nach oben

Child's Nervous System

Erschienen in:

29.06.2023 | Review

Revolutionizing pediatric neuroimaging: the era of CT, MRI, and beyond

verfasst von: Maura E. Ryan, Alok Jaju

Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System | Ausgabe 10/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To review the evolution of cross-sectional imaging in pediatric neuroradiology from early developments to current advancements and future directions.

Methods

Information was obtained through a PubMed literature search as well as referenced online resources and personal experience from radiologists currently practicing pediatric neuroimaging and those who experienced the era of nascent cross-sectional imaging.

Results

The advent of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the 1970s and 1980s brought about a revolutionary shift in the field of medical imaging, neurosurgical and neurological diagnosis. These cross-sectional imaging techniques ushered in a new era by enabling the visualization of soft tissue structures within the brain and spine. Advancements in these imaging modalities have continued at a remarkable pace, now providing not only high high-resolution and 3-dimensional anatomical imaging, but also functional assessment. With each stride forward, CT and MRI have provided clinicians with invaluable insights, improving the accuracy and precision of diagnoses, facilitating the identification of optimal surgical targets, and guiding the selection of appropriate treatment strategies.

Conclusion

This article traces the origins and early developments of CT and MRI, chronicling their journey from pioneering technologies to their current indispensable status in clinical applications and exciting possibilities that lie ahead in the realm of medical imaging and neurologic diagnosis.

Alexander RE, Gunderman RB (2010) EMI and the first CT scanner. J Am Coll Radiol 7(10):778–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.003CrossRefPubMed

Goodman LR (2010) The Beatles, the Nobel Prize, and CT scanning of the chest. Thorac Surg Clin 20:(1)1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.12.001

Schulz RA, Stein JA, Pelc NJ (2021) How CT happened: the early development of medical computed tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 8(5):052110. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052110

Beckmann EC (2006) CT scanning the early days. Br J Radiol 79(937):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/29444122CrossRefPubMed

Ambrose J (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 2. Clinical application. Br J Radiol 46(552):1023–47. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1023

Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 46(552):1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016CrossRefPubMed

Petrik V, Apok V, Britton JA, Bell BA, Papadopoulos MC (2006) Godfrey Hounsfield and the dawn of computed tomography. Neurosurgery 58(4):780–7; discussion 780–7. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000204309.91666.06

Rubin GD (2014) Computed tomography: revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years. Radiology 273(2 Suppl):S45-74. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14141356CrossRefPubMed

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149CrossRefPubMed

10.

Seeram E (2018) Computed tomography: a technical review. Radiol Technol 89(3):279CT-302CT. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298954

11.

Lell MM, Wildberger JE, Alkadhi H, Damilakis J, Kachelriess M (2015) Evolution in computed tomography: the Battle for speed and dose. Invest Radiol 50(9):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000172CrossRefPubMed

12.

Goldman LW (2008) Principles of CT: multislice CT. J Nucl Med Technol 36(2):57–68; quiz 75–6. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.107.044826

13.

Forghani R, De Man B, Gupta R (2017) Dual-energy computed tomography: physical principles, approaches to scanning, usage, and implementation: part 2. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 27(3):385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2017.03.003CrossRefPubMed

14.

Postma AA, Das M, Stadler AA, Wildberger JE (2015) Dual-energy CT: what the neuroradiologist should know. Curr Radiol Rep 3(5):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-015-0097-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Tran NA, Sodickson AD, Gupta R, Potter CA (2022) Clinical applications of dual-energy computed tomography in neuroradiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 43(4):280–292. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2022.03.003CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hsieh SS, Leng S, Rajendran K, Tao S, McCollough CH (2021) Photon counting CT: clinical applications and future developments. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 5(4):441–452. https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2020.3020212CrossRefPubMed

17.

Pourmorteza A et al (2017) Photon-counting CT of the brain: in vivo human results and image-quality assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(12):2257–2263. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc NJ, Fleischmann D (2018) Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology 289(2):293–312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172656CrossRefPubMed

19.

Dillon WP (2021) 50th anniversary of computed tomography: past and future applications in clinical neuroscience. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 8(5):052112. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052112

20.

Wang LL, Leach JL, Breneman JC, McPherson CM, Gaskill-Shipley MF (2014) Critical role of imaging in the neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic management of brain tumors. Radiographics 34(3):702–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.343130156

21.

Berrington de Gonzalez A et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2071–2077. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440CrossRefPubMed

22.

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):289–296. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289CrossRefPubMed

23.

Huang WY et al (2014) Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 110(9):2354–2360. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Mathews JD et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians, 346:f2360. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360

25.

