Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Research

Infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus caused by levofloxacin-resistant microorganisms

verfasst von: Naoko Kato, Takeshi Ide, Hidenaga Kobashi, Ikuko Toda

Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Introduction

We present seven cases of infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking (CXL) to attenuate keratoconus progression.

Methods

Of 524 consecutive patients who underwent CXL, 7 cases (4 males and 3 females; 21.5 ± 7.1 years) developed postoperative infectious keratitis were retrospectively reviewed. CXL was performed using the Dresden protocol or an accelerated protocol involving epithelial removal.

Results

All cases appeared normal on the day after surgery, but subsequently developed eye pain, blurred vision, corneal infiltration, inflammation of the anterior chamber, and ciliary injection on day 2 or 3. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was cultured from two eyes, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus from two eyes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae from one eye. All detected bacteria were resistant to levofloxacin (LVFX). Five of the seven cases, especially four of the five severe cases with hypopyon, had a history of atopic dermatitis. All cases were observed after 2015.

Conclusions

Infectious keratitis after CXL caused by microbes resistant to LVFX is increasing. In addition to careful postoperative observation of the cornea, preoperative evaluation of bacteria within the conjunctival sac evident on nasal swab cultures may be useful to identify potentially problematic microbes and inform the selection of appropriate antibiotics.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) attenuates keratoconus progression, as first reported by Wollensak et al. in 2003 [1]. Progression was halted in 90–95 % of cases in clinical trials [25]. However, several rare complications have been described, including delayed epithelial healing [6, 7], stromal melting [7, 8], sterile infiltration [810], early infectious keratitis [1121], stromal hazing and demarcation after several weeks [9], deep stromal scarring [22], failure [9],  and progressive flattening [23, 24]. Infectious keratitis is the most concerning complication; scarring and irregular astigmatism may develop even after infection control, thus impairing the vision of young patients. We first used CXL to treat keratoconus 13 years ago, and encountered no case of infectious keratitis up to 2015. Sporadic cases were noted from 2016 onward (Table 1); these cases are summarized in this paper, including the possible causes and preventative measures and treatments that we employ.
Table 1
Demographic of cases with infectious keratitis after CXL at Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic
 
Number of cases with infection
Number of CXL
Frequency (%)
2007
0
3
0.0
2008
0
2
0.0
2009
0
10
0.0
2010
0
12
0.0
2011
0
8
0.0
2012
0
5
0.0
2013
0
4
0.0
2014
0
45
0.0
2015
0
52
0.0
2016
2
46
4.4
2017
0
60
0
2018
1
92
1.1
2019
3
134
2.2
2020
1
51
2.0
Total
7
524
1.3

