nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Review

Visualizing GABA transporters in vivo: an overview of reported radioligands and future directions

verfasst von: Niels Knippenberg, Matthias Bauwens, Olaf Schijns, Govert Hoogland, Alexandru Florea, Kim Rijkers, Thomas J. Cleij, Kasper Eersels, Bart van Grinsven, Hanne Diliën

Erschienen in: EJNMMI Research | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

By clearing GABA from the synaptic cleft, GABA transporters (GATs) play an essential role in inhibitory neurotransmission. Consequently, in vivo visualization of GATs can be a valuable diagnostic tool and biomarker for various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Not surprisingly, in recent years several research attempts to develop a radioligand have been conducted, but so far none have led to suitable radioligands that allow imaging of GATs. Here, we provide an overview of the radioligands that were developed with a focus on GAT1, since this is the most abundant transporter and most of the research concerns this GAT subtype. Initially, we focus on the field of GAT1 inhibitors, after which we discuss the development of GAT1 radioligands based on these inhibitors. We hypothesize that the radioligands developed so far have been unsuccessful due to the zwitterionic nature of their nipecotic acid moiety. To overcome this problem, the use of non-classical GAT inhibitors as basis for GAT1 radioligands or the use of carboxylic acid bioisosteres may be considered. As the latter structural modification has already been used in the field of GAT1 inhibitors, this option seems particularly viable and could lead to the development of more successful GAT1 radioligands in the future.

Additional file 1. Overview of lipophilic N-substituted nipecotic acid and guvacine based GAT1 inhibitors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-00992-5.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

AchE

Acetylcholinesterase

BBB

Blood–brain barrier

BGT1

Betaine-GABA transporter 1

Carboxylesterase

CNS

Central nervous system

GABA

γ-Aminobutyric acid

GAD

Glutamate acid decarboxylase

GAT

GABA transporter

HUGO

Human Genome Organization

PET

Positron emission tomography

Pgp

P-glycoprotein

RCY

Radiochemical yield

SPECT

Single-photon emission computerized tomography

SUV

Standardized uptake value

VGAT

Vesicular GABA transporter

Introduction

The amino acid γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA (1)) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). Synthesis of GABA occurs in GABA-producing neurons through the enzymatic decarboxylation of glutamate by two glutamate acid decarboxylase (GAD) enzymes (Fig. 1) [1]. Synthesized GABA is then stored into vesicles, into which it is transported by the vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT). GABA is released from these vesicles into the synaptic cleft by exocytosis. This process is regulated by voltage-dependent calcium channels, which allow calcium to pass into the presynaptic neuron upon depolarization. After exocytosis, GABA in the synaptic cleft can bind to the postsynaptic GABA_A and GABA_B receptors, which pass on the inhibitory signal to the postsynaptic neuron(s) [2, 3]. GABA signals are terminated by removal of GABA from the synaptic cleft by its reuptake into adjacent presynaptic neurons and glial cells by the GABA transporters (GATs).

A well-balanced status of inhibitory (e.g. GABA) and excitatory (e.g. glutamate) neurotransmission systems is required for a healthy brain function. Hence, disruptions in the GABAergic system could lead to an imbalance between the two neurotransmission systems and are associated with the pathogenesis of various CNS diseases, such as epilepsy, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease [4]. The GABAergic system is therefore a prime target of several CNS-targeted drugs [5], even though the exact role of GABA in these disorders is not fully understood. Non-invasive imaging of the GABAergic system could aid to understand this role.

Several imaging methods have been developed for GABA receptors, with the benzodiazepine derivatives [¹¹C]flumazenil ([¹¹C]2), [¹⁸F]flumazenil ([¹⁸F]2), and [¹¹C]Ro15-4513 ([¹¹C]3) frequently being used as positron emission tomography (PET) tracers for the GABA_A receptor (Fig. 2) [5, 6]. For example, clinical studies using these radioligands include applications in schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism spectrum disorder [6]. Since the GABA receptors are mainly found on postsynaptic membranes, the GABA_A addressing tracers can provide information on postsynaptic GABA function. However, there are no PET tracers available yet to study presynaptic neuronal and glial GABAergic activity. Radiotracers for other presynaptic neuronal markers have been developed by addressing the neuronal and vesicular neurotransmitter transporters. For example, the use of PET tracers to localize and quantify dopamine transporters in patients with Parkinson’s disease is well established [7] and radioligands have also been developed for serotonin, noradrenalin, and glycine transporters [8]. However, there are no radioligands that can successfully image the GABA transporters (GATs) in vivo.

These GATs are membrane bound GABA/Na⁺ symporters, belonging to the solute carrier family SLC-6. As Na⁺/Cl⁻-dependent transporters, they entail the cotransport of two Na⁺ ions and one Cl⁻ ion [9‐11]. The first GAT was isolated from rat brain by Radian et al. [12], after which this transporter was designated as GAT1. Following the isolation of GAT1 in rats, four different GAT subtypes have been cloned in various species leading to a complex nomenclature (Table 1) [13]. For the purpose of this review, the nomenclature proposed by the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) will be used (i.e. GAT1, BGT1, GAT2, and GAT3). It has been shown that the four GAT isoforms have a different distribution in the CNS [14]. GAT1—the most abundant transporter of the four GAT subtypes [15]—is mainly present on presynaptic GABAergic neurons, while GAT3 resides in astrocytes. Immunocytochemistry studies revealed that GAT2 is mainly located in the leptomeningeal cells, while BGT1 (betaine-GABA transporter 1) is present in the renal medullary cells.

Table 1

Overview of GABA transporter nomenclature for various species

Species	Nomenclature
Mouse	mGAT1	mGAT2	mGAT3	mGAT4
Rat	rGAT1	rBGT1	rGAT2	rGAT3
Human	hGAT1	hBGT1	hGAT2	hGAT3
HUGO	GAT1	BGT1	GAT2	GAT3

Since the cellular distribution of the four GATs differs significantly depending on the isoform, it is preferable to develop selective GAT radioligands to suit the desired imaging application. As GAT1 is the most abundant and most of the research concerns this GAT subtype, this review will mainly focus on summarizing the efforts made to develop GAT1 addressing radioligands for in vivo imaging of presynaptic GABAergic neurons. The development of these radioligands is highly desirable, as they could contribute to our understanding of the pathogenesis of CNS disorders. This might be especially beneficial for schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease, as in these disorders GATs have been shown to play an important pathophysiological role [4]. Several lines of evidence also suggest that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have a lower GAT expression [16‐20]. The recognition of GAT inhibitors to exhibit anticonvulsant properties then led to the development of the GAT1 inhibitor tiagabine (11, vide infra) [21‐23], which is currently the only approved GAT1 inhibitor that is clinically used for the adjunctive treatment of epilepsy [24].

Several attempts have been made to develop GAT radioligands, which are summarized in this review. Since these attempts have mostly been unsuccessful, we specifically aim to elucidate why the radioligands that have been developed so far are of limited use. Based on our findings, we propose the use of non-nipecotic acid-based structures and the use of carboxylic acid bioisosterism as potential solutions for the successful development of GAT radioligands in the near future.

Cyclic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

In order to develop GAT1 radioligands, a good understanding of small molecular weight GAT1 binders is of crucial importance. Given that a plethora of GAT1 inhibitors have already been developed, these molecules are a good starting point to develop GAT1 addressing radioligands. By the 1970s, it was known that cyclic analogues of GABA, such as nipecotic acid (4) and guvacine (5), can bind to the GABA binding site of GATs and function as GAT inhibitors (Fig. 3) [25, 26]. Further studies revealed that (R)-nipecotic acid ((R)-4) is about an order of magnitude more potent as GAT inhibitor than its enantiomer (S)-4 [27, 28]. This difference was also found for homo-β-proline (6) [29]. Since these initial studies were conducted using rat brain slices, the results could not be specified for each of the GAT subtypes. However, the later cloning of the various GAT subtypes allowed for the determination of more specified IC₅₀ values [30, 31], showing that these small amino acids mostly have a preference for GAT1.

