nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

09.05.2022 | Original Article

The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application

verfasst von: Muhittin Ugurlu, Fatmanur Sari

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical success of posterior composite restorations repaired with and without silane application for up to 2 years.

Materials and method

In this retrospective study, patient record files acquired from the 40 patients who were treated due to needing repair for two class II defective composite restorations and visited the clinical practice for regular check-up visits were used. In the experimental group, the defective restorations were repaired using a silane coupling agent (Porcelain Primer), a universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond), and a microhybrid resin composite (Charisma Smart). In the control group, the restorations were repaired using the universal adhesive and the resin composite without silane coupling agent application. The repaired restorations were blindly assessed by two calibrated examiners using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 6 months, 1, and 2 years. The data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (p = 0.05).

Results

After 2 years, 80 repaired class II restorations were evaluated. No restoration of either the control or silane-treated group failed. After 2 years, there were no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05). The differences in surface roughness were observed in each group over time (p < 0.05). There were no variations in other criteria over time (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no significant effect of the silane coupling agent on restoration repair survival.

Clinical relevance

The repair of localized defects of the posterior composite restorations either with or without silane application is a conservative treatment option that may increase the clinical success of these restorations.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC (2010) 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 89:1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071CrossRefPubMed

Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003CrossRefPubMed

Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gordan VV, Riley JL, Worley DC, Gilbert GH (2012) Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN. J Dent 40:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kanzow P, Wiegand A (2020) Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations. Dent Mater 36:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.001CrossRefPubMed

Loomans B, Özcan M (2016) Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent 41:S68–S78. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-269-LITCrossRefPubMed

Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP, Fernández E, Loomans B, Moraes RR (2016) Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 69:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.020CrossRef

Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N (2013) Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 29:28–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006CrossRefPubMed

Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G (2015) Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent 43:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015CrossRefPubMed

10.

Estay J, Martín J, Viera V, Valdivieso J, Bersezio C, Vildosola P, Mjor IA, Andrade MF, Moraes RR, Moncada G, Gordan VV, Fernández E (2018) 12 Years of repair of amalgam and composite resins: a clinical study. Oper Dent 43:12–21. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-313-CCrossRefPubMed

11.

Moncada G, Martin J, Fernández E, Hempel MC, Mjör IA, Gordan VV (2009) Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 140:425–432. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191CrossRefPubMed

12.

Fernández EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjör IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA (2011) Survival rate of Sealed, Refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J 22:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008CrossRefPubMed

13.

Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L (2015) Influence of repair procedure on composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 28:255–260PubMed

14.

Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 27:701–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013CrossRefPubMed

15.

Junior SAR, Ferracane JL, Della BÁ (2009) Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 25:442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.009CrossRef

16.

Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B (2009) Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 13:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0228-2CrossRefPubMed

18.

Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2016) Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials (Basel) 9:547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070547CrossRef

19.

Staxrud F, Dahl JE (2011) Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 119:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00833.xCrossRefPubMed

20.

Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A (2019) Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater 35:1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.008CrossRefPubMed

21.

Da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2012) Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 40:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001CrossRefPubMed

22.

Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2018) Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 4:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262CrossRefPubMed

23.

Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM (2017) Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent 42:367–374. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-259-LCrossRefPubMed

24.

Michelotti G, Niedzwiecki M, Bidjan D, Dieckmann P, Deari S, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2020) Silane effect of universal adhesive on the composite-composite repair bond strength after different surface pretreatments. Polymers (Basel) 12:950. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040950CrossRef

25.

Popoff DA, de Magalhães CS, de Freitas OW, Soares LA, de Almeida Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Moreira AN, Mjör IA (2014) Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite. J Adhes Dent 16:575–583. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33196CrossRefPubMed

26.

Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Mjör IA (2009) A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 140:1476–1484. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098CrossRefPubMed

27.

Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA (2012) Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 37:E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-121-CCrossRefPubMed

28.

Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BAC, Huysmans MCDNJM (2012) Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. J Dent 40:829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007CrossRefPubMed

29.

Valente LL, Silva MF, Fonseca AS, Münchow EA, Isolan CP, Moraes RR (2015) Effect of diamond bur grit size on composite repair. J Adhes Dent 17:257–263. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34398CrossRefPubMed

30.

Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent 39:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007CrossRefPubMed

31.

De Paris MT, Perdigão J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2020) Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater 36:1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENTAL.2020.08.007CrossRef

32.

Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-006-0095-7CrossRefPubMed

33.

Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J, Mjör IA (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1708-8240.2006.00007.xCrossRefPubMed

34.

Moncada G, Fernández E, Martín J, Arancibia C, Mjör IA, Gordan VV (2008) Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 33:258–264. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-113CrossRefPubMed

35.

Baur V, Ilie N (2013) Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 17:601–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application
verfasst von: Muhittin Ugurlu
Fatmanur Sari
Publikationsdatum: 09.05.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application

Abstract

Objective

Materials and method

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Materials and method

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

Dental age estimation with fewer than mandibular seven teeth: An accuracy study of Bedek models in Turkish children

Influence of radiotherapy on dental implants placed in individuals before diagnosed with head and neck cancer: focus on implant-bed-specific radiation dosage

Attenuation of near-ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared light in sound and carious human enamel and dentin

Oral appliances reduce masticatory muscle activity-sleep bruxism metrics independently of changes in heart rate variability

Prevalence of dens invaginatus and its association with periapical lesions in a Western Indian population—a study using cone-beam computed tomography

Influence of flow rate and different size of suction cannulas on splatter contamination in dentistry: results of an exploratory study with a high-volume evacuation system

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Zahnmedizin