Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Residual cancer is a strong predictor of survival in T3 incidental gallbladder cancer

verfasst von: Chuan You, Mengyi Xie, Meng Ling, Facai Yang, Yinghe Qiu, Jingdong Li

Erschienen in: BMC Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background and purpose

Index cholecystectomy is insufficient for curing T3 incidental gallbladder cancer (IGC), and once residual cancer (RC) is found, the prognosis is often poor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of RC on the prognosis and the optimal choice of adjuvant therapy for R0 reresection patients with T3 IGC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with T3 IGC who underwent radical reresection from January 2013 to December 2018. RC was defined as histologically proven cancer at reresection. Demographics and tumour treatment-related variables were analysed in correlation with RC and survival. Adjuvant (Adj) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Of the 167 patients with IGC who underwent surgery, 102 underwent radical extended resection. Thirty-two (31.4%) RCs were found. Hepatic side tumours (T3h) and both side tumours (T3h + T3p) were associated with the presence of RC. In multivariate analysis, RC and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS (P < 0.05). RC was associated with a significantly shorter median OS (20 vs. 53 months; P < 0.01) and DFS (11 vs. 40 months; P < 0.001) despite R0 resection. For R0 reresection patients with RC and/or lymph node metastasis, Adj CRT significantly improved OS (P = 0.024).

Conclusion

Residual cancer and lymphatic metastasis are important factors for the poor prognosis of T3 IGC despite R0 resection, and these patients should actively receive adjuvant therapy.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12893-022-01869-5.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has an insidious onset, high malignancy and poor overall prognosis. Only one-fifth of patients are diagnosed early, and 80% are diagnosed with advanced disease [1]. Approximately half of the patients are found incidentally during or after elective or emergency cholecystectomy [2]. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been widely accepted as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of benign gallbladder disease, but with the application of laparoscopic techniques, especially in community hospitals, the diagnosis of IGC has greatly increased [3]. Index cholecystectomy is insufficient for curative treatment of IGC staged above T1b. A study suggested that RC is associated with poor outcomes in IGC [4]. IGC is curable after R0 extended resection, but definitive resection (including cholecystectomy, partial hepatectomy, and lymphadenectomy) is attained in only 43–63% of patients, and approximately 10–76% of these patients were found to have RC with the most common sites being the gallbladder fossa and lymph nodes [57]. Patients with T3 stage disease have the highest incidence of GBC, perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion, and the T3 stage is strongly associated with RC [7]. Studies have shown that surgical resection combined with adjuvant therapy can significantly improve the 3-year OS of GBC patients, but only approximately 30% of patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy after surgery [8]. To date, the need for adjuvant therapy after R0 extended resection remains controversial. Which patients can benefit from adjuvant therapy? This remains a question worth exploring. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of RC on the prognosis and the optimal choice of adjuvant therapy for R0 reresection patients with T3 IGC (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Materials and methods

Study population

Clinicopathological data of 167 patients with T3 GBC who underwent radical extended resection were collected from 2 major hepatobiliary centres between January 2013 and December 2018; Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China, n = 87), Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (Nanchong, China, n = 80). A clinical and histopathological diagnosis of T3 IGC and age ≥ 18 years old were used as inclusion criteria. To assess prognostic factors for IGC, we excluded the patients with the following characteristics: those with incomplete clinical and/or histopathological data (n = 18), those with exploratory laparotomy or unresectable tumours (n = 18), those with an indeterminate lymph node status (n = 7), those that had IGC combined with other tumours (n = 2), and those with rare histopathological subtypes other than adenocarcinoma (n = 11). Finally, 102 patients were included in this study. See Fig. 1. The study complied with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the patients and their families signed informed consent for the operation. The experimental protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College.

Definitions

IGC was defined as a gallbladder malignancy confirmed by histopathological examination after index cholecystectomy of a gallbladder disease initially diagnosed preoperatively or intraoperatively as benign. The “abdominal and hepatic sides” were defined according to the procedure of Shindoh J and colleagues [9]. RC is defined as tumour invasion confirmed by pathology at the liver, bile duct or adjacent tissue or organs after radical extended resection. R0 resection was defined as resection with macroscopically and microscopically tumour-free margins, and R1 resection was defined as resection with microscopically positive margins.