Modelling studies showed that the amine and carboxylic acid functionalities of GABA and the above-mentioned cyclic GABA analogues are necessary for efficient binding into the GABA binding site of GATs [32‐37]. However, these functionalities also give rise to zwitterionic behaviour, preventing these molecules from passing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [38, 39]. Therefore, GABA and its (cyclic) analogues are of limited use in being a human biomarker. This was illustrated by early attempts to image the GABAergic system using ¹³N- and ¹¹C-labelled GABA ([¹³N]1 and [¹¹C]1) (Fig. 4) [40, 41]. In later attempts, ¹¹C-methylated nipecotic acid [¹¹C]7 was developed as potential GAT1 inhibitor, but also proved unsuccessful [42].

Because PET imaging studies in rats showed no brain uptake of [¹¹C]7 due to the reasons discussed above, the ester intermediate [¹¹C]8 was tested. However, this molecule did not cross the rat’s BBB either. This result is more surprising, as previous imaging studies from 1998 using mice show a moderate uptake of [¹¹C]8 in the brain (2.5–5.5% injected dose per gram of tissue (ID/g)) [43]. Moreover, [¹¹C]8 is both structurally and chemically related to N-[¹¹C]methylpiperidin-4-ylpropionate ([¹¹C]PMP, [¹¹C]9), which is a radiotracer used in PET imaging of acetylcholinesterase (AchE) [44, 45]. A potential explanation for the latter issue could be that [¹¹C]8 and [¹¹C]9 are hydrolysed by different esterases due to the different attachment of the ester functionality. Previous research indicates indeed that [¹¹C]8 is not hydrolysed by AchE, but by other carboxylesterases (CEs) [43]. A different expression of these esterases in plasma could then lead to the hydrolysis of [¹¹C]8 before brain entry. This would be consistent with the suspected hydrolysis of [¹⁸F]39 in rats (vide infra), though further research would be required to find a definite answer.

Lipophilic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

The failed trials to image GATs using small analogues of GABA introduce a second requirement for a successful radioligand besides docking into the GABA binding site: BBB permeability. While several PET tracers, such as 6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-L-DOPA and [¹⁸F]FDG, are able to cross the BBB through carrier-mediated transport [46], nipecotic acid-related compounds are not known to be transported in such a way. Therefore, transcellular diffusion seems the most feasible way to make GAT1 radioligands cross the BBB. Fortunately, several strategies to optimize key physiochemical parameters in order to enhance membrane diffusion have been developed in medicinal chemistry. Lipinski’s Rule of Five, which relates membrane permeability to molecular weight, lipophilicity, and hydrogen bonding [47], is one of the best known examples [48]. Adaptations and extensions of the Rule of Five for CNS drugs in specific have also been made, in which the existing limits were refined and more properties were added [49‐52]. A common theme for these strategies is to improve the lipophilicity, which has also been done in the field of GAT inhibitors and radioligands.

Lipophilic N-substituted GAT1 inhibitors

For the field of GAT inhibitors, the BBB problem was solved by the addition of a lipophilic moiety to the small amino acids described above. This lipophilic moiety most often has the form of an N-alkyl spacer connected to a biaryl system. Such a system was first reported by Ali et al., who synthesized various N-(4,4-diphenyl-3-butynyl)amino acid derivatives [28]. The resulting compounds, such as SKF89976A 10, were not only more lipophilic, but also more potent GAT inhibitors than their parent amino acids (Fig. 5A). Following the original report, several other research groups have synthesized similar derivatives. For example, bioisosteric replacement of the phenyl rings of 10 by 2-thienyl moieties gave rise to tiagabine 11 [21‐23], which is currently the only approved drug targeting GAT1. Other well-known GAT1 inhibitors include the guvacine analogues NNC-711 12 [53] and Cl-966 13 [54] exhibiting an oxime and ether spacer. All these compounds are more potent as GAT1 inhibitor than their parent amino acids (compare Fig. 5A and Fig. 3 for mGAT1). Modelling studies suggest that further interactions between the lipophilic tail and hydrophobic regions of the GAT could give rise to this increased potency [35, 36, 55]. Modelling studies also allowed for the development and validation of a pharmacophore model of lipophilic GAT inhibitors (Fig. 5B) [56]. This pharmacophore model includes three features: an amino acid region with the acidic centre A and the basic centre B and a lipophilic region with the diaryl centre C, which is connected by a linker. By investigating several known GAT inhibitors, the distances between the pharmacophore features were found to be within the following range: a = 3.9–5.6 Å, b = 3.8–7.8 Å, c = 3.4–9.7 Å, and ∠ABC = 42°–147°

Based on the success of these second-generation GAT1 inhibitors, further selective and potent inhibitors have been developed over the last two decades [57‐59]. An overview of these lipophilic GAT1 inhibitors is presented in Additional file 1: Tables S1–S7. Wanner and co-workers published several studies and, to the best of our knowledge, developed the most potent GAT1 inhibitor to date. Their compound, DDPM-2571 14, is an NNC-711 derivative that was found after the screening of oxime libraries using MS binding assays (Fig. 6) [60]. In vivo studies showed that this inhibitor was effective in the prevention of induced seizures in mouse models [61], though no further in vivo testing has been performed afterwards. Compound 15, the GAT1 inhibitor with the highest affinity, is part of an analogous series of nipecotic acid derivatives that has been synthesized by the same research group [62]. The group of Wanner has also developed potent GAT1 inhibitors with carbon linkers, for which they found that inhibitors with alkyne linkers and a biphenyl moiety have the highest potency [63]. Optimization of the linker revealed that a C₄ linker has the optimal length and that compounds with an alkyne linker have a higher potency than analogous inhibitors with an alkene linker [64]. Substitution of the terminal aryl group then afforded compounds such as 16 and 17 with potencies in the same range than those of the above-mentioned oxime series without this potentially labile functionality.

Synthesis of lipophilic GAT1 radioligands

Using the more efficient lipophilic GAT1 inhibitors as starting point, several attempts have been made to synthesize a viable GAT1 radioligand based on these inhibitors. While the biological evaluations of these radioligands are summarized in the section "Biological evaluation of GAT radioligands", their synthesis is outlined in the next two sections. The first radioligands, radiolabelled Cl-966 derivatives [¹⁸F]24a-c, were synthesized by Kilbourn et al. in 1990 through a rather lengthy radiosynthesis (Scheme 1) [65]. For radioligands [¹⁸F]24a-b, the radiosynthesis started from the aryltrimethylammonium triflate precursors 19a-b, which were obtained from the acyl chlorides 18a-b [66, 67]. On the other hand, the synthesis of compound [¹⁸F]24c was started from brominated precursor 19c. Following nucleophilic fluorination, a reduction and chlorination were performed to access intermediates [¹⁸F]22a-c. These intermediates were subsequently reacted with the ethyl ester of N-(2-hydroxylethyl)nipecotic acid to afford the radioligands [¹⁸F]24a-c after deprotection of the ester functionality.

A few years later Le Bars et al. reported the synthesis of the ¹¹C-labelled lipophilic GABA derivative [¹¹C]27 [68], based on their promising results using the non-labelled derivative as GABA uptake inhibitor [69] (Scheme 2A). The radiolabelled analogue was obtained through methylation of N-diphenylbutenyl GABA 26, for which the synthesis has been reported by Ali et al. [28]. Another ¹¹C-labelled radioligand has been reported by Vandersteene et al. [70]. Their compound [¹¹C]31 is a [¹¹C]methoxy-labelled analogue of the GAT1 inhibitor SKF89976A. Starting from 4-hydroxybenzophenone (28), the phenol precursor 29 was obtained in four steps (Scheme 2B) [71]. The radioligand [¹¹C]31 was then synthesized through a methylation reaction using [¹¹C]methyl iodide followed by deprotection of the ester functionality in alkaline conditions.

Furthermore, ¹²⁵I-labelled CIPCA [¹²⁵I]33 has been synthesized by Van Dort et al. (Scheme 3A) [72]. In their approach, CIPCA 33 was obtained from 4-iodobenzoyl chloride (32) in six steps. Afterwards, [¹²⁵I]33 was synthesized through a solid state isotopic exchange in a 34% radiochemical yield (RCY). In a more recent trial, tiagabine 11 was successfully labelled with ¹²³I by Schijns et al. [73]. In this synthesis, tiagabine was brominated to give radiolabelling precursor 34 in a 70% yield (Scheme 3B). Through a Cu(I)-assisted halogen exchange, the radiolabelled derivative [¹²³I]35 was then obtained in 50% RCY.

