Background
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)-derived tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells constitute the most abundant heterogeneous immune-related cells in the tumor microenvironment, and play essential roles in tumor immune evasion [
1‐
3]. Among them, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are pathologically activated and extremely immunosuppressive, which are closely associated with poor clinical outcomes of cancer patients [
4]. Emerging studies demonstrated that MDSCs contribute to the myeloid cell diversity in pathological conditions. Whereas, the nature of this diversity and the characteristics for the distinction of MDSCs from neutrophils and monocytes have been poorly understood [
5]. Generally, MDSCs can be divided into granulocytic/polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) and monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) according to the strong phenotypic and morphological distinction. Actually, the complex pathological environment leads to specific genomic, proteomic and metabolic features of MDSCs which enable their particular immune suppression for tumor evasion. Thus, characterizing and exploring the features and function of different substantial proportion of MDSCs are essential for targeting myeloid cells to improve current immunotherapeutic regimens or to overcome resistance to immunotherapy.
The initiation and progression of tumors depend on the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells to fulfill their bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands to support rapid proliferation as well as constitute immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) [
6]. Not only tumor cell-derived cytokines, but also low pH and hypoxia environment [
7] are all involved in regulation of MDSCs mediated immune suppression [
8]. Moreover, enhanced free fatty acids (FFAs) uptake, fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and lipids present are all benefit MDSCs mediated immunosuppression obviously [
9]. In spite of the dominant role of lactic acid in TME, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) including acetate (C2), propionate (C3) and butyrate (C4) have long been considered as key signaling molecules in numerous physiological and pathological processes [
10]. However, previous studies mainly focus on the regulation of host homeostasis by intestinal microbiota produced SCFAs. Recent studies suggested the existence of a de novo pathway for acetate production derived from pyruvate, the end product of glycolysis [
11]. Hyperactive metabolism such as Warburg effect in tumors leads to increased glucose uptake, incomplete metabolism, and the release of metabolic intermediates, like acetate, into the extracellular space [
12]. Whereas, the immune regulation of SCFAs in tumor microenvironment is rarely explored.
The accumulation of SCFAs in tumor microenvironment not only enhanced the SCFAs uptake and carbon metabolism of immune cells, but also increased the G protein signaling through free fatty acid receptors (FFARs) which belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). As a classic GPCR, FFAR2 couples to Gαi/o and Gαq, resulting in inhibition of the adenylate cyclase pathway or increasing intracellular calcium levels [
13,
14]. Although, FFAR2 has been found to play a critical role in migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) [
15] and regulate the size and function of Treg pool through gut microbiota-derived SCFAs [
16], the function of FFAR2 in MDSCs mediated tumor immune evasion remains unclear.
Here, we report a significant accumulation of SCFAs (acetic acids) in both patients and mouse tumor tissues, and FFAR2 activated by acetic acids in a more immune suppressive MDSCs, which are proven essential for immune suppression and cancer progression. Furthermore, we also demonstrated the non-redundant role of FFAR2 in MDSCs mediated L-Arginine consumption through Gαq/Calcium/PPAR-γ/Arg1 signaling. Moreover, pharmaceutical inhibition of FFAR2 signaling significantly facilitated the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) mediated tumor suppression, suggesting the great potential of FFAR2 as a novel target for cancer immune therapy.
Materials and methods
Cell preparation and culture
Mouse Lewis lung carcinoma cell (LLC), melanoma cell (B16F10), fibroblast cell (3T3), human melanoma cell (SK-MEL-2), lung adenocarcinoma cell (A549), human normal epithelial cell (BEAS-2B) and umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). NCM460 and PC-9 cell line was obtained from Cell Resource Center of East China Normal University. LLC was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 × penicillin–streptomycin. LLC stably expressing firefly luciferase (LLC-luci) was generated by our lab as described [
17,
18] and cultured in complete DMEM medium with 200 ng/mL G418 (Gibco). B16F10, HUVEC, PC-9, A549 and 3T3 were cultured in RPMI 1640 Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 × penicillin–streptomycin. SK-MEL-2 was cultured in Modified Eagle’s Medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 × penicillin–streptomycin. All cell lines cultured maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO
2, and were regularly tested for mycoplasma-free.
