Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2012

01.11.2012 | Gynecologic Oncology

Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)

verfasst von: Fuat Demirkiran, Evrim Yavuz, Hakan Erenel, Tugan Bese, Macit Arvas, Cevdet Sanioglu

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of pipelle endometrial biopsy with dilatation and curettage.

Methods

From October 2007 to November 2009, 673 patients were evaluated with pipelle endometrium biopsy, D&C and hysterectomy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty. 478 patients underwent pipelle and D&C, 212 patients underwent pipelle and hysterectomy and 161 patients underwent D&C and hysterectomy. Uterine findings were grouped under five headings: normal, hyperplasia, focal lesion, atypia, and atrophy. Histologic sections from pipelle biopsy or D&C specimens were compared with each other and hysterectomy specimens. Chi-square, Mc.Nemar, and Fisher-exact tests were used as appropriate. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each method used in the study.

Results

We compared the histological results of pipelle biopsy and D&C. Statistically outcomes of pipelle and D&C were concordant with each other. Concordance rate was 67 % between pipelle and hysterectomy and 70 % between D&C and hysterectomy. Sensitivity of pipelle biopsy in detection of hyperplasia and aytpia was 67 and 75 %, respectively. Sensitivity of D&C for detecting hyperplasia and atypia was 62 and 83 %. NPV of pipelle biopsy and D&C was 99 % for malignancy.

Conclusions

Pipelle biopsy and D&C showed almost equal success rate in the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies. Neither pipelle nor D&C is adequate method for focal endometrial pathologies. Both biopsy methods are not perfect, but pipelle biopsy is a cheaper and easy technique compared with D&C, and ultrasonographic findings of endometrium should be considered prior to endometrial biopsy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Oehler MK, Rees MC (2003) Menorrhagia: an update. Acta Obtet Gynecol Scand 82(5):405–422 (review)CrossRef Oehler MK, Rees MC (2003) Menorrhagia: an update. Acta Obtet Gynecol Scand 82(5):405–422 (review)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Word B, Gravlee LC, Wideman GL (1958) The fallacy of simple uterine curettage. Obstet Gynecol 12(6):642–648PubMed Word B, Gravlee LC, Wideman GL (1958) The fallacy of simple uterine curettage. Obstet Gynecol 12(6):642–648PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stock RJ, Kanbour A (1975) Prehysterectomy curettage. Obstet Gynecol 45(5):537–541PubMed Stock RJ, Kanbour A (1975) Prehysterectomy curettage. Obstet Gynecol 45(5):537–541PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME (1993) A comparison of the pipelle device and vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the vabra aspirator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(1 Pt 1):55–59PubMed Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME (1993) A comparison of the pipelle device and vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the vabra aspirator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(1 Pt 1):55–59PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferry J, Farnsworth A, Webster M, Wren B (1993) The efficacy of the pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 33(1):76–78PubMedCrossRef Ferry J, Farnsworth A, Webster M, Wren B (1993) The efficacy of the pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 33(1):76–78PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP (2000) The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer 89(8):1765–1772PubMedCrossRef Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP (2000) The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer 89(8):1765–1772PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK (2002) Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 109(3):313–321PubMedCrossRef Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK (2002) Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 109(3):313–321PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barut A, Barut F, Arikan I, Harma M, Harma MI, Ozmen Bayar U (2012) Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and hysterectomy specimens. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38(1):16–22PubMedCrossRef Barut A, Barut F, Arikan I, Harma M, Harma MI, Ozmen Bayar U (2012) Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and hysterectomy specimens. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38(1):16–22PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fothergill DJ, Brown VA, Hill AS (1992) Histological sampling of the endometrium—a comparison between formal curettage and the pipelle sampler. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(9):779–780PubMedCrossRef Fothergill DJ, Brown VA, Hill AS (1992) Histological sampling of the endometrium—a comparison between formal curettage and the pipelle sampler. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(9):779–780PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldchmit R, Katz Z, Blickstein I, Caspi B, Dgani R (1993) The accuracy of endometrial pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):727–730PubMed Goldchmit R, Katz Z, Blickstein I, Caspi B, Dgani R (1993) The accuracy of endometrial pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):727–730PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA (1995) Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med 40(8):553–555PubMed Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA (1995) Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med 40(8):553–555PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang GS, Gebb JS, Einstein MH, Shahabi S, Novetsky AP, Goldberg GL (2007) Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):243.e1–243.e5CrossRef Huang GS, Gebb JS, Einstein MH, Shahabi S, Novetsky AP, Goldberg GL (2007) Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):243.e1–243.e5CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR (2009) Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):105–108PubMedCrossRef Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR (2009) Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):105–108PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L (2001) Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(12):1131–1136PubMedCrossRef Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L (2001) Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(12):1131–1136PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Vicino M, Marello F, Impedovo L, Selvaggi L (2001) Diagnostic inadequacy of dilatation and curettage. Fertil Steril 75(4):803–805PubMedCrossRef Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Vicino M, Marello F, Impedovo L, Selvaggi L (2001) Diagnostic inadequacy of dilatation and curettage. Fertil Steril 75(4):803–805PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley LD (2011) Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding with biopsy or hysteroscopy. Menopause 18(4):425–433PubMedCrossRef Bradley LD (2011) Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding with biopsy or hysteroscopy. Menopause 18(4):425–433PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingol B, Gunenc MZ, Gedikbasi A, Guner H, Tasdemir S, Tiras B (2011) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginalsonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):111–117PubMedCrossRef Bingol B, Gunenc MZ, Gedikbasi A, Guner H, Tasdemir S, Tiras B (2011) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginalsonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):111–117PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathew M, Gowri V, Rizvi SG (2010) Saline infusion sonohysterography—an effective tool for evaluation of the endometrial cavity in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(1):140–142PubMedCrossRef Mathew M, Gowri V, Rizvi SG (2010) Saline infusion sonohysterography—an effective tool for evaluation of the endometrial cavity in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(1):140–142PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cepni I, Ocal P, Erkan S, Saricali FS, Akbas H, Demirkiran F, Idil M, Bese T (2005) Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine cavity pathologies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef Cepni I, Ocal P, Erkan S, Saricali FS, Akbas H, Demirkiran F, Idil M, Bese T (2005) Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine cavity pathologies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)
verfasst von
Fuat Demirkiran
Evrim Yavuz
Hakan Erenel
Tugan Bese
Macit Arvas
Cevdet Sanioglu
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2438-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.