Lastly, Sowa et al. developed the radioligand [¹⁸F]40 [42], which was inspired by a series of GAT1 inhibitors developed by Quandt et al. [74]. These GAT1 inhibitors exhibit an asymmetrical bis-aromatic residue connected to the nipecotic acid core through a vinyl ether spacer. Optimization of the methanone-bridged compounds showed that the (Z)-isomer was slightly more potent. Moreover, it was found that the addition of fluorine substituents increased the potency and selectivity with respect to the non-substituted derivative, leading to compound 36 as the most potent inhibitor of this series (Scheme 4). Given the electron deficient aromatic system, the radiolabelled derivative [¹⁸F]39 could be accessed through a nucleophilic aromatic substitution from the chlorinated precursor 38. Further deprotection of the ester functionality afforded the radioligand [¹⁸F]40.

Synthesis of radioligands for other GAT subtypes

As discussed earlier, efforts to develop GAT radioligands have focussed on GAT1, mainly due to its high abundancy among the GAT subtypes and its presynaptic cellular distribution. In contrast, no attempts to develop a radioligand for BGT1 and GAT2 have been reported to date. For GAT3, however, Schirrmacher et al. attempted to synthesize a radioligand which they based on GAT3 inhibitor (S)-SNAP-5114 (S)-42 [75]. This inhibitor was developed by Dhar et al., who found that the addition of a third aryl moiety to the lipophilic GAT1 inhibitors causes selectivity for GAT3 (Fig. 7) [30]. While the non-substituted trityl derivative 41 was more potent for GAT1, introduction of methoxy substituents on the para positions increased the affinity for GAT3. Further studies into the stereochemical preferences led to compound (S)-SNAP-5114 (S)-42. The radiolabelled derivative [¹⁸F]fluoroethyl SNAP-5114 [¹⁸F]47 was first accessed from the tosylate precursor 44. However, the synthesis of this precursor from compound 43 and subsequent labelling proved to be difficult (i.e. route A, Scheme 5) and a different approach using 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyltosylate was developed (route B). In this procedure, precursor 45 was reacted with separately synthesized [¹⁸F]fluoroethyltosylate to give ester intermediate [¹⁸F]46. Subsequent hydrolysis of the ester protecting group afforded radioligand [¹⁸F]47 in 70% RCY.

Biological evaluation of GAT radioligands

For most of the reported GAT radioligands, in vivo imaging studies have also been conducted (Fig. 8). Preliminary results of the first reported radioligand, [¹⁸F]24a, indicated that the compound exhibited low brain permeability in mice [65]. Despite the low brain uptake, a heterogeneous brain distribution (i.e. cortex/striatum ratio of 1.44) was obtained, which is similar to [³H]tiagabine [76]. However, no further studies were done to optimize these radioligands due to, among other reasons, the found toxicity of Cl-966 [42, 77, 78]. Similar results were obtained for the structurally related ¹²⁵I-labelled CIPCA [¹²⁵I]33. Although a ¹²³I-labelled derivative would be needed for clinical single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging, studies using [¹²⁵I]33 still provided useful information on the brain uptake of GAT radioligands. Imaging studies in mice showed a low brain uptake of the radioligand (i.e. 0.82% of the injected dose) [72]. Thyroid radioactivity concentrations showed < 1% in vivo deiodination, ruling out this option as cause for the low brain uptake. A slight heterogeneous distribution (i.e. cortex/striatum ratio of 1.2) was obtained, which is significantly lower than the [³H]tiagabine ratio [76]. This might be one of the reasons why no further studies to synthesize the (R)-isomer or the ¹²³I-labelled analogue were conducted. Besides the mediocre results of the early GAT1 radioligands, the GAT3 radioligand [¹⁸F]47 also suffered from low brain uptake (0.3% ID/g) during preliminary in vivo imaging studies in mice [75].

More recently, radiolabelled iodotiagabine [¹²³I]35 has been synthesized. In vivo gamma camera whole-body images in rodents showed that the radioligand appeared in the head, suggesting it had passed the BBB [20]. However, more detailed SPECT images proved that the radioligand was present in the nasal mucosa or Harderian glands instead of the brain. The authors suggest that altered biophysical properties due to the addition of the iodine or possible deiodination could explain why the radioligand failed to enter the brain. Moreover, radioligand [¹⁸F]40 was also shown to exhibit poor BBB permeability during initial PET imaging studies in rodents [42]. Repeated imaging following pretreatment with the P-glycoprotein (Pgp) inhibitor cyclosporine A showed no difference in brain uptake, indicating that the radioligand [¹⁸F]40 is not a substrate for the Pgp efflux transporter. Further studies using the ester [¹⁸F]39 were then undertaken in order to verify whether the carboxylic acid moiety limits the BBB permeability of [¹⁸F]40. However, these experiments did not show brain uptake of [¹⁸F]39 either. In contrast to the results in rats, PET imaging studies in rhesus monkeys using [¹⁸F]39 and [¹⁸F]40 showed significant brain uptake of the ester [¹⁸F]39 in the cortex, thalamus, striatum, and cerebellum (i.e. standardized uptake value (SUV) ≈ 1 after 90 min; Fig. 9). The authors suggest that differences in esterase expression could lead to the hydrolysis of [¹⁸F]39 in rats before brain entry, which would explain the different uptake of [¹⁸F]39 between the species.

Despite the brain uptake of ester [¹⁸F]39, it is unlikely that the radioligand has specific affinity for GAT1, as the free carboxylic acid group of the nipecotic acid moiety is essential for specific binding. Several studies have shown that nipecotic acid ester prodrugs have no affinity for GAT1 and require in situ hydrolysis in order to selectively bind to GAT1 [79‐82]. Alternatively, the radioligand [¹⁸F]39 could behave like a prodrug and the ester could hydrolyse after crossing the BBB to give the carboxylic acid [¹⁸F]44 that binds to GAT1. While such prodrugs have been used for preclinical PET imaging [83, 84], they complicate quantitative analysis and kinetic modelling of imaging data. Hence, the radioligand [¹⁸F]39 is not suitable for the in vivo imaging of neuronal GATs.

Alternatives for nipecotic acid-based structures

The insufficient brain uptake of the nipecotic acid-related radioligands discussed above and the significant brain uptake of ester [¹⁸F]43 seem to suggest that the unprotected nipecotic acid moiety hinders the BBB permeability. Given that several brain-penetrating PET tracers with free carboxylic acid moieties have been reported [85, 86], the presence of the carboxylic acid does not necessarily disqualify a molecule from passing the BBB. Rather, it seems that the zwitterionic nature of the nipecotic acid moiety causes these problems.

As shown above, the addition of lipophilic substituents to the nipecotic acid residue increased the BBB permeability and allowed for the development of GAT1 inhibitors (e.g. tiagabine) that show sufficient brain build-up to achieve a therapeutic effect. However, the BBB permeability of lipophilic radioligands is still insufficient to visualize GATs in vivo. These findings are also in line with pharmacological research of tiagabine, which suggests that tiagabine might exhibit a slow equilibration between plasma and brain [87, 88]. While this is less of an issue for therapeutic drugs, it can thwart the rapid brain uptake required for imaging purposes. Altogether, the above observations support the idea that the direct radiolabelling of GAT1 inhibitors might not be the optimal strategy and alternatives for such nipecotic acid-based structures might need to be developed.

Non-classical GAT1 inhibitors

A potential solution to circumvent the above-mentioned problem would be to use non-classical GAT inhibitors that are not based on nipecotic acid or similar amino acids as a basis for developing GAT1 radioligands. Although less models and structure activity relationships have been developed for such non-classical GAT inhibitors, a few classes of compounds have been explored. For 2-substituted 4-hydroxybutanamides, it was found that a benzyl substituent on the amide group, a distal aromatic substituent at the 2-position, and a hydrophilic moiety at the 4-position are crucial for their activity (Fig. 10) [89, 90]. However, after screening compounds with various linkers, aromatic systems, and different hydrophilic functionalities at the 4-position (alcohols, amines, and phthalimides) no selective GAT inhibitors were found within this class of compounds [90‐93]. Most of the active inhibitors display a broad inhibitory profile for all four GAT subtypes instead. For example, compounds BM130 and BM131 48a-b are the most promising mGAT1 inhibitors within this series, but also inhibit mGAT2-4.