Chemicals, reagents, and antibodies
RPMI 1640, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), penicillin–streptomycin, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco. TRIzol reagent and PrimeScript RT Master Mix were acquired from Takara. SYBR Green PCR Master Mix was purchased from Yeasen. Mouse TNF-α ELISA kit was purchased from Biolegend and Mouse IL-12 p70 ELISA kit was purchased from Invitrogen. GM-CSF and IL-6 were purchased from Proteintech. InVivoMab anti-mouse Ly6G/Ly6C (Gr-1; clone RB6-8C5), InVivoMab IgG2a isotype antibody (clone LTF-2) and InVivoMab anti-mouse PD-1 (clone RMP1-14) were purchased from BioXCell. Mouse Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Isolation Kit, mouse CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit, mouse CD8+ T Cell Isolation Kit, LS Separation columns, MS Separation columns, MACS BSA Stock Solution, autoMACS Rinsing Solution, autoMACS Running Buffer and mouse T Cell Activation/Expansion Kit were purchased from Miltenyi. FFAR2 Agonist (#371725), FFAR2 inhibitor (GLPG0974, #SML2443), Sodium acetate (#S2889) and Urethane (#U2500) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Gαq inhibitor (YM-254890) and FFAR2 inhibitor (CATPB) were purchased from MCE. Ca2+ inhibitor (2-APB) was purchased from Tocris and PPAR-γ-inhibitor (GW9662) was purchased from Selleck. Live/dead dye and antibodies used for flow cytometry were purchased from Biolegend unless indicated otherwise: Fixable Viability Dye (BD, Horizon™ Fixable Viability Stain 780), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 (clone 17A2), Brilliant Violet 421™-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 (clone RM4-4), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53-6.7), PE/Cyanine7-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (clone BM8), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD11c (clone N418), TruStain fcX™ anti-mouse CD16/32 (clone 93), Brilliant Violet 605™-conjugated anti-mouse I-A/I-E (clone M5/114.15.2), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (BD Pharmingen, clone 53-6.7), BV421-conjugated anti-mouse LY-6G (BD Pharmingen, clone 1A8), APC-conjugated anti-mouse LY-6C (BD Pharmingen, clone AL-21), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b (BD Pharmingen, clone M1/70), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53-6.7), PE-conjugated anti-human/mouse Arginase 1 (eBioscience™, clone A1exF5), Brilliant Violet 421™-conjugated anti-mouse/human CD11b (clone M1/70), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFNγ (clone XMG1.2), Brilliant Violet 421™-conjugated anti-mouse/human CD11b (clone M1/70), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFNγ (clone XMG1.2), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53-6.7), PE-conjugated anti-mouse iNOS (clone W16030C), PE/Cyanine7-conjugated anti-mouse IL-10 (clone JES5-16E3), Alexa Fluor® 700 -conjugated anti-mouse NK-1.1 (clone PK136) and Brilliant Violet 421™-conjugated anti-mouse CD25 (clone A18246A). Antibodies used for Western blotting are as follows: PPAR-γ (#2443), Arginase-1 (#93668), STAT1 (#9172), p-STAT1 (#9171), STAT3 (#4904), p-STAT3 (#9145) and AlexaFluor® 488/555 mouse, rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST). C/EBPβ (H7, sc-7962) and p-C/EBPβ (Thr217, sc-16993-R) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies used for immunofluorescence are as follows: Anti-human FFAR2 (ab124272) and anti-human CD15 (ab17080) were purchased from abcam. Anti-mouse Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5) was purchased from Biolegend. Anti-CD8 (GB13429), anti-CD4 (GB13064-2), anti-human ARG1 (GB11285) and anti-PPAR-γ (GB112205) were purchased from Servicebio.
Mice
C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Gempharmatech Co., Ltd. Lyz2-cre mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Global knockout mice Ffar2−/− and conditional knockout mice Ffar2fl/fl were constructed using the CRISPR–Cas9 genome-editing system. Ffar2fl/fl mice were crossed with Lyz2-cre mice to obtain mice with targeted Ffar2 deletion. All mouse breeding and mouse animal experiments are done at the specific-pathogen-free conditions Experimental Animal Center of East China Normal University. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of East China Normal University. The protocol was approved by the East China Normal University Center for Animal Research (m20230201).
Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) measured by GC–MS
Sample preparation of cell supernatants: 3T3, LLC, B16F10, BEAS-2B, NCM460, HUVEC, PC-9, A549 and SK-MEL-2 cells were cultured in recommended complete medium for a few days, and seeded then in 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells per well), and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 × penicillin–streptomycin (3 ml complete medium per well) for 16 h. Cell culture supernatants were then collected and kept in −80 °C. Preparation of urethane-induced lung cancer tissue: Urethane-induced mice lung cancer tissue and normal mice lung tissue was dissected, washed twice with precooled PBS, and kept then in −80 °C. All samples were sent to Suzhou Meixin Bioscience Co., Ltd and analyzed and quantified by GC–MS.
Development of mouse MDSCs from bone marrow (BM) precursors
Bone marrow cells were harvested from tibias and femurs of C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old), after red cell lysis, cell suspension was cultured RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1 × Penicillin and Streptomycin, 10% FBS, GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) and IL6 (40 ng/ml) medium for 4 days.
Preparation of LLC tumor explant supernatants
Mice were subcutaneously injected with LLC (1 × 106 cells/mouse), and LLC tumors were excised at day 21. LLC tumors were minced into small pieces (less than 3 mm in diameter) and re-suspended into T75 culture flask with RPMI 1640 medium (without FBS) and incubated for 16–18 h. After incubation, supernatants were collected. After centrifugation and filtration (0.22 μm filters), supernatants were directly used or kept in −80 °C.
CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and MDSCs isolation from mouse spleen
Disrupt spleen in recommended buffer and pass through 70 μm nylon cell strainer (Corning) and followed red blood cell lysis. Prepared single cell suspensions were determined cell number, and used for following cell isolation. CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were isolated from naïve C57BL/6 mouse spleen via Mouse CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi) or Mouse CD8+ T Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi), following the manufacturer’s instructions. MDSCs were isolated from LLC tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mouse spleen via Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
CD8+ T cells isolation from LLC tumors of Ffar2fl/fl and Ffar2fl/flLyz2-cre mouse
LLC cells were subcutaneously injected into Ffar2fl/fl and Ffar2fl/flLyz2-cre mice (1 × 106 cells/mouse), and LLC tumors were excised at day 21. LLC tumors were minced into small pieces (less than 3 mm in diameter) and resuspended with RPMI 1640, 400 U/mL Collagenase IV (Gibco) and 30 U/mL DNase I (Gibco). Tumor small pieces were incubated at 37 °C for half an hour. Stopping tumor samples digestion used complete medium (RPMI 1640 + 10% FBS), and tumor samples were filtered through 70 μm nylon cell strainer (Corning). After red cell lysis, and CD8+ T cells isolated from generated single-cell suspensions via Mouse CD8a Positive Selection Kit II (STEMCELL Technologies) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Flow cytometry analysis
For tumor infiltrating immune leukocytes, tumor single-cell suspensions created as described (CD8+ T cells isolation from LLC tumors). For spleen infiltrating immune leukocytes, disrupt spleen in PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and pass through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer (Corning) and followed red blood cell lysis. All samples were blocked FcγII/III with anti-CD16/32 (BD Pharmingen) at 4 °C for 30 min, and surface marker was stained at 4 °C for 30 min. Samples were then stained with indicated fluorescence-conjugated antibodies. Fixable Viability Stain 780 (BD Pharmingen) was used to gate out non-viable cells. For intracellular Arg1 and IFNγ staining, Cytofix/Cytoperm Soln Kit (BD Pharmingen) was used to fix and permeabilize cells, following the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were run on LSRFortessa (BD Pharmingen) and analyzed by FlowJo software (Tree Star).
T cell suppression assays
CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells isolation from naïve mice spleen and MDSCs isolation from tumor-bearing mice spleen described as above. MDSCs were plated in the 48-well plates and cocultured with 1 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeled CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at different ratios in the complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS). For T cells activation, T Cell Activation/Expansion beads (Miltenyi) was added to coculture of T cells and MDSCs. After 72 h, T cells proliferation and IFNγ expression were measured by flow cytometry.
