Background
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the US military initiated prolonged conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The frontlines of battle were blurred, and enemy tactics focused on blast weaponry in the form of improvised explosive devices and other munitions [
1]. A higher proportion of service members were injured by blasts during these conflicts than in any previous war [
1‐
3]. Advances in combat casualty care, medical transport, and personal protective equipment led to a greater survivability from wounds, and the US Military Health System subsequently faced a growing number of service members and veterans with injury-related sequelae [
3].
A robust body of literature now exists on blast injury, with most research conducted in the last 15 years. Blasts cause injury in a variety of ways, from the blast wave itself to fragmentation and blunt trauma [
4]. The specific injuries resulting from blasts are numerous. In the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, concussions, serious extremity injuries, and amputations evidenced an unprecedented rise that paralleled the heightened use of blast weaponry [
5‐
8]. Sensory injuries, such as hearing and vision deficits, have been linked to blasts as well [
9‐
12]. Blasts can cause injuries to multiple systems, as one study among blast-injured military personnel found an average of nearly four injuries per patient [
4]. The effects of blast move well beyond the physical, as the nature and circumstances of blast injury can often lead to psychological problems such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression [
13‐
15].
Multimorbidity describes a state where two or more medical conditions exist simultaneously in an individual, which can complicate treatment options and create the need for a diversity of health services [
16]. Most of the research on multimorbidity in civilian populations has focused on older or chronically ill individuals [
17‐
19]. This concept has also been explored in some recent military studies [
20‐
23]. The polytrauma clinical triad (PCT) refers to three comorbid diagnoses of postconcussion syndrome, chronic pain, and PTSD [
20]. A Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) study found PCT in 6% of veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts [
21]. Another study extended PCT to what they called “complex comorbidity clusters,” finding six unique clusters, including: PCT; PCT with chronic disease; mental health and substance abuse; sleep, amputation, and chronic disease; pain and moderate PTSD; and relatively healthy. Walker et al. described a similar idea, termed postdeployment multisymptom disorder (PMD), and suggested the need for an integrated treatment model in these cases [
22]. It is important to note, however, that PCT describes a group of comorbid diagnoses postinjury, whereas PMD refers to symptomatology after deployment that may or may not include deployment-related injury.
The concept of a multisymptom disorder following deployment is not new; numerous studies have examined this phenomenon in veterans of the Gulf War, commonly referred to as Gulf War illness or chronic multisymptom illness (CMI). Further, the VA reports that CMI may also be common among veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts [
24]. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of literature on multimorbidity among service members with diagnosed blast-related injury, and the impact of these multiple disorders on postinjury patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL). Patient-reported outcomes provide vital information about an individual’s subjective experience that cannot otherwise be captured via objective medical records. QOL in particular encompasses perceptions of one’s own mental, physical, and emotional status, as well as how well an individual is functioning in their everyday life [
25]. Outcomes of blast-related injury can frequently result in activity limitation, participation restriction, and other reduced functioning, which may detrimentally affect QOL [
26‐
28]. It is important to characterize multimorbidity resulting from blast-related injury, and to understand how it impacts patient-reported QOL in the military population. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether unique clusters of multimorbidity exist following blast-related injury, and to describe these clusters by QOL.
Results
Descriptive characteristics of the study sample are shown in Table
1. Most participants were male (95.2%), E4–E6 (60.5%), in the Army (76.0%), and under age 30 years at time of injury (70.6%). The mean ISS for the overall sample was 7.6 (SD = 7.9), and mean QOL 0.476 (SD = 0.143).
