Intraocular pressure
After menopause, IOP tends to rise. Panchami et al. reported significantly higher average IOPs in 60 postmenopausal women compared to 60 premenopausal women (18.5 mmHg vs. 15.2 mmHg,
p < 0.05) [
16]. Similarly, in a study by Birgul et al. comparing 153 premenopausal women with 142 postmenopausal women, the authors measured significantly higher average IOPs in the postmenopausal eyes (17.1 ± 1.7 vs. 15.7 ± 2.7 mmHg,
p < 0.001) [
19]. The mechanism by which female sex hormones may lower IOP was discussed above in the context of pregnancy. In menopause, as estrogen and progesterone levels fall, the effect would be the opposite. Birgul et al. suggested that the IOP increase is secondary to the reduction in estrogen specifically [
19]. The hypothesis presented is that estrogen reduction hinders the function of the carbonic anhydrase pump located in the corneal endothelium, causing a decrease in uveoscleral flow, increase in episcleral venous pressure, and subsequent rise in ocular tension. Finally, the decreased estrogen levels in menopause may contribute to the steepening of the horizontal curvature in postmenopausal women, which could not only impact the patient’s refraction, but also the measured IOP [
31].
Corneal thickness
CCT tends to decrease after menopause. In a prospective, case–control, single-blinded study, Keskin et al. measured CCT in 40 premenopausal and 40 postmenopausal women [
39]. The study found significantly lower average CCT values in the postmenopausal group (521.2 ± 38 μm vs. 561 ± 42.8 μm,
p < 0.005). The research team posited that the lack of estrogen reduced the production and release of nitric oxide from the corneal endothelium, leading to the reduction in corneal thickness. Furthermore, they suggested that the loss of estrogen-induced systemic water retention could similarly impact corneal thickness. Lastly, Sanchis-Gimeno et al. found that the CCT of 30 postmenopausal women with dry eye was significantly lower than that of 32 postmenopausal women without dry eye (533.1 + 4.7 μm vs. 547.6 + 15.1 μm,
p < 0.001) [
40]. The study ascribed these findings to increased evaporation of the tear film with subsequent rise in tear fluid osmolarity and thus ultimately decreased thickness [
40].
Ocular surface
Several studies have suggested a higher incidence of DED among postmenopausal women [
13,
24]. Garcia-Alfaro and coresearchers reported the prevalence of DED symptoms to be 76.4% versus 80.5% in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively (
p = 0.029) [
13]. Additionally, the average OSDI score was significantly higher in postmenopausal women (30.61 ± 19.97 vs. 26.81 ± 18.19,
p < 0.001). Another study concluded tear volume and stability measured by Schirmer’s and TBUT tests, respectively, to be notably diminished in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women [
41]. The literature suggests inflammation of the lacrimal gland, diminished meibomian gland tissue, and reduced lipid production secondary to androgen deficiency as the possible underlying mechanisms [
42‐
45]. Nuzzi et al.’s clinical experience supports this current hypothesis as several cancer patients treated with anti-androgen drugs would report symptoms of ocular burning, photophobia, and foreign body sensation, consistent with DED [
45]. Moreover, decreased estradiol triggers upregulation of degradative enzymes toward exocrine glands, and thus, reduced tear secretion [
43]. The correlation between sex hormone levels and symptomatology of DED remains inconclusive [
24,
43]. This is exemplified by the previously discussed increase in DED severity in pregnant and postmenopausal women and suggests other factors could be at play.
Hormonal therapies
The cornea, like other tissues influenced by female hormone levels, is also believed to respond to external hormonal treatments, such as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and hormonal preparation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Dry eye symptoms are commonly reported by postmenopausal women, prompting several studies to investigate the impact of HRT on these symptoms, yielding varying results. HRT typically involves the administration of exogenous estrogens with the addition of progestins for women with an intact uterus. A recent meta-analysis of 17 studies found significant improvement in dry eye symptoms one month after systemic HRT use [
46]. However, this improvement was no longer statistically significant by the three and six-month follow-up. When comparing DED symptoms in postmenopausal subjects with and without concurrent HRT use, the rate was significantly higher among those on HRT (odds ratio [OR] 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49–1.91 for HRT containing only estrogen, and OR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13–1.48 for estrogen with progesterone/progestin) [
47]. These data suggest an elevated risk of ocular discomfort associated with HRT use, most commonly with estrogen-only HRT [
24,
47]. On the other hand, a review by Peck et al. discussed evidence indicating that prolonged duration of HRT eventually leads to decreased number of ocular complaints [
24]. While future studies are needed to investigate the impact of systemic HRT on postmenopausal DED, others have begun exploring the clinical potential of local HRT in the form of topical estradiol ophthalmic formulations. However, one randomized, placebo-controlled trial failed to detect significant differences in Schirmer’s test scores using topical 17-β-estradiol-3-phosphate drops [
48].
