Anzeige
Erschienen in:
25.08.2023 | Original Article
Evaluation of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal impacted ureter stones based on a new scoring standard: a bicentric matched-pair analysis
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 10/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objective
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) in the treatment of proximal impacted ureter stones (PIUS) based on a new scoring standard in two medical centers.
Methods
The data of 45 patients with Complicated PIUS (total stone score ≥ 3) and 350 with Simple PIUS (total stone score < 3) who underwent URSL were collected in this retrospective study between January 2015 and June 2022. The definition and scoring standards for preoperative high-risk factors associated with stones included whether the diameter of the stone was > 2 cm, stone density was > 1000 HU, there was a history of lithotripsy, the degree of hydronephrosis was greater than moderate, and there was an infection. Scores for stones were then assigned (yes = 1, no = 0), and the Complicated stone case was defined as a total stone score ≥ 3; the Simple stone case was defined as a total stone score < 3. During the same period, 45 patients were selected from the patients with Simple stone cases as the control group, matched at a 1:1 ratio to index Complicated stone cases with regard to age, sex, and BMI. Perioperative data were compared between the two groups.
Results
All 90 operations were successfully completed. Compared to the Simple cases group, the surgical duration of the Complicated group was significantly longer (59.69 ± 28.06 min vs. 73.46 ± 27.12 min, p < 0.05), and stone-free rate (SFR) was significantly lower (88.89 vs. 68.9%, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in complication rate between the two groups regarding Clavien grade I, II, or III complications (20.0% in Complicated cases group vs. 8.9% in Simple cases group, p = 0.037). As for the length of the hospital stay and the total treatment cost, the two groups have no difference.
Conclusion
For Simple stone cases, URSL had a better SFR and higher surgical efficacy, whereas complicated stone cases had a high complication rate and long operation time. Thus, we suggest that URSL is the preferred choice for Simple stone cases rather than complicated stone cases.