Skip to main content
Erschienen in: African Journal of Urology 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Original Research

Outcome and predictors of failure of abdominal surgical repair of high vesico-vaginal and vesico-uterine fistulae at Gezira Hospital for Renal Disease and Surgery

verfasst von: Muzafr Shakir Ali Yousif, Ismail Gareeballah Alhag Mohamad, Mohamed Elimam Mohamed Ahmed, Yassin Mohammed Osman, Ahmed Shakir Ali Yousif, Mustafa Omran

Erschienen in: African Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Urogenital fistula can arise from various causes, leading to the development of diverse surgical procedures. The prevention and treatment of obstetric fistula continue to pose challenges in low-income countries.

Aim

To assess the outcomes and predictors of failure of surgical repair for urogenital fistulas, specifically high vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) and vesico-uterine fistula (VUF), within our context.

Methods

Conducted a prospective hospital-based study involving 100 female patients with urogenital fistula (95 VVF and 5 VUF) who underwent abdominal surgical repair at Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery from 2018 to 2023. Collected data encompassing demographics, obstetric history, fistula etiologies, Swab test, cystoscopy findings, urine diversion, ureteric re-implantation, and repair outcomes.

Results

The majority of women were aged 20–29 years (39%), illiterate (62%), and had a low socio-economic status (87%). Lack of antenatal care was noted in 77% of patients. Fistula etiologies were predominantly obstetric (70%), mainly due to spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), with the remaining 30% attributed to gynecological causes (hysterectomy). In terms of fistula characteristics, all patients had a high-level fistula, 95% had a single fistula, and 69% had a posterior wall fistula. Successful closure was achieved in 84% of cases, with 11% experiencing ureteric involvements. The analysis of failures pointed to recurrent fistulae (50%), larger fistula size (31%), and the presence of multiple fistulae (19%) as notable predictors of unsuccessful repair.

Conclusion

VVF was the prevalent type of urogenital fistula in our population. Risk factors included being in the third decade of life, illiteracy, low socioeconomic status, and a lack of prenatal care. Obstetric causes, particularly prolonged and obstructed labor through SVD, dominated the etiology. Surgical procedures resulted in successful closure in 84% of cases. Recurrent fistulae, larger size, and multiple occurrences emerged as predictors of surgical repair failure.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
ANC
Antenatal care
AOR
Adjusted odds ratio
OR
Odd ratio
RVF
Recto-vaginal fistula
SPSS
Statistical package for social sciences
SVD
Spontaneous vaginal delivery
VUF
Vesico-uterine fistula
VVF
Vesico-vaginal fistula

1 Background

Urogenital Fistula refers to an abnormal opening connecting a woman's vagina to the bladder (vesico-vaginal fistula, VVF), uterus or cervix to the urinary bladder (vesico-uterine fistula, VUF), vagina to the rectum (recto-vaginal fistula, RVF), or both bladder and rectum (VVF + RVF) [1]. This condition, resulting from obstructed labor, leads to uncontrollable urine leakage and remains a serious health concern. Despite global and local efforts, addressing VVF and VUF remains challenging in low-income countries with insufficient access to emergency obstetric care and skilled birth attendants [2, 3].
In sub-Saharan Africa, the lifetime prevalence of VVF and VUF ranges from 1.60 to 3.0 cases per 1000 women of reproductive age [4, 5]. Fistulae commonly arise from prolonged or obstructed labor, causing necrosis of tissues and subsequent fistula formation. Additionally, iatrogenic fistula during obstetric surgery is on the rise [6].
Diagnosis involves clinical examination, verified by a dye test or cystoscopy, and the primary treatment is surgical through transvaginal or transabdominal techniques. While reported surgical closure rates are as high as 90%, they vary among repair hospitals, influenced by factors such as repair technique, surgeon expertise, fistula characteristics, and post-operative care. Discrepancies also exist in defining outcomes, with some studies focusing on fistula closure rates and others distinguishing closure and continence following surgery [7].
Studies in various contexts highlight factors influencing repair outcomes, including complete urethral destruction, severe vaginal scarring, small bladders, and previous repairs [810].

2 Methods

2.1 Study design

A prospective hospital based study.

2.2 Study duration

This study was conducted in the period from 2018 to 2023.

2.3 Study settings

The study was conducted in Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery, Wad-Medani, Gezira State, Sudan.

