Introduction
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the definitive surgical treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee to improve quality of life, alleviate pain, and enhance function [
1‐
3]. It is predicted that by 2030, there will be a 174% and 673% growth for THA and TKA respectively, with a projected 4 million total joint arthroplasties (TJA) annually in the USA [
4‐
6]. Although TJA is considered a relatively safe procedure with reported rates of major cardiac complication as low as 0.2 to 0.8%, this risk becomes increasingly significant when considering the substantial increase in arthroplasties expected in the future [
7‐
11]. Cardiac complication represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality after TJA and is associated with increased hospital mortality, increased length of stay, increased non-cardiac events, and increased health expenditure [
7,
12‐
15]. Therefore, there is a growing imperative to understand the risks contributing to cardiac complications associated with THA and TKA.
With advances in medical care increasing life expectancy combined with sedentary lifestyles, the TJA population is increasing in age and comorbidity, particularly obesity and diabetes [
16‐
18]. This poses an evolving challenge in TJA; to navigate the increasing rate of arthroplasty procedures in a population with greater cardiovascular risk. In anticipation of this, there has been a surge of literature in the last decade to identify patient risk factors that predispose to cardiovascular complication. Nonetheless, there remains a lack of consensus and clarity for many risk factors.
Previous systematic reviews have focussed on identifying peri- and post-operative complications associated with TJA [
19‐
25]. Risk factors for one specific complication, venous thromboembolism, were discussed in a review by Zhang et al. [
19]; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews specifically exploring the risk factors which contribute to major cardiac complications in THA and TKA. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to assess the most recent published literature and identify the risk factors associated with cardiac complication in THA and TKA.
Materials and methods
Search strategy
This systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (see Additional file
1) [
26]. Prior to commencing the study, a detailed protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42018095887). Four databases including Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 13th of May, 2018 for the following search terms: (heart OR myocard* OR cardi*) AND (arthroplasty OR “joint replacement” OR “knee replacement” OR “hip replacement”) AND (risk OR complication OR adverse OR problem OR event OR issue OR mortality OR morbidity) AND (factor* OR characteristic* OR predispos* OR predic* OR profile). The following MeSH terms were also included in our search: Arthroplasty, Cardiology, Orthopaedics, and Risk Factors. Manual searches were also performed through hand searching the reference lists of included articles.
Study selection
This review included studies that explored specific risk factors for cardiac complication associated with elective primary THA and TKA in patients ≥18 years old. Studies involving other types of arthroplasty or concerning revision THA or TKA were excluded. Only studies published from 2008 onwards were considered, and studies were excluded if more than 50% of their study population were operated on prior to 2008. This review only included studies in which the indication for TJA was osteoarthritis and excluded those with fractures, inflammatory, or autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis etc.). Studies examining the risk of cardiac complication associated with medication exposures, such as the use of anti-thrombotic agents and beta-blockers prior to surgery, were also excluded for the purpose of this analysis.
Cardiac complication was defined in this review as cardiac arrest (CA), myocardial infarction (MI), or new-onset arrhythmia, occurring within 90 days of THA or TKA. Articles which reported on general outcomes such as increased length of hospital stay or major complication without exploring the specific associations between a risk factor and cardiac complication were excluded. Literature that was not available in the English language, studies involving animal models, and levels IV and V evidence papers were also excluded.
Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent investigators (YE, IJ), and following exclusions, full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility. If two investigators could not reach a consensus on inclusion, a third investigator (HL) was involved in the final determination.
Data extraction was performed using a pre-defined excel spreadsheet, which was prepared and agreed upon by three independent authors (YE, IJ, HL). Extracted data included information on study characteristics, patient demographics (age, gender, procedure) and comorbidities (cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular), as well as incidence of cardiac complication in each study. Reported odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), and relative risk (RR) were the principal summary measures collected to determine the association between studied risk factors and cardiac complication. Only significant values will be reported in this review, with statistical significance set as p < 0.05. Data on the definitions of cardiac complication and the length of follow-up was also extracted. Where possible, sub-group analysis between TKA and THA was collected to compare these cohorts in the analysis. Following data extraction, the included studies were too heterogeneous and therefore a meta-analysis was not conducted.
