nach oben

Current Anesthesiology Reports

Erschienen in:

06.04.2023 | Computer-Assisted Anesthesia Management (A Joosten, Section Editor)

On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology

verfasst von: Sherwin C. Davoud, Vesela P. Kovacheva

Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current research and critically examine artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and their applicability to the daily practice of anesthesiologists.

Recent Findings

Novel AI tools are developed using data from electronic health records, imaging, waveforms, clinical notes, and wearables. These tools can accurately predict the perioperative risk for adverse outcomes, the need for blood transfusion, and the risk of difficult intubation. Intraoperatively, AI models can assist with technical skill augmentation, patient monitoring, and management. Postoperatively, AI technology can aid in preventing complications and discharge planning. While further prospective validation is needed, these early applications demonstrate promise in every area of perioperative care.

Summary

The practice of anesthesiology is at a precipice fueled by technological innovation. The clinical AI implementation would enable personalized and safer patient care by offering actionable insights from the wealth of perioperative data.

Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology. History of Anesthesia; 2023. https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/history-of-anesthesia/. Accessed January 17, 2023.

Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ. AI in health and medicine. Nat Med. 2022;28:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0.CrossRefPubMed

Grand View Research. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-healthcare-market; 2022. Accessed January 10, 2023.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA-approved A.I.-based algorithms; https://medicalfuturist.com/fda-approved-ai-based-algorithms/. Accessed January 10, 2023.

Connor CW. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:1346–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002694.CrossRefPubMed

Horvath B, Kloesel B, Todd MM, et al. The evolution, current value, and future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:904–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003947.CrossRefPubMed

Ferrari L, Leahy I, Staffa SJ, Berry JG. The pediatric-specific American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score: a multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:807–17. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005025.CrossRefPubMed

Silveira SQ, da Silva LM, Gomes RF, et al. An evaluation of the accuracy and self-reported confidence of clinicians in using the ASA-PS classification system. J Clin Anesth. 2022;79:110794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110794.CrossRefPubMed

• Zhong H, Thor P, Illescas A, et al. An overview of commonly used data sources in observational research in anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:548–58. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005880. Excellent review of the commonly used sources for big data in anesthesiology research.CrossRefPubMed

10.

• Abdel-Kader AK, Eisenkraft JB, Katz DJ. Overview and limitations of database research in anesthesiology: a narrative review. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:1012–22. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005346. A comprehensive narrative review of the large-scale databases for research in anesthesiology with a discussion on the advantages and limitations of their use and information about their access and cost.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D. Statistical development and validation of clinical prediction models. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003871.CrossRefPubMed

12.

•• Bonde A, Varadarajan KM, Bonde N, et al. Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e471–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00084-4. The largest retrospective study demonstrating the efficacy of a neural network model designed to predict postoperative complications outperformed the currently established surgical risk prediction tools.CrossRefPubMed

13.

MacKay EJ, Stubna MD, Chivers C, et al. Application of machine learning approaches to administrative claims data to predict clinical outcomes in medical and surgical patient populations. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0252585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Choi B, Oh AR, Lee SH et al. Prediction model for 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery using machine-learning techniques based on preoperative evaluation of electronic medical records. J Clin Med 2022; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216487.

15.

Xue B, Li D, Lu C, et al. Use of machine learning to develop and evaluate models using preoperative and intraoperative data to identify risks of postoperative complications. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e212240. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Chen PF, Chen L, Lin YK, et al. Predicting postoperative mortality with deep neural networks and natural language processing: model development and validation. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10:e38241. https://doi.org/10.2196/38241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Yan X, Goldsmith J, Mohan S, et al. Impact of intraoperative data on risk prediction for mortality after intra-abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:102–13. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

•• Suh HS, Tully JL, Meineke MN, et al. Identification of preanesthetic history elements by a natural language processing engine. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:1162–71. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006152. A proof-of-concept study that utilized an NLP pipeline to extract medical conditions relevant to pre-anesthetic evaluation from unstructured free-text input.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

•• Lou SS, Liu H, Lu C, et al. Personalized surgical transfusion risk prediction using machine learning to guide preoperative type and screen orders. Anesthesiology. 2022;137:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004139. A large, well-designed study that developed a machine learning prediction model to predict surgical transfusion using both patient and surgery-specific variables and tailored it to guide decision-making regarding preoperative type and screen orders. This model outperformed the established standard of care based only on surgery-specific factors.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Wang Z, Zhe S, Zimmerman J, et al. Development and validation of a machine learning method to predict intraoperative red blood cell transfusions in cardiothoracic surgery. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05445-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

• Lee SM, Lee G, Kim TK, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for need for massive transfusion during surgery using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2246637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46637. A pilot study showing the feasibility of a real-time deep learning model in predicting, up to 10 min in advance, the likelihood of massive transfusion using preoperative and intraoperative data.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:429–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200508000-00027.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zhou CM, Wang Y, Xue Q, et al. Predicting difficult airway intubation in thyroid surgery using multiple machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Front Public Health. 2022;10:937471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.937471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Connor CW, Segal S. Accurate classification of difficult intubation by computerized facial analysis. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820098d6.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Connor CW, Segal S. The importance of subjective facial appearance on the ability of anesthesiologists to predict difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:419–27. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000012.CrossRefPubMed

26.

