Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) take a large share to the growing public health challenge of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In 2019, over half a billion prevalent cases, 18.6 million deaths, and 393 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs) were due to CVDs [
1], so being a major contributor of adult morbidity and mortality. Coherently, CVDs are the leading cause of death in Europe, with estimated 4 million deaths each year and 25% of all-cause DALYs [
2]. In Belgium and the United Kingdom (UK), CVDs respectively account for 28% and 27% of all deaths, and 14.2% and 14.9% of total DALYs [
2,
3].
The burden of CVDs greatly varies across countries and regions, with over three-quarters of deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [
4]. Although the incidence and mortality due to CVDs is higher in LMICs [
5], vulnerable communities of high-income countries (HIC) are also being affected to a large extent [
6]. Socially and/or economically disadvantaged groups are disproportionately at higher risk. Socioeconomic status including income, education, occupation, living environment and access to healthcare services have all been linked with CVD incidence and mortality [
6‐
11], indicating the impact of social and financial deprivation on CVDs and risk factors. Vulnerable populations including elderly, racial and ethnic minorities, unemployed, uninsured and under-insured populations also take a large share of the burden [
12]. Hence, it is crucial to provide more attention to groups and individuals who are at greatest risk to minimize the widespread inequality in the burden of CVDs.
The effect of lifestyle including physical activity (PA), dietary habit, tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, and stress on CVDs is well documented [
13‐
15]. Likewise, adopting a healthy lifestyle reduces CVD incidence and mortality at population level [
16]. Studies showed that knowledge of behavioral risks is the central element of lifestyle change and individuals who perceive themselves at higher risk of CVDs are more likely to adopt a healthy lifestyle [
17‐
21]. Therefore, measuring knowledge, risk perception and intention towards a healthy lifestyle is essential to develop and implement targeted public health interventions [
21‐
23]. Evidence is limited on differences in knowledge and risk perception and their role in variation of CVD burden in vulnerable communities. As a result, it is pivotal to investigate the level and socioeconomic disparities in knowledge on CVDs, risk perception and intention to change lifestyle that could play a role in the observed higher burden in vulnerable communities. Examining disparities within the vulnerable communities could guide in prioritization of intervention components and reach out to more disadvantaged groups.
A multi-country CVD prevention implementation project named ‘SPICES’ – Scaling-up Packages of Interventions for Cardiovascular diseases in Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa aimed to reduce CVD risks in LMICs and vulnerable populations of HICs. The project is being conducted in selected areas of Belgium, England, France, South-Africa and Uganda. This particular study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge, risk perception and intention to healthy lifestyle among adults living in selected vulnerable communities of Nottingham (England) or Antwerp (Belgium) as well as to identify socioeconomic disparities particularly in Antwerp. The results from this study provide evidence on which segments of the population should be targeted for the intervention and to inform public health professionals working on CVD prevention to give more emphasis for high-risk vulnerable groups.
Discussion
CVDs, principally heart attack and stroke, continue to be the top-ranked causes of disease burden globally. It is evidenced that a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality due to CVDs can be ameliorated by targeting behavioral risks including smoking, unhealthy dietary habits, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption and stress. Nevertheless, these major risk factors are still prevalent causing a large proportion of disease burden in all regions of the world. Low-income countries and vulnerable communities living in high-income countries share a remarkably high CVD burden. Due to the superficial perception of Europe as a wealthy region, vulnerable communities living in these countries have received little attention. Targeting knowledge and risk perception of such vulnerable communities is vital to change behavior towards a healthy lifestyle, which is the cornerstone of CVD prevention. Hence, we investigated the level of CVD knowledge, risk perception and intention to healthy lifestyle among adults living in vulnerable districts of Antwerp and Nottingham. We also examined the socioeconomic disparities in these outcome measures within the vulnerable districts of Antwerp. Thus, this study provides evidence of low CVD knowledge in vulnerable communities, in which majorities in both settings have poor knowledge related to CVDs and risk factors. We also found gender and other socioeconomic variations in perceived benefit and intention towards a healthy lifestyle. Furthermore, the level of education, household income and sex highly correlated with risk knowledge and intention towards a healthy lifestyle.
In this study, only one-third of participants in Antwerp and one-fifth in Nottingham had good knowledge related to CVDs and risk factors. Although the sampling procedure varies, consistent results from both settings showed that the level of knowledge related to CVDs is low, implying the need for more targeted interventions in vulnerable communities living in high-income countries. Vulnerable communities of high-income countries are overlooked due to the superficial consideration of these countries to have a better understanding of CVDs and risk factors. Our results indicated that there is still a lot to be done to improve CVD knowledge and risk perception in developed countries. When intervention mechanisms are considered to prevent and control CVDs, it is crucial to identify groups and individuals at higher risk and therefore preventive programs should focus on those groups.