Study quality assessment
A quality assessment tool was specifically developed for this review based on two existing appraisal tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the Evidence-Based Library Appraisal Checklist (Additional file
2: Table S1) [
27,
28]. Our tool included 25 questions, which assessed study methodology, population selection, diagnosis, and reporting of cardiac complications, as well as the level of analysis between THA and TKA cohorts. Two authors (YE and IJ) who were blinded from study identifiers (title, author, and journal) conducted the quality assessment. Any discrepancies of two or more points led to review by a third author (HL) and discussion until consensus was achieved. All 25 questions were equally weighted and individual scores were calculated based on the number of ‘YES’ answers. The final score was calculated as a percentage of the number of answerable questions. Studies that scored < 80%, 80–89%, and > 90% were deemed of low, moderate, and high quality, respectively.
Discussion
The projected rise in hip and knee arthroplasty in the next decade has emphasised the importance in understanding the risks and complications associated with these procedures [
4‐
6]. Myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and acute renal failure are major complications known to be associated with THA and TKA [
36,
37]. Whilst current literature has extensively evaluated and identified peri- and post-operative complications that can be expected with TJA, there is an overall lack of evidence regarding patient risk factors associated with development of complications, in particular, cardiac complications. A previous systematic review identified risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism in TJA; however, the study by Zhang et al. did not specifically investigate post-operative cardiac complication, therefore necessitating this review [
19]. A thorough understanding of these risk factors will allow for better pre-operative care to reduce the incidence of cardiac complication in TJA. The reasons for limiting this systematic review to studies published in 2008 and onwards, as well as those with at least 50% of surgeries occurring since 2008 are two-fold. Firstly, significant improvements in surgical techniques [
25,
38,
39], implant technology [
39,
40], peri-operative [
41] and post-surgical management [
40], changes in anaesthetic practices [
42‐
45], and the introduction of ‘fast-track’ hip and knee arthroplasty [
42,
44,
46] and same-day bilateral arthroplasty have occurred over the past decade [
47]. Secondly, THA and TKA are increasingly performed in older patients as life expectancy increases [
14,
39,
41], and those with a greater burden of medical comorbidities including obesity, diabetes, and hypertension [
5,
43,
48]. Thus, we focused our investigation to the past decade in order to comprehensively assess current cardiac complications in THA and TKA and relationships to patient risk factors.
In our series, Shah et al. reported the lowest incidence of cardiac complication (0.07%), within a patient group containing no reported risk factors [
7]. Conversely, Feng et al. reported the highest complication rate of 3.0%, which is likely attributable to their study population, which contained a greater proportion of coronary artery disease patients [
4]. The majority of studies reported incidences of cardiac complication between 0.2 and 0.8%, which is similar to that previously reported in the literature [
7]. Of the risk factors analysed, age and history of cardiac disease demonstrated the most consistent relationship with cardiac complication following THA or TKA. The majority of studies examined in the current review reported a positive association with these risk factors and peri- and post-operative cardiac complication (Additional files
3 and
4: Tables S2 and S3) [
4,
5,
7,
11,
12,
32]. This highlights the importance of age and history of cardiac disease in the pre-operative screening of THA and TKA patients. Obesity was not identified as a risk factor for cardiac complication post-TJA in this series [
7,
17,
29,
33,
34]. These findings are of interest to orthopaedic surgeons who are anticipating a more obese patient demographic for arthroplasty in the future [
29,
49]. Interestingly, we report a potential relationship between cardiac complication and underweight patients [
8,
30], which warrants further investigation. For additional, lesser-reported risk factors that were analysed in the current review (i.e., bilateral arthroplasty, renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, anaemia, smoking history, and ASA class), the reviewed literature suggests some association. As many of these factors are well-established risk factors for cardiac complication following non-cardiac surgery [
50], further research will be necessary to better determine these associations following THA and TKA.
Findings were less clear for other highly reported risk factors such as gender, hypertension, diabetes, and type of arthroplasty, due to greater discrepancy between studies. These inconsistencies were surprising given that gender, hypertension, and diabetes are considered classical cardiovascular risk factors in non-cardiac surgery [
13,
50]. For diabetic patients, previous studies have also reported a statistically significant increased risk of MI following arthroplasty; however, these did not meet the inclusion criteria for this review [
18,
51]. The inconclusive results in the current review with respect to these particular risk factors may reflect the changes and improvements in arthroplasty previously mentioned, and/or improved management of these risk factors, particularly diabetes and hypertension. However, further investigation is required to better understand the factors contributing to these variances.
