nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2017 | Review Article

Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature

verfasst von: Farshid Amirabdollahian, Salvatore Livatino, Behrad Vahedi, Radhika Gudipati, Patrick Sheen, Shan Gawrie-Mohan, Nikhil Vasdev

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.

Akinbiyi T, Reiley CE, Saha S et al (2006) Dynamic augmented reality for sensory substitution in robot-assisted surgical systems. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS’06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, pp 567–570

Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg J-U et al (2013) Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:266–280PubMedCrossRef

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Maddahi Y, Ghasemloonia A, Zareinia K, Sepehri N, Sutherland GR (2016) Quantifying force and positional frequency bands in neurosurgical tasks. J Robot Surg 10:97–102PubMedCrossRef

Maddahi Y, Zareinia K, Gan LS, Sutherland C, Lama S, Sutherland GR (2016) Treatment of glioma using neuroArm surgical system. BioMed Res Int 2016:1–8CrossRef

Solodova RF, Galatenko VV, Nakashidze ER et al (2016) Instrumental tactile diagnostics in robot-assisted surgery. Med Devices (Auckland, NZ) 9:377

Hadavand M, Mirbagheri A, Behzadipour S, Farahmand F (2014) A novel remote center of motion mechanism for the force-reflective master robot of haptic tele-surgery systems. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:129–139CrossRef

Craig JC (1985) Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. J Acoust Soc Am 77:238–246PubMedCrossRef

Watanabe T, Fukui S (1995) A method for controlling tactile sensation of surface roughness using ultrasonic vibration. In: 1995 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 1995. Proceedings, vol 1. IEEE, pp 1134–1139

10.

Takasaki M, Nara T, Tachi S, Higuchi T (2000) A tactile display using surface acoustic wave. In: 9th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2000. RO-MAN 2000. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 364–367

11.

Ikei Y, Wakamatsu K, Fukuda S (1997) Texture presentation by vibratory tactile display-image based presentation of a tactile texture. In: Virtual reality annual international symposium, 1997. IEEE, 199–205

12.

Benali-Khoudja M, Hafez M, Alexandre J-M, Kheddar A (2004) Tactile interfaces: a state-of-the-art survey. In: Int. symposium on robotics, vol 31. Citeseer, pp 23–26

13.

Minamizawa K, Fukamachi S, Kajimoto H, Kawakami N, Tachi S (2007) Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. ACM, p 8

14.

Tsagarakis NG, Horne T, Caldwell DG (2005) Slip aestheasis: a portable 2d slip/skin stretch display for the fingertip. In: Eurohaptics conference, 2005 and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, 2005. World Haptics 2005. First Joint. IEEE, pp 214–219

15.

Solazzi M, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M (2010) Design of a cutaneous fingertip display for improving haptic exploration of virtual objects. In: RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE. IEEE, pp 1–6

16.

Bau O, Poupyrev I, Israr A, Harrison C (2010) TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, pp 283–292

17.

Kuchenbecker K, Gewirtz J, McMahan W et al (2010) VerroTouch: high-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. In: Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations, pp 189–196

18.

Tezuka M, Kitamura N, Miki N (2015) Micro-needle electro-tactile display. In: 37th annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, pp 5781–5784

19.

King C, Higa AT, Culjat MO et al (2006) A pneumatic haptic feedback actuator array for robotic surgery or simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 125:217

20.

Prattichizzo D, Chinello F, Pacchierotti C, Malvezzi M (2013) Towards wearability in fingertip haptics: a 3-dof wearable device for cutaneous force feedback. IEEE Trans Haptics 6:506–516PubMedCrossRef

21.

Pacchierotti C, Chinello F, Malvezzi M, Meli L, Prattichizzo D (2012) Two finger grasping simulation with cutaneous and kinesthetic force feedback. In: International conference on human haptic sensing and touch enabled computer applications. Springer, pp 373–382

22.

Pacchierotti C, Tirmizi A, Prattichizzo D (2014) Improving transparency in teleoperation by means of cutaneous tactile force feedback. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 11:4

23.

Pacchierotti C, Chinello F, Prattichizzo D (2012) Cutaneous device for teleoperated needle insertion. In: 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), 2012. IEEE, pp 32–37

24.

Fearing RS (1990) Tactile sensing mechanisms. Int J Robot Res 9:3–23CrossRef

25.