2.4 Study population

Adult female patients with high VVF and VUF were recruited for the study.

2.5 Inclusion criteria

  • Adult female
  • High VVF or VUF
  • Patients who underwent abdominal repair at Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery
  • On regular follow-up

2.6 Exclusion criteria

  • Low VVF
  • Refusal to participate

2.7 Sample size

The study encompassed the entire population of eligible female patients with high vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) and vesico-uterine fistula (VUF) during the study period from 2018 to 2023. Consequently, the sample size for this study comprised 100 patients.

2.8 Data collection tools and methods

The principal investigator conducted data collection using structured questionnaires covering demographics, obstetric history, fistula etiologies, Swab test results, and cystoscopy findings, details of urine diversion, ureteric re-implantation, and outcomes of the surgical repair.

2.9 Study variables

  • Demographics: Age, education and socioeconomic status
  • Obstetric history: Antenatal care (ANC) attendance, Personnel of ANC
  • Etiologies of fistula
  • Intraoperative obstetrical and gynecological complications
  • Postoperative obstetrical and gynecological complications
  • Swab test
  • Cystoscopy findings
  • Ureteric involvement
  • Ureteric re-implantation
  • Fistula repair outcomes

2.10 Statistical analysis

The data underwent analysis utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS V. 26.0) computer program. The outcomes of the analysis were then visually presented in tables and figures crafted using Microsoft Excel 2010.

3 Results

This study prospectively examined 100 female patients with urogenital fistula. A significant proportion, 39% (n = 39), fell within the 20–29 age group, were illiterate (62%), and had a low socioeconomic status (87%) (Table 1).
Table 1
The demographics demographic characteristics of female patients with high VVF and VUF (N = 100)
 
Frequency
%
Age (Years)
 < 20
23
23
20–29
39
39
30–39
32
32
40 + 
6
6
Education
Illiterate
62
62
Literate
38
38
Socioeconomic status
Low
87
87
High
13
13
The majority of urogenital fistula cases were vesico-vaginal fistulas (VVF) in 95% of patients, with vesico-uterine fistulas (VUF) observed in 5% (Fig. 1).
The research findings indicate that 45% of fistulae were less than 1 cm in size, 37% measured between 1.5 and 3 cm, while 18% exceeded 3 cm in diameter (Table 2).
Table 2
The classification of fistulae according to size among patients with high VVF and VUF (N = 100)
Size
Number
%
Less than 1.5 cm
45
45
1.5–3 cm
37
37
More than 3 cm
18
18
Sixteen percent of fistulae were recurrent fistulae while 84% presented for the first time. Multiple fistulae were 5% (Figs. 2 and 3 respectively).
In terms of obstetric history, only 23% attended antenatal care, with 77% lacking prenatal care (Table 3).
Table 3
The obstetric history of female patients with high VVF and VUF (N = 100)
 
Frequency
%
Antenatal care (ANC)
Yes
23
23
No
77
77
Personnel of ANC
Primary health care center
10
10
Midwives
7
7
Obstetrician
6
6
Fistula etiologies were predominantly obstetric, with 70% attributed to spontaneous vaginal delivery (42%), cesarean section  (24%), and assisted vaginal delivery (4%). Hysterectomy was the cause in 30% of cases (Trans-abdominal in 16% and Trans-vaginal in 14%) (Table 4).
Table 4
The distribution of fistula etiologies among female patients (N = 100)
Causes of fistula
Frequency
%
Obstetric
70
70
Spontaneous vaginal delivery
42
42
Emergency cesarean section
18
18
Assisted vaginal delivery
6
6
Elective cesarean section
4
4
Hysterectomy
30
30
Trans-abdominal
16
16
Trans-vaginal
14
14
Intra-operative obstetrical complications predominantly involved bleeding, affecting 29% of patients (Fig. 4).
In postoperative complications, leakage was the dominant complication in 89(89%) patients which was the main presenting symptom (Fig. 5).
Swab tests yielded positive results in 54% of cases (Fig. 6).
Cystoscopy findings revealed a high level of fistula in all patients, with 95% having a single fistula, and 69% located in the posterior wall (Table 5).
Table 5
The cystoscopy findings of female patients with high VVF and VUF (N = 100)
Cystoscopy
Frequency
%
Level of fistula
High
100
100
Number of fistula
Single
95
95
Multiple
5
5
Site of fistula
Posterior wall
69
69
Trigon
20
20
Domal
9
9
Lateral wall
2
2
Ureteric involvement was identified in 11% of cases (Fig. 7), leading to ureteric diversion and later intra-operative re-implantation in 11% of patients (Fig. 8).
Fistula repair outcomes indicated successful closure in 84% of subjects (Fig. 9).
Among failed surgical repairs, 8(50%) had recurrent fistula, 5(31%) were more than 3 cm in diameter, and 3(19%) presented with multiple fistulae (Table 6).
Table 6
Causes of failure of abdominal surgical repair in patients with high VVF and VUF (N = 16)
Cause
Frequency
%
Recurrent fistula
8
50
Size > 3 cm
5
31
Multiple fistulae
3
19