Resection procedures

IGC patients from different centres all underwent radical extended resection within 1–2 months after index cholecystectomy. The specific re-excision procedure is as follows: (1) Preoperative imaging assessment (PET-CT examination if necessary) suggested that the tumour was resectable, without distant and intra-abdominal metastasis; (2) Laparoscopy or laparotomy was performed after successful anaesthesia to redetermine the resectability of the tumour; (3) Radical resection of IGC included liver wedge resection or S4b + S5 segment liver resection or extensive liver resection (≥ 3 liver segments), resection of involved tissues or organs around the gallbladder, and regional lymphadenectomy; (4) The scope of regional lymphadenectomy included lymph nodes around the cystic duct and the hepatoduodenal ligament.

Follow-up

Clinical staging of IGC was performed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (8th edition). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and the chemotherapy regimen included capecitabine alone and gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin or tegafur. OS was defined as the time from the date of radical surgery to the date of death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. DFS from the date of radical resection to the date of recurrence or last follow-up.
OS was obtained by querying the patient's registered date of death, which was the most effective evaluation result of this study. DFS was obtained by screening serum CA199 levels and imaging to assess any suspected recurrent disease every three months for 2 years after surgery and every 6 months for > 2 years. The patient follow-ups started on the day of surgery and ended when the patient died or in December of 2019.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for analysis. Continuous variable data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or mean (interquartile range, IQR), and the comparison between groups was performed using the independent samples t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Enumeration data were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival rates were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. P < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinicopathological features

RC was found in 31.4% (32/102) of IGC patients after index cholecystectomy, with liver RC being the most common (81.3%, 26/32), followed by bile duct RC (18.8%, 6/32) and adjacent tissue or organ RC (9.4%, 3/32). The original tumour location was closely related to RC. The RC in patients with peritoneal-side tumours (T3p) was significantly lower than in patients with T3h or T3h + T3p (P < 0.05). Preoperative CA199 levels [36.3 (7.2–212.9) vs. 11.8 (6.7–20.7) U/ml, P = 0.027], surgery margin positivity (9.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.029), poorly differentiated tumour (40.6% vs. 17.1%, P < 0.05), lymph node positivity (46.9% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.034) and postoperative hospital stay [11 (9–15) vs. 10 (7–11) days, P = 0.034] in RC + patients were higher than those in RC− patients. The number of RC + patients undergoing extended cholecystectomy was significantly lower than that of RC− patients during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (15.6% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.022). There was no significant difference in other clinicopathological factors between the two groups. See Table 1.
Table 1
Comparison of Clinicopathologic Variables between Patients with RC− versus RC + 
Characteristics
All (n = 102)
RC +  (n = 32)
RC− (n = 70)
P value
Sex, n (%)
    
 Male
43 (42.2)
15 (46.9)
28 (40.0)
0.514
 Female
59 (57.8)
17 (53.1)
42 (60.0)
Age, mean ± SD, year
59 ± 11
61 ± 9
59 ± 11
0.271
CA19-9, median (IQR), U/ml
12.4 (6.8–40.1)
36.3 (7.2–212.9)
11.8 (6.7–20.7)
0.027
First cholecystectomy procedure
    
 Extended cholecystectomy
33 (32.4)
5 (15.6)
28 (40.0)
0.022
 Simple cholecystectomy
69 (67.6)
27 (84.4)
42 (60.0)
 
Tumour location*, n (%)
    
 Peritoneal side
76 (74.5)
6 (18.8)
70 (100)
 < 0.001
 Hepatic side
23 (22.5)
23 (71.9)
0
 Both sides
3 (2.9)
3 (9.4)
0
Surgical approach, n (%)
    
