nach oben

Erschienen in:

22.05.2023 | Review

New small molecules in dermatology: for the autoimmunity, inflammation and beyond

verfasst von: Paulo Ricardo Criado, Daniel Lorenzini, Hélio Amante Miot, Roberto Bueno-Filho, Francisca Regina Oliveira Carneiro, Mayra Ianhez

Erschienen in: Inflammation Research | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective and design

The discovery of new inflammatory pathways and the mechanism of action of inflammatory, autoimmune, genetic, and neoplastic diseases led to the development of immunologically driven drugs. We aimed to perform a narrative review regarding the rising of a new class of drugs capable of blocking important and specific intracellular signals in the maintenance of these pathologies: the small molecules.

Materials/methods

A total of 114 scientific papers were enrolled in this narrative review.

Results

We describe in detail the families of protein kinases—Janus Kinase (JAK), Src kinase, Syk tyrosine kinase, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK)—their physiologic function and new drugs that block these pathways of intracellular signaling. We also detail the involved cytokines and the main metabolic and clinical implications of these new medications in the field of dermatology.

Conclusions

Despite having lower specificity compared to specific immunobiological therapies, these new drugs are effective in a wide variety of dermatological diseases, especially diseases that had few therapeutic options, such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo.

Sulzberger MB, Witten VH. Hydrocortisone ointment in dermatological therapy. Med Clin North Am. 1954;11:321–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(16)34877-5.CrossRefPubMed

Zipfel PF, Skerka C. From magic bullets to modern therapeutics: Paul Ehrlich, the German immunobiologist and physician coined the term “complement.” Mol Immunol. 2022;150:90–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2022.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

Gooderham M. Small molecules: an overview of emerging therapeutic options in the treatment of psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2013;18:1–4.PubMed

Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. New York: Garland Science; 2002. General Principles of Cell Communication. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26813/

Ding C, Song Z, Shen A, Chen T, Zhang A. Small molecules targeting the innate immune cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling pathway. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10:2272–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kano N, Ong GH, Ori D, Kawai T. Pathophysiological role of nucleic acid-sensing pattern recognition receptors in inflammatory diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12: 910654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.910654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wrobleski ST, Moslin R, Lin S, Zhang Y, Spergel S, Kempson J, et al. Highly selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: discovery of the allosteric inhibitor BMS-986165. J Med Chem. 2019;24(62):8973–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00444.CrossRef

Armstrong AW, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Papp KA, Strober B, Thaçi D, et al. Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;S0190–9622(22):02256–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.07.002.CrossRef

Port A, Shaw JV, Klopp-Schulze L, Bytyqi A, Vetter C, Hussey E, et al. Phase 1 study in healthy participants of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of enpatoran (M5049), a dual antagonist of toll-like receptors 7 and 8. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9: e00842. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

ClinicalTrials.gov. The WILLOW Study With M5049 in SLE and CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) (WILLOW). 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05162586?recrs=ab&cond=enpatoran&draw=2&rank=1. Acessed 17 March 2022.

11.

ClinicalTrials.gov. The Willow LTE Study With M5049 in Participants With SCLE, DLE and/or SLE (WILLOW LTE). 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05540327?recrs=ab&cond=enpatoran&draw=2&rank=2. Accessed 17 March 2022.

12.

Szilveszter KP, Németh T, Mócsai A. Tyrosine Kinases in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01862.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:273–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00754.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Dudley AC, Thomas D, Best J, Jenkins A. The STATs in cell stress-type responses. Cell Commun Signal. 2004;2:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-2-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Damsky W, King BA. JAK inhibitors in dermatology: The promise of a new drug class. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:736–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Lin CM, Cooles FA, Isaacs JD. Basic Mechanisms of JAK Inhibition. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2020;31(Suppl 1):100–4. https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.1.100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, Mohsenzadegan M, Sedighi G, Bahar M. The role of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Schwartz DM, Kanno Y, Villarino A, Ward M, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:843–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.201.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Li WX. Canonical and non-canonical JAK-STAT signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:545–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2008.08.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Shawky AM, Almalki FA, Abdalla AN, Abdelazeem AH, Gouda AM. A comprehensive overview of globally approved JAK inhibitors. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14051001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Tsiogka A, Kyriazopoulou M, Kontochristopoulos G, Nicolaidou E, Stratigos A, Rigopoulos D, et al. The JAK/STAT pathway and its selective inhibition in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4431. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154431.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Chovatiya R, Paller AS. JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:927–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Klein B, Treudler R, Simon JC. JAK inhibitors in dermatology - small molecules, big impact? Overview of the mechanism of action, previous study results, and potential adverse effects. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022;20:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14668.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Solimani F, Meier K, Ghoreschi K. Emerging topical and systemic JAK inhibitors in Dermatology. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02847.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Kerkemeyer KLS, Sinclair RD, Bhoyrul B. Topical tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata affecting facial hair. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:677–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20419.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Putterman E, Castelo-Soccio L. Topical 2% tofacitinib for children with alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, and alopecia universalis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:1207–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.031.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Qiu Q, Feng Q, Tan X, Guo M. JAK3-selective inhibitor peficitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019;12:547–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2019.1615443.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ezzedine K, Peeva E, Yamaguchi Y, Cox LA, Banerjee A, Han G, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: a randomized phase 2b clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;S0190–9622(22):02989–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.005.CrossRef

