Predictors of avascular necrosis of the trochlea after pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

In this study, we systematically reviewed randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and case series. We included studies without language restriction. A minimum follow-up of 6 months should be available. We excluded studies evaluating fishtail deformity or trochlea necrosis in other primary injuries (fracture of the medial or lateral condyles). We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library (February 22, 2020) using the search terms:

<predictors> OR <indicators> OR <markers> AND <dissolution> OR <avascular necrosis> OR <nonunion> AND <supracondylar fracture> AND <children> OR <child> OR <Childhood>

One author (N.O.) conducted the literature research and scanned all references for eligibility. Articles that could not clearly be excluded were retrieved in full-text and read independently by two authors (N.O. and K.W.), who decided independently on eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Two authors (N.O. and K.W.) using pre-tested forms extracted study characteristics and results independently. In cases of discrepancies between data in the abstract and the text, we extracted data from the most comprehensive source (Fig. 1). In cases of multiple publications of data from identical patients at different follow-up, we summarized the temporal development and included data from the most recent follow-up only. We did not contact the authors for primary patient data. The available data were organized based on age, sex, affected side, fracture classification, treatment, number of used K‑wires, time to surgery, complications, and time to diagnosis of avascular necrosis.

The risk of bias in observational studies was assessed according to predefined criteria:

Overall, 191 articles were found. After reviewing the title and abstract of these articles, 13 out of 191 were selected. After retrieving the full text, eight out of 13 were included in the present study. These studies were mainly retrospective case reports (Fig. 1).

Table 1 summarizes the patients reviewed according to the case reports. Silva et al. reviewed retrospectively the information regarding 143 type II pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures, and avascular necrosis was identified in two patients [18]. Also, Bronfen et al. presented six out of 280 cases with a necrosis of the trochlea after type III Gartland fractures [2]. Etier et al. [3] and Ruiz et al. [17] reported on two patients with an avascular necrosis after a nondisplaced supracondylar humerus fracture. In the study of Etier et al., in four out of five cases it was a Gartland type III fracture. A retrospective report of five cases was presented by Narayanan et al. [14]. Nwakama et al. [15] described two case reports and Kim et al. [10] presented one case report. Glotzbecker et al. reported on eight cases with avascular necrosis of the trochlea after supracondylar humeral fractures [7].

Overall, 30 patients were identified who had avascular necrosis after a supracondylar humerus fracture in childhood. The mean age of injury was 5 years (min. 2; max. 10; SD: 2.8 years); 18 (60.0%) were male, 11 (36.7%) were female, and one was unknown. Six cases (20%) were on the right, nine on the left side (30%), and in 15 out of 30 (50%) the side was unknown. Five patients (16.7%) had a Gartland type I, three (10.0%) a type II, and 22 (73.3%) a type III fracture of the distal humerus (Table 2). Six patients (20.0%) were treated nonoperatively, whereas 24 patients (80.0%) underwent operative treatment with closed reduction and K‑wire fixation (23) or an open reduction and K‑wire fixation (1; Table 3). An accompanying nerve lesion was reported in 23.3% of cases (n = 7): The radial nerve (n = 4), the median nerve (n = 2), and the ulnar nerve (n = 1) were affected. The surgical procedure was known in 13 out of 30 cases. In 33.3% of patients (n = 10), two lateral K‑wires were used, while in only 10% patients (n = 3) was an additional medial K‑wire needed. The time to surgery was available in 24 cases. It was less than 7 days in 22 cases (91.7%) and more than 7 days in two cases (8.3%).

The avascular necrosis of the trochlea was diagnosed at a mean time of 33 months (min. 4; max. 84; SD: 24.5 months). Fracture type correlated with the accompanying complications, especially nerve lesions (r = 0.436; p = 0.042), and with the therapy selected (r = 0.666; p = 0.00). The other variables showed no significant correlations. The majority of the patients with avascular necrosis were males and had displaced supracondylar humerus fracture, Gartland type III. The severity of the fracture with the amount of dislocation may be a risk factor for avascular necrosis.

