nach oben

Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

Erschienen in:

30.03.2021 | COVID-19 | Occupational Allergies (JA Poole, Section Editor) Zur Zeit gratis

What Is New in Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Year of the COVID Pandemic?

verfasst von: Erica B. Lee, Marissa Lobl, Aubree Ford, Vincent DeLeo, Brandon L. Adler, Ashley Wysong

Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article aims to summarize some recent trends in occupational allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), including dermatitis related to pandemic-level personal protective equipment in healthcare workers, hazards patients may experience when working from home, and occupational perspectives on the recent American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) allergens of the year and ACDS Core Allergen Series updates.

Recent Findings

Recent ACDS Allergens of the Year may be particularly relevant to healthcare workers, including isobornyl acrylate, which is present in glucose sensors and propylene glycol present in hand cleansers and disinfectants. Lavender, limonene, and linalool, all of which are new additions to the ACDS Core Allergen Series, have been reported as causes for occupational ACD in massage therapists and aromatherapists. Isothiazolinone allergy continues to rise in both consumer and occupational settings. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a wave of occupational ACD in healthcare workers to personal protective equipment, and revealed new potential allergens for individuals working from home.

Summary

Occupational allergic contact dermatitis continues to exert a significant occupational disease burden. Remaining aware of the current trends in allergens may allow for earlier recognition, diagnosis, and treatment, subsequently helping our patients to work in healthier and safer environments.

Fonacier L, Bernstein DI, Pacheco K, Holness DL, Blessing-Moore J, Khan D, et al. Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter-update 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract [Internet]. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 12];3:S1–39. Available from: https://www.pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.library1.unmc.edu/25965350/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Lushniak BD. Occupational contact dermatitis [Internet]. Dermatol. Ther. Dermatol Ther; 2004 [cited 2020 Aug 12]. p. 272–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15186373/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Slodownik D, Lee A, Nixon R. Irritant contact dermatitis: a review [Internet]. Australas. J. Dermatol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. p. 1–11. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2007.00409.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Sasseville D. Occupational contact dermatitis. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 13];4:59. Available from: http://www.aacijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1710-1492-4-2-59. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Bains SN, Nash P, Fonacier L. Irritant contact dermatitis [Internet]. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. Humana Press Inc.; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 12]. p. 99–109. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8713-0. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

•• Hollins LC, Flamm A. Occupational contact dermatitis: evaluation and management considerations [Internet]. Dermatol. Clin. W.B. Saunders; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. p. 329–38. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32475511/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020. Great overview of workup and treatment for occupational contact dermatitis.

Rosa G, Fernandez AP, Vij A, Sood A, Plesec T, Bergfeld WF, et al. Langerhans cell collections, but not eosinophils, are clues to a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis in appropriate skin biopsies. J Cutan Pathol [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 25];43:498–504. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cup.12707. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Wildemore JK, Junkins-Hopkins JM, James WD. Evaluation of the histologic characteristics of patch test confirmed allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mosby Inc. 2003;49:243–8.CrossRef

Frings VG, Böer-Auer A, Breuer K. Histomorphology and immunophenotype of eczematous skin lesions revisited—skin biopsies are not reliable in differentiating allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis. Am J Dermatopathol [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 13];40:7–16. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/00000372-201801000-00002. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

10.

Rashid RS, Shim TN. Contact dermatitis. BMJ [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 13];353. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

11.

Chu C, Marks JG, Flamm A. Occupational contact dermatitis: common occupational allergens. Dermatol. Clin. W.B. Saunders. 2020;38(3):339–49.CrossRef

12.

Toby Mathias CG. Contact dermatitis and workers’ compensation: criteria for establishing occupational causation and aggravation. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mosby. 1989;20:842–8.CrossRef

13.

Kucenic MJ, Belsito D V. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis is more prevalent than irritant contact dermatitis: a 5-year study. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. Elsevier; 2002 [cited 2020 Aug 13];46:695–9. Available from: http://www.jaad.org/article/S0190962202083366/fulltext. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

14.

Skin Exposures and Effects | NIOSH | CDC [Internet]. [cited 2020 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/skin/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

15.

DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Zug KA, Maibach HI, Belsito D V., Sasseville D, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2015-2016 [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 31]. p. 297–309. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30422882/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

16.

Nicholson PJ, Llewellyn D, English JS. Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. p. 177–86. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01763.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

17.

Holness DL. Occupational Dermatosis [Internet]. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. Current Medicine Group LLC 1; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 14]. p. 1–8. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-019-0870-6. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

18.

Militello M, Hu S, Laughter M, Dunnick CA. American Contact Dermatitis Society Allergens of the Year 2000 to 2020 [Internet]. Dermatol. Clin. W.B. Saunders; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. p. 309–20. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32475509/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

19.

Aerts O, Herman A, Mowitz M, Bruze M, Goossens A. Isobornyl Acrylate. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 1];31:4–12. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/10.1097/DER.0000000000000549. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

20.

Herman A, Baeck M, de Montjoye L, Bruze M, Giertz E, Goossens A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in the Enlite glucose sensor and the Paradigm MiniMed Quick-set insulin infusion set. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];81:432–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31385313/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

21.

Mowitz M, Fornander L, Hosseiny S, Ryberg K, Bruze M. Patch testing with isobornyl acrylate in 16 swedish patients with contact dermatitis from glucose sensors and/or insulin pumps. Acta Derm Venereol [Internet]. Medical Journals/Acta D-V; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];99:1286–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31289841/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

22.

Raison-Peyron N, Mowitz M, Bonardel N, Aerts O, Bruze M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in OmniPod, an innovative tubeless insulin pump. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 1];79:76–80. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29635853/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

23.

Ulriksdotter J, Svedman C, Bruze M, Glimsjö J, Källberg K, Sukakul T, et al. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors—15 adult patients tested with a medical device patch test series. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 1]; Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32608015/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

24.

Malinauskiene L, Šlekyte G, Mowitz M, Isaksson M, Zablockis R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in two patients treated for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 1];83:170–1. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13617. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

25.

Christoffers WA, Coenraads P-J, Schuttelaar M-LA. Two decades of occupational (meth)acrylate patch test results and focus on isobornyl acrylate. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013 [cited 2020 Sep 1];69:86–92. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cod.12023. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

26.

Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito D V., Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, et al. Parabens. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];30:3–31. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201901000-00002. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

27.

Sasseville D, Alfalah M, Lacroix J-P. “Parabenoia” debunked, or “who’s afraid of parabens?” dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 13];26:254–9. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201511000-00003. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

28.

Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito D V., Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, et al. Parabens. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019. p. 3–31.

29.

Cashman AL, Warshaw EM. Parabens: a review of epidemiology, structure, allergenicity, and hormonal properties. Dermatitis [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Sep 2];16:55–66. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16036114/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

30.

Fisher AA. Paraben dermatitis due to a new medicated bandage: the “paraben paradox.” Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 1979 [cited 2020 Sep 2];5:273–4. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/498778/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

31.

Fisher A. Dermatitis of the hands from food additives. Cutis [Internet]. 1982 [cited 2020 Sep 2];30:304. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7172732/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

32.

Eguino P, Sanchez A, Agesta N, Lasa O, Raton JA, Diaz-Perez JL. Allergic contact dermatitis due to propylene glycol and parabens in an ultrasonic gel - PubMed. Contact Dermaititis [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2020 Sep 2];48:290. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12931739/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

33.

McGowan MA, Scheman A, Jacob SE. Propylene glycol in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 2];29:6–12. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201801000-00003. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

34.

Warshaw EM, Botto NC, Maibach HI, Fowler JF, Rietschel RL, Zug KA, et al. Positive patch-test reactions to propylene glycol: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis. 2009;20:14–20.

35.

Rodriguez-Homs LG, Atwater AR. Allergens in medical hand skin cleansers [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 24]. p. 336–41. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31724988/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

36.

Voller LM, Schlarbaum JP, Hylwa SA. Allergenic ingredients in health care hand sanitizers in the United States. Dermatitis. 2020;Publish Ah:1–9.