• Tavolara TE, Gurcan MN, Segal S, Niazi MKK. Identification of difficult to intubate patients from frontal face images using an ensemble of deep learning models. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104737. An interesting pilot study that calls to attention the utility of deep learning models in using patient features such as facial appearance using frontal face images to predict difficult intubation.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Matava C, Pankiv E, Raisbeck S, et al. A convolutional neural network for real time classification, identification, and labelling of vocal cord and tracheal using laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy video. J Med Syst. 2022;44:44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1481-4.CrossRef

28.

Li Y, Zheng X, Xie F, et al. Development and validation of the artificial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic model for bronchial lumen identification. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022;11:2261–74. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-761.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Zhao S, Xiao X, Zhang X, et al. Automated assessment system for neonatal endotracheal intubation using dilated convolutional neural network. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:5455–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Larkin HD. FDA approves artificial intelligence device for guiding regional anesthesia. JAMA. 2022;328:2101. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.20029.CrossRefPubMed

31.

• Bowness JS, Macfarlane AJR, Burckett-St Laurent D, et al. Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2023;130:226–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.049. This is the first study to directly compare ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia by non-expert anesthesiologists with and without an assistive AI device.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Sessler DI, Bloomstone JA, Aronson S, et al. Perioperative quality initiative consensus statement on intraoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:563–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.013.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Lee S, Lee HC, Chu YS, et al. Deep learning models for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126:808–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.035.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Choe S, Park E, Shin W, et al. Short-term event prediction in the operating room (STEP-OP) of five-minute intraoperative hypotension using hybrid deep learning: retrospective observational study and model development. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9:e31311. https://doi.org/10.2196/31311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, et al. Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300.CrossRefPubMed

36.

• Frassanito L, Sonnino C, Piersanti A, et al. Performance of the hypotension prediction index with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms in awake cesarean delivery patients under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:633–43. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005754. A small study of the hypotension prediction index that provided an accurate real-time and continuous prediction of impending intraoperative hypotension before its occurrence in awake pregnant patients under spinal anesthesia.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Davies SJ, Vistisen ST, Jian Z, et al. Ability of an arterial waveform analysis-derived hypotension prediction index to predict future hypotensive events in surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:352–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004121.CrossRefPubMed

38.

• Kouz K, Brockmann L, Timmermann LM, et al. Endotypes of intraoperative hypotension during major abdominal surgery: a retrospective machine learning analysis of an observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.056. A pilot study that used machine learning to identify different mechanisms associated with intraoperative hypotension. If validated, these results may enable causal treatment of intraoperative hypotension.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1346–57. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Struys MM, De Smet T, Glen JI, et al. The history of target-controlled infusion. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001008.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Maheshwari K, Malhotra G, Bao X, et al. Assisted fluid management software guidance for intraoperative fluid administration. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:273–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003790.CrossRefPubMed

42.

•• Joosten A, Rinehart J, Van der Linden P, et al. Computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management reduces intraoperative hypotension in intermediate- and high-risk surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:258–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003807. A pilot study that investigated the use of computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management consisting of a combination of a closed-loop system for vasopressor administration and a decision-support system for bolus fluid administration. The novel system significantly reduced intraoperative hypotension compared to the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lee HC, Ryu HG, Chung EJ, Jung CW. Prediction of bispectral index during target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil: a deep learning approach. Anesthesiology. 2018;128:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001892.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Connor CW. Open reimplementation of the BIS algorithms for depth of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:855–64. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006119.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Absalom AR, Glen JI, Zwart GJ, et al. Target-controlled infusion: a mature technology. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001009.CrossRefPubMed

46.

• Mathis MR, Engoren MC, Williams AM, et al. Prediction of postoperative deterioration in cardiac surgery patients using electronic health record and physiologic waveform data. Anesthesiology. 2022;137:586–601. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004345. The first study to demonstrate machine learning–based prediction models for postoperative hemodynamic deterioration using discrete electronic health record and continuous physiologic waveform data.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Palla K, Hyland SL, Posner K, et al. Intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit hypotension. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:623–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.052.CrossRefPubMed

48.