Table 1
Characteristics of the study sample (n = 1972)
Age, years |
18–24 | 857 | 43.5 |
25–29 | 536 | 27.2 |
30+ | 579 | 29.4 |
Service branch |
Army | 1499 | 76.0 |
Marine Corps | 396 | 20.1 |
Other | 77 | 3.9 |
Sex |
Female | 94 | 4.8 |
Male | 1878 | 95.2 |
Rank/pay grade |
E1–E3 | 339 | 17.2 |
E4–E6 | 1194 | 60.5 |
E7–E9 | 234 | 11.9 |
Warrant officer/officer | 205 | 10.4 |
Based on the dendrogram and pseudo T, five clusters were selected. A total of 11 CCS categories met the 0.5 inclusion criteria in at least one cluster, and Table
2 provides a breakdown of these categories, with the most frequent ICD-9-CM codes shown. Table
3 details the CCS categories for the five clusters. The clusters were defined as musculoskeletal, heterogeneous, concussion/anxiety, polytrauma, and clinical triad. The musculoskeletal cluster was predominated by other connective tissue disorder and other joint disorder, which mostly consisted of muscle weakness and pain (see Table
2). The heterogeneous cluster was diverse, without any CCS meeting inclusion criteria. Intracranial injury, headache/migraine, and anxiety disorder were key components of the concussion/anxiety cluster. The polytrauma cluster contains other connective tissue disorder, other nerve disorder, other joint disorder, other injury, open wound extremities, and open wound head, neck, and trunk. The most CCS categories that met inclusion criteria were in the clinical triad cluster (i.e., other nerve disorder, other connective tissue disorder, other joint disorder, intracranial injury, headache/migraine, back problem, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder). The term clinical triad refers to the co-occurrence of musculoskeletal pain, concussion, and mental health morbidity.
Table 2
Top 3 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnoses for primary Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) categories identified in cluster analysis
Adjustment disorders | Unspecified adjustment reaction (25.7) | Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (24.4) | Adjustment disorder with anxiety (23.8) |
Anxiety disorders | Posttraumatic stress disorder (62.5) | Anxiety state, unspecified (26.1) | Other acute reactions to stress (5.8) |
Back problem | Lumbago (43.4) | Cervicalgia (18.1) | Pain in thoracic spine (13.0) |
Headache/migraine | Headache (35.2) | Other headache syndromes (30.1) | Posttraumatic headache, unspecified (10.7) |
Intracranial injury | Late effect of intracranial injury without mention of skull fracture (41.8) | Intracranial injury of other and unspecified nature (24.9) | Concussion with loss of consciousness of 30 min or less (6.5) |
Open wound extremity | Traumatic amputation of leg, unilateral, below knee (10.1) | Traumatic amputation of leg, unilateral, at or above knee (9.0) | Traumatic amputation of leg, bilateral (7.2) |
Open wound head, neck, trunk | Open wound, multiple sites (17.1) | Open wound of buttock (10.3) | Open wound of ear drum (7.5) |
Other connective tissue | Muscle weakness (37.3) | Pain in limb (29.1) | Myalgia and myositis (4.7) |
Other joint disorder | Difficulty in walking (17.3) | Pain in joint, lower leg (16.1) | Pain in joint, ankle and foot (13.0) |
Other nerve disorder | Abnormality of gait (44.9) | Lesion of ulnar nerve (4.3) | Other chronic pain (4.0) |
Other injury | Posttraumatic wound infection (14.2) | Other specified sites, including multiple injury (11.3) | Head injury, unspecified (9.0%) |
Table 3
Percent distribution of Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) categories by cluster
Adjustment disorders | 11.4 | 17.8 | 32.4 | 24.1 | 52.9a |
Anxiety disorders | 13.3 | 21.8 | 53.7a | 30.3 | 76.0a |
Back problem | 3.9 | 27.3 | 45.3 | 23.4 | 54.1a |
Headache/migraine | 4.6 | 11.9 | 83.8a | 17.5 | 59.5a |
Intracranial injury | 7.3 | 12.1 | 52.1a | 49.6 | 63.2a |
Open wound extremity | 40.4 | 12.6 | 3.2 | 67.5a | 28.1 |
Open wound head, neck, trunk | 14.7 | 9.5 | 2.9 | 54.7a | 19.0 |
Other connective tissue | 56.2a | 11.0 | 14.9 | 74.1a | 69.4a |
Other joint disorder | 72.4a | 24.5 | 21.7 | 55.5a | 72.3a |
Other nerve disorder | 27.6 | 14.0 | 39.5 | 77.4a | 70.7a |
Other injury | 21.2 | 11.5 | 4.5 | 72.6a | 21.1 |
Table
4 details the results of Duncan’s multiple range test, grouping the five clusters into domains based on QOL. Clusters were further described by percentage of study sample and ISS. The largest group was the heterogeneous cluster, which comprised 39.1% of the study sample. The highest ISS was in the polytrauma cluster and the smallest was in the concussion/anxiety cluster (17.1 vs. 4.0, respectively). The lowest QOL was in the clinical triad cluster, and the highest was in the musculoskeletal and heterogeneous clusters. Both the polytrauma and concussion/anxiety clusters had similar QOL.
