Background
In the canonical JAK/STAT signaling pathway, activated JAK phosphorylates STAT at a tyrosine residue around a.a.700, and the resulting phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT) dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus, where it functions as a transcription factor, while the dormant unphosphorylated STAT (uSTAT) in the cytoplasm has no significant functions. However, our previously research using
Drosophila STAT92E and human STAT5A has demonstrated a non-canonical JAK/STAT signaling, in which uSTAT is capable of associating with HP1 and stabilizing heterochromatin [
1,
2]. JAK activation can increase pSTAT and decrease uSTAT, thus causing heterochromatin instability [
3,
4]. Other groups have shown that human JAK2 activation reduces heterochromatin in leukemia and stem cells [
5‐
8].
Many groups have reported that uSTATs can translocate into and prominently exist in the nucleus in various mammalian cells at quiescence, when STAT proteins are not phosphorylated [
9‐
16]. Specifically, it has been shown that STAT3 maintains a prominent nuclear presence independent of its tyrosine phosphorylation status in several mammalian cell lines [
12,
13,
16], and that uSTAT5 similarly is detected in the nucleus of serum-starved unstimulated cells, where STATs are not phosphorylated [
11,
17,
18]. Further, uSTAT1, 3, and 5 can bind to DNA [
18‐
21] and to regulate gene transcription [
9,
13,
14,
18].
Our previous work has shown that the STAT-HP1 interaction is mechanistically and functionally conserved in human cells for STAT5A [
2], which is most homologous to
Drosophila STAT92E [
22,
23]. We have shown that both endogenous STAT5A and transfected uSTAT5A (or STAT5A
Y694F) are prominently present in the nucleus of cultured human cells [
2]. This observation is consistent with reports by other groups (see Fig. 1a in ref. [
11]; Fig. 5A in [
17]; Fig. 1 in ref. [
18]). In addition, uSTAT5A physically interacts with HP1α via an HP1-binding motif, PxVxI, present in STAT proteins [
1,
2]. It has been shown that uSTAT5 in the nucleus directly binds to and represses differentiation genes in hematopoietic progenitor cells [
18]. Thus, the “textbook” version of JAK/STAT signaling needs revision; uSTATs are not simply “latent cytoplasmic proteins” but constantly shuttle into the nucleus [
15,
24], where they may function to regulate gene transcription [
14,
18] and promote heterochromatin stability [
2,
4,
25].
While many groups have demonstrated nuclear localization of uSTATs, their nuclear functions are nonetheless less clear. Although it is reported that uSTAT3 can activate gene expression [
14], genomic studies have shown that uSTAT5 is mainly involved in gene repression, that activation of the JAK/STAT pathway causes genome-wide redistribution of chromatin-bound STAT5 to traditional STAT transcriptional targets, due to conversion of uSTAT5 to pSTAT5, and that either STAT5 activation or its depletion causes derepression of differentiation genes [
18]. This latter finding is consistent with our studies of STAT5A [
2]. We have shown that uSTAT5A functions strikingly similar to HP1α in gene repression, and that many of the genes repressed by uSTAT5A and HP1α in common are overexpressed in colon cancer [
2]. Importantly, these same genes increase their expression when endogenous STAT5A or HP1α is knocked down, suggesting that endogenous uSTAT5A and HP1α are involved in repressing these genes possibly via heterochromatin formation.
Heterochromatin is important for chromosomal compaction and transcriptional silencing as well as for genome stability, animal longevity, and tumor suppression [
26‐
28]. Cellular differentiation is associated with increases in heterochromatin levels [
29‐
32]. The reverse of this process, i.e., dedifferentiation, is a hallmark of cancer development [
33]. Loss of heterochromatin and derepression of satellite repeats is found in many cancers [
34]. Tumorigenesis occurs only in cells that have decreased levels of heterochromatin or are unable to form new heterochromatin [
35,
36]. Heterochromatin is marked by di- or tri-methylated lys9 on histone H3 (H3K9me3), which provides docking site for HP1, both of which are hallmarks of heterochromatin [
26‐
28]. It has been shown that Suv39h1, a H3K9-specific histone methyl transferase (HMT) and key component of heterochromatin, functions as a tumor suppressor whose loss permits lymphoma development in response to oncogenic Ras [
35]. Consistent with these findings, we have shown that heterochromatin is essential for maintaining genome stability [
37], and suppresses tumor growth [
2].
Since the HP1-binding motif PxVxI is conserved in all STAT proteins including STAT3, we sought to investigate whether uSTAT3 can also bind HP1 and can thereby play a role in tumor suppression. Activation of STAT3 has been found more often than STAT5 or any other STATs in cancers. Thus, understanding the functions of STAT3 is important in cancer biology. Interestingly, it has been shown that loss of STAT3 or STAT5 promotes cancer growth in certain tissues, suggesting these STAT proteins might function as tumor suppressors in these situations [
38‐
42]. On the other hand, several groups have shown that increasing uSTAT3 levels inhibits tumor growth [
43,
44], an effect that has been attributed to its dominant-negative interference with transcriptional activation of pSTAT3. The apparently contradicting results regarding STAT3 in lung cancer are entirely consistent with our hypothesis that the tumor suppressor function of STAT3 stems from its noncanonical function in controlling heterochromatin, i.e., uSTAT3 rather than pSTAT3 suppresses tumors. Our hypothesis predicts that expressing uSTAT3 and STAT3 knockdown would have opposite effects on lung cancer growth.