• Safavi KC, Deng H, Driscoll W, et al. A Remote surveillance platform to monitor general care ward surgical patients for acute physiologic deterioration. Anesth Analg. 2021;133:933–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005530. A study demonstrating the potential of a remote surveillance software program that continually and automatically monitors physiologic data streams from the electronic health record and alerts multidisciplinary providers for acute changes in the patient's condition.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

•• Eddahchouri Y, Peelen RV, Koeneman M, et al. Effect of continuous wireless vital sign monitoring on unplanned ICU admissions and rapid response team calls: a before-and-after study. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:857–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.036. Single center before-and-after study showing that medical patients wearing wireless continuous vital sign monitoring had fewer unplanned ICU admissions than those without.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Klemt C, Uzosike AC, Esposito JG, et al. The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04526-x.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Song BM, Lu Y, Wilbur RR, et al. Machine learning model identifies increased operative time and greater BMI as predictors for overnight admission after outpatient hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021;3:e1981–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Karhade AV, Schwab JH, Bedair HS. Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of sustained postoperative opioid prescriptions after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2272–22772271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.013.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Katakam A, Karhade AV, Schwab JH, et al. Development and validation of machine learning algorithms for postoperative opioid prescriptions after TKA. J Orthop. 2020;22:95–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.052.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Klemt C, Tirumala V, Habibi Y, et al. The utilization of artificial neural networks for the prediction of 90-day unplanned readmissions following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04566-3.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Gabriel RA, Harjai B, Simpson S, et al. Machine learning-based models predicting outpatient surgery end time and recovery room discharge at an ambulatory surgery center. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:159–69. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Safavi KC, Khaniyev T, Copenhaver M, et al. Development and validation of a machine learning model to aid discharge processes for inpatient surgical care. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1917221. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Obermeyer ZN, R. Stern, M. Eaneff, S. Bembeneck, E. Mullainathan, S. Algorithmic bias playbook. Center for Applied AI at Chicago Booth; 2021.

59.

Hernandez-Boussard T, Bozkurt S, Ioannidis JPA, Shah NH. MINIMAR (minimum information for medical AI reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:2011–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2022;26:1364–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x.CrossRef

61.

Armero W, Gray KJ, Fields KG, et al. A survey of pregnant patients’ perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;30:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac200.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Khullar D, Casalino LP, Qian Y, et al. Perspectives of patients about artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2210309. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Civaner MM, Uncu Y, Bulut F, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03852-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Arora A. Artificial intelligence: a new frontier for anaesthesiology training. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e407–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.049.CrossRefPubMed

65.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles; 2021. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles. Accessed January 10, 2023.

66.

Cohen IG, Evgeniou T, Gerke S, Minssen T. The European artificial intelligence strategy: implications and challenges for digital health. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e376–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30112-6.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology
verfasst von: Sherwin C. Davoud
Vesela P. Kovacheva
Publikationsdatum: 06.04.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports / Ausgabe 2/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00558-0

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Beutel versus Maschine: Beste Beatmungstechnik bei Herzstillstand gesucht

02.05.2024 Kardiopulmonale Reanimation Nachrichten

Stehen die Chancen auf eine Rückkehr der Spontanzirkulation nach Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand bei manueller oder maschineller Beatmung besser? Und unterscheidet sich das neurologische Outcome nach der Reanimation? Das belgische Herzstillstand-Register liefert die Daten für einen direkten Vergleich zwischen Beutel und Beatmungsgerät.

Tipps für den Umgang mit Behandlungsfehlern

01.05.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis es zu einem Zwischenfall kommt und ein Behandlungsfehler passiert. Doch wenn Ärztinnen und Ärzte gut vorbereitet sind, schaffen es alle Beteiligten den Umständen entsprechend gut durch diese Krise.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Beutel versus Maschine: Beste Beatmungstechnik bei Herzstillstand gesucht

Tipps für den Umgang mit Behandlungsfehlern

Update AINS

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Computer-Assisted Fluid Therapy

Sedating Pregnant Patients for Minimally Invasive Fetal Interventions

Postpartum Neuropathies

What Is the Current Status of Global Health Training for US Postgraduate Trainees in Anesthesiology? What Are Possible Visions for the Future?

Nitrous Oxide — Application in Modern Anesthesia

Neonatal Resuscitation in Delivery Room: Current Trends and Guidelines in 2022

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Beutel versus Maschine: Beste Beatmungstechnik bei Herzstillstand gesucht

Tipps für den Umgang mit Behandlungsfehlern

Update AINS