Table 4
Duncan’s multiple range test grouping of clusters by quality of life (QOL)
A | Musculoskeletal | 518 | 26.3% | 0.501 | 7.3 |
Heterogeneous | 629 | 31.9% | 0.496 | 5.3 |
B | Concussion/anxiety | 309 | 15.7% | 0.459 | 4.0 |
Polytrauma | 274 | 13.9% | 0.452 | 17.1 |
C | Clinical triad | 242 | 12.3% | 0.416 | 8.3 |
Discussion
The primary finding of the present study was the identification of patient profiles following blast-related injury based on multimorbidity and QOL. These distinct medical clusters provide further evidence that modern day combat produces injuries with multifaceted outcomes requiring integrated treatment strategies. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to quantify QOL among US military personnel based on their multimorbidity status. The cluster with the lowest QOL contained diagnoses that suggested a clinical triad consisting of musculoskeletal pain, concussion, and mental health morbidity, similar to the PCT described previously in the literature [
20]. This suggests that unique post-blast injury syndromes may exist, which would benefit from strategic allocation of health services and multidisciplinary refinements to clinical practice guidelines.
Implications of the present findings may include the creation of a risk dashboard to distinguish vulnerable populations. The five identified clusters were grouped into three QOL domains. Based on the minimal difference in QWB-SA identified by Le et al., the domains were clinically distinct in regard to QOL [
46]. It is notable that the multimorbidity clusters consisted of medical diagnoses within the first year postinjury and still appeared to impact QOL an average of 6 years later. Although additional research is needed, this finding suggests that the physical and mental health problems an individual experiences within the first year postinjury could act as an early warning matrix (e.g., clinical decision tree) for future medical and psychological status. Without effective treatment, these individuals may continue to experience many of these problems for years. Thus, targeting key health services and implementing optimized intervention strategies during this first year following injury may result in improved outcomes for years to follow.
Musculoskeletal pain was ubiquitous in many of the identified clusters. This finding was not surprising considering that musculoskeletal injury is highly prevalent in the military and confers a substantial contribution to disability among military members [
49,
50]. Interestingly, although both the musculoskeletal and clinical triad clusters had similar ISSs, the latter cluster had substantially lower QOL that exceeded minimally clinically important differences [
46]. The clinical triad cluster, characterized by musculoskeletal pain, concussion, and mental health morbidity, had the lowest QOL and affected 12.3% of the study population. Central pain mechanisms may be influenced by psychological factors or a result of concussion [
51,
52]. Although impossible to delineate in this study, it is plausible that the combination of comorbid concussion, psychological disorders, and musculoskeletal pain contributes to greater real or perceived functional limitations relative to the other symptom clusters. Alternatively, it may also reflect a higher level of psychological trauma experienced at the time of injury.
There were a multitude of adverse health conditions observed in the clinical triad cluster. Specific diagnoses included concussion with associated symptomology (e.g., headache), anxiety and adjustment disorders, and pain in the joints, back, and connective tissue. This resembles the PCT identified in previous literature [
20,
21]. The PCT, however, assumes polytrauma, which is typically defined as an ISS ≥16 [
53]. In our clinical triad cluster, the mean ISS was half that. Therefore, in the circumstances of blast-related injury, a term such as “post-blast clinical triad” may be more appropriate than PCT. This altered terminology will extend the definition to include individuals with mild injuries who also experience comorbid musculoskeletal pain, concussion, and mental health issues. Further research is needed to determine whether this triad exists as a distinct entity (or syndrome), rather than the sum of individual conditions.