To understand the biological functions of STAT3 in lung cancer and to determine whether noncanonical function of STAT3 plays a role in lung cancer development, we investigated the interaction between STAT3 and HP1α in a few non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. We found that STAT3 and HP1α partially colocalize in the nucleus and might physically interact, and that uSTAT3 promotes heterochromatin formation and suppresses lung cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that the non-canonical functions of STAT3 operate in lung cancer cells, in which uSTAT3 plays a role in suppressing cancer growth.
Discussion
We have previously discovered a noncanonical JAK/STAT pathway, in which uSTAT plays a role in promoting heterochromatin formation by associating with HP1 [
1,
3,
4]. We have further shown that the noncanonical function of STAT is conserved from
Drosophila to human STAT5A [
2]. The physiological functions of this noncanonical STAT pathway and how many other STAT proteins have this function, however, remain incompletely understood. In this study, we used human lung cancer cells to investigate the non-canonical functions of STAT3, which has been implicated in many human cancers and has been reported to also have tumor suppressor function. We have found that STAT3 possesses a noncanonical function, is capable of associating with HP1, promoting heterochromatin formation, and suppressing tumor progression.
We have shown by immunostaining and FRET that uSTAT3 and HP1α colocalize, albeit partially, in the nucleus. The difference between uSTAT3 and uSTAT5A, which we have found to exhibit a more complete nuclear co-localization with HP1α [
2], is intriguing and is still under investigation. Nonetheless, our studies of STAT3, and previously of STAT5A, suggest that the noncanonical function of uSTAT, initially identified in
Drosophila, is conserved in mammals. These results are consistent with our previous report that knocking down HP1α enhances growth of tumor cells as mouse xenografts [
2], and are consistent with reports that STAT3 functions as a tumor suppressor and loss of STAT3 promotes lung cancer cell growth in mouse xenografts [
38]. Importantly, in this study we have shown that expressing uSTAT has effects opposite to knock downing STAT on cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth. Thus, our model that pSTAT promotes cancer development and uSTAT suppresses tumors by influencing heterochromatin dynamics can reconcile the contradicting results reported by different groups regarding the functions of STAT proteins, especially STAT3, in cancers.
Furthermore, how heterochromatin loss might lead to cancer development and how heterochromatin is initially established remain unclear at the molecular level [
27,
28]. Noncoding RNA transcription is essential for heterochromatin formation in fission yeast [
56,
57]. In other eukaryotes, however, DNA-binding proteins, including transcription factors, may initially bind to certain nucleation centers to recruit HMTs and/or HP1 [
58‐
61]. Although BRCA1 and RB, and KLF11 can recruit HP1 to specific loci or maintain constitutive heterochromatin [
58,
62‐
65], uSTAT recruiting HP1 to initiate new heterochromatin is yet to be investigated. It is conceivable that uSTAT is among the factors that can initiate heterochromatin formation by binding to specific DNA sequence motifs and recruiting HP1. Although several transcription factors have been implicated in heterochromatin formation across diverse species [
58,
62‐
65], a prominent heterochromatin localization has only been shown for STAT proteins [
1,
2]. Thus, STAT proteins might be among the protein factors that collectively or cooperatively control heterochromatin formation, which should have implications in both cancer biology and heterochromatin formation. The roles of uSTAT in heterochromatin initiation and maintenance and in cancer development are currently under investigation.
Methods
Source of cell lines
Human NSCLC cell lines A549, H226, H441, H460, and H520; and other human cancer cell lines HeLa and HEK293T were from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA 20110 USA).
Cell culture, DNA constructs, and transfection
Human NSCLC cell lines A549, H226, H441, H460, and H520; and other human cancer cell lines HeLa and HEK293T cells were maintained in RPMI medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and antibiotics at 37 °C and with 5% CO2 in water-jacketed, humidified incubators. Transient transfection with plasmid DNA was done by using FuGENE 6 (Life Sciences, Inc) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells stably transfected with the indicated cDNAs or shRNAs were selected as puromycin (5 μg/ml)-resistant colonies and several colonies were pooled. Cell culture and transfection procedure was approved by UCSD BUA R1347.
Plasmid DNA constructs with Myc-tagged human STAT3 and STAT3Y705F were kindly provided by Dr. Pradipta Ghosh (UCSD). DNA construct for sh-HP1α was from Open BioSystems. The following DNA constructs were acquired from Addgene (Cambridge, MA): human HP1α (17652), sh-STAT3 (26596), and H3K9me3 FRET reporter (22866).