Patients

From February 2007 to May 2020, 524 consecutively enrolled eyes of keratoconus patients, exhibiting pellucid marginal degeneration or keratectasia after laser in-situ keratomileusis, underwent CXL with epithelial debridement under topical anesthesia with application of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride (0.4 % w/v) eyedrops before each procedure. After the eye lid skin was delicately rubbed 2 times using a sterilized cotton swab soaked in the 10 % povidone-iodine solution, a lid speculum was inserted. The eye surface was rinsed with 20 ml of 5 ppm ozone water, followed by removal of the central corneal epithelium (diameter = 7.0–8.0 mm) using a blunt spatula or an excimer laser. Then, 0.1 % (w/v) isotonic riboflavin in dextran 20 % (w/v) solution was instilled every 2 min for 20 min. After confirming stromal riboflavin saturation via slit-lamp examination, the thinnest part of the corneal stroma was measured using an AL-3000 pachymeter (Tomey, Aichi, Japan). If the stromal thickness was < 400 μm, 0.1 % (w/v) hypotonic riboflavin or distilled water was instilled until the minimal thickness reached 400 μm. UV-A radiation was then delivered at 3.0 mW/cm2 for 30 min (KERA-X; Peschke, Huenenberg, Switzerland) or 18.0 mW/cm2 for 5 min (KXL; Avedro, Waltham, MA, USA). At the end of the procedure, a soft bandage contact lens was applied and a drop of levofloxacin (LVFX) instilled. Postoperative medications included LVFX and betamethasone (0.1 % w/v) eyedrops four times daily.
The study protocol was approved by the Internal Review Board of Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic. While this study was the retrospective observational study, the written informed consent was waived by the Internal Review Board of Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic. In all cases, the CXL was performed by experienced ophthalmologists.
The characteristics of the seven patients are summarized in Table 2: bacterial infections were proven or strongly suspected in all patients. Microbiological evaluations were performed for five patients; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was cultured from two eyes, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus from two eyes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae from one eye. All detected bacteria were resistant to LVFX. Four experienced surgeons performed the CXL for the seven cases, and there was no remarkable prevalence among individuals.
Table 2
Characteristics of cases with infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking
Case
Age
Gender
AD
Year of surgery
Microbes
Sensitivity for antibiotics
Hypopyon
Clinical course
Antibiotics used for treatment
Others
1
21
M
+
2016
MRSA
R; LVFX, CTZ, EM
S; VCM
+
Pain on day 3, healed with scar, eventual PKP
VCM
Ferrara ring implantation was performed simultaneously with CXL
2
33
F
-
2016
St pneumoniae
R; EM
I; LVFX
S; CTZ
-
Pain on day 2,
Diagnosed on day 3
CTZ
 
3
15
M
+
2018
MSSA
R; LVFX
S; CTZ
+
Pain on day 2,
Diagnosed on day 3
CTZ
 
4
20
M
-
2019
Not tested
NA
+
Pain on day 2,
Diagnosed on day 3
TOB, CP, CTZ
 
5
25
F
+
2019
MSSA
R; LVFX, EM
S; CTZ
+
Pain and visual disturbance on day 2
Corneal perforation on day 3
TOB, CTZ
 
6
16
M
+
2019
Not tested
NA
-
Diagnosed on day 3
TOB, CP, CTZ
 
7
16
F
+
2020
MRSA
R; LVFX, CTZ
+
Pain and diagnosed on day 2
VCM
 
AD atopic dermatitis; R resistant; S sensitive; PKP penetrating keratoplasty; LVFX levofloxacin; CTZ ceftazidime; EM erythromycin; VCM vancomycin; TOB tobramycin; CXL corneal crosslinking, MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA methicillin‐sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; St pneumoniae Streptococcus pneumoniae
Five patients (1, 3, 4, 5 and 7) exhibited severe infectious keratitis with hypopyons. One patient (Case 1) underwent implantation of a pair of Ferrara rings contemporaneously with CXL. All five patients with severe keratitis appeared normal on the day after surgery, but complained of eye pain on day 2 or 3. All patients exhibited corneal epithelial defects accompanied by infiltration, ciliary injection, and a hypopyon on day 3. The infections were controlled by antibiotics, and the corneas healed but with stromal scarring. In the two patients without hypopyons, two (Cases 2 and 6) complained of pain on day 2 or 3 and were diagnosed with infectious keratitis on day 3. These two patients recovered quickly after application of topical antibiotics, without stromal scarring.