Mouse tumor models
For urethane-induced lung cancer, Ffar2+/+, Ffar2−/−, Ffar2fl/fl and Ffar2fl/flLyz2-cre mice were intraperitoneally injected with urethane (1 g/kg body weight in 200 μl PBS) once per week for 10 weeks, lung tissues were excised and collected at 28 weeks. Then, the lungs were soaked in 4% paraformaldehyde in a fixed shape for 2 weeks. After that, lung nodules were quantified and photographed. For mice subcutaneous tumor model, LLC, LLC-luci or B16F10 cells were injected subcutaneously into Ffar2+/+, Ffar2−/−, Ffar2fl/fl and Ffar2fl/flLyz2-cre mice (1 × 106 cells/mouse), and tumor volume assessed using calipers and calculated using the formula [(small diameter)2 × (large diameter) × 0.5]. For MDSCs deletion in vivo, Ffar2+/+ or Ffar2−/− mice were injected subcutaneously with LLC cells (1 × 106 cells/mouse) and injected intraperitoneally with isotype or anti-Gr-1 antibody (200 μg/mouse, every 4 days) from day 4 to day 23. For bone marrow chimeras, bone-marrow cells after red blood cell lysis were collected from Ffar2+/+ or Ffar2−/− mice. Prepared Ffar2+/+ or Ffar2−/− mice were lethally irradiated with 8.5 Gy, and lethally irradiated mice received bone marrow transplants from Ffar2+/+ or Ffar2−/− mice. Ten weeks after transplantation, chimeric mice were subcutaneously injected with LLC (1 × 106 cells/mouse), and tumor growth was recorded. For the combined treatment with FFAR2 inhibitor and anti-PD-1 antibody, WT mice were injected subcutaneously with LLC (1 × 106 cells/mouse). LLC-tumor bearing mice treated with FFAR2 inhibitor (5 mg/kg per day, single esophageal gavage), anti-PD1 antibody (200 μg/mouse every 4 days), FFAR2 inhibitor + anti-PD1 antibody or control (PBS containing 0.5% DMSO). Tumor-bearing mice were treated starting at day 4 post-tumor injection. Tumor growth and survival curve were recorded in two independent experiments. For survival analysis, mice were euthanized when total tumor burden approached IACUC guidelines with a tumor burden exceeding 1500 mm3 in volume.
Coinjection of MDSCs and mouse tumor cells
MDSCs were isolated from tumor-bearing mice spleen via Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi) as described. WT mice were then injected with tumor cells (LLC or B16F10; 5 × 105 cells/mouse) or co-injected with tumor cells and Ffar2+/+ MDSCs (5 × 105:5 × 105) or tumor cells and Ffar2−/− MDSCs (5 × 105:5 × 105). Tumor volumes were recorded.
Histology and immunofluorescence assay
Urethane-induced lung cancer tissues, LLC and B16F10 tumors were dissected, and washed twice by precooled PBS. Samples were fixed then in 4% paraformaldehyde for overnight, and embedded into paraffin. All paraffin embedded samples were sent to Servicebio. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunofluorescence assay were stained and analyzed by Servicebio.
Western blotting analysis
Generated bone marrow-derived MDSCs were first resting overnight, and then stimulated by GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) + IL6 (40 ng/ml) for the indicated time. After stimulation, BM-MDSCs were harvested and lysed with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (CoWin Biosciences, China, catalog# CW2333) supplemented with complete Mini Protease and Phosphatase inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, catalog# 4693159001 and 4906837001). Cell lysates were separated by standard SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Sample preparation of cell supernatants: generated bone marrow-derived MDSCs were first resting overnight, and then stimulated by GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) + IL6 (40 ng/ml) for 48 h. Remove particulates by centrifugation and assay immediately or store samples at -80℃. Preparation of LLC tumor tissue extracts: Mice were subcutaneously injected with LLC (1 × 106 cells/mouse), and LLC tumors were excised at day 21. Add appropriate amount of PBS to the tissue and mash it. Centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 10 min to take the supernatants and kept then in -80℃. The concentration of L-Arginine from cell supernatants and LLC tumor tissue extracts were quantified using mouse L-Arginine (L-Arg) ELISA Kit (Shanghai Coibo Bio Technology Co.Ltd). Consumption of L-Arginine by MDSCs was calculated according to the formula: (concentration of L-Arginine in medium-concentration of L-Arginine in culture supernatants) × volume. TNF-α and IL-12 p70 in the culture supernatants and lysates of MDSCs were determined by ELISA following the manufacturer's instructions.
Patients
Human lung adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China) and statements that informed written consent of lung adenocarcinoma patients were obtained. All tissues were collected and handled according to the ethical and safety procedures approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of the Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (reference ethics number 20180701-02). The lung cancer tissue array (HLugA180Su08) was purchased from Shanghai Outdo Biotech.