Similar problems were observed for aminomethylphenols, which have also been evaluated as GAT inhibitors. N-alkylated derivatives like 49 were already reported in the early 1980s and found to inhibit neuronal GABA uptake and glial β-alanine uptake in vitro [94]. Full GAT subtype selectivity was determined in 2008 by Kragler et al., who found that inhibitor 49 has a broad inhibitory effect for all four GAT subtypes with a slight preference for mGAT3 [95]. Unfortunately, variations in the lipophilic moiety and the position of the hydroxyl group only had small effects, showing that it is difficult to develop selective GAT inhibitors within this class of compounds.

Another class of GAT inhibitors worth mentioning are the 4-methoxyphenylpiperidin-4-ol derivatives, which exhibit a modified nipecotic acid residue. However, this modification seems to eliminate the high affinity for GAT1, giving inhibitors that are mainly selective for GAT2. NNC-05-2090 50 is the most potent GAT2 inhibitor of this series and exhibits a more than tenfold selectivity over other GATs [96]. Another non-conventional GAT inhibitor has been found by Timple et al., who showed that the lignan(−)-hinokinin (51) acts as a non-competitive inhibitor of hGAT1 [97]. Unfortunately, this compound is not selective for GAT1 either, as it was found to inhibit dopamine and the norepinephrine transporters as well.

As can be observed from the above overview, modifications or omissions of the nipecotic acid residue seem to result in GAT inhibitors that either display a broad inhibitory profile for all GAT subtypes or are otherwise not selective for GAT. Therefore, major developments would be necessary to develop a non-nipecotic acid-based GAT1 inhibitor, which makes it complicated to use such non-classical GAT inhibitors as basis for the development of selective GAT1 radioligands.

Bioisosteres

Besides the use of non-classical GAT1 inhibitors as basis for GAT1 selective radioligands, another solution to overcome the zwitterionic nature of the nipecotic acid moiety would be to use carboxylic acid bioisosteres. This potential solution has also been proposed by Sowa et al. [42]. Fortunately, several carboxylic acid bioisosteres have been developed and are frequently applied in medicinal chemistry to create structural derivatives with similar biological properties [98‐100]. Several of these bioisosteres have also been applied to GABA and its analogues.

For example, Kehler et al. synthesized phoshinic acid derivatives of nipecotic acid and tested those in [³H]GABA uptake assays (Fig. 11) [101]. It was found that phosphinic acid 52 shows a moderate potency about tenfold weaker than nipecotic acid. On the other hand, the methylphospinic acid derivative 53 completely killed the activity. Interestingly, introduction of the lipophilic N-(4,4-diphenyl-3-butenyl) group to afford 54 did not lead to an increased potency. Lipophilic phosphonic acid and sulphonic acid analogues of GABA 56 and 57 also did not show any activity for GAT1 [102], although this might also be due to the additional carbon in the structure after replacement of the carboxylic acid. Moreover, hypotaurine 58 and taurine 59 exhibiting the sulphinic and sulphonic acid functionalities were shown to have no to minimal affinity to GAT1 [14, 103]. Therefore, these functional groups do not seem to be a viable bioisostere for GAT inhibitors.

Moreover, tetrazoles have been explored as potential carboxylic acid bioisosteres (Fig. 12). As early as 1984, Schlewer et al. synthesized several tetrazole amino acids [104]. Inhibition of GABA uptake was tested for derivatives of β-alanine, GABA, and nipecotic acid 60–62 in rat brain synaptosomes, but neither of them showed promising potencies (pIC₅₀ < 4) [105]. More recently, Schaffert et al. have presented several lipophilic tetrazole analogues of glycine in a search for novel mGAT1-mGAT4 inhibitors [105]. Their parent structure 63 showed no activity in any of the four GAT subtypes, which is similar to glycine. Interestingly, the addition of lipophilic residues to give monosubstituted lipophilic derivatives 64 did not enhance the potency. 1,5-Disubstituted tetrazole derivatives also showed only marginal inhibition for mGAT1, although several compounds were found to act as moderate inhibitors for mGAT2-4. For example, diphenylpropyl derivative 65 showed moderate inhibition for mGAT3 and mGAT4. Lengthening of the alkyl chain or introduction of a double bond to give 66 and 67 also resulted in an inhibitory effect in mGAT2.

Muscimol 68 is another bioisosteric analogue of GABA with a 3-isoxazolol moiety replacing the carboxylic acid [106]. While muscimol and direct analogues such as 4,5-dihydromuscimol 69 show moderate effects as GABA uptake inhibitors (Fig. 13) [25, 107], they are also potent agonists of the ionotropic GABA receptors [108, 109]. Therefore, these analogues are of limited use in developing selective GAT1 radioligands. Further development using muscimol as a lead compound led to THPO 70 and derivatives as selective GABA uptake inhibitors after incorporating the amino sidechain into the ring [106]. While substitution of the 3-isoxazolol moiety back to a carboxylic acid functionality afforded the potent GAT inhibitor nipecotic acid, moving the amino group of THPO to an exocyclic position as in 71 was less effective [110]. Nevertheless, several lipophilic exo-THPO analogues have been synthesized exhibiting a 3-hydroxyisoxazol moiety as bioisosteric replacement for the carboxylic acid functionality [111, 112]. Despite several of them being selective GAT1 inhibitors (e.g. Lu-32-176B 72 and EF1500 73), the exo-THPO moiety has also been shown to be zwitterionic and exhibits a low BBB permeability [110].

Further studies regarding carboxylic acid bioisosterism in GAT inhibitors have been reported by Sowa, who performed an exploratory [³H]GABA uptake inhibition assay for several nipecotic acid bioisosteres [113]. These preliminary results (Table 2) show that ethyl nipecotate 74 and THPO 70 are of limited use as bioisosteric replacements due to their low potency. However, in contrast to earlier results, the tetrazole 62 showed promising inhibition of GABA uptake. Unfortunately, attempts to synthesize this tetrazole derivative were met with problems as no satisfactory separation of the tetrazole and the 3-cyanopiperidine starting material could be obtained, making further investigation of this bioisostere difficult. Instead, further focus was devoted to using thiazole 76 as bioisosteric replacement. In order to allow in vivo imaging, this bioisostere was radiolabelled using [¹¹C]MeOTf, to give radioligand [¹¹C]77 (Scheme 6). PET imaging studies using this tracer in rats gave excellent brain uptake with a maximum SUV of 4. Similar results were obtained in rhesus monkeys, in which a maximum whole brain SUV of 3 was obtained. Further analysis showed that radioligand was mostly taken up in the striatum (maximum SUV ≈ 4).

Table 2

Results of the preliminary screening of nipecotic acid bioisosteres as GAT inhibitors by Sowa [113]

Compound	Inhibition (%)	Normalized to tiagabine
	− 3	− 10.7
	− 4	− 14.3
	4	14.3
	9	32.1
	− 6	− 21.4
Tiagabine	28	100

Inhibition was measured using [³H]GABA uptake inhibition assay in rat brain homogenate

Outlook and conclusion

The studies summarized in this review demonstrate that most attempts to create GAT radioligands have been unsuccessful up until now, mostly due to insufficient brain uptake. This low brain uptake is proposed to be caused by the zwitterionic nature of the nipecotic acid moiety. Developing GAT1 radioligands without this nipecotic acid moiety is difficult, because it facilitates binding into GAT1. Hence, no selective non-classical GAT1 inhibitors are available to use as a basis for GAT1 radioligands. Therefore, further efforts should focus on developing strategies to increase the brain permeability of nipecotic acid-based compounds.

