Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2023

Open Access 12.01.2023 | Research

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes

verfasst von: Jorge Fonseca, Maria Francisca Moraes-Fontes, Jorge Rebola, Rui Lúcio, Miguel Almeida, Ciprian Muresan, Artur Palmas, Ana Gaivão, Celso Matos, Tiago Santos, Daniela Dias, Inês Sousa, Francisco Oliveira, Ricardo Ribeiro, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Avelino Fraga

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2023

Abstract

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) has emerged as a surgical option for patients with prostatic cancer in high-volume centers. The objective is to assess oncological and functional outcomes when implementing RS-RARP in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery. This is a prospective observational single-center study. Patients operated between July 2017 and April 2020 were divided into two consecutive groups, A and B, each with 104 patients. The surgeons had prior experience in laparoscopic surgery and underwent robotic training. Positive surgical margin (PSM) status, urinary continence, and erectile function projected by Kaplan–Meier curves, together with patient reported quality of life outcomes at 12 months post-surgery were documented. Median patient age was 63 years (IQR = 59–67), overall PSM rate were 33%, 28% for pT2 disease. Pre-operative values showed no significant difference between both groups. The rate of urinary continence dropped from 81 to 78% (SE = 5.7) (Group A) and from 90 to 72% (SE = 6.3) (Group B) using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Baseline sexual function was regained in 41% (Group A) and 47% (Group B) of patients. The median Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26 total score decreased from 86 to 82. These outcomes relate favorably to prior reports. There was a clinically significant decrease in median operative time in the successive groups with post-operative complications occurring in less than 2% of surgical procedures overall. A 12-month follow-up suggests that RS-RARP may be safely introduced in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11701-022-01517-3.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

In developed countries, prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death among men [1]. Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option with curative intent in clinically localized PC, in patients with a life expectancy exceeding 10 years [2]. The presence of a positive surgical margin (PSM) after surgery has prognostic significance for cancer recurrence [3] and is a surrogate marker of surgical quality [4].
Contemporary open radical prostatectomy (ORP) was described by Walsh et al. [5] in 1983, remaining largely unchallenged as the surgical technique of choice, until Guillonneau and Vallancien [6] described laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Soon afterwards, in 2002, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was standardized [7], thus combining principles of ORP with concepts from LRP. Even though minimally invasive, whether laparoscopic or robotic, these techniques used the retropubic route, approaching the prostate anteriorly. In 2010, Galfano described the Bocciardi technique of Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP), in which the prostate is approached posteriorly, through an incision in the parietal peritoneum, in the anterior aspect of the pouch of Douglas [8, 9]. Through this innovative surgical route, the prostate is immediately accessed, avoiding bladder dissection and damage to its supportive fascial structures. Over and above RARP, safer oncological outcomes together with a reduced number of adverse functional results have empowered RS-RARP as the technique of choice to be employed in high-volume centers with robotic facilities [10, 11].
The objective of this study is to determine the impact on patient outcomes from implementing RS-RARP in a medium-volume center such as ours, without previous experience in robotic surgery, by comparing two consecutive groups of patients. We hereby present prospectively collected real-life short-term oncological, functional and quality of life data in PC patients subjected to RS-RARP.

Methods

Patients and functional status evaluation

Our study included 208 patients that underwent RS-RARP with at least 1 year of follow-up, operated on by four surgeons, between July 2017 and April 2020. The cohort was divided into two consecutive  groups, each comprising 104 patients (Group A followed by Group B). Parameters were collected prospectively, including age and body mass index, preoperative oncological parameters such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), highest International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group at biopsy, and multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-based tumor clinical staging using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2) [12].
Urinary incontinence was evaluated through pad use as well as the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) [13]. The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores ≥ 17 or  ≥ 22 indicated mild or absent erectile dysfunction (ED), respectively, [14] regardless of whether potency-enhancing medication was used. Health-related quality of life (QoL) was evaluated through the Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire [15] and pre-established EPIC-26 Minimally Important Difference (MID) [16].
ICIQ-SF, pad-use and SHIM were documented every 3 months up to 12 months, whilst EPIC-26 was recorded at 12 months, postoperatively. All patients were considered incontinent and impotent in the immediate post-operative period. No patient required radiotherapy before continence or mild erectile function was achieved. QoL measures excluded any patient that required post-operative radiotherapy. PSA levels were recorded at 3 and 12 months post-operatively. All patients provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 7.7.2017).