Nevertheless, we were not able to identify any significant predictors for avascular necrosis after supracondylar humerus fractures in childhood.

We reviewed the literature on 30 patients with avascular necrosis after a supracondylar humerus fracture in childhood. The supracondylar humerus fracture is a common injury of the pediatric elbow, whereas avascular necrosis is a rarely reported complication [2, 3]. Hence, it could be a misdiagnosed long-term complication. The patients had a mean age at injury of 5 years, 4–10 years is a typical age for these fractures [5, 16]. The majority were displaced fractures, Gartland type III [5, 6]. However, avascular necrosis was also identified after non-displaced fractures of the distal humerus in some cases [17]. The lack of blood supply seems to represent a potential risk for avascular necrosis. A recent study investigated the vascular anatomy of the distal humerus and demonstrated that the distal metaphysis of the humerus is consistently supplied by a single, terminal, nutrient artery, terminating approximately 3–4 cm proximal to the olecranon fossa. Areas distal to this point are considered a watershed area. In particular, the medial column is supplied by anterior and posterior segmental perforating vessels, without anastomosis between the medial and lateral perforating vessels [11, 20].

Beaty and Kasser classified two types of trochlea necrosis depending on the vascular supply. Type A necrosis is the result of an injury to the posterior vessels supplying the lateral aspect of the trochlea, whereas type B necrosis results from an insult to both the medial and lateral vascular supplies of the trochlea [1]. These investigations underline the severity of the fracture as a possible risk factor. According to our data, it remains unclear whether the initial trauma and/or the surgical procedure caused a lack of blood supply to the capitulum. Hence, only one out of 24 patients had an open reduction and K‑wire osteosynthesis. Moreover, only three patients were treated with an additional medial K‑wire. Thus, relevant injury to the blood vessels that supply the trochlea, as possibly seen in extended surgical approaches, seems improbable [4, 19]. Our results may indicate that the severity of the fracture and not the surgical procedure is a potential risk for avascular necrosis.

However, avascular necrosis was also observed in non-displaced supracondylar fractures. Yang et al. studied the vascularization of 19 fetuses to establish a hypothesis for avascular necrosis [21]. There was a longitudinal channel of vessels in the epiphysis between the capitulum and the trochlea, a centripetal vascularity in the area of muscle attachment, and a vascular arch in the olecranon fossa that also nourished the epiphyseal cartilage of the distal humerus. The vessels are susceptible to all types of fractures, including a non-displaced fracture, because of the longitudinal nature. Nevertheless, a severely displaced fracture will lead to a pronounced interruption of the vascularization.

The mean delay of 33 months between the fracture and the development of changes is consistent with avascular necrosis. The trochlea ossifies at the age of 7–8 years [12], and the defect of the lateral trochlea cannot be seen because the medial part is still cartilaginous. Thus, avascular necrosis would not be evident on radiographs of younger children. The patients present mainly with restricted range of motion, pain, or crepitus. Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging should be performed whenever avascular necrosis is suspected. Depending on the severity of the presenting symptoms, a conservative procedure can be attempted. However, it is essential to keep the patient under observation. In some cases, a complete regeneration of small defects with minimal joint involvement can be observed.

In the case of persistent symptoms, an operative management should be discussed. Depending on the individual pathology, the operative treatment ranges from arthroscopic or open debridement with capsulotomy, to surgical arrest of the remaining medial or lateral epiphysis and to osteotomy for persistent deformity. However, recurrent symptoms were not uncommon and long-term outcomes are missing [7]. Consequently, the parents, the child, and the surgeon should have a frank discussion on the possible operative and conservative procedures available. With the knowledge that the natural course of necrosis cannot be influenced, it appears to be more important to identify these patients early in the course of the disease. Our own experience supports the results of this study as seen in the following clinical case.