Miglioretti DL et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167(8):700–707. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Pearce MS et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

National Research Council (1998) In Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, phase I, letter report (1998). Washington (DC)

28.

Kodama K, Ozasa K, Okubo T (2012) Radiation and cancer risk in atomic-bomb survivors. J Radiol Prot 32(1):N51–N54. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N51CrossRefPubMed

29.

Wakeford R (2013) The risk of childhood leukaemia following exposure to ionising radiation–a review. J Radiol Prot 33(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/33/1/1CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nagayama Y et al (2018) Radiation dose reduction at pediatric CT: use of low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction. Radiographics 38:(5):1421–1440. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180041

31.

Strauss KJ et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):868–873. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4091CrossRefPubMed

32.

Schild HH (1994) MRI made easy: (...well almost) Berlex Laboratories, p. 105

33.

Pooley RA (2005) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fundamental physics of MR imaging (in eng). Radiographics 25(4):1087–99. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.254055027

34.

Roguin A (2004) Nikola Tesla: the man behind the magnetic field unit. J Magn Reson Imaging 19(3):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20002CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rabi II, Zacharias JR, Millman S, Kusch P (1938) A new method of measuring nuclear magnetic moment. Phys Rev 53(4):318–318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.53.318CrossRef

36.

Bloch F (1946) Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 70(7–8):460–474. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.460CrossRef

37.

Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound RV (1946) Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 69(1–2):37–38. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.37CrossRef

38.

Gorter LFJBCJ (1942) Negative result of an attempt to observe nuclear magnetic resonance in solids. Phys Rev 9(6):591–596

39.

Damadian R (1971) Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance (in eng). Science 171(3976):1151–1153. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3976.1151CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lauterbur PC (1989) Image formation by induced local interactions. Examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance 1973 (in eng). Clin Orthop Relat Res 244:3–6

41.

Garroway AN, Grannell PK, Mansfield P (1974) Image formation in NMR by a selective irradiative process. J Phys C: Solid State Phys 7(24):L457

42.

Kumar A, Welti D, Ernst RR (2011) NMR Fourier zeugmatography. 1975 (in eng). J Magn Reson 213(2):495–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.019

43.

Clow H, Young IR (1973) Britain’s brains produce first NMR scans. New Scientist 242:190–191

44.

Bilaniuk LT et al (1984) “Cerebral magnetic resonance: comparison of high and low field strength imaging,” (in eng). Radiology 153(2):409–414. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.153.2.6541355CrossRefPubMed

45.

Ai T et al (2012) “A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations,” (in eng). Invest Radiol 47(12):725–741. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318272d29fCrossRefPubMed

46.

Zimmerman RA (1999) “Past, present and future of pediatric neuroradiology,” (in eng). Childs Nerv Syst 15(11–12):624–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810050451CrossRefPubMed

47.

Wesbey GE, Moseley ME, Ehman RL (1984) Translational molecular self-diffusion in magnetic resonance imaging. II. Measurement of the self-diffusion coefficient (in eng). Invest Radiol 19(6):491–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198411000-00005

48.

Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M (1986) “MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders,” (in eng). Radiology 161(2):401–407. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909CrossRefPubMed

49.

Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE (1984) “Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent,” (in eng). AJR Am J Roentgenol 142(3):619–624. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.142.3.619CrossRefPubMed

50.

Russell EJ et al (1987) “Multiple cerebral metastases: detectability with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging,” (in eng). Radiology 165(3):609–617. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.3.3317495CrossRefPubMed

51.

Runge VM (2008) Notes on “Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent.” AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(6):1433–1434. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3549CrossRefPubMed

52.

Marckmann P et al (2006) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 17(9):2359–2362. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006060601CrossRefPubMed

53.

FDA (2018) FDA Drug Safety Communication: New warnings for using gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with kidney dysfunction | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm223966.htm. Accessed May 2023

54.

Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D (2014) “High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material,” (in eng). Radiology 270(3):834–841. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131669CrossRefPubMed

55.

McDonald JS et al (2017) Intracranial gadolinium deposition following gadodiamide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: a case-control study. JAMA Pediatr 171(7):705–707. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

McDonald RJ et al (2015) “Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging,” (in eng). Radiology 275(3):772–782. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.15150025CrossRefPubMed

57.

FDA (2022) FDA Drug Safety Podcast: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs are retained in the body; requires new class warnings. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-drug-safety-podcasts/fda-drug-safety-podcast-fda-warns-gadolinium-based-contrast-agents-gbcas-are-retained-body-requires. Accessed May 2023

58.

