PD-L1+ macrophages are associated with favorable features in primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma
verfasst von:
Raphael E. Steiner, Edwin R. Parra, Francisco Vega, Lei Feng, Jason R. Westin, Sattva S. Neelapu, Paolo Strati, Michael R. Green, Christopher R. Flowers, Luisa M. Solis, Ignacio I. Wistuba, Sairah Ahmed, Ranjit Nair, Fredrick B. Hagemeister, Mansoor Noorani, Mario L. Marques-Piubelli
Primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare, aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has a complex inflammatory microenvironment. Although most patients can be cured with standard-of-care immunochemotherapy, patients who have disease relapse have an unfavorable prognosis. Pre-treatment prognostic biomarkers in PMBCL are needed. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical features and outcomes of PMBCL patients and their association with immune cell subpopulations identified by multiplex immunofluorescence at initial diagnosis. Two different antibody panels were used to assess macrophages in tissue biopsy specimens collected before the initiation of induction therapy. Twelve PMBCL patients, including five patients who had disease relapse, were included in the analysis. At a median follow-up time of 32.2 months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were not reached. Our findings suggest that a high density of PD-L1+ macrophages is associated with favorable features, such as early disease stage and the absence of B-symptoms, and indicate that a high percentage of PD-L1+ macrophages and high densities of CD30+PD-L1+ cells and CD30+ cells might be associated with a lower risk of relapse within 12 months of therapy initiation. Further studies are needed to develop a biomarker signature predictive of treatment response with therapeutic consequences for patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
IPI
International prognosis index scores
mIF
Multiplex immunofluorescence
OS
Overall survival
PFS
Progression-free survival
PMBCL
Primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma
To the editor
Primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) shares several features with classic Hodgkin lymphoma, such as 9p24.1 amplification, increased programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) ligand and CD30 expression [1, 2]. Between 7 and 20% of PMBCL patients have relapse after frontline chemoimmunotherapy, and most have dismal outcomes in spite of intensive therapy [3‐5]. Predictive studies are needed to identify PMBCL patients with inferior outcomes, who may benefit from novel therapies or enrollment in a clinical trial.
Anzeige
In this retrospective study, we used multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) to analyze pretreatment samples from PMBCL patients to identify prognostic characteristics and features associated with treatment response. MIF was not previously used to analyze PMBCL samples and enables better characterization of the cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment in terms of cellular subtypes and has increased sensitivity compared to conventional immunohistochemistry [6]. Methods are described in Additional file 1.
Patient and treatment characteristics are given in Table 1. Twelve PMBCL patients were included in this study. The median age at the time of initial diagnosis was 33 years (range, 22–54 years). Of the 12 patients, 7 (58%) had bulky disease, 5 (42%) had stage I or II disease, 7 (58%) had no B-symptoms, and 8 (67%) had an IPI score of 0 or 1. Nine patients (75%) received 6 cycles of dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin [4]), as a first line of therapy. However, no patients received consolidative radiotherapy in first complete remission. Five patients had disease relapse at a median of 6 months (range, 3–8 months) and received different additional therapies. At a median follow-up time of 32.2 months (range, 18.3–65.2 months), the median PFS and OS durations were not reached. At the most recent follow-up, one patient had died of progressive disease.
Per patient, the mean tissue area analyzed was 93.66 mm2 (range, 11.6–240.0 mm2) and the mean number of cells analyzed was 9658 cells (range, 6453–12,351 cells). The presented combination of markers output (Additional file 1: Table 1) is based on the previously most commonly assessed combinations [7‐9].
Compared with patients who had stage III or IV disease, patients who had stage I or II PMBCL had a significantly higher mean density of CD68+PD-L1+ cells (115.4 vs. 21.2 cells/mm2; p = 0.02; Fig. 1A, D). Compared with patients with B-symptoms, patients without B-symptoms had a significantly higher mean percentage of CD68+PD-L1+ cells (26.2% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.01; Fig. 1B). Compared with patients who had disease relapse within 12 months of therapy initiation, patients who did not have relapse within 12 months had a non statistically significant higher mean percentage of CD68+PD-L1+ macrophages (23.6% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.14; Fig. 1C), higher mean density of CD30+PD-L1+ cells (156.9 vs. 38.1 cells/mm2, p = 0.14; Fig. 1E, Additional file 1: Figure 1), and higher mean density of CD30+ cells (2,394.6 vs. 283.5 cells/mm2; p = 0.14; Fig. 1F).
Fig. 1
A-F Expression of PD-L1 and CD30 by multiplex immunofluorescence on pre-treatment biopsy and their association with clinical characteristics and outcome
×
Anzeige
Our results suggest that a high density and mean percentage of PD-L1+ macrophages in pre-treatment tissue biopsy samples is associated with favorable features, including early-stage disease and the absence of B-symptoms. Moreover, our results indicate that a high percentage of PD-L1+ macrophages or high densities of CD30+PD-L1+ cells or CD30+ cells in pre-treatment biopsy samples might be associated with a lower risk of relapse within 12 months of therapy initiation.
