Introduction
Interocular asymmetry could be an abnormal sign necessitating further investigation [
1‐
3]. In addition, some disease entities preferentially affect one eye [
4]. While our vital organs are not perfectly symmetrical due to inherent physiological asymmetries, it is important to note that a certain degree of asymmetry can be a typical variation in healthy eyes. Hence, understanding the range of this asymmetry in normal eyes is crucial.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is firmly established as a vital tool for structural imaging in the diagnosis and management of ophthalmic diseases [
5]. Its rapid, non-invasive, and non-contact nature makes it particularly valuable in evaluating children with various ocular pathologies. However, interpreting pediatric tomograms presents unique challenges compared to those of adults, given the growth of the eyeball, changes in axial lengths, and the continuous development of the retina and optic nerve. As such, additional adjustments are essential for the precise interpretation of pediatric tomograms.
To date, in adult populations, the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (p-RNFL) thickness has been well documented, with several studies establishing norms for interocular symmetry [
6,
7]. However, there remain limited data specific to pediatric populations. Notably, while previous studies have examined RNFL asymmetry in children, the majority have focused on non-Asian cohorts [
8,
9], leaving a noticeable gap in data specific to Chinese children. Moreover, there has been a marked increase in myopia in East Asian regions such as Hong Kong and an elongated axial length (AL) associated with myopia can influence the RNFL thickness. Given the heightened prevalence of myopia in this demographic, understanding the variations of AL and asymmetries in RNFL thickness becomes even more vital. Recognizing the normal variations and asymmetries in RNFL thickness among children can guide clinicians in distinguishing between physiological variations and pathological changes. This study aims to fill the knowledge gap by investigating the interocular symmetry of RNFL thickness and the associated factors in Chinese children, providing a foundation for future clinical and research applications in this demographic.
Discussion
In this population-based study, we established a normative database of p-RNFL thickness difference among Chinese children aged 6–8 years old in Hong Kong. We observed the differences in global and all six quadrants of the p-RNFL thickness between two eyes, indicating a discernible level of asymmetry. Notably, the disparity in axial length demonstrated a robust association with p-RNFL thickness difference: a greater variation in axial length corresponded to increased p-RNFL symmetry between eyes. Our study has clinical implications that when evaluating the nature of p-RNFL asymmetry—whether it is physiological or pathological—it is imperative to factor in the influence of axial length differences. This insight can refine diagnostic precision in pediatric patients.
We found that the ICC value of the global p-RNFL thickness was 0.872. In line with our findings, prior studies also observed the asymmetry in p-RNFL thickness between eyes [
8,
9,
17]. In the Sydney Childhood Eye Study, which involved 1765 children aged 6 years, an interocular correlation of 0.7 was observed for average RNFL thickness [
8]. Another study, which focused on the degree of symmetry among healthy adults of different ethnicities, showed a symmetry value of 86.7% in the mean p-RNFL thickness among Chinese [
18]. This supported our data in terms of the representativeness of the ethnic Chinese populations.
We established a normative database of p-RNFL thickness in Hong Kong. In our study, the observed mean and median differences in global p-RNFL thickness were 3.85 and 2.83 μm, respectively, with the 95th percentile marked at 11 μm. This falls within the interocular differences range observed in prior studies on healthy populations. A study involving 357 healthy children determined that the typical interocular disparity in average RNFL should not surpass 13 μm for normal individuals [
9]. Similarly, research conducted among adults highlighted that standard variations between the two eyes generally stay within the limits of 9–12 μm [
17]. It was further posited that variations exceeding these identified thresholds could potentially be indicative of the early stages of optic neuropathy, such as glaucoma [
17]. Given our findings, the majority of the studied children remains within these established norms. This emphasizes the importance of understanding these baseline variations for pediatric eye care practitioners, as discerning physiological variances from potential pathological markers is crucial. Therefore, in a clinical setting, when children present with interocular differences beyond the recognized range, further in-depth evaluation might be warranted to rule out potential pathological conditions.
Prior research has consistently indicated an inverse relationship between axial length and p-RNFL thickness, suggesting that eyes with longer axial lengths tend to have thinner p-RNFLs and vice versa [
7,
19,
20]. However, few studies established the correlation of differences in axial length with variations in p-RNFL thickness. Our study is pioneering in highlighting this significant association between variances in axial length and p-RNFL thickness symmetry between the eyes. These findings carry substantial implications for interpreting axial length and p-RNFL thickness symmetry in the pediatric population, especially in the context of Hong Kong. Furthermore, when differentiating physiological from pathological asymmetry, clinicians should consider the influence of axial length differences.
In our study, the variation in p-RNFL thickness across different quadrants appeared more pronounced than that in global p-RNFL thickness. The ICC for the six quadrants ranged from 0.567 to 0.736, and the mean absolute differences extended from 7.43 to 14.82 μm. Moreover, the disparity in AL influenced p-RNFL thickness across most quadrants in varying degrees. It remains unclear how AL differences might distinctly impact different p-RNFL quadrants. Historical research observed AL correlated negatively with sectoral p-RNFL thickness in all non-temporal quadrants, but correlated positively with the temporal quadrant in both adults and children [
21,
22]. There is likely redistribution of retinal nerve fiber with increasing AL, in which the retinal thickness in the most central area—the temporal sector of the RNFL—is preserved, but the peripheral retina becomes thinner since it is less resistant to traction and stretch [
23]. As axial length increases, the retina is dragged towards the temporal horizon, and consequently the RNFL thickens in the temporal quadrant [
24]. Although this theory provides insights, it does not entirely elucidate the phenomenon our study observed—where AL differences exert varying impacts on distinct p-RNFL quadrants. Nonetheless, it highlights the intricacy underlying the influence of AL on the quadrants of p-RNFL thickness.
The strength of this study includes its large-scale population-based setting, with its standardized random sampling method. In addition, the study had well-experienced ophthalmologists and optometrists who carried out comprehensive ophthalmoscopic examinations for the subject group in a well-equipped eye center. Meanwhile, several limitations of the study were noted. First, we did not include the optic disc parameters such as cup disk ratio (CDR) value. Second, we did not evaluate tilted disc. Also, the cyclotorsion in the tilted disc might influence the RNFL symmetry measurement, potentially resulting in under or overestimation. Third, the causal relationship between symmetry and its associated factors cannot be inferred because of the cross-sectional nature of our data. Fourth, this study included a narrow age range, from 6 to 8 years. As a result, the findings might not extend to a more diverse age group. Future studies including a broader age spectrum could provide more information on the asymmetry of p-RNFL thickness and will be warranted.