Douek P, Turner R, Pekar J, Patronas N, Le Bihan D (1991) MR color mapping of myelin fiber orientation (in eng). J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:(6):923–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199111000-00003

59.

Kwong KK et al (1992) “Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation,” (in eng). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(12):5675–5679. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Laub GA, Kaiser WA (1988) MR angiography with gradient motion refocusing (in eng). J Comput Assist Tomogr 12(3):377–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198805010-00002

61.

Marchal G et al (1990) Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (in eng). Radiology 175(2):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326471CrossRefPubMed

62.

Bottomley PA, Edelstein WA, Foster TH, Adams WA (1985) In vivo solvent-suppressed localized hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a window to metabolism? (in eng). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82(7):2148–2152. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.7.2148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Jahng GH, Li KL, Ostergaard L, Calamante F (2014) Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive update on principles and techniques. Korean J Radiol 15(5):554–77. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.554

64.

Geubert (2022) Guerbet announces U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of Elucirem (Gadopiclenol). https://www.guerbet.com/news/guerbet-announces-u-s-food-and-drug-administration-fda-approval-of-elucirem-gadopiclenol. Accessed May 2023

65.

Funke SKI et al (2022) Long-term gadolinium retention in the healthy rat brain: comparison between gadopiclenol, gadobutrol, and gadodiamide. Radiology 305(1):179–189. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212600CrossRefPubMed

66.

Robic C et al (2019) Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic profiles of gadopiclenol: a new macrocyclic gadolinium chelate with high T1 relaxivity. Invest Radiol 54(8):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Rinck PA (2023) An excursion into the history of magnetic resonance imaging, 13 ed. Norderstadt, Germany: The Round Table Foundation

68.

Smith-Bindman R et al (2019) Trends in use of medical imaging in US health care systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000–2016. JAMA 322(9):843–856. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Brownell GL (1999) A history of positron imaging. Res Lab. Massachusetts General Hospital, MIT

70.

Jones T, Townsend D (2017) History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 4(1):011013. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011013

71.

Townsend DW (2008) Combined positron emission tomography-computed tomography: the historical perspective. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29(4):232–235. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2008.05.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Muzic RF Jr, DiFilippo FP (2014) Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review. Semin Roentgenol 49(3):242–254. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2014.10.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Davis KM, Ryan JL, Aaron VD, Sims JB (2020) PET and SPECT Imaging of the brain: history, technical considerations, applications, and radiotracers (in eng). Semin Ultrasound CT MR 41(6):521–529. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2020.08.006CrossRefPubMed

74.

Fois A et al (1995) “EEG, PET, SPET and MRI in intractable childhood epilepsies: possible surgical correlations,” (in eng). Childs Nerv Syst 11(12):672–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00262229CrossRefPubMed

75.

Frost R et al (2019) Markerless high-frequency prospective motion correction for neuroanatomical MRI. Magn Reson Med 82(1):126–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27705CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Hori M, Hagiwara A, Goto M, Wada A, Aoki S (2021) Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: its history and renaissance. Invest Radiol 56(11):669–679. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Knopp LAE (2021) Clinical use cases for the Hyperfine Swoop Portable MR imaging system

78.

Martin D, Tong E, Kelly B, Yeom K, Yedavalli V (2021) Current perspectives of artificial intelligence in pediatric neuroradiology: an overview. Front Radiol 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2021.713681

79.

Duong MT, Rauschecker AM, Mohan S (2020) Diverse applications of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 30(4):505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Koetzier LR et al (2023) Deep learning image reconstruction for CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology 306(3):e221257. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221257

81.

Lin DJ, Johnson PM, Knoll F, Lui YW (2021) Artificial intelligence for MR image Reconstruction: an overview for clinicians. J Magn Reson Imaging 53(4):1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27078CrossRefPubMed

82.

Lui YW et al (2020) Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: current status and future directions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(8):E52–E59. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Revolutionizing pediatric neuroimaging: the era of CT, MRI, and beyond
verfasst von: Maura E. Ryan
Alok Jaju
Publikationsdatum: 29.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System / Ausgabe 10/2023
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06041-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Revolutionizing pediatric neuroimaging: the era of CT, MRI, and beyond

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2023

Correction: Revolutionizing pediatric neuroimaging: the era of CT, MRI, and beyond

The evolution of spinal cord surgery: history, people, instruments, and results

Vedran Deletis, MD PhD 1946–2023

Technical evolution of pediatric neurosurgery: moyamoya disease

Surgery for spina bifida occulta: spinal lipoma and tethered spinal cord

Development of shunt valves used for treating hydrocephalus: comparison with endoscopy treatment

Update Chirurgie