29.

King B, Guttman-Yassky E, Peeva E, Banerjee A, Sinclair R, Pavel AB, et al. A phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitors ritlecitinib and brepocitinib in alopecia areata: 24-week results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:379–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.050.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Chimalakonda A, Burke J, Cheng L, Catlett I, Tagen M, Zhao Q, et al. Selectivity profile of the Tyrosine Kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib compared with Janus Kinase 1/2/3 inhibitors. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11:1763–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00596-8.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hu X, Li J, Fu M, Zhao X, Wang W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Hoisnard L, Lebrun-Vignes B, Maury S, Mahevas M, El Karoui K, Roy L, et al. Adverse events associated with JAK inhibitors in 126,815 reports from the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10777-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Li N, Gou ZP, Du SQ, Zhu XH, Lin H, Liang XF, et al. Effect of JAK inhibitors on high- and low-density lipoprotein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:677–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-06003-z.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Elmariah SB, Smith JS, Merola JF. JAK in the [Black] Box: A Dermatology perspective on systemic JAK inhibitor safety. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23:427–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-022-00701-3.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rous PA. sarcoma of the fowl transmissible by an agent separable from the tumor cells. J Exp Med. 1911;13:397–411. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.13.4.397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Czernilofsky AP, Levinson AD, Varmus HE, Bishop JM, Tischer E, Goodman HM. Nucleotide sequence of an avian sarcoma virus oncogene (src) and proposed amino acid sequence for the gene product. Nature. 1980;287:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/287198a0.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Parker RC, Varmus HE, Bishop JM. Expression of v-src and chicken c-src in rat cells demonstrates qualitative differences between pp60v-src and pp60c-src. Cell. 1984;37:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90308-8.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Brown MT, Cooper JA. Regulation, substrates and functions of src. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1287:121–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-419x(96)00003-0.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Mori S, Rönnstrand L, Yokote K, Engström A, Courtneidge SA, Claesson-Welsh L, et al. Identification of two juxtamembrane autophosphorylation sites in the PDGFβ-receptor; involvement in the interaction with Src family tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 1993;12:2257–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05879.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Rameh LE, Chen CS, Cantley LC. Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5) P3 interacts with SH2 domains and modulates PI 3-kinase association with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. Cell. 1995;83:821–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90195-7.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Hartmann JT, Haap M, Kopp HG, Lipp HP. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors - a review on pharmacology, metabolism, and side effects. Curr Drug Metab. 2009;10:470–81. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920009788897975.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Roskoski R Jr. Src protein–tyrosine kinase structure, mechanism, and small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol Res. 2015;94:9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2015.01.003.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signaling. Nature. 2001;411:355–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/35077225.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Parsons SJ, Parsons JT. Src family kinases, key regulators of signal transduction. Oncogene. 2004;23:7906–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208160.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Shupnik MA. Crosstalk between steroid receptors and the c-Src-receptor tyrosine kinase pathways: implications for cell proliferation. Oncogene. 2004;23:7979–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208076.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Thomas SM, Brugge JS. Cellular functions are regulated by Src family kinases. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:513–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.513.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Yeatman TJ. A renaissance for SRC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:470–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1366.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Zhang S, Yu D. Targeting Src family kinases in anti-cancer therapies: turning promise intotriumph. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33:122–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2011.11.002.