While several PET tracers, such as 6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 2-[¹⁸F]FDG, are able to cross the BBB through carrier-mediated transport [46], nipecotic acid-related compounds are not known to be transported in such a way. Hence, like most current PET imaging agents, passive diffusion seems the most feasible way for GAT1 radioligands to enter the brain [49]. In order to facilitate this diffusion, lipophilic moieties have been attached to nipecotic acid to access tiagabine and derivatives. However, radiolabelled analogues of these lipophilic GAT1 inhibitors still show insufficient brain uptake in order to be useful human biomarkers. The uptake of ester [¹⁸F]39 showed that the incorporation of a masked carboxylic acid moiety could be a viable strategy. These masked carboxylic acids are used in two strategies: prodrugs and bioisosteres. While prodrugs are less ideal due to difficult quantitative analysis and kinetic modelling, the use of carboxylic acid bioisosteres seems to be promising strategy. After all, a variety of carboxylic acid bioisosteres have been developed and as visible in the above overview have precedent in the field of GAT inhibitors. Moreover, it has been shown that thiazole [¹¹C]76 exhibits excellent brain uptake, indicating that these bioisosteric replacements can improve the BBB permeability significantly.

Less explored options to increase BBB permeability could include disruption of the BBB in order to increase the paracellular diffusion of radioligands [114, 115]. However, there are only limited studies available that use this approach to increase the BBB permeability of PET tracers. Nevertheless, several studies have shown promising results [116]. For example, BBB disruption using focussed ultrasound significantly increased the brain uptake of [¹⁸F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-sorbitol [117]. Besides BBB disruption, linking the radioligand to a carrier system could also enable transport across the BBB by exploiting natural transport mechanisms [46]. Also for this option, limited studies on PET tracers have been conducted, making it difficult to achieve a fast application in the field of GAT radioligands. Pioneering studies synthesized several ¹⁸F and ⁶⁸Ga-labelled transferrin receptor targeting peptides in order to evaluate their potential to actively transport small molecular weight compounds through the BBB (Fig. 14) [118]. Due to a difficult radiosynthesis and purification of the ¹⁸F-labelled analogues, only the ⁶⁸Ga-labelled NOTA and DOTA derivatives [⁶⁸Ga]78 and [⁶⁸Ga]79 were used for further experiments. In vitro cell uptake experiments showed that both peptides exhibit negligible cellular uptake. Moreover, in vivo experiments using the DOTA derivative showed an extremely low brain uptake of the peptide [⁶⁸Ga]79, indicating that further development is necessary to efficiently use these carrier systems to increase the BBB permeability of PET tracers. The same can be said for nanoparticles, which have also been recognized as promising carrier systems for brain delivery of medicine and nuclear probes [119, 120]. For example, studies showed that nanoparticles can be used as carrier agents to deliver molecular imaging dyes across the BBB for MRI applications [121]. Moreover, several efforts have been performed in the radiolabelling of nanoparticles in order to access nanoparticle PET tracers [122, 123], which could serve as precedent to apply this technology for the development of brain-permeable GAT1 radioligands.

Given the little precedent of applying BBB disruption and carrier systems in order to develop brain-permeable PET tracers, there are still major challenges that need to be resolved. For example, in the case of carrier systems the potential loss of binding affinity of the imaging agents is a remaining risk. Therefore, the use of BBB disruption or carrier systems could work as a long-term solution in order to improve the BBB permeability of the GAT1 radioligands. The use of carboxylic acid bioisosteres could lead to a faster solution given the more extensive use of these masked carboxylic acids in the field of GAT1 inhibitors.

Taken together, the proposed strategies to increase the BBB permeability in combination with the increased knowledge on small molecular weight binders for GAT1 could lead to the development of more successful GAT1 radioligands in the future.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Overview of lipophilic N-substituted nipecotic acid and guvacine based GAT1 inhibitors.

Buddhala C, Hsu C-C, Wu J-Y. A novel mechanism for GABA synthesis and packaging into synaptic vesicles. Neurochem Int. 2009;55:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2009.01.020.CrossRefPubMed

Owens DF, Kriegstein AR. Is there more to gaba than synaptic inhibition? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:715–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn919.CrossRefPubMed

Bowery NG, Smart TG. GABA and glycine as neurotransmitters: a brief history. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147:S109–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706443.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zhang W, Xiong B-R, Zhang L-Q, Huang X, Yuan X, Tian Y-K, et al. The role of the GABAergic system in diseases of the central nervous system. Neuroscience. 2021;470:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.037.CrossRefPubMed

Murrell E, Pham JM, Sowa AR, Brooks AF, Kilbourn MR, Scott PJH, et al. Classics in neuroimaging: development of positron emission tomography tracers for imaging the GABAergic pathway. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:2039–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00343.CrossRefPubMed

Andersson JD, Matuskey D, Finnema SJ. Positron emission tomography imaging of the γ-aminobutyric acid system. Neurosci Lett. 2019;691:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.08.010.CrossRefPubMed

Kilbourn MR. 11C- and 18F-radiotracers for in vivo imaging of the dopamine system: past, present and future. Biomedicines. 2021;9:108. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kilbourn MR. Small molecule PET tracers for transporter imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2017;47:536–52. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.05.005.CrossRefPubMed

Bröer S, Gether U. The solute carrier 6 family of transporters. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167:256–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01975.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Chen N-H, Reith MEA, Quick MW. Synaptic uptake and beyond: the sodium- and chloride-dependent neurotransmitter transporter family SLC6. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:519–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-003-1064-5.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Nelson N. The family of Na+/Cl− neurotransmitter transporters. J Neurochem. 1998;71:1785–803. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051785.x.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Radian R, Bendahan A, Kanner BI. Purification and identification of the functional sodium- and chloride-coupled gamma-aminobutyric acid transport glycoprotein from rat brain. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:15437–41.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Madsen KK, Clausen RP, Larsson OM, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Schousboe A, Steve WH. Synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA transporters as targets for anti-epileptic drugs. J Neurochem. 2009;109:139–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05982.x.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Borden LA. GABA transporter heterogeneity: pharmacology and cellular localization. Neurochem Int. 1996;29:335–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-0186(95)00158-1.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Durkin MM, Smith KE, Borden LA, Weinshank RL, Branchek TA, Gustafson EL. Localization of messenger RNAs encoding three GABA transporters in rat brain: an in situ hybridization study. Mol Brain Res. 1995;33:7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-328X(95)00101-W.CrossRefPubMed

16.