Surgical technique

The surgical team comprised four surgeons who switched from ORP to LRP in 2014, with prior experience of 172 LRP procedures. The da Vinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) became available in our hospital center from 2016. All surgeons were trained by Intuitive and the first eight patients, not included in this study, were proctored. RS-RARP was performed as described by Galfano [9]. A complete intrafascial procedure was performed for all patients who specifically demonstrated a desire for nerve preservation, with ISUP grade group < 4 disease on biopsy and mpMRI-based clinical stage < cT3. Unilateral or bilateral extrafascial dissection encompassing the neurovascular bundles was undertaken in patients with erectile dysfunction, high risk or locally advanced disease. Lymphadenectomy was performed in patients with a higher than 5% risk of nodal metastases, calculated according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram [17, 18]. Data related to the surgical procedure included operative time (skin-to-skin), estimated blood loss, blood transfusions, duration of hospital stay, bladder catheterization, and complications graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification [19]. An indwelling Foley catheter was kept for at least 1 week. Performing approximately one hundred radical prostatectomies per year, our unit fits the definition of a medium volume center [20].

Pathology examination

The same senior pathologist reviewed prostatic biopsies and surgical specimens. ISUP consensus and the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition schemes were followed for grading and staging [21]. Pathological parameters included: prostate volume, tumor ISUP grade group, tumor stage, surgical margin status and length, and Gleason pattern of the PSM.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were reported as medians and interquartile range (IQR), and qualitative variables as counts or percentages for the full cohort as well as for each consecutive group. Results for functional outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier function, reported as percentage and standard error. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 27 for Windows, and a statistical significance level of 5% was defined.

