Anzeige
Erschienen in:
11.09.2020 | Original Article
Cytokine Expression Pattern and Protein-Protein interaction network analysis of Leucocyte Rich Platelet Rich Fibrin and Injectable Form of Platelet Rich Fibrin
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) such as leucocyte-rich PRF (L-PRF) and injectable form of PRF (i-PRF) are widely used in various surgical applications. L-PRF- and i-PRF-derived cytokine variations and functional pathways are still unexplored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the expression pattern of Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-related cytokines by L-PRF and i-PRF under in vitro.
Methods
Cytokine levels were evaluated using multi-analyte ELISArray kit. Using elevated level of cytokines, the protein-protein interaction and pathway were predicted by computational method.
Results
The expressed cytokine levels were higher in L-PRF than in i-PRF. Specifically in L-PRF, IL8, IL2, IL6, and IL1A were expressed abundantly, whereas IL4, IL10, and IL6 were significantly high in i-PRF. Furthermore, protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks (cytokine-cytokine interactions) and pathway analyses were predicted using higher-order cytokines. PPI networks and gene ontology enrichment analysis showed functional variations between L-PRF and i-PRF. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome pathway analysis found that L-PRF mediates NF-k B signaling, Toll-like receptor signaling (TLR), and MAPK signaling via T-cell receptor signaling pathway. i-PRF is significantly involved in JAK-STAT signaling pathway through upregulation of STAT1.
Conclusion
Our study concludes that L-PRF and i-PRF act via different pathways that confirm functional variations between them. Therefore, we speculate that L-PRF may be effective in acute phase of chronic wounds such as in diabetes mellitus and immunocompromised patients whereas i-PRF may have a better outcome in acute wounds.