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Lowell CA. Src-family kinases: rheostats of immune cell signaling. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:631–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2004.04.010.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Mocsai A, Ruland J, Tybulewicz VL. The SYK tyrosine kinase: a crucial player in diverse biological functions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:387–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2765.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Futosi K, Mocsai A. Tyrosine kinase signaling pathways in neutrophils. Immunol Rev. 2016;273:121–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12455.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Jakus Z, Fodor S, Abram CL, Lowell CA, Mocsai A. Immunoreceptor- like signaling by β2 and β3 integrins. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2007.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Kovacs M, Nemeth T, Jakus Z, Sitaru C, Simon E, Futosi K, et al. The Src family kinases Hck, Fgr, and Lyn are critical for the generation of the in vivo inflammatory environment without a direct role in leukocyte recruitment. J Exp Med. 2014;211:1993–2011. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20132496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Turner M, Mee PJ, Costello PS, Williams O, Price AA, Duddy LP, et al. Perinatal lethality and blocked B-cell development in mice lacking the tyrosine kinase Syk. Nature. 1995;378:298–302. https://doi.org/10.1038/378298a0.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Cheng AM, Rowley B, Pao W, Hayday A, Bolen JB, Pawson T. Syk tyrosine kinase required for mouse viability and B-cell development. Nature. 1995;378:303–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/378303a0.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Abtahian F, Guerriero A, Sebzda E, Lu MM, Zhou R, Mocsai A, et al. Regulation of blood and lymphatic vascular separation by signaling proteins SLP-76 and Syk. Science. 2003;299:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Mocsai A, Zhou M, Meng F, Tybulewicz VL, Lowell CA. Syk is required for integrin signaling in neutrophils. Immunity. 2002;16:547–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00303-5.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Mocsai A, Abram CL, Jakus Z, Hu Y, Lanier LL, Lowell CA. Integrin signaling in neutrophils and macrophages uses adaptors containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1326–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Crowley MT, Costello PS, Fitzer-Attas CJ, Turner M, Meng F, Lowell C, et al. A critical role for Syk in signal transduction and phagocytosis mediated by Fcgamma receptors on macrophages. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1027–39. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.186.7.1027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Stanley JR, Amagai M. Pemphigus, bullous impetigo, and the staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1800–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra061111.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Nguyen VT, Ndoye A, Shultz LD, Pittelkow MR, Grando SA. Antibodies against keratinocyte antigens other than desmogleins 1 and 3 can induce pemphigus vulgaris-like lesions. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1467–79. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Kugelmann D, Rotzer V, Walter E, Egu DT, Fuchs MT, Vielmuth F, et al. Role of Src and cortactin in pemphigus skin blistering. Front Immunol. 2019;10:626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet. 2013;381:320–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61140-4.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Bagci IS, Horvath ON, Ruzicka T, Sardy M. Bullous pemphigoid. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.03.010.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Zhao ML, Trimbeger ME, Li N, Diaz LA, Shapiro SD, Liu Z. Role of FcRs in animal model of autoimmune bullous pemphigoid. J Immunol. 2006;177:3398–405. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3398.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Schulze FS, Beckmann T, Nimmerjahn F, Ishiko A, Collin M, Kohl J, et al. Fcγ receptors III and IV mediate tissue destruction in a novel adult mouse model of bullous pemphigoid. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:2185–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.05.007.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Sitaru C, Kromminga A, Hashimoto T, Brocker EB, Zillikens D. Autoantibodies to type VII collagen mediate Fcgamma-dependent neutrophil activation and induce dermal-epidermal separation in cryosections of human skin. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:301–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64182-X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Nemeth T, Virtic O, Sitaru C, Mocsai A. The Syk tyrosine kinase is required for skin inflammation in an in vivo mouse model of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Samavedam UK, Mitschker N, Kasprick A, Bieber K, Schmidt E, Laskay T, et al. Whole-genome expression profiling in skin reveals sYK as a key regulator of inflammation in experimental epidermolysis Bullosa acquisita. Front Immunol. 2018;9:249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