37.

Schlarbaum JP, Hylwa SA. Allergic contact dermatitis to operating room scrubs and disinfectants. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 3];30:363–70. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31724990/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

38.

Noiles K, Kudla I, De Koven J. Propylene glycol dermatitis in the printing industry: the fundamental role of a workplace visit . Dermatitis [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Sep 3];21:E1–4. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20137732/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

39.

Loranger C, Alfalah M, Le Bouedec Ferrier MC, Sasseville D. Alkyl glucosides in contact dermatitis [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 1]. p. 5–13. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27775979/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

40.

Sasseville D. Alkyl Glucosides. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 1];28:296. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201707000-00018. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

41.

Bhoyrul B, Solman L, Kirk S, Orton D, Wilkinson M. Patch testing with alkyl glucosides: concomitant reactions are common but not ubiquitous. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];80:286–90. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cod.13186. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

42.

Alfalah M, Loranger C, Sasseville D. Alkyl Glucosides. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 1];28:3–4. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201701000-00002. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

43.

Andrade P, Gonçalo M, Figueiredo A. Allergic contact dermatitis to decyl glucoside in Tinosorb M ®. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010 [cited 2020 Sep 1];62:119–20. Available from: https://www/wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01680.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

44.

Monteiro AF, Paulino M, Máquina A, Amaro C, Viana I. Allergic contact dermatitis to decyl glucoside: still an important allergen in Tinosorb M. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 26];82:126–8. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31566773/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

45.

Schlarbaum JP, Hylwa SA. Allergic contact dermatitis to operating room scrubs and disinfectants. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];30:363–70. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31724990/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

46.

Foti C, Romita P, Rigano L, Zimerson E, Sicilia M, Ballini A, et al. Isobornyl acrylate: an impurity in alkyl glucosides. Cutan Ocul Toxicol [Internet]. Taylor and Francis Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 1];35:115–9. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15569527.2015.1055495. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

47.

Fowler JF. Cobalt. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 1];27:3–8. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201601000-00002. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

48.

Goh CL, Kwok SF, Gan SL. Cobalt and nickel content of Asian cements. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1986 [cited 2020 Sep 1];15:169–72. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01319.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

49.

Condé-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Villegas C, Rumero A, Gonzalez MA. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 1995 [cited 2020 Sep 1];33:226–30. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8654071/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

50.

das Graças Mota Melo M, Villarinho ALCF, da Costa Leite I. Sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with occupational contact dermatitis seen at a work-related dermatology service, 2000 - 2014. An Bras Dermatol [Internet]. NLM (Medline); 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 1];94:147–56. Available from: https://www.pmc/articles/PMC6486076/?report=abstract. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

51.

Papa G, Romano A, Quaratino D, Di Fonso M, Viola M, Sernia S, et al. Contact dermatoses in metal workers. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol [Internet]. Biomedical Research Press s.a.s.; 2000 [cited 2020 Sep 1];13:43–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12749778/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

52.

Kettelarij J, Midander K, Lidén C, Julander A. Contamination of skin and surfaces by cobalt in the hard metal industry. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 1];79:226–31. Available from: .httsp://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cod.13056. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

53.

•• Schalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, Brod B, Warshaw E, Mowad C, et al. American contact dermatitis society core allergen series: 2020 update [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14]. p. 279–82. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32947457/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020. ACDS Core Allergen Series 2020 Update.

54.

•• Schalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, Brod B, Warshaw E, Mowad C. American contact dermatitis society core allergen series. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 25];28:141–3. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201703000-00005. Accessed 31 Aug 2020. ACDS Core Allergen Series 2017 Update.

55.

Wu PA, James WD. Lavender [Internet]. Dermatitis. 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. p. 344–7. Available from: https://www.journals.lww.com/dermatitis/Fulltext/2011/11000/Lavender.7.aspx. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

56.

Sugiura M, Hayakawa R, Kato Y, Sugiura K, Hashimoto R. Results of patch testing with lavender oil in Japan. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2000 [cited 2020 Aug 28];43:157–60. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043003157.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

57.