Trejos AL, Jayender J, Perri MT, Naish MD, Patel RV, Malthaner RA (2009) Robot-assisted tactile sensing for minimally invasive tumor localization. Int J Robot Res 28:1118–1133CrossRef

26.

Minamizawa K, Prattichizzo D, Tachi S (2010) Simplified design of haptic display by extending one-point kinesthetic feedback to multipoint tactile feedback. In: Haptics symposium, 2010 IEEE. IEEE, pp 257–260

27.

Nikhil Vasdev, Conrad Bishop, Atoine Kass-Iliyya et al (2013) Developing a robotic prostatectomy service and a robotic fellowship programme-defining the learning curve. Curr Urol 7:136–144CrossRef

28.

Bowes D, Hall T, Beecham S (2012) SLuRp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver valid and rigorous results. In: The 2nd international workshop on evidential assessment of software technologies

S1.

Abolhassani N, Patel RV (2009) Teleoperated master–slave needle insertion. Int J Med Robot 5:398–405PubMedCrossRef

S2.

Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:331–336PubMedCrossRef

S3.

Akinbiyi T, Reiley CE, Saha S et al (2006) Dynamic augmented reality for sensory substitution in robot-assisted surgical systems. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:567–570PubMed

S4.

Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA (2015) Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 12:727–735PubMedCrossRef

S5.

Banks SA (2009) Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 38:23–27PubMed

S6.

Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M et al (2004) Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:191–195PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S7.

Beyl T, Nicolai P, Monnich H, Raczkowksy J, Worn H (2012) Haptic feedback in OP: sense-augmented reality in telemanipulated robotic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 173:58–63PubMed

S8.

Bhattacharjee T, Son HI, Lee DY (2008) Haptic control with environment force estimation for telesurgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:3241–3244PubMed

S9.

Bianchi M, Gwilliam JC, Degirmenci A, Okamura AM (2011) Characterization of an air jet haptic lump display. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:3467–3470PubMed

S10.

Bornhoft JM, Strabala KW, Wortman TD, Lehman AC, Oleynikov D, Farritor SM (2011) Stereoscopic visualization and haptic technology used to create a virtual environment for remote surgery—biomed 2011. Biomed Sci Instrum 47:76–81PubMed

S11.

Bowyer SA, Rodriguez Y, Baena F (2014) Deformation invariant bounding spheres for dynamic active constraints in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228:350–361PubMedCrossRef

S12.

Cabuk B, Ceylan S, Anik I, Tugasaygi M, Kizir S (2015) A haptic guided robotic system for endoscope positioning and holding. Turk Neurosurg 25:601–607PubMed

S13.

Cannon JW, Howe RD, Dupont PE, Triedman JK, Marx GR, Nido PJ (2003) Application of robotics in congenital cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 6:72–83PubMedCrossRef

S14.

Choi C, Kim J, Han H, Ahn B, Kim J (2009) Graphic and haptic modelling of the oesophagus for VR-based medical simulation. Int J Med Robot 5:257–266PubMedCrossRef

S15.

Chowriappa A, Raza SJ, Fazili A et al (2015) Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 115:336–345PubMedCrossRef

S16.

Comparetti MD, Vaccarella A, Dyagilev I, Shoham M, Ferrigno G, De Momi E (2012) Accurate multi-robot targeting for keyhole neurosurgery based on external sensor monitoring. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 226:347–359PubMedCrossRef

S17.

Cruces RA, Wahrburg J (2007) Improving robot arm control for safe and robust haptic cooperation in orthopaedic procedures. Int J Med Robot 3:316–322PubMedCrossRef

S18.

Culmer P, Barrie J, Hewson R et al (2012) Reviewing the technological challenges associated with the development of a laparoscopic palpation device. Int J Med Robot 8:146–159PubMedCrossRef

S19.

Cundy TP, Gattas NE, Yang GZ, Darzi A, Najmaldin AS (2014) Experience related factors compensate for haptic loss in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol 28:532–538PubMedCrossRef

S20.

De Lorenzo D, Koseki Y, De Momi E, Chinzei K, Okamura AM (2013) Coaxial needle insertion assistant with enhanced force feedback. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60:379–389PubMedCrossRef

S21.

De Lorenzo D, De Momi E, Dyagilev I et al (2011) Force feedback in a piezoelectric linear actuator for neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot 7:268–275PubMed

S22.