LeibundGut-Landmann S, Gross O, Robinson MJ, Osorio F, Slack EC, Tsoni SV, et al. Syk- and CARD9-dependent coupling of innate immunity to the induction of T helper cells that produce interleukin 17. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:630–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1460.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Muro R, Nitta T, Nakano K, Okamura T, Takayanagi H, Suzuki H. γδ TCR recruits the Syk/PI3K axis to drive proinflammatory differentiation program. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:415–26. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI95837.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Satoh TK, Mellett M, Contassot E, French LE. Are neutrophilic dermatoses autoinflammatory disorders? Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:603–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15105.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Tartey S, Gurung P, Samir P, Burton A, Kanneganti TD. Cutting edge: dysregulated CARD9 signaling in neutrophils drives inflammation in a mouse model of neutrophilic dermatoses. J Immunol. 2018;201(1639):44. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800760.CrossRef

74.

Krishnan S, Juang YT, Chowdhury B, Magilavy A, Fisher CU, Nguyen H, et al. Differential expression and molecular associations of Syk in systemic lupus erythematosus T cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:8145–52. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.8145.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Bahjat FR, Pine PR, Reitsma A, Cassafer G, Baluom M, Grillo S, et al. An orally bioavailable spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor delays disease progression and prolongs survival in murine lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1433–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23428.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Bollag G, Hirth P, Tsai J, Zhang J, Ibrahim PN, Cho H, et al. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Nature. 2010;467:596–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Rheault TR, Stellwagen JC, Adjabeng GM, Hornberger KR, Petrov KG, Waterson AG, et al. Discovery of dabrafenib: a selective inhibitor of Raf Kinases with antitumor activity against B-Raf-Driven tumors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4:358–62. https://doi.org/10.1021/ml4000063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.

Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Festino L, Vanella V, Palla M, Ascierto PA. Combination treatment of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma: a new standard of care. BioDrugs. 2017;31:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-016-0208-z.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Dréno B, Atkinson V, Liszkay G, Maio M, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1867–76. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408868.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Wongchenko MJ, McArthur GA, Dréno B, Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Sosman J, et al. Gene expression profiling in BRAF-mutated melanoma reveals patient subgroups with poor outcomes to vemurafenib that may be overcome by cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:5238–45. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0172.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Homsi J, Cubitt CL, Zhang S, Munster PN, Yu H, Sullivan DM, et al. Src activation in melanoma and Src inhibitors as therapeutic agents in melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2009;19:167–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0b013e328304974c.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Homsi J, Cubitt C, Daud A. The Src signaling pathway: a potential target in melanoma and other malignancies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007;11:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.11.1.91.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Buettner R, Mesa T, Vultur A, Lee F, Jove R. Inhibition of Src family kinases with dasatinib blocks migration and invasion of human melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1766–74. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Anastassiadis T, Deacon SW, Devarajan K, Ma H, Peterson JR. Comprehensive assay of kinase catalytic activity reveals features of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:1039–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

85.

Kehest Y, Seger R. The Map Kinase signaling cascades: a system of hundreds of components regulates a diverse array of physiological functions. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;661:3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-795-2_1.CrossRef

86.

Guo YJ, Pan WW, Liu SB, Shen ZF, Xu Y, Hu LL. EPL/MAPK signaling pathway and tumorigenesis (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:1997–2007. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Cheng Y, Zhang G, Li G. Targeting MAPK pathway in melanoma therapy. Cancer metastasis Rev. 2013;32:567–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-013-9433-9.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Strickland LA, Chandra Pal H, Elmets CA, Afaq F. Targeting drivers of melanoma with synthetic small molecules and phytochemicals. Cancer Lett. 2015;359(1):20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.01.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

89.

Lazaroff J, Bolotin D. Targeted Therapy and immunotherapy in melanoma. Dermatol Clin. 2023;41:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2022.07.007.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Lee S, Rauch J, Kolch W. Targeting MAPK signaling in cancer: mechanisms of drug resistance and sensitivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

91.

Sanchez JN, Wang T, Cohen MS. BRAF and MEK inhibitors: use and resistance in BRAF-mutated cancers. Drugs. 2018;78:549–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0884-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

92.

Yager R, Cocoran RB. Targeting alterations in the RAF-MEK pathway. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:329–41. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1321.CrossRef

93.

Meurer SK, Weiskirchen R. Usage of mitogen-activated protein kinase small molecule inhibitors: more than just inhibition! Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

94.

Dreas A, Mikulski M, Milik M, Fabritius CH, Brzzka K, Rzymski T. Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) interacting kinases 1 and 2 (MNK1 and MNK2) as targets for cancer therapy: recent progress in the development of MNK inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24:3025–53. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170203123427.CrossRefPubMed

95.

Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, Baldwin A, Whitcomb P, Fisher MJ, et al. Selumetinib in children with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1430–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

96.

ClinicalTrials.gov. Efficacy and Safety of Selumetinib in Adults With NF1 Who Have Symptomatic, Inoperable Plexiform Neurofibromas (KOMET). 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04924608. Accessed 29 April 2023.

97.

Jessen WJ, Miller SJ, Jousma E, et al. MEK inhibition exhibits efficacy in human and mouse neurofibromatosis tumors. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI60578.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Crofford LJ, Nyhoff LE, Sheehan JH, Kendall PL. The role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in autoimmunity and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016;12:763–73. https://doi.org/10.1586/1744666X.2016.1152888.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Naik PP. Translational autoimmunity in pemphigus and the role of novel Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Transl Autoimmun. 2022;5: 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

100.