4 Discussion

This prospective study examined 100 females diagnosed with urogenital fistulas (95 with high VVF and 5 with VUF) at Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery from 2018 to 2023. The aim was to discern fistula characteristics, risk factors, and repair outcomes.
The study revealed that the majority of patients (39%) were aged 20–29 years, aligning with Demisew et al. [6] in Ethiopia who reported the mean age of 25 (± 6) years. This supports young age at delivery as a significant risk factor for fistula as reported by Tebeu PM et al. [11].
Additionally, low education levels were identified as a risk factor, with 62% of cases being illiterate, consistent with studies in Africa [7, 12] and India [13]. Addressing this, health education should target women with low or no education, emphasizing the importance of skilled attendance during delivery. Policy-wise, promoting education programs beyond primary levels could be a strategy to control and eliminate obstetric fistula in Sudan.
Socioeconomic status emerged as another risk factor, as 87% of women had a low socioeconomic status, echoing findings in a systemic review concluded by Tebeu PM et al. [11] and Dharitri et al. [13] study in India associating fistula with low family income.
The study highlighted the predictive role of attending antenatal care, with 77% of subjects lacking prenatal care. Similarly, other studies in Africa have found that failure to attend antenatal care is a risk factor of fistula [11, 14]. This underscores the need to enhance the quality of antenatal care, encouraging women to avail themselves of these services.
Fistula etiologies were predominantly obstetric (70%), mainly due to spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), while 30% were gynecological, involving hysterectomy. This suggests that fistulas in this series resulted from prolonged and obstructed labor. Comparable observations were noted in Zambia [15]. Also, observations were similar to the study of Manoj et al. [16] in India who reported obstetric cause, due to obstructed labour, was the most common cause of fistula formation (68.96%), while remaining (29.31%) were attributed to hysterectomy. In contrast, Justus et al. [12] in Uganda identified caesarean section (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 13.30, 95% CI  6.74–26.39) as a significant risk factor.
Regarding fistula characteristics, all patients had a high-level fistula, 95% had a single fistula, and 69% had a posterior wall fistula, aligning with findings in Africa [8].
Ureteric involvement were reported in 11%, similar to the study of Demisew et al. [6] in Ethiopia (8.9%).
Surgery is the definitive treatment for urogenital fistulas, with this study reporting a successful closure in 84% of subjects, consistent with literature (55%–95%) [17]. Also, our figure was consistent with Manoj et al. [16] in India (84.1%) and Demisew et al. [6] in Ethiopia (93.4%). As well our successful closure rate was higher than the studies of Alexandre et al. [7] in Guinea (67%) and Somaia et al. [18] in Saudi Arabia (74%). Success rates varied, potentially influenced by factors such as urethral involvement, size, location, and number of fistulae, scar tissue, bladder capacity, and prior repair history [17].
Our analysis identified that half of the failed surgical treatments were cases of recurrent fistulae. This indicates the difficulty and challenge in treating cases with prior failed repairs. Also failed repairs included 31% of fistulae that were larger than 3 cm in diameter because bigger fistulas may create problems during surgical closure, affecting the success rates. Another factor was the complexity as cases with multiple fistulae represented 19% of failures. Treating multiple fistulas at the same time may raise the complexity of the surgical procedure.
These findings are consistent with existing literature, highlighting the importance of fistula features in forecasting repair results [9, 10]. The variation in success rates could be explained by factors such as urethral involvement, scar tissue, and the surgeon's skill [17].
While the overall success rate in our study was similar to international figures, it is essential to comprehend and address these causes of failure for improving surgical methods and patient results.