 Radical resection
93 (91.2)
28 (87.5)
65 (92.9)
0.456
 Extended resection
9 (8.8)
4 (12.5)
5 (7.1)
 Operation duration, mean ± SD, h
3.5 (3.0–4.0)
4.0 (3.5–4.5)
3.5 (3.0–4.0)
0.090
 Intraoperative blood loss, median (IQR), ml
300 (200–400)
300 (200–450)
300 (188–400)
0.166
Surgical Margin
    
 Positive
3 (2.9)
3 (9.4)
0
0.029
 Negative
99 (97.1)
29 (90.6)
70 (100)
Peripheral neurovascular invasion, n (%)
11 (9.8)
6 (18.8)
5 (7.1)
0.079
 No. of positive lymph node, median (IQR)
2 (1–4)
2 (1–4)
2 (1–3)
0.682
 No. of harvested lymph node, median (IQR)
5 (4–8)
6 (3–9)
5 (4–7)
0.166
Tumour differentiation grade, n (%)
    
 Well
8 (7.9)
4 (12.1)
4 (5.7)
0.010
 Moderately
69 (67.7)
15 (46.9)
54 (77.1)
 Poorly
25 (24.5)
13 (40.6)
12 (17.1)
Lymph node status
    
 Negative
69 (67.6)
17 (53.1)
52 (74.3)
0.034
 Positive
33 (32.4)
15 (46.9)
18 (25.7)
TNM Group of AJCC 8th*, n (%)
    
 IIIA
69 (67.6)
17 (53.1)
52 (74.3)
0.079
 IIIB
24 (23.5)
10 (31.3)
14 (20.0)
 IVB
9 (8.8)
5 (15.6)
4 (5.7)
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    
 Have
22 (21.6)
6 (18.8)
16 (22.9)
0.640
 None
80 (78.4)
26 (81.3)
54 (77.1)
Postoperative major complications*, n (%)
8 (7.8)
5 (15.6)
3 (4.3)
0.104
Postoperative hospital stay, mean ± SD, d
10 (8–12)
11 (9–15)
10 (7–11)
0.034
*Complications of Clavien–Dindo classification grade III or above; IQR interquartile range

Residual cancer associated with poor prognosis in IGC

To analyse the risk factors for the prognosis of IGC, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses for 102 IGC patients. The results showed that RC (HR = 3.057, 95% CI: 1.276–7.326, P = 0.012), intraoperative blood transfusion (HR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.149–0.909, P = 0.030) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.263, 95% CI: 1.137–4.504, P = 0.020) were independent risk factors affecting OS; RC (HR = 3.165, 95% CI: 1.572–8.314, P = 0.002), intraoperative blood transfusion (HR = 2.396, 95% CI: 1.046–5.492, P = 0.030) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 3.316, 95% CI: 1.784–5.601, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for DFS. See Table 2.
Table 2
Univariable and multivariable analysis for OS and DFS among all IGC patients (n = 102) with definitive surgical treatment
Risk factor
OS
DFS
Univariate
Multivariate
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95% CI)
P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
Age (≥ 60 years)
1.477 (0.844–2.585)
0.172
  
1.425 (0.859–2.346)
0.171
  
CA19-9 (≥ 39 U/mL)
2.615 (1.433–4.739)
0.002
2.114 (1.041–4.292)
0.038
2.311 (1.323–4.038)
0.003
1.402 (0.768–2.559)
0.271
 Residual cancer (Absent vs. Present)
4.650 (2.647–8.171)
 < 0.001
3.347 (1.439–7.785)
0.005
3.440 (2.048–5.779)
 < 0.001
3.615 (1.572–8.314)
0.002
Tumour location (vs. Peritoneal side)
 
 < 0.001
 
0.119
 
0.001
 
0.132
 Hepatic side
2.388 (1.302–4.382)
0.005
0.566 (0.211–1.523)
0.260
2.152 (1.227–3.772)
0.007
0.495 (0.199–1.231)
0.130
 Both sides
9.429 (3.113–28.559)
 < 0.001
2.559 (0.638–10.260)
0.185
6.204 (1.849–20.816)
0.003
1.431 (0.353–5.800)
0.616
Intraoperative blood transfusion (Absent vs. Present)
2.346 (1.175–4.685)
0.016
3.068 (1.274–7.389)
0.012
1.915 (0.906–4.049)
0.089
2.396 (1.046–5.492)
0.039
R1 resection and/or peri neural and/or lymphovascular invasion (Absent vs. Present)
2.792 (1.343–5.805)
0.006
0.905 (0.322–2.542)
0.849
1.693 (0.674–4.256)
0.263
  