Haselmayer P, Camps M, Liu-Bujalski L, Nguyen N, Morandi F, Head J, et al. Efficacy and pharmacodynamic modeling of the BTK inhibitor Evobrutinib in autoimmune disease Models. J Immunol. 2019;202:2888–906. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800583.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

101.

Chang BY, Huang MM, Francesco M, Chen J, Sokolove J, Magadala P, et al. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 ameliorates autoimmune arthritis by inhibition of multiple effector cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R115. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

102.

Tasso B, Spallarossa A, Russo E, Brullo C. The development of BTK inhibitors: a five-year update. Molecules. 2021;26:7411. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237411.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

103.

Caldwell RD, Qiu H, Askew BC, Bender AT, Brugger N, Camps M, et al. Discovery of Evobrutinib: an oral, potent, and highly selective, covalent Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor for the treatment of immunological diseases. J Med Chem. 2019;62:7643–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00794.CrossRefPubMed

104.

Angst D, Gessier F, Janser P, Vulpetti A, Wälchli R, Beerli C, et al. Discovery of LOU064 (Remibrutinib), a potent and highly selective covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. J Med Chem. 2020;63:5102–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01916.CrossRefPubMed

105.

Brullo C, Villa C, Tasso B, Russo E, Spallarossa A. Btk Inhibitors: a medicinal chemistry and drug delivery perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:7641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

106.

Robak E, Robak T. Bruton’s Kinase Inhibitors for the treatment of immunological diseases: current status and perspectives. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102807.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

107.

Murrell D, Patsatsi A, Stavropoulos P, Baum S, Zeeli T, Kern J, et al. Proof of concept for the clinical effects of oral rilzabrutinib, the first Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for pemphigus vulgaris: The phase II BELIEVE study. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:745–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20431.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

108.

Murrell DF, Patsatsi A, Stavropoulos P, Baum S, Zeeli T, Kern JS, et al. Phase 2 BELIEVE study part B: efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib for patients with pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18318.CrossRefPubMed

109.

Sanofi. Sanofi provides update on Phase 3 study evaluating rilzabrutinib for the treatment of pemphigus, https://www.sanofi.com/en/media-room/press-releases/2021/2021-09-09-05-00-00-2293920. 2022. Accessed 18 September 2022.

Titel: New small molecules in dermatology: for the autoimmunity, inflammation and beyond
verfasst von: Paulo Ricardo Criado
Daniel Lorenzini
Hélio Amante Miot
Roberto Bueno-Filho
Francisca Regina Oliveira Carneiro
Mayra Ianhez
Publikationsdatum: 22.05.2023
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Inflammation Research / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1023-3830
Elektronische ISSN: 1420-908X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01744-w

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Neue S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Schadet Ärger den Gefäßen?

14.05.2024 Arteriosklerose Nachrichten

In einer Studie aus New York wirkte sich Ärger kurzfristig deutlich negativ auf die Endothelfunktion gesunder Probanden aus. Möglicherweise hat dies Einfluss auf die kardiovaskuläre Gesundheit.

Intervallfasten zur Regeneration des Herzmuskels?

14.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Die Nahrungsaufnahme auf wenige Stunden am Tag zu beschränken, hat möglicherweise einen günstigen Einfluss auf die Prognose nach akutem ST-Hebungsinfarkt. Darauf deutet eine Studie an der Uniklinik in Halle an der Saale hin.

Klimaschutz beginnt bei der Wahl des Inhalators

14.05.2024 Klimawandel Podcast

Auch kleine Entscheidungen im Alltag einer Praxis können einen großen Beitrag zum Klimaschutz leisten. Die neue Leitlinie zur "klimabewussten Verordnung von Inhalativa" geht mit gutem Beispiel voran, denn der Wechsel vom klimaschädlichen Dosieraerosol zum Pulverinhalator spart viele Tonnen CO₂. Leitlinienautor PD Dr. Guido Schmiemann erklärt, warum nicht nur die Umwelt, sondern auch Patientinnen und Patienten davon profitieren.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective and design

Materials/methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Biofilm-forming strains of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus isolated from cystic fibrosis patients differently affect inflammatory phenotype of macrophages

Causal associations of circulating Helicobacter pylori antibodies with stroke and the mediating role of inflammation

From bench to bedside: targeting lymphocyte activation gene 3 as a therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases

Cuproptosis-related gene CDKN2A as a molecular target for IPF diagnosis and therapeutics

Dual role of ANGPTL4 in inflammation