5 Conclusion

Our findings indicate that vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) was the predominant urogenital fistula type in our population. The third decade of life, illiteracy, low socioeconomic status, and lack of prenatal care emerged as major risk factors for fistula development. Obstetric causes, particularly prolonged and obstructed labor spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), were the primary etiological factors. The success rate of abdominal surgical treatment was 84%, however, the failure analysis revealed that recurrent, large, and multiple fistulae were important factors influencing the repair outcome.

6 Limitations

1.
Single-Center Study: The research was conducted at Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery, limiting the generalizability of findings to a broader population.
 
2.
Sample Size: The study's sample size of 100 patients, while informative, may not capture the full diversity of urogenital fistula cases, necessitating caution in extrapolating results.
 
3.
Surgical Outcome Variability: Surgical success rates may vary based on factors such as surgeon expertise and techniques, introducing potential variability in the reported closure outcomes.
 
4.
Temporal Considerations: The study spans from 2018 to 2023, and advancements in healthcare practices during this period might influence outcomes, limiting the study's temporal relevance.
 

7 Recommendations

1.
Tailored Surgical Approaches: Surgeons should adapt their approaches for cases with recurrent or multiple fistulae and those with bigger fistula sizes, as these were the observed predictors of failure. Personalized surgical planning, taking into account these factors, may increase the chance of successful closure.
 
2.
Quality Improvement in Antenatal Care: Improving the quality of antenatal care is vital, as our study found that a lack of prenatal care was a major risk factor. Initiatives aimed at enhancing access to and utilization of antenatal care services can have a positive effect on fistula prevention.
 
3.
Surgeon Skill Enhancement: Ongoing training and skill development for surgeons involved in fistula repair are necessary. This can lead to better outcomes, especially in cases with difficult factors like recurrent or multiple fistulae.
 
4.
Future Research: Considering the limitations of this single-center study, future research efforts should involve multi-center studies with larger sample sizes. This would offer a more comprehensive understanding of urogenital fistula dynamics and help to improve prevention and treatment strategies.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors express gratitude to the Gezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and Surgery staff for their valuable assistance in collecting patient data. Special appreciation is extended to the statistics and data analysis department.

Declarations

Ethical approval was granted by the Ministry of Health, with acceptance from the hospital authority. All patients consented to participate. To protect patient confidentiality, data was anonymized using identity numbers instead of names. The information is securely stored in a separate file, with study reports avoiding any reference to individual participants. Subject identities are exclusively known by the study staff.
We hereby grant permission to African Journal of Urology to publish this paper. We understand that this publication may be distributed in print and/or online.

Competing interests

No competing interests are declared.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und 100 € sparen!