Immunostaining, Immunoprecipitation, and Western blotting
For immunofluorescence, transfected cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min, blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min, and incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibodies. Primary antibodies used in this study include rabbit anti-STAT3 (1:250; Santa Cruz, sc-482), mouse anti-HP1 (CBX5) (1:200; Life Sciences, 730,019), goat anti-c-Myc (1:500, Fisher, NB600–335). Slides were washed four times in PBS and then immunostained with Alexa Fluor® 546-conjugated secondary antibody (1:250; Molecular Probes) at 37 °C for 1 h.
For co-immunoprecipitation, A549 cells were harvested in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 5% Glycerol) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail and PMSF at a final concentration of 2 mM. Portions of lysate containing equal amounts of protein (200 μg) were then immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with protein G-Agarose (Roche) bound antibodies. The beads were then washed six times with lysis buffer, and associated protein complexes were recovered in SDS sample buffer. Protein samples were resolved on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto Pure Nitrocellulose Blotting Membranes (Pall) for immunoblot analysis. Rabbit anti-STAT3 (1:250; Santa Cruz, sc-482) and mouse anti-HP1 (CBX5) (1:200; Life Sciences, 730,019) primary antibodies were used to detect endogenous HP1α and STAT3, respectively, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies and visualization using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce). Full-length gel images are shown in Fig. S1.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
To detect changes in histone methylation (H3K9me3) levels in living cells, cells were transfected with a CFP/YFP histone methylation FRET reporter construct [
48]. Donor and acceptor bleed through was corrected using donor and acceptor only samples. FRET measurements were carried out using a Zeiss Axio Observer fluorescence microscope equipped with FRET setup and software.
To detect FRET in fixed cells, cells were fixed on a coverslip and immunostained with anti-HP1α-Alexa488 (donor) to anti-STAT3-Alexa546 (acceptor) primary and secondary antibody pairs, as described in [
47]. Donor and acceptor bleed through was corrected using donor and acceptor only samples. FRET was detected and processed using a Leica confocal microscope with built-in FRET software.
Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase assay
Cells were plated on 24 well plates. Nearly confluent cells were fixed with 3.7% Paraformaldehyde in PBS. 500ul of β-gal staining solution (0.1% X-Gal, 5 mM 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM Sodium chloride, and 2 mM Magnesium chloride in 40 mM citric acid/sodium phosphate solution, pH 6.0) was added and plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. After removal of staining solution, 70% glycerol was added and visualized with 20X bright field microscope. Senescence cells show blue staining in the cytosol [
53].
Quantitative PCR measurement of major satellite transcripts
Total RNA from A549 cells stably expressing the indicated transgene was isolated using RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher) was used to generate cDNA, according to the manufacturer’s manual, and was subjected to Sybr Green qPCR using the Applied Biosystems 7300 Real Time PCR instrument per manufacturer’s protocol. Major satellite transcripts expression values were normalized relative to Gapdh. Primers used for qPCR are as the following.
Major Sattellite Forward: AGGGAATGTCTTCCCATAAAAACT.
Major Satellite Reverse: GTCTACCTTTTATTTCAATTCCCG.
Gapdh forward: CATGGGTGTGAACCATGAGA.
Gapdh reverse: CAGTGATGGCATGGACTGTG.
Anchorage-independent growth (soft agar) assay
Stable A549 cell lines with the indicated transgene were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells grown to 60% confluency were resuspended in 0.4% Noble agar (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in RPMI, and were seeded at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/well in 6-well culture plates on top of a 2 ml underlayer composed of 0.8% agarose in RPMI. Media were refreshed twice per week for 3 weeks, and then were stained with p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and photographed on an inverted compound microscope with phase contrast optics.
Stable A549 cell lines with the indicated transgene were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells grown to 60% confluency were harvested and diluted in fresh media, and seeded at 100 cells/plate in 6-well plates. Cells were maintained in RPMI medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and antibiotics at 37 °C and with 5% CO2 in a water-jacketed, humidified incubator until large colonies (in excess of 50 cells) were visible in control plates. Medium was removed and cells were fixed with a solution of 6% glutaraldehyde and 0.5% crystal violet in PBS, and the number of colonies was counted.
Xenograft assays
Tumor formation was assayed by xeno-implantation of genetically perturbed cells. Prior to xeno-implantation, transfected cells were grown for 48 h under standard culture conditions without selective drugs. 5 × 105 cells were subcutaneously injected into the left and right flanks of 4–6 month old female CD-1 nude mice (Crl:CD-1-Foxn1nu, Charles River Laboratories). Tumor volumes were measured weekly using a caliper for 4 weeks. Following final tumor measurements, mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation per IACUC protocol. Tumor volume was calculated using the average of 3 measurements of the tumor radius and the formula Volume = (4/3)πr3. The statistical significance of differences in tumor size was determined by Student’s t-test. The vertebrate animal protocol has been approved by UCSD Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Protocol Number: S13282).
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.