During MJ, Ryder KM, Spencer DD. Hippocampal GABA transporter function in temporal-lobe epilepsy. Nature. 1995;376:174–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/376174a0.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Williamson A, Telfeian AE, Spencer DD. Prolonged GABA responses in dentate granule cells in slices isolated from patients with temporal lobe sclerosis. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:378–87. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.74.1.378.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Mathern GW, Mendoza D, Lozada A, Pretorius JK, Dehnes Y, Danbolt NC, et al. Hippocampal GABA and glutamate transporter immunoreactivity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 1999;52:453. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.52.3.453.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Treiman DM. GABAergic mechanisms in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2001;42:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.042suppl.3008.x.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hoogland G, Spierenburg HA, van Veelen CWM, van Rijen PC, van Huffelen AC, de Graan PNE. Synaptosomal glutamate and GABA transport in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci Res. 2004;76:881–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20128.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Braestrup C, Nielsen EB, Sonnewald U, Knutsen LJS, Andersen KE, Jansen JA, et al. (R)-N-[4,4-Bis(3-Methyl-2-Thienyl)but-3-en-1-yl]nipecotic acid binds with high affinity to the brain γ-aminobutyric acid uptake carrier. J Neurochem. 1990;54:639–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb01919.x.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nielsen EB, Suzdak PD, Andersen KE, Knutsen LJS, Sonnewald U, Braestrup C. Characterization of tiagabine (NO-328), a new potent and selective GABA uptake inhibitor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;196:257–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(91)90438-V.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Andersen KE, Braestrup C, Groenwald FC, Joergensen AS, Nielsen EB, Sonnewald U, et al. The synthesis of novel GABA uptake inhibitors. 1. Elucidation of the structure-activity studies leading to the choice of (R)-1-[4,4-bis(3-methyl-2-thienyl)-3-butenyl]-3-piperidinecarboxylic acid (Tiagabine) as an anticonvulsant drug candidate. J Med Chem. 1993;36:1716–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00064a005.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Czuczwar SJ, Patsalos PN. The new generation of GABA enhancers. CNS Drugs. 2001;15:339–50. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200115050-00001.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Johnston GAR. Inhibition of GABA uptake in rat brain slices by nipecotic acid, various isoxazoles and related compounds. J Neurochem. 1975;25:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1975.tb04410.x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Johnston GAR, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Stephanson A. Betel nut constituents as inhibitors of γ-aminobutyric acid uptake. Nature. 1975;258:627–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/258627a0.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Johnston GAR, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Stephanwn AL, Twitchin B. Inhibition of the uptake of GABA and related amino acids in rat brain slices by the optical isomers of nipecotic acid. J Neurochem. 1976;26:1029–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1976.tb06488.x.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ali FE, Bondinell WE, Dandridge PA, Frazee JS, Garvey E, Girard GR, et al. Orally active and potent inhibitors of γ-aminobutyric acid uptake. J Med Chem. 1985;28:653–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm50001a020.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nielsen L, Brehm L, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. GABA agonists and uptake inhibitors. Synthesis, absolute stereochemistry, and enantioselectivity of (R)-(-)- and (S)-(+)-homo-.beta.-proline. J Med Chem. 1990;33:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00163a012.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Dhar TGM, Borden LA, Tyagarajan S, Smith KE, Branchek TA, Weinshank RL, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of substituted triarylnipecotic acid derivatives as GABA uptake inhibitors: identification of a ligand with moderate affinity and selectivity for the cloned human GABA transporter GAT-3. J Med Chem. 1994;37:2334–42. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00041a012.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kragler A, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Novel parent structures for inhibitors of the murine GABA transporters mGAT3 and mGAT4. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;519:43–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.06.053.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Palló A, Bencsura Á, Héja L, Beke T, Perczel A, Kardos J, et al. Major human γ-aminobutyrate transporter: in silico prediction of substrate efficacy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;364:952–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.108.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Wein T, Wanner KT. Generation of a 3D model for human GABA transporter hGAT-1 using molecular modeling and investigation of the binding of GABA. J Mol Model. 2010;16:155–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-009-0520-3.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Baglo Y, Gabrielsen M, Sylte I, Gederaas OA. Homology modeling of human γ-butyric acid transporters and the binding of pro-drugs 5-aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinic acid used in photodynamic therapy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65200-e. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065200.CrossRef

35.

Skovstrup S, Taboureau O, Bräuner-Osborne H, Jørgensen FS. Homology modelling of the GABA transporter and analysis of tiagabine binding. ChemMedChem. 2010;5:986–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201000100.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Wein T, Petrera M, Allmendinger L, Höfner G, Pabel J, Wanner KT. Different binding modes of small and large binders of GAT1. ChemMedChem. 2016;11:509–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201500534.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Nowaczyk A, Fijałkowski Ł, Zaręba P, Sałat K. Docking and pharmacodynamic studies on hGAT1 inhibition activity in the presence of selected neuronal and astrocytic inhibitors. Part I. J Mol Graph Model. 2018;85:171–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.09.003.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Wang H, Hussain AA, Wedlund PJ. Nipecotic acid: systemic availability and brain delivery after nasal administration of nipecotic acid and n-butyl nipecotate to rats. Pharm Res. 2005;22:556–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-005-2491-0.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Frey HH, Popp C, Löscher W. Influence of inhibitors of the high affinity GABA uptake on seizure thresholds in mice. Neuropharmacology. 1979;18:581–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(79)90108-4.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Antoni G, Långström B. Synthesis of γ-amino[4-11C]butyric acid (GABA). J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1989;27:571–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580270510.CrossRef

41.

Lambrecht RHD, Slegers G, Mannens G, Claeys A. Immobilization of glutamate decarboxylase and the preparation of an enzyme column for the synthesis of γ-[13N]aminobutyric acid. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1987;9:221–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(87)90019-6.CrossRef

42.

Sowa AR, Brooks AF, Shao X, Henderson BD, Sherman P, Arteaga J, et al. Development of positron emission tomography radiotracers for the GABA transporter 1. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9:2767–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00183.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kilbourn MR, Nguyen TB, Snyder SE, Sherman P. N-[11C]methylpiperidine esters as acetylcholinesterase substrates: an in vivo structure–reactivity study. Nucl Med Biol. 1998;25:755–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8051(98)00071-7.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Irie T, Fukushi K, Akimoto Y, Tamagami H, Nozaki T. Design and evaluation of radioactive acetylcholine analogs for mapping brain acetylcholinesterase (AchE) in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 1994;21:801–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8051(94)90159-7.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kilbourn MR, Snyder SE, Sherman PS, Kuhl DE. In vivo studies of acetylcholinesterase activity using a labeled substrate, N-[11C]methylpiperdin-4-yl propionate ([11C]PMP). Synapse. 1996;22:123–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199602)22:2%3c123::AID-SYN5%3e3.0.CO;2-F.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Schirrmacher R, Bernard-Gauthier V, Reader A, Soucy J-P, Schirrmacher E, Wängler B, et al. Design of brain imaging agents for positron emission tomography: do large bioconjugates provide an opportunity for in vivo brain imaging? Future Med Chem. 2013;5:1621–34. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.13.128.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;23:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1.CrossRef

48.

Lipinski CA. Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2004;1:337–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Lindberg A, Chassé M, Varlow C, Pees A, Vasdev N. Strategies for designing novel PET radiotracers to cross the blood brain barrier. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.4019.CrossRef

50.

Pajouhesh H, Lenz GR. Medicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs. NeuroRx. 2005;2:541–53. https://doi.org/10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Wager TT, Chandrasekaran RY, Hou X, Troutman MD, Verhoest PR, Villalobos A, et al. Defining desirable central nervous system drug space through the alignment of molecular properties, in vitro ADME, and safety attributes. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2010;1:420–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn100007x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Wager TT, Hou X, Verhoest PR, Villalobos A. Central nervous system multiparameter optimization desirability: application in drug discovery. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016;7:767–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00029.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Suzdak PD, Frederiksen K, Andersen KE, Sørensen PO, Knutsen LJS, Nielsen EB. NNC-711, a novel potent and selective γ-aminobutyric acid uptake inhibitor: pharmacological characterization. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;224:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(92)90804-D.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Bjorge S, Black A, Bockbrader H, Chang T, Gregor VE, Lobbestael SJ, et al. Synthesis and metabolic profile of Cl-966: a potent, orally-active inhibitor of GABA uptake. Drug Dev Res. 1990;21:189–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.430210305.CrossRef

55.

Jurik A, Zdrazil B, Holy M, Stockner T, Sitte HH, Ecker GF. A binding mode hypothesis of tiagabine confirms liothyronine effect on γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1 (GAT1). J Med Chem. 2015;58:2149–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm5015428.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Nowaczyk A, Fijałkowski Ł, Kowalska M, Podkowa A, Sałat K. Studies on the activity of selected highly lipophilic compounds toward hGAT1 inhibition. Part II. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10:337–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00282.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Kulig K, Szwaczkiewicz M. The role of structure activity relationship studies in the search for new GABA uptake inhibitors. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2008;8:1214–23. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955708786141070.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Soudijn W, van Wijngaarden I. The GABA transporter and its inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2000;7:1063–79. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867003374363.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Singh K, Kumar P, Bhatia R, Mehta V, Kumar B, Akhtar MJ. Nipecotic acid as potential lead molecule for the development of GABA uptake inhibitors; structural insights and design strategies. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;234:114269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114269.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Kern FT, Wanner KT. Generation and screening of oxime libraries addressing the neuronal GABA transporter GAT1. ChemMedChem. 2015;10:396–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201402376.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Sałat K, Podkowa A, Malikowska N, Kern F, Pabel J, Wojcieszak E, et al. Novel, highly potent and in vivo active inhibitor of GABA transporter subtype 1 with anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, antidepressant and antinociceptive properties. Neuropharmacology. 2017;113:331–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.10.019.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Kern F, Wanner KT. Screening oxime libraries by means of mass spectrometry (MS) binding assays: identification of new highly potent inhibitors to optimized inhibitors γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1. Bioorg Med Chem. 2019;27:1232–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2019.02.015.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Lutz T, Wein T, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Development of highly potent GAT1 inhibitors: synthesis of nipecotic acid derivatives with N-arylalkynyl substituents. ChemMedChem. 2017;12:362–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201600599.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Petrera M, Wein T, Allmendinger L, Sindelar M, Pabel J, Höfner G, et al. Development of highly potent GAT1 inhibitors: synthesis of nipecotic acid derivatives by Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions. ChemMedChem. 2016;11:519–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201500490.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Kilbourn MR, Pavia MR, Gregor VE. Synthesis of fluorine-18 labeled GABA uptake inhibitors. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum Part A Appl Radiat Isot. 1990;41(9):823–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2889(90)90059-P.CrossRef

66.