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Manzi M, van den Boogaard W, Vandeborne A, Bishinga A, De Plecker E, Lambert V, Christiaens B, Sinabajije G, Trelles M, Goetghebuer S, Reid T, Harries A (2013) Obstetric fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(13):164CrossRef Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Manzi M, van den Boogaard W, Vandeborne A, Bishinga A, De Plecker E, Lambert V, Christiaens B, Sinabajije G, Trelles M, Goetghebuer S, Reid T, Harries A (2013) Obstetric fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(13):164CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Osotimehin B (2013) Obstetric fistula: ending the health and human rights tragedy. Lancet 381(9879):1702–1703CrossRefPubMed Osotimehin B (2013) Obstetric fistula: ending the health and human rights tragedy. Lancet 381(9879):1702–1703CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler AJ, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, Filippi V (2013) Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adler AJ, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, Filippi V (2013) Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Demisew A, Azale A, Gemeda D (2016) Characteristics and repair outcome of patients with Vesicovaginal fistula managed in Jimma University teaching Hospital. Ethiopia BMC Urol 16:41CrossRef Demisew A, Azale A, Gemeda D (2016) Characteristics and repair outcome of patients with Vesicovaginal fistula managed in Jimma University teaching Hospital. Ethiopia BMC Urol 16:41CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexandre D, Therese D (2016) Factors associated with the failure of obstetric fistula repair in Guinea: implications for practice. Reprod Health 13:135CrossRef Alexandre D, Therese D (2016) Factors associated with the failure of obstetric fistula repair in Guinea: implications for practice. Reprod Health 13:135CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barone MA, Frajzyngier V, Ruminjo J, Asiimwe F, Barry TH, Bello A et al (2012) Determinants of postoperative outcomes of female genital fistula repair surgery. Obstet Gynecol 120(3):524–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barone MA, Frajzyngier V, Ruminjo J, Asiimwe F, Barry TH, Bello A et al (2012) Determinants of postoperative outcomes of female genital fistula repair surgery. Obstet Gynecol 120(3):524–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayondo M, Wasswa S, Kabakyenga J, Mukiibi N, Senkungu J, Stenson A et al (2011) Predictors and outcome of surgical repair of obstetric fistula at a regional referral hospital, Mbarara, western Uganda. BMC Urol 11:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kayondo M, Wasswa S, Kabakyenga J, Mukiibi N, Senkungu J, Stenson A et al (2011) Predictors and outcome of surgical repair of obstetric fistula at a regional referral hospital, Mbarara, western Uganda. BMC Urol 11:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nardos R, Browning A, Chen CC (2009) Risk factors that predict failure after vaginal repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):578.e1–4CrossRefPubMed Nardos R, Browning A, Chen CC (2009) Risk factors that predict failure after vaginal repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):578.e1–4CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH (2012) Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J 23(4):387–394CrossRefPubMed Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH (2012) Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J 23(4):387–394CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Justus K, Nazarius M, Josaphat K (2014) Risk factors for obstetric fistula in western uganda: a case control study. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112299CrossRef Justus K, Nazarius M, Josaphat K (2014) Risk factors for obstetric fistula in western uganda: a case control study. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112299CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dharitri S, Swayam P, Hrushikesh D (2020) Prevalence and risk factors of obstetric fistula: implementation of a need-based preventive action plan in a South-eastern rural community of India. BMC Womens Health 20:40CrossRef Dharitri S, Swayam P, Hrushikesh D (2020) Prevalence and risk factors of obstetric fistula: implementation of a need-based preventive action plan in a South-eastern rural community of India. BMC Womens Health 20:40CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Melah GS, Massa AA, Yahaya UR, Bukar M, Kizaya DD et al (2007) Risk factors for obstetric fistulae in north-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:819–823CrossRefPubMed Melah GS, Massa AA, Yahaya UR, Bukar M, Kizaya DD et al (2007) Risk factors for obstetric fistulae in north-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:819–823CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Holme A, Breen M, MacArthur C (2007) Obstetric fistulae: a study of women managed at the Monze Mission Hospital. Zambia BJOG 114(8):1010–1017CrossRefPubMed Holme A, Breen M, MacArthur C (2007) Obstetric fistulae: a study of women managed at the Monze Mission Hospital. Zambia BJOG 114(8):1010–1017CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Manoj K, Samarth A, Apul G (2019) Transvaginal repair of Vesico vaginal fistula: a 10-year experience with analysis of factors affecting outcomes. Urol Int 103:218–222CrossRef Manoj K, Samarth A, Apul G (2019) Transvaginal repair of Vesico vaginal fistula: a 10-year experience with analysis of factors affecting outcomes. Urol Int 103:218–222CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrowsmith SD, Barone MA, Rominjo J (2013) Outcomes in obstetric fistula care: a literature review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25:399–403CrossRefPubMed Arrowsmith SD, Barone MA, Rominjo J (2013) Outcomes in obstetric fistula care: a literature review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25:399–403CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Somaia A, Ahmed H (2018) Causes and management of urogenital fistulas: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 39(4):373–378CrossRef Somaia A, Ahmed H (2018) Causes and management of urogenital fistulas: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 39(4):373–378CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcome and predictors of failure of abdominal surgical repair of high vesico-vaginal and vesico-uterine fistulae at Gezira Hospital for Renal Disease and Surgery
verfasst von
Muzafr Shakir Ali Yousif
Ismail Gareeballah Alhag Mohamad
Mohamed Elimam Mohamed Ahmed
Yassin Mohammed Osman
Ahmed Shakir Ali Yousif
Mustafa Omran
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
African Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1110-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1961-9987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00409-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

African Journal of Urology 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

30.05.2024 Operationen am Penis Nachrichten

In Lebensgefahr brachte ein junger Mann nicht nur sich selbst, sondern auch das urologische Team, das ihm zu Hilfe kam: Er hatte sich zur Selbstbefriedigung eine scharfe Patrone in die Harnröhre gesteckt.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.