Warshaw EM, Zug KA, Belsito D V., Fowler JF, Dekoven JG, Sasseville D, et al. Positive patch-test reactions to essential oils in consecutive patients from North America and Central Europe. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 28];28:246–52. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28614106/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

58.

Bingham LJ, Tam MM, Palmer AM, Cahill JL, Nixon RL. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis caused by lavender: a retrospective study from an Australian clinic. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 28];81:37–42. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30779160/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

59.

Brandáo FM. Occupational allergy to lavender oil. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 1986 [cited 2020 Aug 28];15:249–50. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2948764/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

60.

Keane F, Smith H, White I, Rycroft R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in two aromatherapists. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43:49–51.PubMed

61.

Boonchai W, Iamtharachai P, Sunthonpalin P. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from essential oils in aromatherapists. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 28];56:181–2. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01024.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

62.

Trattner A, David M, Lazarov A. Occupational contact dermatitis due to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 28];58:282–4. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01275.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

63.

Navarro-Triviño FJ, Jadczak P, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Lavandula angustifolia and cross-reaction with Citrus bergamia essential oils in an aromatherapist [Internet]. Int. J. Dermatol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32614066/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

64.

Corazza M, Amendolagine G, Borghi A, Toni G, Lauriola MM. Aromatherapy and occupational allergic contact dermatitis: two further cases caused by lavender oil and other essential oils. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 28];81:378–9. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13328. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

65.

Crawford GH, Katz KA, Ellis E, James WD. Use of aromatherapy products and increased risk of hand dermatitis in massage therapists. Arch Dermatol [Internet]. American Medical Association; 2004 [cited 2020 Aug 28];140:991–6. Available from: https://www.jamanetwork.com/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

66.

Schaller MS, Korting HC. Allergic airborne contact dermatitis from essential oils used in aromatherapy. Clin Exp Dermatol [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1995 [cited 2020 Aug 28];20:143–5. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8565250/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

67.

Hagvall L, Bråred Christensson J. Patch testing with main sensitizers does not detect all cases of contact allergy to oxidized lavender oil. Acta Derm Venereol [Internet]. Medical Journals/Acta D-V; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 28];96:679–84. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26671837/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

68.

Sköld M, Hagvall L, Karlberg AT. Autoxidation of linalyl acetate, the main component of lavender oil, creates potent contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 28];58:9–14. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18154552/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

69.

de Groot AC, Schmidt E. Essential Oils, Part IV. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 28];27:170–5. Available from: http://www.journals.lww.com/01206501-201607000-00003. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

70.

Bråred Christensson J, Karlberg AT, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Johansen JD, Garcia-Bravo B, et al. Oxidized limonene and oxidized linalool - concomitant contact allergy to common fragrance terpenes. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 15];74:273–80. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26918793/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

71.

De Groot A. Linalool Hydroperoxides [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 26]. p. 243–6. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31313746/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

72.

De Groot A. Limonene Hydroperoxides [Internet]. Dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 26]. p. 331–5. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31433385/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

73.

Pesonen M, Suomela S, Kuuliala O, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K. Occupational contact dermatitis caused by D -limonene. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2014 [cited 2020 Oct 15];71:273–9. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25141986/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

74.

Foti C, Zambonin CG, Conserva A, Casulli C, D’Accolti L, Angelini G. Occupational contact dermatitis to a limonene-based solvent in a histopathology technician. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2007 [cited 2020 Oct 15];56:109–12. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17244081/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

75.

Guarneri F, Barbuzza O, Vaccaro M, Galtieri G. Allergic contact dermatitis and asthma caused by limonene in a labourer handling citrus fruits. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2008 [cited 2020 Oct 15];58:315–6. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18416769/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

76.

Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Basketter DA. Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2001 [cited 2020 Oct 15];45:221–5. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450406.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

77.

Herman A, Aerts O, de Montjoye L, Tromme I, Goossens A, Baeck M. Isothiazolinone derivatives and allergic contact dermatitis: a review and update [Internet]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. p. 267–76. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jdv.15267. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

78.