Our findings must be considered in the context of the quality of the included studies, together with the wider literature. As evidenced by the results of our appraisal tool (Additional file
2: Table S1), the majority of studies in this series were of moderate quality and multiple limitations were identified that potentially contributed to the discrepancies in results between studies. A commonly encountered limitation in this series was the lack of consistency in study design. For example, although Shah et al. identified significant associations, their study design must be carefully considered for accurate interpretation of data. A knee arthroscopy (KA) population was used as a control cohort with the presumption that KA is a lower risk treatment alternative for osteoarthritis. However, this view is controversial in the current literature [
7]. Similarly, in their study of BMI and cardiac complication, Thornqvist et al. included overweight patients (BMI 25 to 30) as a reference for all analysis [
8], rather than patients within a normal BMI range as is typically used in the literature. Additionally, although Thornqvist et al. and Anoushiravani et al. report a possible relationship between underweight patients and the risk of cardiac complication in TJA, accurate interpretation is impaired by the absence of a reported
p value [
8,
30]. Furthermore, many of the studies used shared databases, such as the NSQIP and the NIS. Whilst these databases have allowed access to a large volume of data and assisted in developing established pre- and post-operative risk stratifications models, there are limitations when used for analyses. For example, the NSQIP only includes data to 30 days after a surgical procedure and contains limited information regarding several comorbidities [
52]. Similarly, the NIS only records inpatient events, does not allow for longitudinal tracking of patients, and does not facilitate distinction between comorbidities from complications [
52]. In light of this, not all cardiac events would be identified by studies in this series and some risk factors may be unaccounted for.
To reduce the confounding effect of other disease processes (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), this review excluded studies that grouped both OA and non-OA patients without adequate sub-analysis. Despite this, all studies included in our series, except four [
4,
29,
32,
33], did not specify an indication for TJA and therefore the effect of cofounders cannot be accurately considered. This influences the reliability of the results, which may not adequately reflect the interaction between particular risk factors and cardiac complication. Similarly, many studies did not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral arthroplasty despite different risk profiles of these two procedures [
53]. This lack of specificity is a shortcoming of the studies in this series, as well as the current broader literature. Moreover, due to the reliance on national databases for studies in this review, few studies defined their cardiac outcomes (MI, CA, or arrhythmia) to ensure consistency with the current guidelines. Across the various studies, risk factors and outcomes were either poorly defined or defined differently, which contributed to the heterogeneity of the data set and difficulty of conducting a reliable comparative analysis [
33].
Additional issues were identified in the broader literature with respect to the effects of many risk factors on peri- and post-operative outcomes. The primary concern encountered with these studies was a lack of further analysis to identify which risk factors were associated with a given complication. This lack of detailed investigation is unfortunate, particularly since in many cases the necessary data was available. Many full-texts that were excluded discussed the relationship between risk factors and increased hospital re-admission, length of stay, major complication or mortality with little or no reference to the individual complications. Although the findings of the current review will help surgeons better understand the risks for patients undergoing TJA, will assist pre-operative counselling of patients, and will allow for better hospital resource allocation, the data does not provide sufficient guide for stratifying patients at greater risk of cardiac complication. It is crucial that future studies provide more robust analysis in order to better determine the association between patient risk factors and post-arthroplasty cardiac complications. Future studies should also investigate various combinations of risk factors, rather than analysing each factor as an independent variable.
One of the major limitations of the current review is the exclusion of potentially relevant studies and risk factors due to the stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria utilised. However, this was necessitated by the lack of specificity in the current literature. Other important risk factors not included in this series include obstructive sleep apnoea and atrial fibrillation. In a study of 530,809 patients, Memtsoudis et al. showed that sleep apnoea was associated with greater odds of cardiac complication (adjusted OR 1.59; CI 95% 1.48–1.71;
p < 0.001) [
54]. With an increasing prevalence of sleep apnoea, this is an important area of future research [
54,
55]. Chronic kidney disease has also been shown to be a significant predictor of cardiac complication (OR 5.5; CI 95% 1.68–9.39;
p = 0.002), as has atrial fibrillation (OR 2.4; CI 95% 2.1–2.8;
p < 0.0046) [
56,
57]. Therefore, it is evident that, whilst this systematic review provides an extensive evaluation on the current literature, there are several other relevant studies, which did not meet our inclusion criteria. The exclusion of foreign language studies constitutes a language bias in this review, whilst there is a potential selection bias for studies utilising the large patient databases. Furthermore, publication bias resulting in only significant results being published and/or being published earlier may result in an over-representation of significant associations between risk factors and cardiac complications.