De Momi E, Ferrigno G (2010) Robotic and artificial intelligence for keyhole neurosurgery: the ROBOCAST project, a multi-modal autonomous path planner. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 224:715–727PubMedCrossRef

S23.

Devarajan V, Wang X, Shen Y et al (2006) A novel laparoscopic mesh placement part task trainer. Int J Med Robot 2:312–320PubMedCrossRef

S24.

Diaz I, Gil JJ, Louredo M (2014) A haptic pedal for surgery assistance. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 116:97–104CrossRef

S25.

Val I, Loureiro C, McCulloch P (2015) The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy. Int J Surg 19:104–111CrossRef

S26.

Ehrampoosh S, Dave M, Kia MA, Rablau C, Zadeh MH (2013) Providing haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a direct optical force-sensing solution for haptic rendering of deformable bodies. Comput Aided Surg 18:129–141PubMedCrossRef

S27.

Falkenback D, Lehane CW, Lord RV (2015) Robot-assisted oesophageal and gastric surgery for benign disease: antireux operations and Heller’s myotomy. ANZ J Surg 85:113–120PubMedCrossRef

S28.

Fichera L, Pardo D, Illiano P, Ortiz J, Caldwell DG, Mattos LS (2016) Online estimation of laser incision depth for transoral microsurgery: approach and preliminary evaluation. Int J Med Robot 12:53–61PubMedCrossRef

S29.

Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A (2013) Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot 9:396–406PubMedCrossRef

S30.

Fujiwara K, Fukuhara T, Niimi K et al (2015) Mechanical evaluation of newly developed mouth-piece using polyethylene terephthalate glycol for transoral robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 9:347–354PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S31.

Fujiwara K, Fukuhara T, Niimi K, Sato T, Kitano H (2015) Load evaluation of the da Vinci surgical system for transoral robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 9:315–319PubMedCrossRef

S32.

Gosling T, Westphal R, Hufner T et al (2005) Robot-assisted fracture reduction: a preliminary study in the femur shaft. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:115–120PubMedCrossRef

S33.

Tholey G, Chanthasopeephan T, Hu T, Desai JP, Lau A (2003) Measuring grasping and cutting forces for reality-based haptic modeling. In: International congress series. fCARSg 2003. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Proceedings of the 17th international congress and exhibition, vol, 1256, pp 794–800

S34.

S35.

Hadavand M, Mirbagheri A, Salarieh H, Farahmand F (2011) Design of a force-reflective master robot for haptic telesurgery applications: RoboMaster1. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:7037–7040PubMed

S36.

Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P (2008) Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:1505–1508PubMedCrossRef

S37.

Halic T, Sankaranarayanan G, De S (2010) GPU-based efficient realistic techniques for bleeding and smoke generation in surgical simulators. Int J Med Robot 6:431–443PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S38.

Houston K, Sieber A, Eder C, Tonet O, Menciassi A, Dario P (2007) Novel haptic tool and input device for real time bilateral biomanipulation addressing endoscopic surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007:198–201PubMed

S39.

Hu T, Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE (2004) Evaluation of a laparoscopic grasper with force feedback. Surg Endosc 18:863–867PubMed

S40.

Hu Z, Sun W, Zhang B (2013) Characterization of aortic tissue cutting process: experimental investigation using porcine ascending aorta. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 18:81–89PubMedCrossRef

S41.

Huart A, Facca S, Lebailly F, Garcia JC, Liverneaux PA (2012) Are pedicled flaps feasible in robotic surgery? Report of an anatomical study of the kite flap in conventional surgery versus robotic surgery. Surg Innov 19:89–92PubMedCrossRef

S42.

Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Marcus HJ et al (2014) Augmented reality partial nephrectomy: examining the current status and future perspectives. Urology 83:266–273PubMedCrossRef

S43.

Jacob BP, Gagner M (2003) Robotics and general surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1405–1419PubMedCrossRef

S44.

Johnson PJ, Schmidt DE, Duvvuri U (2014) Output control of da Vinci surgical system’s surgical graspers. J Surg Res 186:56–62PubMedCrossRef

S45.

Jung H, Lee DY, Ahn W (2012) Real-time deformation of colon and endoscope for colonoscopy simulation. Int J Med Robot 8:273–281PubMedCrossRef

S46.