Uter W, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher AJ, Brans R, et al. The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];34:333–9. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31419348/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

79.

Schwensen JF, Friis UF, Menné T, Flyvholm MA, Johansen JD. Contact allergy to preservatives in patients with occupational contact dermatitis and exposure analysis of preservatives in registered chemical products for occupational use. Int Arch Occup Environ Health [Internet]. Springer Verlag; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 14];90:319–33. Available from: https://www.link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00420-017-1203-5. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

80.

Schnuch A, Schubert S, Lessmann H, Geier J, Beiteke U, Dissemond J, et al. The methylisothiazolinone epidemic goes along with changing patients’ characteristics – after cosmetics, industrial applications are the focus. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 13];82:87–93. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13414. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

81.

Zirwas MJ, Hamann D, Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, et al. Epidemic of isothiazolinone allergy in North America: prevalence data from the North American contact dermatitis group, 2013-2014. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 13];28:204–9. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28509715/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

82.

Hollins LC, Hallock K, Disse M, Chu C, Szollas R, Marks J, et al. Occupationally induced allergic contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone among water bottle plant workers. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];31:265–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32049715/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

83.

Tous-Romero F, Sánchez-Velázquez A, Penalba-Torres M, de Frutos Ortiz J. Allergic contact dermatitis to a rubber assembly lubricant. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];cod.13579. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13579. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

84.

Franken SM, van der Waal RIF, Rustemeyer T. Occupational contact dermatitis caused by “Chrysal flower food.” Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 14];81:400–1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852493/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

85.

Tramontana M, Hansel K, Bianchi L, Foti C, Romita P, Stingeni L. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from a glue: concomitant sensitivity to “declared” isothiazolinones and “undeclared” (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];83:150–2. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13569. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

86.

Marrero-Alemán G, Saavedra Santana P, Liuti F, Hernández N, López-Jiménez E, Borrego L. The role of cleaning products in epidemic allergic contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 14];29:77–80. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29494393/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

87.

Marrero-Alemán G, Borrego L, Antuña AG, Macías Montes A, Pérez Luzardo O. Isothiazolinones in cleaning products: analysis with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry of samples from sensitized patients and market. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];82:94–100. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31657463/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

88.

Todberg T, Opstrup MS, Johansen JD, Hald M. Occupational facial contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in a stainless steel aerosol spray. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 14];77:173–4. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cod.12773. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

89.

Corazza M, Forconi R, Bernardi T, Bianchi A, Scuderi V, Monti A, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to undeclared benzisothiazolinone in an emulsifying oil. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14];cod.13559. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13559. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

90.

Corazza M, Amendolagine G, Cristofaro D, Bernardi T, Foti C, Romita P, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by isothiazolinones in ultrasound gel: 2 cases. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 14];77:337–8. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29063693/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

91.

Lan J, Song Z, Miao X, Li H, Li Y, Dong L, et al. Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. Mosby Inc.; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27];82:1215–6. Available from: https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.library1.unmc.edu/pmc/articles/PMC7194538/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

92.

Zuo Y, Hua W, Luo Y, Li L. Skin reactions of N95 masks and medial masks among health-care personnel: a self-report questionnaire survey in China [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. p. 145–7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262031/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

93.

Hu K, Fan J, Li X, Gou X, Li X, Zhou X. The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. NLM (Medline); 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 31];99:e20603. Available from: https://www.pmc/articles/PMC7302613/?report=abstract. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

94.

Lin P, Zhu S, Huang Y, Li L, Tao J, Lei T, et al. Adverse skin reactions among healthcare workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: a survey in Wuhan and its surrounding regions [Internet]. Br. J. Dermatol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. p. 190–2. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262186/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

95.

Guertler A, Moellhoff N, Schenck TL, Hagen CS, Kendziora B, Giunta RE, et al. Onset of occupational hand eczema among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: comparing a single surgical site with a COVID-19 intensive care unit. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 26];83:108–14. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32452036/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

96.

Singh M, Pawar M, Bothra A, Maheshwari A, Dubey V, Tiwari A, et al. Personal protective equipment induced facial dermatoses in healthcare workers managing Coronavirus disease 2019 [Internet]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. p. e378–80. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272982/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

97.

