Introduction
Methods
Selection Process
Population | Patients with head-and-neck cancer |
Intervention | None |
Comparison | None |
Outcome | Having oropharyngeal dysphagia and affective symptoms |
PubMed | (“Head and Neck Neoplasms”[Mesh] OR Head and neck Neoplasm* OR Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasm* OR Cancer of the Head and Neck OR HNC OR Head and neck cancer) AND (dysphag* OR deglut* OR swallow* OR "Deglutition Disorders"[Mesh]) AND ((Psychiatr* OR depressi*) OR ((mood OR anxi* OR affective) AND (disorder* OR symptom*)) OR neuropsycho*):ti,ab |
Embase | (Head and neck cancer or Head and neck Neoplasm* or Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasm* or HNC or Cancer of the Head and Neck) and (dysphag* or deglut* or swallow*) and (Psychiatr* or depressi* or ((mood or anxi* or affective) and (disorder* or symptom*)) or neuropsycho*):ti,ab |
PsycINFO | (Head and Neck Neoplasm* OR Cancer of the Head and Neck OR HNC OR Head and neck cancer* OR Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasm) AND (dysphag* OR deglut* OR swallow*) AND (Psychiatr* OR depressi* OR ((mood OR anxi* OR affective) AND (disorder* OR symptom*)) OR neuropsycho*).ti,ab |
Cochrane | (Head and neck cancer OR Head and neck Neoplasm* OR Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasm* OR Cancer of the Head and Neck OR HNC) AND (dysphag* OR deglut* OR swallow*) AND (Psychiatr* OR depressi* OR ((mood OR anxi* OR affective) AND (disorder* OR symptom*)) OR neuropsycho*):ti,ab |
Level of Evidence and Critical Appraisal
Data Extraction
Results
Methodological Quality of Included Studies
Swallowing Function and Affective Symptoms
Reference | Assessment tool | Type | Short description | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|
OD | PRO | |||
[42] | European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire head and neck module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35, supplementary module to EORTC QLQ-C30) | PRO HRQoL | A 35-item questionnaire to assess HRQoL specifically in HNC patients. It has seven multi-item scales (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating and social contact, and sexuality) and eleven single-item scales (teeth, mouth opening, dry mouth, sticky saliva, coughing, feeling ill, pain killers, nutritional supplements, feeding tube, weight loss, and weight gain) | Validated for HNC |
[39] | MD Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI) | PRO HRQoL | A 20-item questionnaire to evaluate the emotional, physical, and functional impact of OD in HNC patients The questionnaire is divided in four subscales (global, functional, physical, and emotional). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale with higher scores indicating better function | Validated for HNC |
[40] | University of Washington quality of life (UW-QOL) version 3 | PRO HRQoL | A HRQoL measurement in HNC patients. The questionnaire measures ten domains: pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, and global overall assessment of QOL. A composite score is calculated ranging from 0 (worst possible response) to 100 (best possible response) | Validated for HNC |
[41] | Dische morbidity recording scheme | PRO | Scoring scale of radiation-induced late-effect changes in the oral and/or pharyngeal mucosal and/or salivary glands. Dysphagia is one of the three symptom-subscales and is classified as a 4-point scale ranging from normal function (0) to severe difficulty with swallowing fluids (4) based on a visual analog scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (maximum impairment) | Not validated |
OD | CRO | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dysphagia outcomes and severity scale (DOSS)/swallowing performance scale (SPS) during | CRO based on functional assessment during instrumental swallowing evaluation | 7-point scale to rate the functional severity of OD based on VFSS and make recommendations for diet level, independence level, and type of nutrition. The scale ranges from one (DOSS: severe dysphagia; SPS: normal swallowing) to seven (DOSS: normal swallowing; SPS: severe dysphagia) | Not validated | |
[34] | Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) | |||
Visuoperceptual ordinal variables on swallowing safety and efficiency/penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) during | CRO based on functional assessment during instrumental swallowing evaluation | Visuoperceptual ordinal variables as piecemeal deglutition, post-swallow vallecular pooling, post-swallow pyriform sinus pooling, penetration, and aspiration | Not validated | |