Corneal effects of IVF have also been studied among premenopausal women undergoing hormone-based reproductive assistance. The exogenous hormones involved in an IVF cycle may vary but often include some combination of FSH, hCG, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and LH, making it somewhat challenging to attribute ocular changes to a specific hormone. In a study by Parihar et al., which included 32 women undergoing IVF, no significant changes in IOP or CCT were noted, although these results may have been limited by the sample size [
49]. By the third trimester, a statistically significant increase in dry eye disease in at least one eye, defined by a Schirmer I below 10 mm, was noted among patients receiving IVF, in agreement with the results discussed above in the pregnancy section. The observed reduction in tear secretions was partially explained by the previously noted mechanisms caused by changes in estrogen and progesterone levels, as well as decreased free testosterone. Without a proper control group, however, these findings should be analyzed with caution [
49]. In another study, Colak et al. compared tear film parameters before and after ovulation induction, which led to significantly higher basal levels of estradiol (
p < 0.001) [
50]. They determined TBUT scores to be elevated after ovulation induction (6.2 ± 2.8 s vs. 8.4 ± 1.4 s,
p = 0.001). In accordance, Schirmer’s test values were also significantly higher after ovulation (14.3 ± 7.1 mm vs. 20.6 ± 6.2 mm,
p < 0.001). Differences in symptomatology using OSDI scores were not statistically significant [
50].
In postmenopausal women, Coksuer et al. investigated the impact of systemic drospirenone and estradiol on tear film parameters and found substantially decreased values of Schirmer’s and TBUT tests before treatment compared to after treatment [
51]. OSDI scores demonstrated an expected inverse correlation. Another study compared the efficacy of systemic tibolone, an HRT agent with estrogenic, progestogenic, and androgenic effects, and estradiol/medroxyprogesterone acetate on the ocular surface of postmenopausal women. Only those on HRT with tibolone exhibited markedly increased values of Schirmer’s (
p < 0.001) and TBUT (
p < 0.001) tests [
42]. This improvement was primarily attributed to the androgenic activity of tibolone on the lacrimal gland and goblet cells as the estrogen-progesterone combination did not exhibit a similar impact [
42]. Of note, the androgen receptor protein exists in the human cornea [
52]. This supports the notion that androgen deficiency could be a major contributor to dry eye disease [
42,
44,
48]. Along these lines and as alluded to above, the topical use of 17-β-estradiol-3-phosphate drops did not significantly change Schirmer’s test scores in postmenopausal women [
48]. In a study in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, androgen replacement therapy had little effect on the cornea and tear function [
53].
Based upon the understanding of the effect of female sex hormones on the cornea, several authors have gone on to speculate that these molecules or related compounds could be leveraged as potential therapeutic interventions. For example, Wei et al. postulated that estrogen might be used to protect retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) by virtue of its activation of collagen synthesis [
54]. This may not only decrease the rigidity of the cornea (thereby decreasing the IOP), but could also enhance the compliance of other parts of the eye such as the lamina cribrosa, where such a change could protect RGC axons from compression.
Another potential area where female sex hormones have shown promise is their use in the treatment of refractive errors, although human clinical studies are presently lacking. Using a rabbit model, Leshno et al. discovered that topical application of estrogen eye drops resulted in a 0.6-diopter myopic shift that regressed with treatment cessation, supporting the notion that corneal refractive error can be modified pharmacologically through the direct action of sex hormones [
55]. Whether systemic or topical estrogen supplementation beneficially impacts ocular surface health remains inconclusive [
44,
48].
Impact of female sex hormone-associated changes on the preoperative evaluation for eye surgery
The available data suggests that pregnancy is a risk factor involved in the pathogenesis of corneal ectasia and the progression of pre-existing KC [
28,
34,
35,
56]. If future studies supported its use, CXL could be more extensively considered to treat women with high-risk KC who contemplate future pregnancy [
28,
34,
35]. Given that pregnancy may also stimulate post-LASIK ectasia, Hafezi et al. suggested that the preoperative counseling of LASIK should include mentioning the risk of ectasia in susceptible women of childbearing age [
37]. Future research comparing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with LASIK may support a preference for surface ablation rather than LASIK in female patients with a history or prospective risk of hormonal imbalance, as suggested by Taneja et al. [
35]. From experience, Nuzzi et al. has found it necessary at times to discontinue hormonal treatments prior to surgical management of refractive defects in order to achieve stable, satisfactory post-operative results [
45].
While more extensive studies are needed to confirm the precise pattern of changes in CCT during the menstrual cycle, some studies have suggested statistically significant changes in CCT between the cycle’s different phases. Such variations can be critical in determining potential candidates or ideal timing for surgery [
8,
9]. As shown by Goldich et al., an overestimation of the corneal thickness and an underestimation of hysteresis may occur if the patient is evaluated at the time of ovulation [
8]. These changes in CCT during the menstrual cycle indicate that a menstrual history may be imperative before refractive surgery evaluation, contact lens fitting, or glaucoma assessment [
9]. We propose that these evaluations include an assessment of a woman’s menstrual cycle phase. Also, the transient physiological changes in CCT and IOP during and after pregnancy need to be recognized when diagnosing or treating women for glaucoma [
10], because if not taken into account they can lead to the implementation of unnecessary anti-glaucoma therapy or surgery, as well as increased patient anxiety [
30]. Finally, although IOP generally remained within the normal range, the rise in IOP measured after menopause may influence the diagnosis or management of those women with glaucoma or suspect status [
16].