Discussion

We encountered 7 cases (among 524 cases; rate of 1.34 %) of infectious keratitis after CXL to treat keratoconus, all within the past 5 years. MRSA and MRSA resistant to LVFX were the most frequent causative microbes, followed by S. pneumoniae (also resistant to LVFX). The frequency of infectious keratitis after CXL has been reported by several clinicians; the microbes involved were gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis[21], S. aureus[1116] and Streptococcus salivarius and/or S. oralis[17, 18]); gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli[19] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[20]), herpes virus[25], and a fungus and Acanthamoeba[26]. Many microbes were resistant to the new quinolone antibiotics, similar to our findings.
As stated above, post-CXL infections were not observed until 2016 in our institute. In the 9 years from 2007 to 2015, we performed CXL on 141 eyes and experienced no case of infection. After the first case in 2016, the incidence increased to 3 of 134 eyes (2.2 %) in 2019 (Table 1).
We used ofloxacin eyedrops until 2000, and later LVFX eyedrops from 2001 still now, as preventative therapies after CXL, PRK, and PTK. The new quinolone antibiotics, such as LVFX, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, have widely been used to prevent infection after various ophthalmological surgeries. The trends in antibiotic resistance among ocular microorganisms have been investigated. Asbell et al. showed that antibiotic resistance was prevalent among staphylococcal isolates, but only a few small changes were observed from 2009 to 2018 in the USA. [27, 28] Deguchi et al. found that the prevalence of MRSA and methicillin-resistant-coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CNS) decreased significantly from 2005 to 2014 in Japan, but over 50 % of Corynebacteriumisolates remained resistant to LVFX[29]. Kamo et al. showed that the prevalence of LVFX-resistant MSSA increased significantly from 2008 to 2018, although the prevalence of MRSA did not increase. MR-CNS was not detected in 2008.[30, 31] Thus, microorganisms resistant to new quinolone antibiotics may have increased in recent years, raising the rate of postoperative infectious keratitis.
A history of atopic dermatitis may increase the risk of post-CXL infection. Skin MRSA levels are elevated in patients with atopic dermatitis[13, 32, 33]. Five of the seven patients (71 %) in this study had been diagnosed with atopic dermatitis, including four of the five (80 %) with severe infectious keratitis accompanied by a hypopyon. Patients on long-term steroids or immunosuppressants to treat allergic disorders, such as vernal keratoconjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, and eczema, require special attention in terms of the evaluation of drug-resistant bacteria, especially those with atopic dermatitis. Although there were no healthcare workers among our patients, that group also requires special attention because they frequently come into contact with drug-resistant bacteria[33]..
In this study, all symptoms of infection became apparent on postoperative day 2 to 3; no symptoms were noted on day 1. Postoperative examinations should be performed on day 2 or 3; if suspicious symptoms are seen, immediate microbiological testing (including for drug sensitivity) is required. We recently began to preoperatively screen for microbes via nasal culture; the conjunctival sac is seldom culture-positive when patients do not develop conjunctivitis. Furthermore, we prescribe additional effective antibiotics, such as chloramphenicol, postoperatively, if some bacteria resistant to LVFX and/or other drugs were detected.
In conclusion, postoperative infectious keratitis after CXL is caused mainly by LVFX-resistant bacteria. As microbial resistance to the new quinolone antibiotics has increased recently, drug-resistant bacteria on the ocular surface, especially in patients with atopic dermatitis, should be screened for in patients undergoing CXL for keratoconus.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Daisuke Todokoro, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Ophthalmology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine and Junko Kamo, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Ophthalmology, Kofu Kyoritsu Hospital for their valuable discussion and support for conceptualization of the manuscript.