Lymph node (Negative vs. Positive)
3.440 (1.957–6.047)
 < 0.001
2.783 (1.503–5.156)
0.001
3.175 (1.898–5.310)
 < 0.001
3.316 (1.784–5.601)
 < 0.001
Differentiation grade (High/Intermediate vs. Low)
2.280 (1.261–4.123)
0.006
1.946 (0.948–3.993)
0.070
1.467 (0.827–2.602)
0.190
  
We excluded patients with lymph node metastasis (n = 33) and R1 resection (n = 3) to analyse the impact of RC on the prognosis of patients with IGC. The median follow-up was 25 (7–79) months [19 (7–64) months in patients with RC + versus 26 (8–79) months in patients with RC−]. RC + was associated with a significant reduction in OS [20 months (RC +) vs. 53 months (RC−), p < 0.01] and DFS [11 months (RC +) vs. 40 months (RC−), p < 0.01], as shown in Fig. 2.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

To analyse the benefit for R0 reresection patients of IGC with adjuvant CRT, we excluded 3 patients with R1 resection. Among the LN/RC (-) (lymph node-negative and no residual cancer) and LN/RC ( +) (lymph node-positive and/or residual cancer) patients, 10 (10/52, 19.2%) and 11 (11/47, 23.4%) received adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that LN/RC (-) patients did not benefit from adjuvant CRT in terms of OS or DFS (all P values > 0.05). Compared with surgical resection alone, adjuvant CRT combined with surgical resection significantly improved the median OS of patients with LN/RC ( +) (Adj CRT vs. Non-Adj CRT = 36 vs. 17 months, P = 0.024), while the median DFS (Adj CRT vs. Non-Adj CRT = 18 vs. 9 months, P = 0.226) was not significantly different. See Fig. 3.