Kadivar S, Belsito D V. Occupational dermatitis in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 19];26:177–83. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26172487/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

98.

Suneja T, Belsito D V. Occupational dermatoses in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 20];58:285–90. Available from: https://www.pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.library1.unmc.edu/18416759/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

99.

Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Soccio AL, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2002 [cited 2020 Aug 20];46:101–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.library1.unmc.edu/11918604/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

100.

Rustemeyer T, Pilz B, Frosch PJ. Contact allergies in medical occupations [Internet]. Hautarzt. Hautarzt; 1994 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. p. 834–44. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7843962/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

101.

Nettis E, Assennato G, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms. Clin Exp Allergy [Internet]. Clin Exp Allergy; 2002 [cited 2020 Aug 17];32:441–7. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11940076/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

102.

Dejonckheere G, Herman A, Baeck M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by synthetic rubber gloves in healthcare workers: sensitization to 1,3-diphenylguanidine is common. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 27];81:167–73. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30891769/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

103.

Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, et al. Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 15];79:149–56. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29923205/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

104.

Warshaw EM, Schram SE, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, Marks JG, Fowler JF, et al. Occupation-related contact dermatitis in North American health care workers referred for patch testing: Cross-sectional data, 1998 to 2004. Dermatitis. 2008;19:261–74.CrossRef

105.

Goodier MC, Ronkainen SD, Hylwa SA. Rubber accelerators in medical examination and surgical gloves. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 26];29:66–76. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29494385/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

106.

Isaac J, Goldminz AM, Scheinman PL. Don’t forget the sponge [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 26]. p. 149–50. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30891773/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

107.

MacGibeny MA, Wassef C. Preventing adverse cutaneous reactions from amplified hygiene practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: how dermatologists can help through anticipatory guidance. Arch Dermatol Res [Internet]. NLM (Medline); 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27];1. Available from: https://www.pmc/articles/PMC7210798/?report=abstract. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

108.

US EPA O. List N: Disinfectants for Use Against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). [cited 2020 Aug 27]; Available from: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-n-disinfectants-use-against-sars-cov-2-covid-19. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

109.

Wentworth AB, Yiannias JA, Davis MDP, Killian JM. Benzalkonium chloride: a known irritant and novel allergen. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 14];27:14–20. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26756511/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

110.

Isaac J, Scheinman PL. Benzalkonium chloride: an irritant and sensitizer. Dermatitis [Internet]. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 14];28:346–52. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28885313/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

111.

Navarro-Triviño FJ, Merida-Fernández C, Ródenas-Herranz T, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by elastic bands from FFP2 mask [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 25]. p. 168–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273080/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

112.

Kosann MK, Brancaccio R, Cohen D. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in an obstetrics and gynecology resident. Am J Contact Dermat. 2003;14:217–8.CrossRef

113.

Al Badri FM. Surgical mask contact dermatitis and epidemiology of contact dermatitis in healthcare workers. Curr Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;30:183–8.

114.

Bothra A, Das S, Singh M, Pawar M, Maheswari A. Retroauricular dermatitis with vehement use of ear loop face masks during COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32491204/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

115.

Aerts O, Dendooven E, Foubert K, Stappers S, Ulicki M, Lambert J. Surgical mask dermatitis caused by formaldehyde (releasers) during the <scp>COVID</scp> -19 pandemic. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 14];cod.13626. Available from: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cod.13626. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

116.

Hua W, Zuo Y, Wan R, Xiong L, Tang J, Zou L, et al. Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 25];83:115–21. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32406064/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

117.

Donovan J, Skotnicki-Grant S. Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde textile resins in surgical uniforms and nonwoven textile masks. Dermatitis [Internet]. Dermatitis; 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 27];18:40–4. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17303043/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

118.

van Kudla Dono I, Holness LD, Skotniki-Grant S, Nethercott JR. Skin reactions following use of N95 facial masks. Dermatitis. 2007;18:104.

119.