[35] | Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) | Procedure in which a transnasal fiberoptic endoscope is inserted into the pharynx to evaluate the structures and bolus transfer during swallowing | ||
[10] | Water swallow test (WST) | CRO based on functional assessment during clinical swallowing screening | Swallowing screening test where a patient is offered 30 mL of water. The time and number of swallows required to drink the entire 30 mL is recorded as well as presence of cough or choking | Not validated |
[26] | The scale used in the study from Zhang et al. ranges from I (normal swallowing) to V (being unable to swallow) |
Affective symptoms | PRO | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
[45] | Beck depression inventory fast screen (BDI-FS) | PRO QoL | A 7-item questionnaire to assess cognitive and affective aspects of depression ranging in intensity Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
[43] | Depression anxiety stress score (DASS) | PRO QoL | A 42-item questionnaire to screen for anxiety, depression, and stress. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and higher scores are indicative of more symptoms | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
[9] | Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) | PRO HRQoL | A 14-item questionnaire to screen for clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and higher scores represent a higher risk of affective symptoms | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
[46] | Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) | PRO QoL | A 20-item questionnaire to assess affective, psychological, and somatic symptoms associated with depression. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and higher scores are indicative of more severe depression | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
[47] | University of Washington quality of life (UW-QOL) version 4 | PRO HRQoL | A HRQoL measurement in HNC patients. In version 4, the mood and anxiety domains are added A composite score is calculated ranging from 0 (worst possible response) to 100 (best possible response) | Validated for HNC |
Affective symptoms | CRO | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
[44] | Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) | CRO QoL | A 10-item questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms based on a non-standardized interview investigating areas including emotional, cognitive, and physical symptoms. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale and higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms of depression | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
FHS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
[49] | Functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) | PRO FHS | A 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale and higher scores indicate a better functional health state | Validated for other population but not for HNC |
[50] | Functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck (FACT-H&N) | PRO FHS | A 39-item questionnaire including the FACT-G questionnaire and 12 general items related to HNC (swallowing, voice, disfigurement, tobacco, alcohol, communication) Each item is scored on a 5-point scale and higher scores indicate a better functional health state | Validated for HNC |
[48] | Performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients (PSS-HN) | CRO FHS | 3-domain questionnaire evaluating normalcy of diet, eating in public, and speech in HNC patients. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better performance | Validated for HNC |
References | Level of evidence and QualSyst score | N | Measurement tools used to screen or assess affective symptoms and OD | Reported results in the included studies |
---|---|---|---|---|
N patients with OD population Moment of evaluation | ||||
Airoldi et al. [27] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 36 N(OD) = 23 | Affective symptoms: HADS MADRS | A significant correlation between OD severity (Dische) and symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) was observed (depression r = 0.389, p = 0.019; anxiety r = 0.387, p = 0.02). Moreover, patients with severe OD (Dische grade 3–4) showed significantly higher symptom levels of anxiety and depression compared to patients without or mild OD (Dische grade 0–1) No association was found between Dische and MADRS |