Declarations

This retrospective observational study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic, and the study protocol was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. While this study was the retrospective observational study, the written informed consent was waived by the Internal Review Board of Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135: 620–627.CrossRef Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135: 620–627.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, et al. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34: 796–801.CrossRef Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, et al. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34: 796–801.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittig-Silva C, Whiting M, Lamoureux E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24: S720-725. Wittig-Silva C, Whiting M, Lamoureux E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24: S720-725.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hersh PS, Stulting RD, Muller D, et al. United States Crosslinking Study Group. United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1259–1270.CrossRef Hersh PS, Stulting RD, Muller D, et al. United States Crosslinking Study Group. United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1259–1270.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobashi H, Rong SS. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8145651.CrossRef Kobashi H, Rong SS. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8145651.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohamed-Noriega K, Butrón-Valdez K, Vazquez-Galvan J, et al. Corneal melting after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in a thin cornea of a diabetic patient treated with topical nepafenac: A case report with a literature review. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016; 7: 119–124.CrossRef Mohamed-Noriega K, Butrón-Valdez K, Vazquez-Galvan J, et al. Corneal melting after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in a thin cornea of a diabetic patient treated with topical nepafenac: A case report with a literature review. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016; 7: 119–124.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiler TG, Schmidinger G, Fischinger I, et al. Complications of corneal cross-linking. Complications of corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmologe. 2013; 110: 639–644.CrossRef Seiler TG, Schmidinger G, Fischinger I, et al. Complications of corneal cross-linking. Complications of corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmologe. 2013; 110: 639–644.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki T, Ide T, Toda I, et al. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation as a Treatment for sterile infiltration and corneal melting after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2018; 9: 185–189.CrossRef Sasaki T, Ide T, Toda I, et al. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation as a Treatment for sterile infiltration and corneal melting after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2018; 9: 185–189.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1358–1362.CrossRef Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1358–1362.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mereaux D, Knoeri J, Jouve L, et al. Sterile keratitis following standard corneal collagen crosslinking: A case series and literature review. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019; 42: 603–611.CrossRef Mereaux D, Knoeri J, Jouve L, et al. Sterile keratitis following standard corneal collagen crosslinking: A case series and literature review. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019; 42: 603–611.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shetty R, Kaweri L, Nuijts RM, et al. Profile of microbial keratitis after corneal collagen cross-linking. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:340509. Shetty R, Kaweri L, Nuijts RM, et al. Profile of microbial keratitis after corneal collagen cross-linking. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:340509.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodavoor SK, Sarwate NJ, Ramamurhy D. Microbial keratitis following accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8: 111–3.CrossRef Kodavoor SK, Sarwate NJ, Ramamurhy D. Microbial keratitis following accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8: 111–3.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fasciani R, Agresta A, Caristia A, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ocular Infection after Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Potential Association with Atopic Dermatitis. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2015;2015:613273. Fasciani R, Agresta A, Caristia A, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ocular Infection after Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Potential Association with Atopic Dermatitis. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2015;2015:613273.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oakey Z, Thai K, Garg S. Bilateral corneal perforation due to MRSA keratitis in a crosslinking patient. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2017;7: Doc21.PubMedPubMedCentral Oakey Z, Thai K, Garg S. Bilateral corneal perforation due to MRSA keratitis in a crosslinking patient. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2017;7: Doc21.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodavoor SK, Tiwari NN, Ramamurthy D. Profile of infectious and sterile keratitis after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2020; 13: 18–23.CrossRef Kodavoor SK, Tiwari NN, Ramamurthy D. Profile of infectious and sterile keratitis after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2020; 13: 18–23.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schear M, Ragam A, Seedor J, et al. Rapid keratitis and perforation after corneal collagen cross-linking. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020; 18: 100658.CrossRef Schear M, Ragam A, Seedor J, et al. Rapid keratitis and perforation after corneal collagen cross-linking. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020; 18: 100658.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Amry M, Mudhaiyan T, Al-Huthail R, et al. Infectious crystalline keratopathy after corneal cross-linking. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017; 24: 100–102.CrossRef Al-Amry M, Mudhaiyan T, Al-Huthail R, et al. Infectious crystalline keratopathy after corneal cross-linking. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017; 24: 100–102.