RNA sequencing and analysis
Ffar2+/+ and Ffar2−/− bone marrow-derived MDSCs (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured in complete RPMI 1640 medium overnight. After overnight resting, BM-MDSCs were re-stimulated by combination GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) with IL-6 (40 ng/ml) for 24 h. After that, RNA was extracted using the RNA extraction kit (Magen, R4801-02) and sequenced by BGI (Beijing Genomic Institute in ShenZhen). The sequencing data were filtered with SOAPnuke (v1.5.2) by removing reads containing sequencing adapters, removing reads whose low-quality base ratio (base quality less than or equal to 5) was more than 20%, and removing reads whose unknown base (“N” base) ratio was more than 5%. After this, the clean reads were obtained and stored in a FASTQ format. The clean reads were aligned to the reference genome using HISAT2 (v2.0.4). Fusion genes and differential splicing genes (DSGs) were detected through Ericscript (v0.5.5), and rMATS (v3.2.5). Bowtie2 (v2.2.5) was used to align the clean reads to the gene set, a database for this organism was built by BGI (Beijing Genomic Institute in ShenZhen), coding transcripts were included, and the expression levels of genes were calculated using RSEM (v1.2.12). Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 (v1.4.5) with a P value ≤ 0.05 and |log2 (fold change)|≥ 0.5. Volcano map was plotted by using the EnhancedVolcano package in R (v4.5.0). GSEA of KEGG pathway was performed by clusterProfiler package and visualized by ggplot2 package and gseaplot2 package. P value ≤ 0.05 was set as the cut-off criteria.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA of cells or tissues was isolated with TRIzol (TaKaRa), and RNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA by PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using the QuantStudio 3 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The expression of each gene was normalized to the expression level of GAPDH and reported as relative mRNA expression (2
−ΔΔCt) or fold change. The sequence-specific primers are shown in Additional file
2: Table S1.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were analyzed by Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software). Statistical differences between two groups were analyzed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The statistical differences for more than two groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Survival analysis was performed using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. All data were shown as mean ± SEM. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, NS, not significant).
Discussion
As the abundant leukocytes in human blood, MDSCs are essential for restricting adaptive immune cells, in particular, cytotoxic T lymphocytes in tumor immune evasion. Whereas, the biological characteristics and immunosuppressive mechanisms of MDSCs in cancer development and immune evasion remained elusive. Here, we demonstrated an extraordinary and particular regulation to MDSCs by aberrant cancer metabolism pathway. The accumulation of tumor-cell-derived acetic acids exacerbates the immune suppression of FFAR2-expressing MDSCs through up-regulation of Arg1 expression and L-Arginine consumption in tumor microenvironment, which contribute to immune suppression and cancer progression in a Gαq/Calcium/ PPAR-γ/Arg1 signaling dependent manner. Furthermore, FFAR2 deletion, pharmaceutical inhibition or L-Arginine supplementation reverse the immunosuppressive microenvironment and promote T cell infiltration and anti-tumor response significantly, which have the great potential to be a novel target to enhance the outcomes of cancer immunotherapy.
The elevated level of glycolysis of tumors provides both energy and precursors for fatty acid synthesis, and accompanied with a coordinated rise in lipogenic and glycolytic enzyme activities [
24]. Most tumors and their precursor lesions unexpectedly undergo exacerbated endogenous fatty acid biosynthesis irrespective of the levels of extracellular lipids [
25]. Accordingly, ACLY (ATP citrate lyase) and FASN (fatty acid synthetase) which are involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis are both greatly upregulated in cancer cells. Moreover, FASN overexpression and hyperactivity commonly occurs in carcinomas with higher risk of both disease recurrence and death [
25,
26]. Whereas, ACLY inhibition reduces tumorigenesis in vivo, implying the importance of fatty acid biosynthesis in tumor formation. Here, we demonstrated a significant accumulation of short chain fatty acids (especially acetic acids) in both human and mouse tumor tissues, as well as tumor cells’ supernatant. Previous studies of SCFAs/FFAR2 signaling are most focused on gut microbiota mediated immune regulation colorectal cancer model. However, the role of FFAR2 in tumor immune evasion through cancer cells exacerbated endogenous fatty acids remains unclear. Here we showed the fundamental role of extraordinary accumulated acetic acids in cancer cells induced immune evasion through consuming L-Arginine in tumor microenvironment by FFAR2
+ MDSCs. Whole or myeloid
Ffar2 gene deletion markedly inhibited urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis, Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), and B16F10 melanoma tumor growth, through restricting MDSCs mediated L-Arginine consumption and promoting CD8
+ T cell infiltration as well as anti-tumor response in the tumor microenvironment which benefit the outcome of cancer immunotherapy significantly. Taken together, our study explored a novel linker between extraordinary fatty acids biosynthesis of cancer cells and L-Arginine consumption by MDSCs in immune evasion and identified a new target to metabolic reprogram for cancer immunotherapy.