0.73 (Good) | Oral cavity cancer survivors (surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy) Median 63 months post-treatment | OD: Dische morbidity recording scheme | ||
Bozec et al. [28] | B (Prospective cohort study) | N = 58 N(OD) = 28 | Affective symptoms: HADS | Psychological distress (HADS scores) was an independent predictor of swallowing impairment (DOSS scores). Psychological distress (higher HADS-depression and total scores) was significantly associated with a poorer swallowing function (lower DOSS score) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively) |
0.77 (Good) | Oropharynx cancer survivors (surgery with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy) Pre- and post-treatment (mean 54 months post-treatment) | OD: DOSS (based on VFSS) | ||
Campbell et al. [29] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 62 N(OD) = 27 | OD: PAS (based on VFSS) | Patients without aspiration during VFSS reported better emotional well-being (higher FACT-G emotional scores) compared to patients who aspirated; however, this association was not significant (p = 0.17). Aspiration during VFSS was associated with a worsened global score of additional head and neck concerns on the FACT-H&N scale (decreased health state) (p ≤ 0.001) |
0.79 (Good) | HNC survivors (surgery and/or radiotherapy) At least 5 years post-treatment | FHS: FACT-G FACT-H&N PSS-HN | ||
Chan et al. [20] | B (Prospective cohort study) | N = 77 N(OD) = not reported | Affective symptoms: BDI-FS | Depression symptom scores (BDI-FS) were significantly associated with the MDADI-functional (β = 17.31; p = 0.009) and physical (β = 14.99; p = 0.032) subscales |
0.96 (Strong) | HNC survivors Prior to treatment | OD: MDADI | ||
Cnossen et al. [25] | B (Prospective cohort study) | N = 67 N(OD) = 27 | Affective symptoms: HADS | Patient-reported swallowing problems (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) were significantly related to emotional distress (HADS) at the two time points measured in the study: diagnosis (r = 0.52, p = 0.00) and at the first follow-up visit (r = 0.46, p = 0.00) |
0.68 (Adequate) | HNC survivors (surgery with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy) At time of HNC diagnosis (baseline) and median 1-month post-treatment | OD: EORTC QLQH&N35 | ||
Florie et al. [21] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 63 N(OD) = 63 | Affective symptoms: MDADI-emotional subscale | Statistically significant mean differences of the MDADI- physical subscale between the ordinal scale levels of the FEES variable piecemeal deglutition (p = 0.043) were found and of the MDADI-general and functional subscales between the ordinal scale levels of post-swallow vallecular pooling (p = 0.020 and p = 0.018, respectively) for thick liquid swallows. These results indicate that a higher score on the ordinal FEES outcome scale (worse swallowing functioning) is accompanied by a lower score on the MDADI subscales (lower swallow-specific QOL). All other comparisons showed no statistically significant results |
0.96 (Strong) | HNC survivors (surgery, (chemo)radiotherapy, or combinations) Post-treatment | OD: MDADI FEES | ||
Hartl et al. [31] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 9 N(OD) = not reported | Affective symptoms: HADS | The HADS-depression was significantly correlated with the EORTC QLQ-H&N35-swallowing domain (p = 0.023). A trend toward a correlation between the HADS-depression and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35-aspiration domain was observed. However, this correlation was not statistically significant (p = 0.06) |
0.68 (Adequate) | Tongue(base) cancer survivors (surgery followed by adjuvant(chemo)radiotherapy) Median 43 months post-treatment | OD: EORTC QLQ-H&N35-swallowing and aspiration domains | ||
Kemps et al. [22] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 35 N(OD) = 35 | Affective symptoms: HADS | Clinically relevant anxiety symptom scores on the HADS were significantly associated with the functional and physical domains of the MDADI (p = 0.006; p = 0.001; respectively). The same applies for clinically relevant depression symptom scores (p = 0.006; p < 0.001; respectively) |
0.86 (Strong) | HNC survivors (total laryngectomy with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy) Mean 85 months post-treatment | OD: MDADI-functional and physical domains | ||
