Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2021

06.01.2021 | Original Article

Clinical concordance with Image Gently guidelines for pediatric computed tomography: a study across 663,417 CT scans at 53 clinical facilities

verfasst von: Taylor Brunton Smith, John Heil, Donald P. Frush, Ehsan Samei

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Managing patient radiation dose in pediatric computed tomography (CT) examinations is essential. Some organizations, most notably Image Gently, have suggested techniques to lower dose to pediatric patients and mitigate risk while maintaining image quality.

Objective

We sought to validate whether institutions are observing Image Gently guidelines in practice.

Materials and methods

Dose-relevant data from 663,417 abdomen-pelvis and chest CT scans were obtained from 53 facilities. Patients were assigned arbitrary age cohorts with a minimum size of n=12 patients in each age group, for statistical purposes. All pediatric (<19 years old) cohorts at a given facility were compared to the adult cohort by a Kruskal-Wallis test for each of the four scan parameters — (1) x-ray tube kilovoltage (kV), (2) tube-current-by-exposure-time product (tube mAs), (3) scan pitch and (4) tube rotation time — to assess whether the distribution of values in the pediatric cohorts differed from the adult cohort. The same was repeated with volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) to assess whether pediatric cohorts received less dose than adult cohorts. A P-value of <0.05 was deemed significant.

Results

Across the 150 pediatric cohorts, 134 had scan parameters that were more child-sized than their adult counterparts. In 128 of these 134 pediatric cohorts, the CTDIvol was less than the adult counterpart. In 111 of these 128 pediatric cohorts, the SSDE was less than the adult counterpart.

Conclusion

The study reaffirms that in practice, Image Gently’s suggestions of lowering tube mAs and peak kilovoltage are commonly employed and effective at reducing pediatric CT dose.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ et al (2009) Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 251:6–12CrossRef Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ et al (2009) Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 251:6–12CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. Radiat Res 146:AV61–AV87CrossRef Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. Radiat Res 146:AV61–AV87CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46:1–144CrossRef Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46:1–144CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce DA, Vaeth M (2006) The shape of the cancer mortality dose-response curve for the A-bomb survivors. Radiat Res 126:36–42CrossRef Pierce DA, Vaeth M (2006) The shape of the cancer mortality dose-response curve for the A-bomb survivors. Radiat Res 126:36–42CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6CrossRef Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRef Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231CrossRef Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong J-Y, Han K, Jung J-H, Kim JS (2019) Association of exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation with risk of cancer among youths in South Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2:e1910584CrossRef Hong J-Y, Han K, Jung J-H, Kim JS (2019) Association of exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation with risk of cancer among youths in South Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2:e1910584CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients—a white paper executive summary. Radiology 240:621–622CrossRef Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients—a white paper executive summary. Radiology 240:621–622CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301CrossRef Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollingsworth C, Frush DP, Cross M, Lucaya J (2003) Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:401–406CrossRef Hollingsworth C, Frush DP, Cross M, Lucaya J (2003) Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:401–406CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269CrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood TJ, Lopez-Costa RI, Rhoades PD et al (2015) CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: a multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics 35:1539–1554CrossRef Greenwood TJ, Lopez-Costa RI, Rhoades PD et al (2015) CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: a multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics 35:1539–1554CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image Gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:868–873CrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image Gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:868–873CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274 Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frush DP (2002) Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 32:714–717CrossRef Frush DP (2002) Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 32:714–717CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D et al (2017) U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133CrossRef Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D et al (2017) U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D et al (2011) Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):461–466CrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D et al (2011) Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):461–466CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2013) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:303–306CrossRef Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2013) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:303–306CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360CrossRef Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson TR (2014) Practical strategies to reduce pediatric CT radiation dose. J Am Coll Radiol 11:292–299CrossRef Nelson TR (2014) Practical strategies to reduce pediatric CT radiation dose. J Am Coll Radiol 11:292–299CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 23 (2008) AAPM Report No. 96 - The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. Vol 6. https://doi.org/10.37206/97 American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 23 (2008) AAPM Report No. 96 - The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. Vol 6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​37206/​97
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
26.
Zurück zum Zitat National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2019) NCRP Report 184: Medical Radiation Exposure of Patients in the United States National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2019) NCRP Report 184: Medical Radiation Exposure of Patients in the United States
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 25:1595–1597CrossRef Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 25:1595–1597CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wildman-Tobriner B, Strauss KJ, Bhargavan-Chatfield M et al (2018) Using the American College of Radiology dose index registry to evaluate practice patterns and radiation dose estimates of pediatric body CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:641–647CrossRef Wildman-Tobriner B, Strauss KJ, Bhargavan-Chatfield M et al (2018) Using the American College of Radiology dose index registry to evaluate practice patterns and radiation dose estimates of pediatric body CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:641–647CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadigh G, Kadom N, Karthik P et al (2018) Noncontrast head CT in children: national variation in radiation dose indices in the United States. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1400–1405PubMedPubMedCentral Sadigh G, Kadom N, Karthik P et al (2018) Noncontrast head CT in children: national variation in radiation dose indices in the United States. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1400–1405PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Marin JR, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M et al (2015) Variation in pediatric cervical spine computed tomography radiation dose index. Acad Emerg Med 22:1499–1505CrossRef Marin JR, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M et al (2015) Variation in pediatric cervical spine computed tomography radiation dose index. Acad Emerg Med 22:1499–1505CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for Paediatric CT. Radiology 268:208–218CrossRef Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for Paediatric CT. Radiology 268:208–218CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (2016) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRef Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (2016) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Sterzik A, Tipnis S (2010) X-ray beam filtration, dosimetry phantom size and CT patient dose conversion factors CT patient dose conversion factors. Phys Med Biol 55:551CrossRef Huda W, Sterzik A, Tipnis S (2010) X-ray beam filtration, dosimetry phantom size and CT patient dose conversion factors CT patient dose conversion factors. Phys Med Biol 55:551CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al (1999) Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung caner: analysis of CT findings. Radiology 212:61–66CrossRef Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al (1999) Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung caner: analysis of CT findings. Radiology 212:61–66CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Christianson O, Winslow J, Frush DP, Samei E (2015) Automated technique to measure noise in clinical CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W93–W99CrossRef Christianson O, Winslow J, Frush DP, Samei E (2015) Automated technique to measure noise in clinical CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W93–W99CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1998) Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. Radiology 209:37–48CrossRef Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1998) Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. Radiology 209:37–48CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuster AL, Forman HP, Strassle PD et al (2018) Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making. Emerg Radiol 25:41–49CrossRef Schuster AL, Forman HP, Strassle PD et al (2018) Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making. Emerg Radiol 25:41–49CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M et al (2018) Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit. J Radiol Prot 38:967–989CrossRef Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M et al (2018) Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit. J Radiol Prot 38:967–989CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TB, Solomon J, Samei E (2017) Estimating detectability index in vivo: development and validation of an automated methodology. J Med Imaging 5:031403CrossRef Smith TB, Solomon J, Samei E (2017) Estimating detectability index in vivo: development and validation of an automated methodology. J Med Imaging 5:031403CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical concordance with Image Gently guidelines for pediatric computed tomography: a study across 663,417 CT scans at 53 clinical facilities
verfasst von
Taylor Brunton Smith
John Heil
Donald P. Frush
Ehsan Samei
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04909-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Pediatric Radiology 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Minisymposium: Pediatric MRI quality and safety

Introduction

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.