The present study had some limitations, including its small, single-center cohort and the lack of markers to precise the phenotype of lymphoma cells and further elements from the immune microenvironment. Further studies with additional patients are necessary to evaluate potential confounding factors such as early-stage disease and the absence of B-symptoms. Besides, additional research is warranted to develop PD-L1+ macrophages density and/or percentage as a potential response signature to predict response to checkpoint inhibitors in the frontline setting [10]. We also acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the need for a precise definition of the neoplastic cells since CD30 expression is negative in around 15% of cases, can have a heterogeneous pattern [2] and can be expressed in reactive B-cells of the background. A broader assessment using high-plex technologies, which allows the association of different markers to define specific cell phenotypes, is required to better understand the immune landscape of PMBCL [11]. Several clinical trials of PD-1 inhibitors with or without brentuximab vedotin as frontline therapy for PMBCL (notably NCT04745949 and NCT04759586) are ongoing [12]. The use of targeted therapies in the frontline setting may decrease chemoresistance. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause immune-related adverse events and brentuximab vedotin can induce neurotoxicity and hematotoxicity. Predictive studies to improve the personalization of PMBCL patients and avoid the unnecessary use of certain therapies and their associated risks are an unmet need.
Acknowledgements
M.R.G. is supported by a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar award. P.S. is supported by the Leukemia Research Foundation Career Development Award, Leukemia Lymphoma Society Career Development Program, Kite Gilead Scholar in Clinical Research Award, Sabin Family Fellowship Award
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of MD Anderson Cancer Center and conducted (protocol 2020–0228) in accordance with our institutional guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The IRB approved the request of waiver of informed consent and a waiver of authorizations as the study does not involve therapeutic intervention or any type of direct patient contact.
Consent for publication
Not required by IRB.
Competing interests
R.E.S.: Research funding: Rafael Pharmaceuticals, BMS, GSK, and Seattle Genetics. E.R.P. has nothing to disclose. F.V. receives research funding from NCI, CRISP Therapeutics, Allogene, Geron corporation and from the Moonshot program at MDACC. L.F. has nothing to disclose. J.R.W. has received research funding from Kite, BMS, Novartis, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Kymera; consulting: Kite, BMS, Novartis, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Merck, Abbvie/GenMab, SeaGen, MonteRosa, Iksuda. S.S.N. has received research support from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Cellectis, Poseida, Allogene, Unum Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Adicet Bio; served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Merck, Novartis, Sellas Life Sciences, Athenex, Allogene, Incyte, Adicet Bio, BMS, Legend Biotech, Bluebird Bio, Fosun Kite, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, and Morphosys; has received royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; has stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy, Inc; and has intellectual property related to cell therapy. P.S. has received research support from Sobi, Astrazeneca Acerta, ADC Therapeutics, ALX Oncology. Advisory board/consultancy: Hutchinson Medipharma, Roche Genentech, Astrazeneca Acerta, ADC Therapeutics, TG Therapeutics, Kite Gilead, Sobi, Incyte Morphosys. M.R.G. reports research funding from Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie and Allogene; consulting for Abbvie; honoraria from Tessa Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics and Daiichi Sankyo; and stock ownership of KDAc Therapeutics. C.R.F. is consultant for Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, Spectrum, has stock Options with Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power Medicine, has research Funding from 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar,Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research. L.M.S. has nothing to disclose. I.I.W. has provided consulting or advisory roles for AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Guardant Health, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Merck, MSD Oncology, OncoCyte, Jansen, Novartis, Flame Inc, and Pfizer; has received grants and personal fees from Genentech/Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, HTG Molecular, Merck, and Guardant Health; has received personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Oncocyte, Daiichi-Sankyo, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Regeneron, Sanofi, Pfizer and Bayer; has received research funding to his institution from 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Adaptimmune, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Akoya Biosciences, Amgen, Bayer, EMD Serono, Genentech, Guardant Health, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Karus Therapeutics, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, OncoPlex Diagnostics, Pfizer, Takeda, and Novartis. S.A. has received research support paid to her institution from Tessa Therapeutics, SeaGen, Merck, Xencor, Chimagen; Advisory committee member: Sanofi, SeaGen, Tessa Therapeutics; Consultancy: Novartis, Myeloid Therapeutics, Servier, Chimagen. R.N. has received honoraria from Incyte for speaker/preceptorship. F.B.H. has nothing to disclose. M.N. has nothing to disclose. M.L.M-P. has nothing to disclose.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
PD-L1+ macrophages are associated with favorable features in primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma
verfasst von
Raphael E. Steiner Edwin R. Parra Francisco Vega Lei Feng Jason R. Westin Sattva S. Neelapu Paolo Strati Michael R. Green Christopher R. Flowers Luisa M. Solis Ignacio I. Wistuba Sairah Ahmed Ranjit Nair Fredrick B. Hagemeister Mansoor Noorani Mario L. Marques-Piubelli
Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.
Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.
Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.
„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