CVD knowledge score was higher in Antwerp than Nottingham. However, the variation in sampling and data collection procedure between two settings could be the main reason for the difference. In Nottingham, face to face interviews were employed using purposive sampling, which is presumed to be better in reaching more vulnerable individuals. Whereas in Antwerp the survey was on a random sample via either postal or online, in which the non-respondents might differ in socioeconomic composition and health concern leading to variation within the vulnerable communities. Studies showed that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups are relatively underrepresented in postal and online surveys [
33,
34]. Socioeconomically better-off are more aware and concerned about health and are more likely to respond, which might lead to a higher knowledge score in Antwerp than Nottingham.
The multivariable analysis particularly for the Antwerp setting found that females have higher intention towards a healthy diet than males. Consistently, a study in Denmark found a significant gender difference in healthy diet intention [
35]. Likewise, other studies also showed variation in perceived benefit and intention to change towards a healthy diet across gender [
36,
37]. Although the intention towards a healthy diet is higher among women, the actual behavior might be determined by several aspects of the food system including the purchasing power and access to healthy food [
35]. Hence, public health professionals and primary caregivers should put an effort to translate such higher intention among females to actual positive behaviors so as to prevent CVDs in vulnerable communities.
In contrast, our study showed that females have a lower intention to PA than males. A similar pattern was reported by Gavin and colleagues, which indicated males have a better intention to follow exercise recommendations than females [
38]. This could be due to the gender variation in self-efficacy, social support and motivation which might lead to discrepancy in the level of physical activity [
39]. Moreover, lack of access to equipment, safe and welcoming facilities, and cultural barriers for females could be the possible reasons [
40,
41]. Thus, CVD preventive interventions aimed to improve physical activity should consider such pronounced gender differences to optimize intervention uptake and effectiveness. Furthermore, establishing female friendly physical activity centers could help to improve their intention as well as behavior towards physical activity [
41]. Furthermore, a qualitative study to investigate an in-depth understanding on the possible reason for such gender disparities is recommended.
The predictive and causal effect of education on CVD is still controversial, meaning whether the correlation is due to reverse causality or confounding with other determinants remains unclear. In our study, level of education was significantly related to CVD knowledge, risk perception and healthy lifestyle intention. Similar studies also reported a positive effect of education on knowledge about CVD risk factors and prevention [
42‐
44], implying special attention needs to be provided for those with lower levels of education. Furthermore, studies also demonstrated that a higher education level is associated with better dietary behavior [
45]. Thus, level of education has an independent effect on CVD knowledge and intention to change, which are initial stages of behavioral change models.
The present study showed that healthy diet intention significantly varies across socioeconomic gradients, which is consistent with previous studies [
45,
46]. This could be due to a higher cost related to nutrition quality foods along with low purchasing power of poor households affecting their intention towards a healthy diet [
47]. This indicates that the intention to change towards a healthy dietary behavior is highly influenced by the income level of individuals. Therefore, CVD preventive lifestyle interventions should be contextual and need to identify potential barriers and enabling factors to improve intervention effectiveness.
Furthermore, country of birth was associated with intention to a healthy diet, in which participants from non-European origin had a lower intention to change their dietary habit. Previous studies also showed that immigrant-origin groups have poorer dietary habits leading to a higher rate of diet-related NCDs than the native born European populations [
48,
49]. A study by Patel and colleagues found that exposure to increased fat intake related to migration could be the possible reason for the disproportionate prevalence of CVD risk factors among immigrants in Britain [
50]. This could be due to the cultural difference in dietary habits along with a better access for foods that are high in fat and sugar in the host country [
51‐
53]. Hence, lifestyle interventions targeting dietary change should be culturally adapted to improve reachability and effectiveness on target vulnerable communities.
The present study has the following limitations. First, the sampling and data collection procedure varies between two settings, which could be the reason for a significant discrepancy in the level of knowledge and intention to change. Thus, it is hardly possible to claim this significant difference reflects the difference in population parameters in two settings. Nevertheless, the results mainly indicate that the level of knowledge and risk perception is low in both settings regardless of the variation in the samples. Second, despite districts being selected based on composite vulnerability indices, we did not measure individual vulnerability indices. Thus, future studies recruiting samples based on individual vulnerability indices are recommended. Third, due to lack of individual level socioeconomic factors in Nottingham, the multivariable modeling was limited to data from the Antwerp setting. Hence, the socioeconomic disparities in our study are solely to this setting. Nevertheless, as the two contexts are somewhat comparable, we expect similar socioeconomic disparities in Nottingham as well. Lastly, we did not measure and adjust for physical parameters such as BMI that could affect an individual’s risk perception and intention towards a healthy lifestyle.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.