Background
Bronchiectasis is a chronic pulmonary condition characterised by a cycle of recurrent lower respiratory tract infections and airway inflammation giving rise to frequent hospitalisations and reduced quality of life [
1,
2]. Globally, there is emerging evidence in the literature to suggest that presence of bronchiectasis is associated with a significant degree of hospitalisations and high mortality rates [
3‐
6]. However, these global studies portray bronchiectasis as largely a disease of the elderly [
7‐
9]. In the First Nations Indigenous people’s context, for the majority bronchiectasis is a lifelong disease, or at best an early adulthood to middle-age disease [
10‐
13] (from here on “Indigenous” is used to refer to global First nations populations, while “Aboriginal Australian” is used to specifically refer to Australia’s’ First Nations people). In the paediatric Aboriginal Australian population, bronchiectasis incidence is one among the highest in the world [
14,
15], and the prevalence remains significantly higher among Aboriginal Australians compared to non-Aboriginal Australian adults [
16], as well as among global Indigenous populations, as observed among the New Zealand’s First Nations Indigenous Māori and Pacific Islander populations compared to New Zealand’s non-Indigenous population [
17,
18].
Presence of bronchiectasis can lead to a greater number of hospitalisations and associated mortality both as direct results of bronchiectasis exacerbations per se or as an indirect contributor to other comorbidities [
19‐
23]. Among both Aboriginal Australians and among Indigenous populations worldwide the prevalence of multimorbidity is high [
24‐
27]. Indeed, concurrent presence of bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been reported in up to 50% of adult Aboriginal Australians [
28‐
33]. Furthermore, hospitalisation frequency related to bronchiectasis, and bronchiectasis specific mortality rates appear to be significantly higher among Indigenous patients than their non-Indigenous counterparts [
34‐
37]. However, although a higher hospitalisation frequency amongst Indigenous patients with bronchiectasis has been described in the existing literature, there is little data regarding other pertinent factors such as principal reasons for hospital presentation, length of hospital stays, utilisation of intensive care unit (ICU) or mechanical ventilation and therapeutic interventions, in particular use of inhaled pharmacotherapy. In the recent past, a significant prevalence of chronic respiratory disorders, including bronchiectasis among adult Aboriginal Australians in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia has begun to be elucidated [
10,
24]. Hence, it is timely to investigate in greater detail hospital presentations and related outcomes among adult Aboriginal Australians with bronchiectasis. Therefore, this study sets forth to describe the demographics, relevant clinical parameters, frequency and reason for hospitalisations, length of stay, treatment details, utilisation of ICU and ventilation in an adult Aboriginal Australian cohort diagnosed to have bronchiectasis over a ten-year period (2011–2020) in the Top End Health Service (TEHS) region of the NT of Australia.
Discussion
In this study, 87% of bronchiectasis patients were noted to have had at least one respiratory related hospital admission during the 10-year study period, with 29% requiring ICU admission. Patients spent a median of 3 weeks in hospital, and 82% of patients had recurrent admissions. Patients who required hospitalisation appeared to be in poorer health than other patients as evidenced by a higher rate of comorbidities, lower lung function values and greater prescription rates of inhaled pharmacotherapy. Presence of COPD or asthma were associated with greater lengths of time spent in hospital, and shorter intervals between hospitalisations.
In the global non-Indigenous populations, hospital admission data and factors associated with mortality, including the economic burden secondary to bronchiectasis are well documented [
3‐
7,
19‐
23]. Among the adult Indigenous population however, literature surrounding hospital admissions is sparse – despite a higher burden of chronic respiratory disease [
10,
24]. On the backdrop of poorer socioeconomic environment, alongside geographic, social and systemic barriers to healthcare, Indigenous people typically display a greater degree of multimorbidity, which in turn may alter the way in which respiratory diseases manifest in comparison to their non-Indigenous counterparts [
28,
31,
42‐
48].
The majority of patients (69.4%) had an admission secondary to COPD (J44), similar to what has been observed in previous reports [
49]. Although, indeed it is difficult to ascertain if bronchiectasis is a primary or a secondary factor driving hospital admission rates in the presence of multi-respiratory morbidity, including concurrent presence of bronchiectasis and COPD among Aboriginal Australians [
28], however, it is reasonable to speculate that the presence of bronchiectasis among patients with COPD would have perpetuated exacerbation rates and subsequent hospitalisations. Previous studies in other population settings have demonstrated worse outcomes when bronchiectasis co-exists with COPD, especially in the presence of a smoking history, alongside lower lung function parameters [
3,
5]. Indeed, in the current cohort with hospitalisations, COPD was recorded in 88%, a smoking history in 85%, and median FVC & FEV
1 of 49 & 36% predicted respectively. Furthermore, a 10% reduction in FEV
1 was associated with a mean 5.3 day increase in the total number of days in hospital, although significance was attenuated on multiple hypotheses correction. Previous reports have shown that among adult Aboriginal Australians, lung function parameters are substantially lower compared to their Caucasian counterparts [
50‐
54], thus, it may be indicative that presence of lower lung function parameters could be a predictor for increased length of hospital admissions among Indigenous patients more generally, including patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that improving lung function parameters with targeted interventions among Indigenous patients with respiratory disorders will reduce hospital admission rates and length of hospitalisation. Furthermore, Bronchiectasis and COPD overlap syndrome (BCOS) is increasingly recognized [
55]. Although both these conditions share several similar clinical features, the management of these conditions differs; hence, in clinical practice, differentiating if COPD or bronchiectasis is the primary disorder, especially when inhaled pharmacotherapy is considered, is vital. In addition to classical clinical manifestations, chest CT scan finding will be of heightened value in differentiating which of these conditions is predominant [
56].