Discussion

Gallbladder cancer is a rare malignant tumour of the digestive system, but its incidence has increased in recent years, with a higher incidence in women than in men [10]. For early-stage gallbladder cancer, achieving R0 resection is the key to planning for surgical treatment, while for advanced disease, comprehensive multidisciplinary management is emphasised. Index cholecystectomy may lead to RC, and no assessment of lymph node status, reassessment of tumour staging and removal of the residual disease have a positive effect on improving patient outcomes [2, 11]. Although extended resection is recommended for selected IGC patients without the disseminated disease, optimal management of IGC remains a critical issue [4, 6, 7, 12, 13]. The main reason is that residual disease detection represents a poor outcome regardless of anatomical location.
An international multicentre study in 2015 showed that patients with T2h had higher vascular invasion, neural invasion, and lymph node metastasis than patients with T2p, and T2h were often associated with worse prognosis [9]. The gallbladder adjacent to the hepatic side has no serosal layer, there are as many as 20 (2–20) gallbladder veins, and the tumour easily metastasises to the liver bed through the gallbladder veins [14]. RC was found in 31.4% of patients after index cholecystectomy, with the liver being the most common residual site. In addition, patients with RC had higher rates of lymph node positivity and lower differentiation tumours. These are the possible reasons for the poor prognosis of RC patients.
Although surgical resection has an irreplaceable role in managing IGC, surgical treatment alone is unlikely to be sufficient in patients with RC or stage III-IV disease, and systemic treatment has an important emerging role [15, 16]. However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses pointed out that there is no strong evidence that adjuvant therapy is effective in GBC patients undergoing radical resection and only has some benefit in patients with positive lymph node disease, and positive surgical margins, or advanced disease [17, 18]. A recent cohort study of 6391 GBC patients who underwent definitive surgery from the US National Database (NCBD) showed that 49.2% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 1.6% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy [19]. Further propensity score matching analysis suggested that GBC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a longer median OS than those who received surgery alone (22 vs. 18 months, HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.96), and lymph node-positive patients benefited from neoadjuvant therapy (median OS: 30 vs. 14 months, P = 0.002).
Our analysis of prognostic factors in 102 IGC patients who underwent re-excision showed that lymph node-positive status and RC were independent risk factors for poor OS and DFS. Even with R0 resection, patients with lymph node positivity and/or RC were associated with low median OS and DFS. Recurrent disease is the main reason for the poor prognosis; 84% of GBC patients experience recurrence within the first 18 months after radical resection, of which 53% only have a local recurrence, 26% only have a distant recurrence, 21% have a local and distant recurrence, and the liver is the most common site, followed by carcinomatosis and lymph nodes [20]. In a subgroup analysis, we found that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS for IGC patients with lymph node metastases and/or residual disease after R0 resection. Therefore, we recommend routine adjuvant therapy for T3 IGC patients with residual disease or lymphatic metastasis.
Certainly, the research has some deficiencies that need to be rectified and optimized in the researches in the future. Firstly, the diagnosis of T3 IGC may be influenced by artificial subjective factors, the main reason is that the accuracy of the diagnosis depends heavily on the experience of the clinician and pathologist. Second, the number of patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after R0 resection was limited, which was not enough to fully reflect the clinical value of adjuvant therapy. Finally, the sample size of this study was limited. Limited by retrospective studies, multi-center, large-sample and prospective studies can provide more evidence-based evidence in the future.
In conclusion, index cholecystectomy does not attain the goal of curative treatment of T3 IGC, and all patients undergoing index cholecystectomy should be systematically evaluated to determine the need for reoperation. If the underlying conditions permit, extended resection should be actively performed for all resectable IGC, and R0 resection should be as extensive as possible to attain better OS and DFS. Residual disease and lymphatic metastasis after index cholecystectomy are the main reasons for the poor prognosis of IGC, and adjuvant therapy should be actively used in these patients.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Our studies have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and the patients and their families signed informed consent for the operation. The experimental protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawla P, Sunkara T, Thandra KC, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019;5(2):93–102.CrossRef Rawla P, Sunkara T, Thandra KC, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019;5(2):93–102.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Soreide K, Guest RV, Harrison EM, Kendall TJ, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review of management of incidental gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2019;106(1):32–45.CrossRef Soreide K, Guest RV, Harrison EM, Kendall TJ, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review of management of incidental gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2019;106(1):32–45.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitt SC, Jin LX, Hall BL, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA. Incidental gallbladder cancer at cholecystectomy: when should the surgeon be suspicious? Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):128–33.CrossRef Pitt SC, Jin LX, Hall BL, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA. Incidental gallbladder cancer at cholecystectomy: when should the surgeon be suspicious? Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):128–33.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Feo CF, Ginesu GC, Fancellu A, Perra T, Ninniri C, Deiana G, Scanu AM, Porcu A. Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: a review. Int J Surg. 2022;98: 106234.CrossRef Feo CF, Ginesu GC, Fancellu A, Perra T, Ninniri C, Deiana G, Scanu AM, Porcu A. Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: a review. Int J Surg. 2022;98: 106234.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Perlmutter BC, Naples R, Hitawala A, McMichael J, Chadalavada P, Padbidri V, Haddad A, Simon R, Walsh RM, Augustin T. Factors that minimize curative resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: an analysis of clinical decision-making and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(9):2344–52.CrossRef Perlmutter BC, Naples R, Hitawala A, McMichael J, Chadalavada P, Padbidri V, Haddad A, Simon R, Walsh RM, Augustin T. Factors that minimize curative resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: an analysis of clinical decision-making and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(9):2344–52.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil L, de Aretxabala X, Lendoire J, Duek F, Hepp J, Imventarza O. Incidental gallbladder cancer: how residual disease affects outcome in two referral HPB centers from South America. World J Surg. 2019;43(1):214–20.CrossRef Gil L, de Aretxabala X, Lendoire J, Duek F, Hepp J, Imventarza O. Incidental gallbladder cancer: how residual disease affects outcome in two referral HPB centers from South America. World J Surg. 2019;43(1):214–20.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinuela E, Vega EA, Yamashita S, Sanhueza M, Mege R, Cavada G, Aloia TA, Chun YS, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, et al. Incidental gallbladder cancer: residual cancer discovered at oncologic extended resection determines outcome: a report from high- and low-incidence countries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(8):2334–43.CrossRef Vinuela E, Vega EA, Yamashita S, Sanhueza M, Mege R, Cavada G, Aloia TA, Chun YS, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, et al. Incidental gallbladder cancer: residual cancer discovered at oncologic extended resection determines outcome: a report from high- and low-incidence countries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(8):2334–43.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shindoh J, de Aretxabala X, Aloia TA, Roa JC, Roa I, Zimmitti G, Javle M, Conrad C, Maru DM, Aoki T, et al. Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):733–9.CrossRef Shindoh J, de Aretxabala X, Aloia TA, Roa JC, Roa I, Zimmitti G, Javle M, Conrad C, Maru DM, Aoki T, et al. Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):733–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherkassky L, D’Angelica M. Gallbladder cancer: managing the incidental diagnosis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019;28(4):619–30.CrossRef Cherkassky L, D’Angelica M. Gallbladder cancer: managing the incidental diagnosis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019;28(4):619–30.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh D-Y, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. The Lancet. 2021;397(10272):428–44.CrossRef Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh D-Y, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. The Lancet. 2021;397(10272):428–44.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethun CG, Le N, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Pawlik TM, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, Isom CA, Fields RC, Krasnick BA, et al. Pathologic and prognostic implications of incidental versus nonincidental gallbladder cancer: a 10-institution study from the United States extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. Am Surg. 2017;83(7):679–86.CrossRef Ethun CG, Le N, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Pawlik TM, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, Isom CA, Fields RC, Krasnick BA, et al. Pathologic and prognostic implications of incidental versus nonincidental gallbladder cancer: a 10-institution study from the United States extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. Am Surg. 2017;83(7):679–86.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahim RB, Mc DJ, Richards JC, Ferris DO. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: a study of its modes of spread. Ann Surg. 1962;156:114–24.CrossRef Fahim RB, Mc DJ, Richards JC, Ferris DO. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: a study of its modes of spread. Ann Surg. 1962;156:114–24.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Manterola C, Duque G, Grande L, de Aretxabala X, Conejeros R, Otzen T, Garcia N. A systematic review of the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with gallbladder cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(11):1427–35.CrossRef Manterola C, Duque G, Grande L, de Aretxabala X, Conejeros R, Otzen T, Garcia N. A systematic review of the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with gallbladder cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(11):1427–35.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1934–40.CrossRef Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1934–40.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozer M, Goksu SY, Sanford NN, Porembka M, Khurshid H, Ahn C, Maxwell MC, Beg MS, Kazmi SM. A propensity score analysis of chemotherapy use in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2): e2146912.CrossRef Ozer M, Goksu SY, Sanford NN, Porembka M, Khurshid H, Ahn C, Maxwell MC, Beg MS, Kazmi SM. A propensity score analysis of chemotherapy use in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2): e2146912.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Vega EA, Newhook TE, Kawaguchi Y, Qiao W, De Bellis M, Okuno M, Panettieri E, Nishino H, Duwe G, Piccino M, et al. Conditional recurrence-free survival after oncologic extended resection for gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09626-3.CrossRef Vega EA, Newhook TE, Kawaguchi Y, Qiao W, De Bellis M, Okuno M, Panettieri E, Nishino H, Duwe G, Piccino M, et al. Conditional recurrence-free survival after oncologic extended resection for gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-021-09626-3.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Residual cancer is a strong predictor of survival in T3 incidental gallbladder cancer
verfasst von
Chuan You
Mengyi Xie
Meng Ling
Facai Yang
Yinghe Qiu
Jingdong Li
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01869-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Traumatologische Notfälle Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.