Xie Z, Yang YX, Zhang H. Mask-induced contact dermatitis in handling COVID-19 outbreak [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. p. 166–7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272860/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

120.

Yu J, Chen JK, Mowad CM, Reeder M, Hylwa S, Chisolm S, et al. Occupational dermatitis to facial personal protective equipment in healthcare workers: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14]; Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33011325/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

121.

Nassau S, Fonacier L. Allergic Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Med. Clin. North Am. W.B. Saunders; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 15]. p. 61–76. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31757238/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

122.

Rundle CW, Presley CL, Militello M, Barber C, Powell DL, Jacob SE, et al. Hand hygiene during COVID-19: recommendations from the American Contact Dermatitis Society. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 27]; Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32707253/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

123.

Crepy MN, Lecuen J, Ratour-Bigot C, Stocks J, Bensefa-Colas L. Accelerator-free gloves as alternatives in cases of glove allergy in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 26];78:28–32. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28748553/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

124.

Pontén A, Dubnika I. Delayed reactions to reusable protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Contact Dermatitis; 2009 [cited 2020 Oct 14];60:227–9. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19338595/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

125.

VoPham T, Weaver MD, Hart JE, Ton M, White E, Newcomb PA. Effect of social distancing on COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the US. medRxiv Prepr Serv Heal Sci [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 23]; Available from: https://www.pmc/articles/PMC7310657/?report=abstract. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

126.

Koo JR, Cook AR, Park M, Sun Y, Sun H, Lim JT, et al. Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. Lancet Publishing Group; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 22];20:678–88. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32213332/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

127.

Midander K, Hurtig A, Borg Tornberg A, Julander A. Allergy risks with laptop computers - nickel and cobalt release. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 23];74:353–9. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/cod.12525. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

128.

Jensen P, Jellesen MS, Moller P, Frankild S, Johansen JD, Menné T, et al. Nickel allergy and dermatitis following use of a laptop computer. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mosby Inc. 2012;67:e170–1.CrossRef

129.

Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 23];174:319–29. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26370659/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

130.

Yokota M, Fox LP, Maibach HI. Bilateral palmar dermatitis possible caused by computer wrist rest. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 23];57:192–3. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01100.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

131.

Garcia-Morales I, Garcia Bravo B, Camacho Martinez F. Occupational contact dermatitis caused by a personal-computer mouse mat. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003 [cited 2020 Aug 23];49:172–172. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0185p.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

132.

Goossens A, Blondeel S, Zimerson E. Resorcinol monobenzoate: a potential sensitizer in a computer mouse. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002 [cited 2020 Aug 23];47:235–235. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470410.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

133.

Li K, Barankin B. Cutaneous manifestations of modern technology use. J Cutan Med Surg [Internet]. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 23];15:347–53. Available from: http://www.journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2310/7750.2011.10053. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

134.

Pföhler C, Körner R, Müller CSL, Vogt T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis of the ears caused by thiurams in a headset. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 23];65:242–3. Available from: .https://www.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01950.x. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

135.

Jacob SE, Admani S. IPad - Increasing nickel exposure in children. Pediatrics [Internet]. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 23];134:580. Available from: https://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/. Accessed 31 Aug 2020

Titel: What Is New in Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Year of the COVID Pandemic?
verfasst von: Erica B. Lee
Marissa Lobl
Aubree Ford
Vincent DeLeo
Brandon L. Adler
Ashley Wysong
Publikationsdatum: 30.03.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Schlagwort: COVID-19
Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1529-7322
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6315
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-021-01000-3

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

What Is New in Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Year of the COVID Pandemic?

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Kinder mit anhaltender Sinusitis profitieren häufig von Antibiotika

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

How to Incorporate Oral Immunotherapy into Your Clinical Practice

The COVID-19 Pandemic—an Epidemiological Perspective

Fatal Anaphylaxis: Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Paget’s Disease of Bone: Osteoimmunology and Osteoclast Pathology

Nutritional Factors in Occupational Lung Disease

Herbal Medicines for Allergic Rhinitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Kinder mit anhaltender Sinusitis profitieren häufig von Antibiotika

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Update HNO