Haka MS, Kilbourn MR, Leonard Watkins G, Toorongian SA. Aryltrimethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonates as precursors to aryl [18F]fluorides: improved synthesis of [18F]GBR-13119. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1989;27:823–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580270711.CrossRef

67.

Haka MS, Kilbourn MR. Synthesis of [18F]GBR 12909, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1990;28:793–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580280708.CrossRef

68.

Le Bars D, Landais P, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Labelling of N-[11C]methyl-N-diphenylbutenyl-GABA, a GABA uptake inhibitor. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1993;32:327. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580320108.CrossRef

69.

Falch E, Korgsgaard-Larsen P. GABA uptake inhibitors. Syntheses and structure—activity studies on GABA analogues containing diarylbutenyl and diarylmethoxyalkyl N-substituents. Eur J Med Chem. 1991;26:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0223-5234(91)90214-8.CrossRef

70.

Vandersteene I, Slegers G. Synthesis of (R)-1-(4-[11C]-p-methoxyphenyl-4-phenyl-3-butenyl)-3-piperidinecarboxylic acid for positron emission tomography of the GABA uptake carrier. Appl Radiat Isot. 1996;47:201–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8043(95)00289-8.CrossRef

71.

Vandersteene I, Slegers G. Synthesis of E/Z-(R)-1-[4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-phenyl-3-butenyl]-3-piperidinecarboxylic acid. Bull Soc Chim Belg. 1995;104:721–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bscb.19951041209.CrossRef

72.

Van Dort ME, Gildersleeve DL, Wieland DM. Synthesis of [2-{(4-chlorophenyl) (4-[125I]iodophenyl)} methoxyethyl]-1-piperidine-3-carboxylic acid, [125I]CIPCA: a potential radiotracer for GABA uptake sites. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1995;36:961–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580361008.CrossRef

73.

Schijns O, van Kroonenburgh M, Beekman F, Verbeek J, Herscheid J, Rijkers K, et al. Development and characterization of [123I]iodotiagabine for in-vivo GABA-transporter imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:175–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835bbbd7.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Quandt G, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Synthesis and evaluation of N-substituted nipecotic acid derivatives with an unsymmetrical bis-aromatic residue attached to a vinyl ether spacer as potential GABA uptake inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:3363–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.02.056.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Schirrmacher R, Hamkens W, Piel M, Schmitt U, Lüddens H, Hiemke C, et al. Radiosynthesis of (±)-(2-((4-(2-[18F]fluoro-ethoxy)phenyl)bis(4-methoxy-phenyl)methoxy)ethylpiperidine-3-carboxylic acid: a potential GAT-3 PET ligand to study GABAergic neuro-transmission in vivo. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2001;44:627–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.492.CrossRef

76.

Suzdak PD, Swedberg MDB, Andersen KE, Knutsen LJS, Braestrup C. In vivo labeling of the central GABA uptake carrier with 3H-Tiagabine. Life Sci. 1992;51:1857–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(92)90037-P.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Sedman AJ, Gilmet GP, Sayed AJ, Posvar EL. Initial human safety and tolerance study of a GABA uptake inhibitor, Cl-966: potential role of GABA as a mediator in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and mania. Drug Dev Res. 1990;21:235–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.430210309.CrossRef

78.

Radulovic L, Woolf T, Bjorge S, Taylor C, Reily M, Bockbrader H, et al. Identification of a pyridinium metabolite in human urine following a single oral dose of 1-[2-[bis[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methoxy]ethyl]-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid monohydrochloride (CI-966), a .gamma.-aminobutyric acid uptake inhibitor. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993;6:341–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx00033a014.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Crider AM, Wood JD, Tschappat KD, Hinko CN, Seibert K. γ-Aminobutyric acid uptake inhibition and anticonvulsant activity of nipecotic acid esters. J Pharm Sci. 1984;73:1612–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600731132.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Gokhale R, Crider AM, Gupte R, Wood JD. Hydrolysis of nipecotic acid phenyl esters. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79:63–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600790115.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Bonina FP, Arenare L, Palagiano F, Saija A, Nava F, Trombetta D, et al. Synthesis, stability, and pharmacological evaluation of nipecotic acid prodrugs. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:561–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/js980302n.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Crider AM, Tita TT, Wood JD, Hinko CN. Esters of nipecotic and isonipecotic acids as potential anticonvulsants. J Pharm Sci. 1982;71:1214–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600711108.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Wang J-Q, Zhang Z, Kuruppu D, Brownell A-L. Radiosynthesis of PET radiotracer as a prodrug for imaging group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in vivo. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:1958–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.01.039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Hoffmann C, Evcüman S, Neumaier F, Zlatopolskiy BD, Humpert S, Bier D, et al. [18F]ALX5406: a brain-penetrating prodrug for GlyT1-specific PET imaging. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021;12:3335–46. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00284.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Rotstein BH, Hooker JM, Woo J, Collier TL, Brady TJ, Liang SH, et al. Synthesis of [11C]bexarotene by Cu-mediated [11C]carbon dioxide fixation and preliminary PET imaging. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2014;5:668–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/ml500065q.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

86.

McConathy J, Yu W, Jarkas N, Seo W, Schuster DM, Goodman MM. Radiohalogenated nonnatural amino acids as PET and SPECT tumor imaging agents. Med Res Rev. 2012;32:868–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.20250.CrossRefPubMed

87.

Wang X, Ratnaraj N, Patsalos PN. The pharmacokinetic inter-relationship of tiagabine in blood, cerebrospinal fluid and brain extracellular fluid (frontal cortex and hippocampus). Seizure. 2004;13:574–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2004.01.007.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Suzdak PD, Jansen JA. A review of the preclinical pharmacology of tiagabine: a potent and selective anticonvulsant GABA uptake inhibitor. Epilepsia. 1995;36:612–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb02576.x.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Malawska B, Kulig K, Śpiewak A, Stables JP. Investigation into new anticonvulsant derivatives of α-substituted N-benzylamides of γ-hydroxy- and γ-acetoxybutyric acid. Part 5: search for new anticonvulsant compounds. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:625–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2003.10.036.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Kulig K, Więckowski K, Więckowska A, Gajda J, Pochwat B, Höfner GC, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new derivatives of 2-substituted 4-hydroxybutanamides as GABA uptake inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2011;46:183–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.11.001.CrossRefPubMed

91.

Kowalczyk P, Sałat K, Höfner GC, Guzior N, Filipek B, Wanner KT, et al. 2-Substituted 4-hydroxybutanamides as potential inhibitors of γ-aminobutyric acid transporters mGAT1–mGAT4: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:5154–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.06.038.CrossRefPubMed

92.

Sałat K, Więckowska A, Więckowski K, Höfner GC, Kamiński J, Wanner KT, et al. Synthesis and pharmacological properties of new GABA uptake inhibitors. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64:817–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1734-1140(12)70877-0.CrossRefPubMed

93.

Kowalczyk P, Sałat K, Höfner GC, Mucha M, Rapacz A, Podkowa A, et al. Synthesis, biological evaluation and structure–activity relationship of new GABA uptake inhibitors, derivatives of 4-aminobutanamides. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;83:256–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.06.024.CrossRefPubMed

94.

Breckenridge RJ, Nicholson SH, Nicol AJ, Suckling CJ, Leigh B, Iversen L. Inhibition of neuronal GABA uptake and glial β-alanine uptake by synthetic GABA analogues. Biochem Pharmacol. 1981;30:3045–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(81)90491-3.CrossRefPubMed

95.