Katz RD, Taylor JA, Rosson GD, Brown PR, Singh NK (2006) Robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: use of a telemanipulator slave robot to perform microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 22:53–57PubMedCrossRef

S47.

Khan F, Pearle A, Lightcap C, Boland PJ, Healey JH (2013) Haptic robot-assisted surgery improves accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:851–859PubMedCrossRef

S48.

King CH, Culjat MO, Franco ML, Bisley JW, Dutson E, Grundfest WS (2008) Optimization of a pneumatic balloon tactile display for robot-assisted surgery based on human perception. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:2593–2600PubMedCrossRef

S49.

King CH, Higa AT, Culjat MO et al (2007) A pneumatic haptic feedback actuator array for robotic surgery or simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 125:217–222PubMed

S50.

Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, Yuh DD (2005) Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:151–158PubMedCrossRef

S51.

Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, Bethea BT, Yuh DD (2004) Effect of sensory substitution on suture manipulation forces for surgical teleoperation. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:157–163PubMed

S52.

Kobayashi Y, Moreira P, Liu C, Poignet P, Zemiti N, Fujie MG (2011) Haptic feedback control in medical robots through fractional viscoelastic tissue model. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:6704–6708PubMed

S53.

Koehn JK, Kuchenbecker KJ (2015) Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 29:2970–2983PubMedCrossRef

S54.

Kuang W, Shin PR, Oder M, Thomas AJ (2005) Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy: a two-layer technique in an animal model. Urology 65:811–814PubMedCrossRef

S55.

Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, Thomas AJ (2004) Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol 171:300–303PubMedCrossRef

S56.

Kumar R, Yadav R, Kolla SB (2007) Simultaneous bilateral robot-assisted dismembered pyelo-plasties for bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: technique and literature review. J Endourol 21:750–753PubMedCrossRef

S57.

Kwok KW, Tsoi KH, Vitiello V et al (2013) Dimensionality reduction in controlling articulated snake robot for endoscopy under dynamic active constraints. IEEE Trans Robot 29:15–31PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S58.

Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ et al (2011) Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1296–1299PubMedCrossRef

S59.

Le Roux PD, Das H, Esquenazi S, Kelly PJ (2001) Robot-assisted microsurgery: a feasibility study in the rat. Neurosurgery 48:584–589PubMedCrossRef

S60.

Lee DH, Choi J, Park JW et al (2009) An implementation of sensor-based force feedback in a compact laparoscopic surgery robot. ASAIO J 55:83–85PubMedCrossRef

S61.

Lee SL, Lerotic M, Vitiello V et al (2010) From medical images to minimally invasive intervention: Computer assistance for robotic surgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 34:33–45PubMedCrossRef

S62.

Li M, Konstantinova J, Secco EL et al (2015) Using visual cues to enhance haptic feedback for palpation on virtual model of soft tissue. Med Biol Eng Comput 53:1177–1186PubMedCrossRef

S63.

Li M, Liu H, Jiang A et al (2014) Intra-operative tumour localisation in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228:509–522PubMedCrossRef

S64.

Li X, Gu L, Zhang S et al (2008) Hierarchical spatial hashing-based collision detection and hybrid collision response in a haptic surgery simulator. Int J Med Robot 4:77–86PubMedCrossRef

S65.

Lim SC, Lee HK, Park J (2015) Role of combined tactile and kinesthetic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 11(3):360–374

S66.

Liu J, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2006) Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration. J Neuroeng Rehabil 3:20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S67.

Liu Y, Wang S, Hu SJ, Qiu W (2009) Mechanical analysis of end-to-end silk-sutured anastomosis for robot-assisted surgery. Int J Med Robot 5:444–451PubMedCrossRef

S68.

Maciel A, Halic T, Lu Z, Nedel LP, De S (2009) Using the PhysX engine for physics-based virtual surgery with force feedback. Int J Med Robot 5:341–353PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S69.

Maciel A, Liu Y, Ahn W, Singh TP, Dunnican W, De S (2008) Development of the VBLaST: a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer. Int J Med Robot 4:131–138PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S70.

Maddahi Y, Gan LS, Zareinia K, Lama S, Sepehri N, Sutherland GR (2016) Quantifying workspace and forces of surgical dissection during robot-assisted neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot 12:528–537PubMedCrossRef

S71.

Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Cundy TP, Yang GZ, Darzi A, Nandi D (2015) da Vinci robot-assisted keyhole neurosurgery: a cadaver study on feasibility and safety. Neurosurg Rev 38:367–371PubMedCrossRef

S72.

Marecik SJ, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Jan A, Chaudhry V (2008) Evaluation of midlevel and upper-level residents performing their first robotic-sutured intestinal anastomosis. Am J Surg 195:333–337PubMedCrossRef

S73.

Masjedi M, Tan WL, Jaskaranjit S, Aqil A, Harris S, Cobb J (2013) Use of robotic technology in cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery. Int J Med Robot 9:23–28PubMedCrossRef

S74.

McBeth PB, Louw DF, Rizun PR, Sutherland GR (2004) Robotics in neurosurgery. Am J Surg 188:68S–75SPubMedCrossRef

S75.

Meli L, Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D (2014) Sensory subtraction in robot-assisted surgery: fingertip skin deformation feedback to ensure safety and improve transparency in bimanual haptic interaction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:1318–1327PubMedCrossRef

S76.

Moglia A, Turini G, Ferrari V, Ferrari M, Mosca F (2011) Patient specific surgical simulator for the evaluation of the movability of bimanual robotic arms. Stud Health Technol Inform 163:379–385PubMed

S77.

Mohammadzadeh N, Safdari R (2014) Robotic surgery in cancer care: opportunities and challenges. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15:1081–1083PubMedCrossRef

S78.

Mojra A, Najarian S, Towliat Kashani SM, Panahi F, Yaghmaei M (2011) A novel haptic robotic viscogram for characterizing the viscoelastic behaviour of breast tissue in clinical examinations. Int J Med Robot 7:282–292PubMed

S79.

Moscarelli M, Harling L, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Casula R (2015) Challenges facing totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Med Robot 11:18–29PubMedCrossRef

S80.

Mozer P, Troccaz J, Stoianovici D (2009) Urologic robots and future directions. Curr Opin Urol 19:114–119PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S81.

Mylonas GP, Kwok KW, James DR et al (2012) Gaze-Contingent Motor Channelling, haptic constraints and associated cognitive demand for robotic. MIS Med Image Anal 16:612–631PubMedCrossRef

S82.

Nawrat Z, Podsedkowski L, Mianowski K et al (2003) Robin Heart 2003—present state of the Polish telemanipulator project for cardiac surgery assistance. Int J Artif Organs 26:1115–1119PubMedCrossRef

S83.

Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2011) The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 22:196–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S84.

Ohnishi K, Shimono T, Natori K (2012) Development of real-world haptic technology. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 39:1035–1038PubMed

S85.

Okamura AM (2009) Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 19:102–107PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S86.

Okamura AM (2004) Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Ind Robot 31:499–508CrossRef

S87.

Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D, Kuchenbecker KJ (2016) Cutaneous feedback of fingertip deformation and vibration for palpation in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63:278–287PubMedCrossRef

S88.

Pan JJ, Chang J, Yang X et al (2015) Virtual reality training and assessment in laparoscopic rectum surgery. Int J Med Robot 11:194–209PubMedCrossRef

S89.

Pan JJ, Chang J, Yang X et al (2011) Graphic and haptic simulation system for virtual laparoscopic rectum surgery. Int J Med Robot 7:304–317PubMed

S90.

Park JW, Choi J, Park Y, Sun K (2011) Haptic virtual fixture for robotic cardiac catheter navigation. Artif Organs 35:1127–1131PubMedCrossRef

S91.

Park JW, Choi J, Pak HN et al (2010) Development of a force-reflecting robotic platform for cardiac catheter navigation. Artif Organs 34:1034–1039PubMedCrossRef

S92.

Paul L, Cartiaux O, Docquier PL, Banse X (2009) Ergonomic evaluation of 3D plane positioning using a mouse and a haptic device. Int J Med Robot 5:435–443PubMedCrossRef

S93.

Pearle AD, O’Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO (2010) Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:230–237PubMedCrossRef

S94.

Perri MT, Trejos AL, Naish MD, Patel RV, Malthaner RA (2010) New tactile sensing system for minimally invasive surgical tumour localization. Int J Med Robot 6:211–220PubMed

S95.

Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kupper-smith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20:1327–1332PubMedCrossRef

S96.