Among patients with bronchiectasis, a lower BMI is reported to be an independent predictor of mortality [
57]. In our study we observed BMI to be lower among patients with hospital admissions– though we did not test the effect of BMI on mortality specifically in this study. If a lower BMI among Aboriginal Australian patients would translate to poorer long-term outcomes is not known currently and only prospective studies will elucidate this aspect. However, it is noteworthy that the median BMI in the current cohort is lower than the BMI reported previously among non-Aboriginal Australian cohort with bronchiectasis [
58].
It is vital to note that the majority of patients in this study resided in remote/rural localities (92%) (Fig.
1). Hence, during exacerbations of airway disease and when needing hospital admissions, patients are inevitably retrieved to secondary or tertiary care centres, therefore incurring substantial cost to the health system [
59,
60]. Nevertheless, the economic burden of managing patients with bronchiectasis in this region is not exactly known, especially for adult Aboriginal Australian people residing in remote and rural communities [
61]. However, a study from Brazil estimated R$28 million (approx. AUD 14 million) in a twelve-year period for an average hospital stay of 8.1 days [
21]. It is reasonable to speculate the economic cost could be substantially higher in the Australian setting, especially when considering transporting patients from remote communities by air and relocating family and caregivers. Due to limited access to specialist health care in remote Aboriginal Australian communities the threshold to transfer to a tertiary institution during exacerbation of airway disease may be low. This may be the reason for observing only 12.5% of hospitalisations were recorded as a same day separation. Hence, it is apparent that addressing bronchiectasis and other respiratory diseases at the community and primary health care level, may be an avenue to prevent recurrent hospital admissions and associated health care utilisation and expenditure [
62]. Moreover, patients are more likely to show adherence to treatment interventions for disease management with continuity of care at community and primary health care level.
Although currently literature portrays a high bronchiectasis disease burden and associated adverse health outcomes globally, innovative preventative or therapeutic interventions are negligible, other than the proven benefits of chest physiotherapy/airway clearance techniques and classic mucolytic/mucoactive agents [
63,
64]. In this study we did not explore specific treatment interventions, either in the ambulatory setting or during acute hospital admissions that would have any influence on recurrent hospital admission rates or for the length of stay. However, among patients prescribed ICS, we observed a higher proportion had an admission related to ICD code J44 compared to patients with no ICS prescription. Utilisation of ICS among patients with bronchiectasis is controversial and may be detrimental [
65]. Previous studies from our centre had reported higher use of ICS among Indigenous patients with bronchiectasis and to have a significant decline in lung function parameters with ICS [
66,
67]. It is unclear if ICS is over prescribed due to concurrent presence of other airway diseases such as COPD and asthma in this cohort. However, prospective studies are needed to define if increased hospital rates are related to natural disease progression and recurrent exacerbation or if they are related to aftermath effects of ICS use [
68].
This study has demonstrated that the bronchiectasis disease burden is substantial, as is its impact on hospital admission rates and overall poor outcomes among adult Aboriginal Australians. In the largely non-Aboriginal Australian bronchiectasis registry, 29% of patients recorded a respiratory hospitalisation in the last year [
58], while in the current Aboriginal Australian cohort, 50% did so. Moreover, despite evidence in the literature dating back to the 1980’s to suggest hospital admission rates are substantially higher among Aboriginal Australian patients in comparison to their non-Aboriginal counterparts with bronchiectasis [
69], hospital admission rates continue to remain substantially high in this population, as evident form our current study. Furthermore, there has been no substantial interventions to address this disparity in the last three decades [
70]. Therefore, it is apparent that it is inevitable that the noted higher morbidity secondary to bronchiectasis is likely to continue to show a grim trend for the future, unless clinically and culturally appropriate interventions are implemented urgently to address the overall respiratory disease burden among adult Aboriginal Australians, so that, in particular, bronchiectasis does not continue to remain a neglected chronic lung disease among Aboriginal Australians for the foreseeable future [
71].
Limitations
This study’s outcomes pertain to Aboriginal Australian people residing in the TEHS region of the NT of Australia and the results represented in this study cannot be generalised to the wider Aboriginal populations in Australia or for Indigenous people globally. We did not assess patients’ presentations to primary health care or at remote community health centres with exacerbation of their airway disease and interventions undertaken, as this was beyond the scope of this study. We also did not have data to represent therapeutic interventions during hospital admissions, which would have provided more insight for those patients with recurrent hospital admissions, especially if interventions such as chest physiotherapy/sputum clearance techniques were implemented. Moreover, with a higher presence of COPD in this population, it is uncertain if bronchiectasis is a primary or a secondary cause for hospital admissions. Furthermore, there may be a bias for those patients recorded to have no hospital admissions, as it is possible despite exacerbations of airway disease, due to remoteness and geographical isolations they did not present to hospital for admission and also spirometry data was not available in all patients. In addition, as this study was retrospective in nature, this would have introduced potential bias in the outcomes observed. Nonetheless, this is the first study to represent hospital admission data in an adult Aboriginal Australian cohort, in this region. The outcomes represented in this study may be an avenue for health organisations and stakeholders to implement strategies to address to close the respiratory health gap among adult Aboriginal Australians and Indigenous people globally.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.