Kragler A, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Synthesis and biological evaluation of aminomethylphenol derivatives as inhibitors of the murine GABA transporters mGAT1–mGAT4. Eur J Med Chem. 2008;43:2404–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.01.005.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Thomsen C, Sørensen PO, Egebjerg J. 1-(3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-1-propyl)-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-piperidinol, a novel subtype selective inhibitor of the mouse type II GABA-transporter. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:983–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0700957.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

97.

Timple JMV, Magalhães LG, Souza Rezende KC, Pereira AC, Cunha WR, Andrade e Silva ML, et al. The lignan (−)-hinokinin displays modulatory effects on human monoamine and GABA transporter activities. J Nat Prod. 2013;76:1889–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400452n.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Ballatore C, Huryn DM, Smith AB III. Carboxylic acid (bio)isosteres in drug design. ChemMedChem. 2013;8:385–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201200585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Lassalas P, Gay B, Lasfargeas C, James MJ, Tran V, Vijayendran KG, et al. Structure property relationships of carboxylic acid isosteres. J Med Chem. 2016;59:3183–203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01963.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

100.

Bredael K, Geurs S, Clarisse D, De Bosscher K, D’hooghe M. Carboxylic acid bioisosteres in medicinal chemistry: synthesis and properties. J Chem. 2022;2022:2164558. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2164558.CrossRef

101.

Kehler J, Stensbøl TB, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Piperidinyl-3-phosphinic acids as novel uptake inhibitors of the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9:811–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00083-9.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Vogensen SB, Jørgensen L, Madsen KK, Jurik A, Borkar N, Rosatelli E, et al. Structure activity relationship of selective GABA uptake inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23:2480–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.03.060.CrossRefPubMed

103.

Schmitt S, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Application of MS transport assays to the four human γ-aminobutyric acid transporters. ChemMedChem. 2015;10:1498–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201500254.CrossRefPubMed

104.

Schlewer G, Wermuth CG, Chambon JP. Tetrazole analogues of GABA-mimetic agents [Analogues tetrazoliques d’agents GABA-mimetiques]. Eur J Med Chem. 1984;19:181–6.

105.

Schaffert ES, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Aminomethyltetrazoles as potential inhibitors of the γ-aminobutyric acid transporters mGAT1–mGAT4: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:6492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.039.CrossRefPubMed

106.

Høg S, Greenwood JR, Madsen KB, Larsson OM, Frolund B, Schousboe A, et al. Structure-activity relationships of selective GABA uptake inhibitors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2006;6:1861–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802606778249801.CrossRefPubMed

107.

Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Nielsen L, Falch E, Curtis DR. GABA agonists. Resolution, absolute stereochemistry and enantioselectivity of (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-dihydromuscimol. J Med Chem. 1985;28:1612–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00149a012.CrossRefPubMed

108.

Johnston GAR. Muscimol as an ionotropic GABA receptor agonist. Neurochem Res. 2014;39:1942–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-014-1245-y.CrossRefPubMed

109.

Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Falch E, Hjeds H. 2 Heterocyclic analogues of GABA: chemistry, molecular pharmacology and therapeutic aspects. In: Ellis GP, West GB, editors. Progress in medicinal chemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. p. 67–120.

110.

Falch E, Perregaard J, Frølund B, Søkilde B, Buur A, Hansen LM, et al. Selective inhibitors of glial GABA uptake: synthesis, absolute stereochemistry, and pharmacology of the enantiomers of 3-hydroxy-4-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,2-benzisoxazole (exo-THPO) and analogues. J Med Chem. 1999;42:5402–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9904452.CrossRefPubMed

111.

Clausen RP, Moltzen EK, Perregaard J, Lenz SM, Sanchez C, Falch E, et al. Selective inhibitors of GABA uptake: synthesis and molecular pharmacology of 4-N-methylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-ol analogues. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13:895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2004.10.029.CrossRefPubMed

112.

Bolvig T, Larsson OM, Pickering DS, Nelson N, Falch E, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, et al. Action of bicyclic isoxazole GABA analogues on GABA transporters and its relation to anticonvulsant activity. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;375:367–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00263-0.CrossRefPubMed

113.

Sowa A. Synthesis and evaluation of GAT-1 selective PET probes. Michigan: University of Michigan; 2018.

114.

Patel MM, Goyal BR, Bhadada SV, Bhatt JS, Amin AF. Getting into the brain. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:35–58. https://doi.org/10.2165/0023210-200923010-00003.CrossRefPubMed

115.

Bellavance M-A, Blanchette M, Fortin D. Recent advances in blood–brain barrier disruption as a CNS delivery strategy. AAPS J. 2008;10:166–77. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9018-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

116.

Arif WM, Elsinga PH, Gasca-Salas C, Versluis M, Martínez-Fernández R, Dierckx RAJO, et al. Focused ultrasound for opening blood–brain barrier and drug delivery monitored with positron emission tomography. J Control Release. 2020;324:303–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.020.CrossRefPubMed

117.

Hugon G, Goutal S, Dauba A, Breuil L, Larrat B, Winkeler A, et al. [18F]2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-sorbitol PET imaging for quantitative monitoring of enhanced blood–brain barrier permeability induced by focused ultrasound. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

118.

Wängler C, Nada D, Höfner G, Maschauer S, Wängler B, Schneider S, et al. In vitro and initial in vivo evaluation of 68Ga-labeled transferrin receptor (TfR) binding peptides as potential carriers for enhanced drug transport into TfR expressing cells. Mol Imag Biol. 2011;13:332–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0329-6.CrossRef

119.

Zhang W, Mehta A, Tong Z, Esser L, Voelcker NH. Development of polymeric nanoparticles for blood–brain barrier transfer—strategies and challenges. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2003937. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003937.CrossRef

120.

Gao H. Progress and perspectives on targeting nanoparticles for brain drug delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6:268–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2016.05.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

121.

Koffie RM, Farrar CT, Saidi L-J, William CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL. Nanoparticles enhance brain delivery of blood–brain barrier-impermeable probes for in vivo optical and magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:18837–42. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111405108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

122.

Welch MJ, Hawker CJ, Wooley KL. The advantages of nanoparticles for PET. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1743–6. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.061846.CrossRefPubMed

123.

Stockhofe K, Postema JM, Schieferstein H, Ross TL. Radiolabeling of nanoparticles and polymers for PET imaging. Pharmaceuticals. 2014;7:392–418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph7040392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Visualizing GABA transporters in vivo: an overview of reported radioligands and future directions
verfasst von: Niels Knippenberg
Matthias Bauwens
Olaf Schijns
Govert Hoogland
Alexandru Florea
Kim Rijkers
Thomas J. Cleij
Kasper Eersels
Bart van Grinsven
Hanne Diliën
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: EJNMMI Research / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-219X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-00992-5

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Visualizing GABA transporters in vivo: an overview of reported radioligands and future directions

Abstract

Supplementary Information

Publisher's Note

Introduction

Cyclic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

Lipophilic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

Lipophilic N-substituted GAT1 inhibitors

Synthesis of lipophilic GAT1 radioligands

Synthesis of radioligands for other GAT subtypes

Biological evaluation of GAT radioligands

Alternatives for nipecotic acid-based structures

Non-classical GAT1 inhibitors

Bioisosteres

Outlook and conclusion

Acknowledgements

Declarations

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Supplementary Information

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Supplementary Information

Publisher's Note

Introduction

Cyclic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

Lipophilic GABA analogues as inhibitors and radioligands

Lipophilic N-substituted GAT1 inhibitors

Synthesis of lipophilic GAT1 radioligands

Synthesis of radioligands for other GAT subtypes

Biological evaluation of GAT radioligands

Alternatives for nipecotic acid-based structures

Non-classical GAT1 inhibitors

Bioisosteres

Outlook and conclusion

Acknowledgements

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Supplementary Information

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Identification of EGFR mutation status in male patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and serum tumor markers CYFRA21-1 and SCC-Ag

Same same but different: dopamine transporter SPECT on scanners with CZT vs. NaI detectors

The effects of novel macrocyclic chelates on the targeting properties of the 68Ga-labeled Gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonist RM2

Sensitivity of an AI method for [18F]FDG PET/CT outcome prediction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients to image reconstruction protocols

Accuracy of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy for inguinal lymph node staging in cN0 penile cancer

Molecular imaging of fibroblast activation in multiple non-ischemic cardiomyopathies