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zamora KV, Males JJ. Polymicrobial keratitis after a collagen cross-linking procedure with postoperative use of a contact lens: a case report. Cornea. 2009; 28: 474–476.CrossRef Zamora KV, Males JJ. Polymicrobial keratitis after a collagen cross-linking procedure with postoperative use of a contact lens: a case report. Cornea. 2009; 28: 474–476.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollhammer M, Cursiefen C. Bacterial keratitis early after corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35: 588–589.CrossRef Pollhammer M, Cursiefen C. Bacterial keratitis early after corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35: 588–589.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma N, Maharana P, Singh G, et al. Pseudomonas keratitis after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: case report and review of literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36: 517–520.CrossRef Sharma N, Maharana P, Singh G, et al. Pseudomonas keratitis after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: case report and review of literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36: 517–520.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez-Santonja JJ, Artola A, Javaloy J, et al. Microbial keratitis after corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35: 1138–1140.CrossRef Pérez-Santonja JJ, Artola A, Javaloy J, et al. Microbial keratitis after corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35: 1138–1140.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato N, Konomi K, Saiki M, et al. Deep stromal opacity after corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2013; 32: 895–898.CrossRef Kato N, Konomi K, Saiki M, et al. Deep stromal opacity after corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2013; 32: 895–898.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato N, Negishi K, Sakai C, et al. Five-year Outcomes of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Comparison Between Conventional and Accelerated Procedures. Cornea. 2020; 39: e1.CrossRef Kato N, Negishi K, Sakai C, et al. Five-year Outcomes of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Comparison Between Conventional and Accelerated Procedures. Cornea. 2020; 39: e1.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Noor IH, Seiler TG, Noor K, et al. Continued Long-term Flattening After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2018; 34: 567–570.CrossRef Noor IH, Seiler TG, Noor K, et al. Continued Long-term Flattening After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2018; 34: 567–570.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sitaula S, Singh SK, Gurung A. Bilateral viral keratitis following corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2019; 9: 16.CrossRef Sitaula S, Singh SK, Gurung A. Bilateral viral keratitis following corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2019; 9: 16.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Maharana PK, Sahay P, Sujeeth M, et al. Microbial Keratitis After Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2018; 37: 162–167.CrossRef Maharana PK, Sahay P, Sujeeth M, et al. Microbial Keratitis After Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2018; 37: 162–167.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbell PA, DeCory HH. Antibiotic resistance among bacterial conjunctival pathogens collected in the Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) surveillance study. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0205814.CrossRef Asbell PA, DeCory HH. Antibiotic resistance among bacterial conjunctival pathogens collected in the Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) surveillance study. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0205814.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbell PA, Sanfilippo CM, Sahm DF, et al. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance Among Ocular Microorganisms in the United States From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020; 138: 1–12.CrossRef Asbell PA, Sanfilippo CM, Sahm DF, et al. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance Among Ocular Microorganisms in the United States From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020; 138: 1–12.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Deguchi H, Kitazawa K, Kayukawa K, et al. The trend of resistance to antibiotics for ocular infection of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Corynebacterium compared with 10-years previous: A retrospective observational study. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0203705.CrossRef Deguchi H, Kitazawa K, Kayukawa K, et al. The trend of resistance to antibiotics for ocular infection of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Corynebacterium compared with 10-years previous: A retrospective observational study. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0203705.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamo J, Soshiu M, Muramatsu S, et al. Change in conjunctivitis bacteria susceptibilities to antibiotics between 2008 and 2011. J Eye 2014; 31: 1037–1042. Kamo J, Soshiu M, Muramatsu S, et al. Change in conjunctivitis bacteria susceptibilities to antibiotics between 2008 and 2011. J Eye 2014; 31: 1037–1042.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamo J, Muramatsu S, Akazawa H, et al. Recommendation of antibiotics for the eyes by age group in 2018 based on microorganism sensitivity. J Eye 2020; 37: 484–489. Kamo J, Muramatsu S, Akazawa H, et al. Recommendation of antibiotics for the eyes by age group in 2018 based on microorganism sensitivity. J Eye 2020; 37: 484–489.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuda M, Ohashi H, Matsumoto C, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ocular surface infection efficacy of chloramphenicol eye drops. Cornea. 2002; 21: S86-89.CrossRef Fukuda M, Ohashi H, Matsumoto C, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ocular surface infection efficacy of chloramphenicol eye drops. Cornea. 2002; 21: S86-89.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitazawa K, Sotozono C, Sakamoto M, et al. Nasal and conjunctival screening prior to refractive surgery: an observational and cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e010733CrossRef Kitazawa K, Sotozono C, Sakamoto M, et al. Nasal and conjunctival screening prior to refractive surgery: an observational and cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e010733CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus caused by levofloxacin-resistant microorganisms
verfasst von
Naoko Kato
Takeshi Ide
Hidenaga Kobashi
Ikuko Toda
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02081-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.