Pisla D, Gherman B, Plitea N et al (2011) PARASURG hybrid parallel robot for minimally invasive surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 106:619–625

S97.

Pisla D, Plitea N, Vaida C et al (2010) PARAMIS parallel robot for laparoscopic surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 105:677–683

S98.

Pow-Sang J (2008) Pure and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technology and techniques merge to improve outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8:15–19PubMedCrossRef

S99.

Punak S, Kurenov S (2012) A simple master–slave control mapping setup to learn robot-assisted surgery manipulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 173:356–358PubMed

S100.

Rassweiler J, Safi KC, Subotic S, Teber D, Frede T (2005) Robotics and telesurgery—an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:109–122PubMedCrossRef

S101.

Reiley CE, Akinbiyi T, Burschka D, Chang DC, Okamura AM, Yuh DD (2008) Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:196–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S102.

Reilink R, Kappers AM, Stramigioli S, Misra S (2013) Evaluation of robotically controlled advanced endoscopic instruments. Int J Med Robot 9:240–246PubMedCrossRef

S103.

Reilink R, Stramigioli S, Kappers AM, Misra S (2011) Evaluation of flexible endoscope steering using haptic guidance. Int J Med Robot 7:178–186PubMedCrossRef

S104.

Ricchiuti D, Cerone J, Shie S, Jetley A, Noe D, Kovacik M (2010) Diminished suture strength after robotic needle driver manipulation. J Endourol 24:1509–1513PubMedCrossRef

S105.

Rizun P, Gunn D, Cox B, Sutherland G (2006) Mechatronic design of haptic forceps for robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot 2:341–349PubMedCrossRef

S106.

Rossi A, Trevisani A, Zanotto V (2005) A telerobotic haptic system for minimally invasive stereotactic neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot 1:64–75PubMedCrossRef

S107.

Sangpradit K, Liu H, Dasgupta P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD (2011) Finite-element modeling of soft tissue rolling indentation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:3319–3327PubMedCrossRef

S108.

Schneider C, Baghani A, Rohling R, Salcudean S (2012) Remote ultrasound palpation for robotic interventions using absolute elastography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 15:42–49PubMed

S109.

Seifabadi R, Iordachita I, Fichtinger G (2012) Design of a teleoperated needle steering system for MRI-guided prostate interventions. Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatron 2012:793–798PubMedPubMedCentral

S110.

Sengul A, Elk M, Rognini G, Aspell JE, Bleuler H, Blanke O (2012) Extending the body to virtual tools using a robotic surgical interface: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. PLoS ONE. 7:e49473PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S111.

Shapiro Y, Wolf A (2010) Introducing haptic capabilities to a bone-mounted robot for intra-operative surface scanning. Int J Med Robot 6:444–453PubMedCrossRef

S112.

Shimachi S, Hirunyanitiwatna S, Fujiwara Y, Hashimoto A, Hakozaki Y (2008) Adapter for contact force sensing of the da Vinci robot. Int J Med Robot 4:121–130PubMedCrossRef

S113.

Simorov A, Otte RS, Kopietz CM, Oleynikov D (2012) Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery? Surg Endosc 26:2117–2125PubMedCrossRef

S114.

Son HI, Bhattacharjee T, Lee DY (2010) Estimation of environmental force for the haptic interface of robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot 6:221–230PubMed

S115.

Sun Z, Ang RY, Lim EW, Wang Z, Ho KY, Phee SJ (2011) Enhancement of a master–slave robotic system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Ann Acad Med Singap 40:223–230PubMed

S116.

Sutherland GR, Maddahi Y, Gan LS, Lama S, Zareinia K (2015) Robotics in the neurosurgical treatment of glioma. Surg Neurol Int 6:1–8CrossRef

S117.

Suzuki N, Hattori A, Ieiri S, Tomikawa M, Kenmotsu H, Hashizume M (2013) Formulation of wire control mechanism for surgical robot to create virtual reality environment aimed at conducting surgery inside the body. Stud Health Technol Inform 184:424–430PubMed

S118.

Tan N, Margolis DJ, McClure TD et al (2012) Radical prostatectomy: value of prostate MRI in surgical planning. Abdom Imaging 37:664–674PubMedCrossRef

S119.

Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M (2006) Multi-sensory force/deformation cues for stiffness characterization in soft-tissue palpation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:837–840PubMed

S120.

Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M (2006) Tool/tissue interaction feed-back modalities in robot-assisted lump localization. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:3854–3857PubMed

S121.

Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M (2005) Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector. Int J Med Robot 1:53–63PubMedCrossRef

S122.

Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Li JS, Kwon YM (2016) Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthro-plasty better restore native acetabular and femoral anatomy? Int J Med Robot 12:288–295PubMedCrossRef

S123.

Meijden OA, Schijven MP (2009) The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc 23:1180–1190PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S124.

Vanmulken DA, Spooren AI, Bongers HM, Seelen HA (2015) Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord 53:547–551PubMedCrossRef

S125.

Veras EJ, De Laurentis KJ, Dubey R (2008) Design and implementation of visual-haptic assistive control system for virtual rehabilitation exercise and teleoperation manipulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:4290–4293PubMed

S126.

Wang Z, Sun Z, Phee SJ (2013) Haptic feedback and control of a flexible surgical endoscopic robot. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 112:260–271PubMedCrossRef

S127.

Watanabe T, Abbasi AZ, Conditt MA et al (2014) In vivo kinematics of a robot-assisted uni- and multi-compartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 19:552–557PubMedCrossRef

S128.

Wedmid A, Llukani E, Lee DI (2011) Future perspectives in robotic surgery. BJU Int 108:1028–1036PubMedCrossRef

S129.

Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23:438–443PubMedCrossRef

S130.

Wu F, Chen X, Lin Y et al (2014) A virtual training system for maxillofacial surgery using advanced haptic feedback and immersive workbench. Int J Med Robot 10:78–87PubMedCrossRef

S131.

Xu Z, Song C, Wu W (2012) Haptic tracking control for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 29:407–410PubMed

S132.

Yamamoto T, Abolhassani N, Jung S, Okamura AM, Judkins TN (2012) Augmented reality and haptic interfaces for robot-assisted surgery. Int J Med Robot 8:45–56PubMedCrossRef

S133.

Ye D, Mozaffari-Naeini H, Busart C, Thakor NV (2005) MEMSurgery: an integrated test-bed for vascular surgery. Int J Med Robot 1:21–30PubMedCrossRef

S134.

Zareinia K, Maddahi Y, Ng C, Sepehri N, Sutherland GR (2015) Performance evaluation of haptic hand-controllers in a robot-assisted surgical system. Int J Med Robot 11:486–501PubMedCrossRef

S135.

Zhang D, Zhu Q, Xiong J, Wang L (2014) Dynamic virtual fixture on the Euclidean group for admittance-type manipulator in deforming environments. Biomed Eng Online 13:51PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

S136.

Zhang J, Wei W, Ding J, Roland JT, Manolidis S, Simaan N (2010) Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 31:1199–1206PubMedCrossRef

S137.

Zhao LC, Meeks JJ, Nadler RB (2009) Robotics in urologic surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol 61:331–339PubMed

S138.

Zhou C, Xie L, Shen X, Luo M, Wu Z, Gu L (2014) Cardiovascular-interventional-surgery virtual training platform and its preliminary evaluation. Int J Med Robot

S139.

Zorn KC (2008) Robotic radical prostatectomy: assurance of water-tight vesicourethral anastomotic closure with the Lapra-Ty clip. J. Endourol 22:863–865PubMedCrossRef

S140.

Barthel A, Trematerra D, Nasseri MA et al (2015) Haptic interface for robot-assisted ophthalmic surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:4906–4909PubMed

S141.

Tezuka M, Kitamura N, Miki N (2015) Micro-needle electro-tactile display. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:5781–5784PubMed

Titel: Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature
verfasst von: Farshid Amirabdollahian
Salvatore Livatino
Behrad Vahedi
Radhika Gudipati
Patrick Sheen
Shan Gawrie-Mohan
Nikhil Vasdev
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2017
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Features of haptic and tactile feedback in TORS-a comparison of available surgical systems

Re: Should every medical student have exposure to robotic surgery?

Prospective assessment of positioning-related pain in robotic urologic surgery

Visualization of endometriosis: comparative study of 3-dimensional robotic and 2-dimensional laparoscopic endoscopes

Retroauricular endoscopic and robotic versus conventional neck dissection for oral cancer

Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program?

Update Chirurgie