Background
A sore throat is a common condition, resulting in considerable numbers of primary care visits and prescriptions of antibiotics. According to the Primary care Record of Infections in Sweden (PRIS), 11% of the prescriptions of antibiotics are issued for sore throats (the vast majority being diagnosed with either pharyngitis or tonsillitis) [
1], but consultation rates and prescription percentages vary between countries [
2]. The European clinical guideline for the management of acute sore throat [
3], and the Swedish equivalent for pharyngotonsillitis [
4], are based on the Centor scoring system [
5], assessing the probability of group A streptococci (GAS) in the pharynx [
6]. In the Swedish official guideline, antibiotics are only recommended to patients with three or four Centor criteria, and a positive rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for GAS [
4]. Throat cultures are not recommended for routine diagnosis but can be indicated for patients with worsened or non-resolving symptoms.
GAS are the most commonly found bacteria among adolescents and adults seeking medical care for pharyngotonsillitis, but the disease has been associated with a variety of pathogens, both bacteria and viruses, including polymicrobial cases [
3,
7]. Bacteria can be found among less than half of the patients seeking medical care for pharyngotonsillitis [
7]. Also, asymptomatic colonization by different pathogens is prevalent [
3,
7,
8].
In Sweden, with a predominantly temperate climate, pharyngotonsillitis is generally considered to be most common during the colder months [
9], but seasonal variations in the prevalence of potential pathogens are sparsely explored. A better understanding of seasonal variation in aetiology could improve the quality of future diagnosis and treatment.
The aim of this study was to explore any seasonal variations in the use and outcome of rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for GAS and throat cultures, among patients diagnosed with pharyngotonsillitis in primary care.
Methods
We retrieved and combined retrospective data from the electronic medical record (EMR) system (Cambio COSMIC, Cambio Healthcare systems, Stockholm, Sweden) and the laboratory information system (ADBAKT, Autonik, Nyköping, Sweden) in Kronoberg County, Sweden, covering the period from 2013-01-01 to 2016-12-31. All the publicly financed Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs) in the county were asked to participate, and 31 out of 34 PHCCs agreed. Due to the system of publicly financed health care, with every citizen connected to a PHCC, our data comprised the vast majority of the population of the county. The mean population included during the 4 years studied was 177,675, while the mean population of the whole county during the period was 191,000 [
10].
Visits to primary care resulting in a diagnosis of acute tonsillitis (ICD-10 J03) or acute pharyngitis (ICD-10 J02) were included and merged, as diagnostic traditions and clinical guidelines do not separate the two. If not otherwise stated, all further use of the word “visits” in this article refers to this definition. From the EMRs, we extracted the date of diagnosis, the personal identification number, if a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for GAS had been used for that patient and date, and if used, the result of that RADT. Any results from throat cultures obtained from that patient and date, were extracted from the laboratory information system. Two types of standardized throat cultures were available at the time, one targeting beta-haemolytic streptococci (A, C and G) only, and the other one also including selective anaerobic incubation to detect Fusobacterium necrophorum. As to duplicates of visits (more than one visit on the same date) in our dataset, we were not able to tell if they represented real duplicates or only duplicated data transfers, as most of them were identical regarding reporting unit/PHCC, and when so, also identical regarding RADT use and results. For technical reasons, we chose to count what appeared to be the first visit, but it should be noted that it does not necessarily reflect true chronology due to data limitations. However, the number of duplicates in the dataset was low (179 of 21,363), and the true number of duplicates possibly even lower. As to duplicates of cultures, positive results were included.
In late 2013, the microbiological laboratory switched from Lancefield classification of streptococci to binomial nomenclature, with the introduction of MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometer). For the analyses in this article, we chose to treat group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GAS) and S. pyogenes as interchangeable, and similarly, to collectively treat group C (GCS) and G (GGS) streptococci as equivalent to S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis.
Discussion
In this study, more light has been shed on the seasonal variations in the aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary care. As expected, a seasonal variation was seen in the mean rate of visits with a diagnosis of pharyngotonsillitis comparing calendar months, with the highest mean observed in December and the lowest in September. More interestingly, a lower mean rate of visits in August and September coincided with a lower proportion of RADTs being positive for GAS among them, which correlated with a higher proportion of visits associated with a throat culture. The high number of visits and RADTs analysed, during 4 consecutive years, provides strong evidence for a lower likelihood of GAS involvement in August and September than during the rest of the year.
Subgroup analysis indicated a somewhat different visiting behaviour for adolescents and young adults (15–29 years), with a mean peak of visits in August instead of December. However, this age group showed the same pattern of a lower proportion of RADTs being positive for GAS in August and September, thus making age a less likely explanatory factor for this variation in GAS involvement. The peak of visits in August among adolescents and young adults was unexpected, and it remains to be explained what factors are involved in this difference between age groups. Furthermore, men were overrepresented from the age of 15 years and above, which contrasts with what is generally seen in primary care visits [
13].