Krebbers et al. [23] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 84 N(OD) = 84 | Affective symptoms: HADS | There was a statistically significant association between aspiration identified during FEES and HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, and HADS-total scores (p = 0.05, p = 0.04, p = 0.04). Patients presenting with aspiration scored on average 2.0, 2.2, and 4.2 points lower on the HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, and HADS-total scale compared to dysphagic patients who did not aspirate, representing lower symptom scores for anxiety and depression |
0.96 (Strong) | HNC survivors (surgery, (chemo)radiotherapy, or combinations) Median 42 months post-treatment | OD: PAS (based on FEES) | ||
Lin et al. [30] | B (Prospective cohort study) | N = 46 N(OD) = not reported | Affective symptoms: BDI-FS | Compared to nondepressed patients, depressed patients (BDI-FS) reported significantly lower scores on the UW-QOL swallowing domain (p = 0.007) and on the MDADI-functional and physical domains (p = 0.001; p = 0.001, respectively), representing more severe swallowing complaints Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the UW-QOL and MDADI scores demonstrated an association between depression (BDI-FS) and UW-swallowing (B = − 23.9, p = 0.035) after controlling for sex, age, comorbidity, marital status, tumor stage, treatment, MDADI, VHI, and UW-QOL |
0.73 (Good) | HNC survivors (surgery, (chemo)radiotherapy, or combinations) 12 months post-treatment | OD: UW-QOL-swallowing domain MDADI-functional and physical domains | ||
Maclean et al. [24] | B (Case–control study) | N = 110 N(OD) = 79 | Affective symptoms: DASS UW-QOL mood and anxiety domains | Laryngectomees who reported swallowing impairment on the questionnaire presented significantly higher levels of depression (z = − 2.58, p = 0.010), anxiety (z = − 2.94, p = 0.003), and stress (z = − 2.139, p = 0.032) on DASS, compared to laryngectomees who reported the absence of swallowing impairment. Laryngectomees who reported swallowing impairment had significantly worse mean scores on mood (z = − 3.39, p = 0.001), and anxiety (z = − 2.75, p = 0.006) domains of the UW-QOL, compared to laryngectomees who report absence of swallowing impairment |
0.82 (Strong) | HNC survivors (total laryngectomy with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy) Post-treatment | OD: Self-designed demographic questionnaire including items on swallowing: –Any difficulty in swallowing? (yes/no) –Changes to their diet texture? (yes/no) –Patients had to list any foods avoided and state why | ||
Nguyen et al. [32] | B (Retrospective cohort study) | N = 104 N(OD) = 73 | Affective symptoms: HADS | Patients without or mild OD identified during VFSS (G1-2) presented lower levels of anxiety (p = 0.005) and depression (p = 0.0001) symptoms (HADS) compared to patients with moderate or severe OD (G3–4) |
0.68 (Adequate) | HNC survivors (surgery, (chemo)radiotherapy, or combinations) G1: No OD N = 31 G2: Mild OD N = 24 G3: Moderate OD N = 25 G4: Severe OD N = 24 Median 24 months post-treatment | OD: SPS (based on VFSS) | ||
Verdonck- de Leeuw et al. [51] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 45 N(OD) = 7 | Affective symptoms: HADS OD: Presence/absence of a feeding tube | Patients who were feeding tube-dependent had significantly (p < 0.05) higher HADS-total scores (mean 14.9; SD 10.7) compared to patients with oral feeding (mean 8.8; SD 6.0). No specific information on the association between OD and the HADS subscales anxiety and depression was provided |
0.82 (Strong) | HNC survivors (surgery, (chemo)radiotherapy, or combinations) Mean 29 months post-treatment | |||
Zhang et al. [26] | B (Prospective cohort study) | N = 58 N(OD) = 58 | Affective symptoms: SDS | Lower levels at the WST (I normal swallowing and II doubtful OD) were associated with lower SDS scores (lower symptom levels of depression). Before swallowing training, WST levels and SDS scores were significantly higher (the presence of OD and higher symptom levels of depression) than those measured after swallowing training and they tended to co-occur in the same direction |
0.86 (Strong) | Tongue(base) cancer survivors (surgery) Before and after ten days of postoperative swallowing training | OD: WST | ||
Zwahlen et al. [33] | B (Cross-sectional study) | N = 31 N(OD) = not reported | Affective symptoms: HADS | Patient-reported swallowing problems (EORTC QLQ-H&N35-swallowing domain) were correlated to higher symptom levels of anxiety and depression (p = 0.24; p = 0.30); however, this relationship was not clinically significant |
0.68 (Adequate) | HNC survivors (surgery with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy) Mean 44 months since cancer diagnosis | OD: EORTC QLQH&N35-swallowing domain |