The results posit the question of whether unique post-blast injury syndromes may exist that can be defined by multimorbidity. As previously mentioned, there is a body of evidence supporting multisymptom disorders associated with wartime deployment. The most notable in recent history were Gulf War illness or CMI, terms used to describe a variety of health-related complaints of unknown etiology among Gulf War veterans [
54,
55]. Previous military conflicts have described combat stress disorders that were frequently associated with both psychological and physical issues [
56‐
58]. Concussion and PTSD have been linked to multiple comorbidities, including chronic pain, sleep problems, and other mental health disorders [
59‐
61]. Because blasts can affect multiple systems simultaneously, the concept of unique post-blast injury syndromes is plausible [
4].
Another finding of this study was that ISS did not appear to have a direct relationship with QOL. This is consistent with civilian literature, which has found that subjective, rather than objective, injury severity tends to be a better predictor of psychological morbidity [
62,
63]. In fact, ISS was created as an indicator of mortality risk from the injury itself, not QOL [
33]. It was also interesting that, despite vastly divergent ISS values, the concussion/anxiety and polytrauma clusters yielded similar QOL scores. This finding provides further support for the importance of what has been termed the “invisible wounds” of war such as concussion and PTSD, which can adversely affect health without physical signs [
64]. Lastly, the heterogeneous cluster showed that 39.1% of the study sample did not have a clearly defined pattern of multimorbidity. This may speak to the overall burden of multimorbidity following blast-related injury, and suggests that a prevalence estimate for multimorbidity could be calculated based on future studies and agreed upon clinical criteria. Additional research is needed to determine whether this pattern of multimorbidity is consistent across other populations with blast-related injury or unique only to military personnel.
These findings underline the importance of multidisciplinary, integrated care across a variety of settings that treat active duty and veteran service members. While the military has progressively moved to a patient-centered medical home model, which employs a team-based approach for in-garrison managed care [
65], additional measures to improve care for service members with multimorbidity may be warranted. Namely, inclusion of interdisciplinary rehabilitation, sports medicine, orthopaedic, and mental health specialists in deployed units may help with the prompt assessment, treatment, and disposition of patients with musculoskeletal pain, concussion, and mental health conditions [
66,
67]. Collocation of interdisciplinary specialists with operational units help to mitigate perceived or actual barriers to care-seeking, factors that may contribute to long-term morbidity [
68]. This recommendation, while salient for past conflicts, will be increasingly important in future conflicts where long latencies before a casualty is transported are anticipated [
69].
Consistent with patient-centered care, routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes, including QOL, should be utilized when caring for military members following injury. Quantifying QOL throughout the healing process and during rehabilitation may provide critical information regarding outcomes of importance to the patient. Clinicians, regardless of specialty, should consider the whole patient for physical, psychological, and cognitive impairment when caring for this population. In addition to standard assessments that may be identified in a healthcare system, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System may also be a useful resource for identifying assessments for a variety and range of problems (e.g., depressed mood, sleep, and pain), and assessing health-related QOL based on changes in physical and mental health [
70].
There are limitations to this analysis. The clustering method used is exploratory in nature and, thus, no causality can be inferred. Results should be replicated using a longitudinal and multivariate approach. Outpatient ICD-9-CM codes were only available for those who presented for care at a military treatment facility. As such, individuals who were self-treating or who received care outside of the Department of Defense may have been missed in the analysis. In addition, the QOL analysis was univariate only, and future studies should examine possible confounders in multivariable analysis. Further, there is potential for selection bias in this study in that participants may not be representative of the larger blast-injured population. Nevertheless, WWRP non-responders have been shown to be similar to responders across most variables with the exception of age (i.e., responders tend to be older) [
44]. Lastly, the study period was long, and there may be relevant variables unaccounted for during the period between injury event and QOL measurement (e.g., changes in financial status, social support).
This study also had strengths that warrant mention. The use of the EMED allowed for the selection of a large sample of individuals with blast-related injuries and ISS from the point of injury. Although outpatient ICD-9-CM codes in this study have their inherent limitations (e.g., dependence on patient presenting for health services), their use in predicting long-term patient-reported outcomes such as QOL may prove useful for targeting clinical interventions. Categorizing ICD-9-CM codes in CCS made use of a validated method for analyzing large data sets. Using QOL as the outcome measure was a comprehensive way to assess long-term health status, and its multifaceted nature aligned appropriately with the focus on multimorbidity.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.