As to other studies of seasonal variations in the aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis, a lower likelihood of GAS involvement among sore throat cases in the northern temperate summer than in the colder winter has previously been hypothesized [
9]. The incidence of GAS-associated pharyngotonsillitis in children has also been shown to be higher when temperatures are lower (in a Mediterranean climate), and when the number of school-free days is reduced [
14]. Recently, seasonal variations in the percentage of RADT positivity have been reported among children with symptoms of acute pharyngitis in a paediatric hospital setting in Portugal, with a decline in August, similar to our findings [
15]. A seasonal pattern has also been suggested for GAS among peritonsillar abscesses, with one study of Danish hospital patients showing a higher prevalence of GAS during the winter and the spring [
16].
The findings in our study of a lower likelihood of GAS involvement in pharyngotonsillitis in August and September than during the rest of the year, seem to confirm that a seasonality of aetiology is present. An overall decline in GAS transmission due to summer holidays (mid-June to mid-August in Sweden) and higher temperatures (with less time spent indoors) appear to be plausible factors behind this pattern, but it still needs to be shown why the same factors would not cause a similar decline in other pathogens. Seasonal variations in the prevalence of other beta-haemolytic streptococci in pharyngotonsillitis have previously been found among symptomatic children, with higher non-GAS recovery rates during warm weather [
17]. A contrasting pattern has been reported from Hungary, with a peak incidence of GCS/GGS in pharyngeal isolates during the colder months (January–March) [
18]. As to virus-associated cases of sore throat in children, these have been shown to be more common during the Scottish winter [
19].
For comparison, seasonal variations in Swedish cases of invasive GAS infection have been described in a report from the Public Health Agency of Sweden, with the incidence being at its highest in the 1st months of the year [
20]. Similar reports of invasive infections, with peak incidence of invasive GAS in the winter (December–February) have been reported both from Norway and Hungary, with contrasting incidence peaks of invasive GCS/GGS in the summer (June–August) [
18,
21].
Given the limited number of cultures in our study, no conclusions could be made from their results with regard to seasonal variations. The low number of cultures was expected, since the current guidelines do not encourage throat cultures as part of routine diagnosis. Hence, they can be thought of as actively selected cases (for instance treatment failure, relapsing episodes, unexpected clinical presentations or RADT results). It is still unclear whether the decline in GAS in August and September is offset by non-GAS bacteria or if other pathogens are involved. In our study, we did not detect any significant variation between calendar months regarding the proportion of negative cultures.
Another factor, potentially obscuring patterns of seasonal variations in the aetiology, is the seasonal variations in the asymptomatic pharyngeal colonization by potential pathogens. Asymptomatic colonization by GAS has been shown to vary with age, time and concurrent infections in the environment [
3]. A small, previous study has also indicated higher prevalence of asymptomatic GAS during the Swedish summer (mid-July to mid-September) than during the winter (mid-January to mid-February) [
9]. In the same study, no significant difference was seen in the prevalence of GAS between symptomatic and asymptomatic children < 16 years of age during the summer, which could question the overall applicability of RADTs during this time of the year. However, other studies have indicated the opposite, that the asymptomatic prevalence of GAS and other beta-haemolytic streptococci is independent of season [
22,
23].
Obviously, GAS are not the only pathogens causing pharyngotonsillitis, but the significance of non-GAS bacteria and other pathogens needs to be better understood. GCS and GGS are more commonly found among pharyngotonsillitis patients than in asymptomatic controls [
8], and GCS have been thought to be of more relevance than GGS [
3], but the pathogenic importance of GCS and GGS in pharyngotonsillitis is much less clear than that of GAS [
7,
8,
24].
F. necrophorum too is more commonly found among patients with pharyngotonsillitis than in asymptomatic controls [
8], and more so among teenagers and young adults [
11]. However, there is yet no strong evidence for causality, and neither is it known if antibiotic treatment can alleviate symptoms or reduce the risk of complications [
25], such as development of the rare Lemierre’s syndrome [
26]. Thus, it remains unclear to what extent symptomatic non-GAS cases could benefit from antibiotic treatment. In general, the absolute benefits of antibiotics for sore throats are considered modest, and the number needed to treat is high, to prevent suppurative and non-suppurative complications in high-income countries [
27].
The study has methodological limitations. For example, no validation of diagnoses was made, as no individual EMRs were read. Several previous studies have suggested that the adherence to diagnostic guidelines in clinical practice is low [
28,
29]. It could be suspected that the outcome of RADTs for GAS among patients with a sore throat is in practice affecting the choice of diagnosis, altering the “true” proportion of positive/negative RADTs among patients with pharyngotonsillitis. However, our study does not describe the general population of sore throats, but one of visits resulting in a diagnosis of acute tonsillitis or pharyngitis. Because of the Swedish health care system, with publicly financed primary care to everyone, and with compulsory diagnosing of all visits, our data can be expected to represent the vast majority of diagnoses of pharyngotonsillitis in our county during the period studied. Another limitation is our time span for duplicate exclusion. Choosing a longer time span, aiming at finding disease episodes rather than visits, would have been an alternative approach. This could have reduced the risk of overestimation of cases due to “second opinions”, for instance after getting a negative RADT. However, setting an optimal time span for what to exclude would not be easy, and a longer time span could have led to exclusion of cultures representing treatment failure that we wanted to find. Thus, we chose to accept this risk of “dilution”, which should be kept in mind also when interpreting the proportion of visits with RADT being used and the proportion of RADTs being positive.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.