed Massoumi RL, Trevino CM, Webb TP (2017) Postoperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparison to the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator and the Tokyo guidelines. World J Surg 41(4):935–939CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal EW, Lyon E, Kearney J et al (2017) Evaluating the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement project risk calculator: results from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. HPB (Oxford) 19(12):1104–1111CrossRefPubMed Beal EW, Lyon E, Kearney J et al (2017) Evaluating the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement project risk calculator: results from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. HPB (Oxford) 19(12):1104–1111CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Donadon M, Galvanin J, Branciforte B et al (2020) Assessment of the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator of outcomes after hepatectomy for liver tumors: results from a cohort of 950 patients. Int J Surg 84:102–108CrossRefPubMed Donadon M, Galvanin J, Branciforte B et al (2020) Assessment of the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator of outcomes after hepatectomy for liver tumors: results from a cohort of 950 patients. Int J Surg 84:102–108CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Mier G, Esquivel-Torres S, Alvarado-Arenas R et al (2022) Application and validation of a surgical risk calculator in a liver surgery cohort of patients in Veracruz. Mexico Cir Cir 90(3):359–364PubMed Martínez-Mier G, Esquivel-Torres S, Alvarado-Arenas R et al (2022) Application and validation of a surgical risk calculator in a liver surgery cohort of patients in Veracruz. Mexico Cir Cir 90(3):359–364PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 211(2):176–186CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 211(2):176–186CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing common bile duct exploration
verfasst von
Ergin Erginoz
Kevser Sak
Haktan Ovul Bozkir
Emin Kose
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03207-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.