MDSCs are present at all stages of tumor growth, which strongly inhibit CD8
+ T cell infiltration and antitumor responses in TME [
27‐
29]. Although PMN-MDSCs, pathologically activated neutrophils, represent the most abundant population of MDSCs, it is still hard to define these cell population through current surface markers due to heterogeneity of MDSCs [
30,
31]. As the most important metabolite-sensing receptor, FFAR2 also known as GPR43, exerts immunomodulatory effects and functions in gut homeostasis and the regulation of inflammation by altering leukocyte chemotaxis and colonic regulatory T (Treg) cell expansion [
32,
33]. However, the role of FFAR2 in tumor infiltrated immune cells remains unknown. To explore the target immune cells involved in acetic acids mediated tumor immune evasion, clinical tumor tissue array and tumor-bearing mouse spleen were analyzed, and found that FFAR2 highly expressed in human tumor derived and tumor-bearing mouse splenic MDSCs. Moreover, tumor-infiltrating immune cells analysis showed that whole or myeloid
Ffar2 gene deletion markedly reduce MDSCs accumulation, but increases CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell infiltration in tumors. Furthermore, MDSCs deletion in vivo, co-injection of MDSCs with tumor cells and myeloid cell conditional knockout
Ffar2 mouse tumor models showed that FFAR2 drive tumor progression mainly through MDSCs. Thus, FFAR2 was demonstrated to be a key regulator for pro-tumor MDSCs in reshaping immune suppressive TME.
MDSCs mediated immune suppression are also driven by signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT1/3) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-β (C/EBPβ) regulated Arg1 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [
34,
35]. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA-seq revealed that FFAR2 deficiency markedly downregulated the calcium and PPAR-γ signaling pathway, as well as the expression of Arg1. Although previous study demonstrated that microbiota-derived butyrate breaks balance of Treg/Th17 cells through PPAR-γ signaling, the FFARs involved in Arg1 and arginine metabolism was not shown [
36]. Most importantly, L-Arginine concentrations directly impact the metabolic fitness and survival capacity of T cells that are crucial for anti-tumor responses [
23]. And metabolic modulation of L-Arginine has been proven to have great clinical potential in enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapies [
37].
Here, we demonstrated that PPAR signal pathway mediated Arg1 expression were almost completely eliminated in FFAR2
−/− MDSCs. Furthermore, the NaAc or FFAR2 agonist-induced PPAR-γ signaling and Arg1 expression was blocked significantly by PPAR-γ antagonist (GW9662) as well, suggesting the dominated role of PPAR-γ in MDSCs mediated T cell suppression by Arg1. Furthermore, not only the accumulation of L-Arginine was enhanced significantly in the tumor from FFAR2 conditional knock mice, but also the consuming of L-Arginine was hampered significantly in FFAR2 knockout MDSCs. And replenishment of L-Arginine or inhibition to PPAR-γ increase the infiltration and antitumor immunity of T cell significantly. Although COX2 inhibitors could reduce the expansion and block the Arg1 expression of MDSCs as well [
31,
38,
39], long-term systemic use of COX2 inhibitors endowed with severe side effects [
31]. Most importantly, these findings suggested that the FFAR2 expressing MDSCs subset play crucial roles in mutual regulation of fatty acid and arginine metabolism. Moreover, the Acetic acids/FFAR2 axis enhanced the expression of Arg1 through the Calcium/PPAR-γ pathway, suggesting inhibitors or modulators targeting Calcium/PPAR-γ or SCFA excess in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies will have potential clinical value in improving cancer treatment. In summary, our study suggested a novel strategy to eliminate the pathologically activated MDSCs specifically by targeting FFAR2 without excessive off-target effects which have great potential in clinical application for cancer immunotherapy.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.