Results

Pre-operative characterization

The overall median patient age was 63 years (IQR = 59–67) and most patients were slightly obese with a median BMI of 27. According to ICIQ-SF, the majority of patients (85%) did not suffer from urinary incontinence, only one patient reporting pad use. In contrast, the SHIM questionnaire yielded higher degrees of ED. Overall, 70% had erections sufficient for intercourse (SHIM ≥ 17) but only 41% of our patients had good erections (SHIM ≥ 22). Consistent EPIC-26 scores were found in the respective domains. There was homogeneity between the two consecutive groups as regards age, BMI, prostate size and PSA concentration. The ISUP grade ≥ 2 on prostate biopsy was slightly higher in group B patients but there were no significant differences in the MRI-based clinical stage. Functional and HRQoL evaluations were similar in both groups (Table 1).
Table 1
Preoperative features: demographics, disease stage, functional status and quality of life
Characteristic
Total
Group A
Group B
Patients evaluated, n
208
104
104
Age, years, median (IQR)
63 (59–67)
63 (59–67)
63 (59–68)
Body mass index, kg/m2, median (IQR)
27 (24–29)
26 (24–29)
27 (25–29)
Preoperative PSA, ng/ml, median (IQR)
7 (5–8)
7 (4 -6)
7 (5–9)
Prostate size, cm3, median (IQR)
43 (32–56)
43 (32–58)
43 (33–53)
Highest ISUP biopsy, n (%)
208 (100)
104 (100)
104 (100)
 Grade 1
29 (14)
19 (18)
10 (10)
 Grade 2
127 (61)
53 (51)
74 (71)
 Grade 3
32 (15)
20 (19)
12 (11.5)
 Grade 4
18 (9)
11 (11)
7 (7)
 Grade 5
2 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)
MRI-based T stage, n (%)
203 (98)
104 (100)
99 (95)1
 T1c
20 (10)
8 (8)
12 (12)
 T2a
57 (27)
32 (31)
25 (25)
 T2b
25 (12)
13 (12)
12 (12)
 T2c
41 (20)
19 (19)
22 (22)
 T3a
53 (25)
28 (27)
25 (25)
 T3b
7 (3)
4 (4)
3 (3)
Daily pad use, n (%)
197 (95)
97 (93)
100 (96)
 No pad use
196 (99.5)
96 (99)
100 (100)
 Pad use
1 (0.5)
1 (1)
0 (0)
ICIQ-SF, n (%)
198 (95)
97 (93)
101 (97)
 ICIQ-SF = 0
168 (85)
78 (81)
90 (90)
 ICIQ-SF > 0
30 (15)
19 (20)
11 (11)
SHIM, n (%)
195 (94)
95 (91)
100 (96)
 No erectile dysfunction (SHIM ≥ 22), n (%)
80 (41)
40 (42)
40 (40)
 Mild erectile dysfunction (17 ≤ SHIM ≤ 21), n (%)
56 (29)
29 (31)
27 (27)
 Mild-Moderate erectile dysfunction (12 ≤ SHIM ≤ 16), n (%)
29 (15)
8 (8)
21 (21)
 Moderate erectile dysfunction (8 ≤ SHIM ≤ 11), n (%)
11 (5)
7 (7)
4 (4)
 Severe erectile dysfunction (SHIM ≤ 7), n (%)
19 (10)
11 (11)
8 (8)
EPIC-26 score, n
197
97
100
 Median (IQR)
86 (79–95)
86 (78–95)
86 (79–94)
Legend: Shown are the total number of patients evaluated for each parent variable, subsequently followed by the corresponding number and percentage of the sub-variable. PSA: prostate-specific antigen; ISUP: International Society of Urological Pathology; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; 1: MRI stage not performed in 5 patients in group B due to contra-indication (n  = 1) and poor image resolution (n = 4); ICIQ-SF: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form; SHIM: Sexual Health Inventory for Men; EPIC-26: Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26.

Surgical procedure

Both consecutive groups remained comparable with respect to the number of patients subjected to extended pelvic lymph node dissection (46 and 42%) and the median number of lymph nodes removed (n = 21). There was also a similar number of patients in whom bilateral and unilateral neurovascular sparing (circa 80%) and bladder neck preservation (over 90%) was performed, with equivalent intraoperative blood loss (200 ml), post-operative complications (0 to 2%), median length of hospital stay (2 to 3 days) and duration of catheterization (8 to 9 days). Whereas the median intraoperative time remained similar as regards radical prostatectomy alone (215 to 220 min), there was a clinical significant reduction from 349 to 300 min with respect to radical prostatectomy accompanied by lymph node dissection, from Group A to Group B (Table 2).
Table 2
Retzius sparing prostatectomy: intra- and postoperative results
Characteristic
Total
Group A
Group B
Recorded lymph node dissection status for all patients, n (%)
208 (100)
104 (100)
104 (100)
 Lymphadenectomy
92 (44)
48 (46)
44 (42)
 No lymphadenectomy
116 (56)
56 (54)
60 (58)
Patients with recorded nerve sparing status, n (%)
167 (80)
76 (73)
91 (87)
 No nerve sparing
34 (20)
13 (17)
21 (23)
 Unilateral
57 (34)
28 (37)
29 (32)
 Bilateral
76 (46)
35 (46)
41 (45)
Patients with recorded bladder neck dissection status, n (%)
145 (70)
65 (62)
80 (77)
 Bladder neck preserved
134 (93)
60 (92)
74 (92)
 Bladder neck not preserved
11 (7)
5 (8)
6 (8)
Recorded operative time, n patients in whom recorded (%)
203 (98)
104 (100)
99 (95)
 Radical prostatectomy, minutes, median (IQR)
219 (188–254)
220 (186–262)
215 (188–251)
 Radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection, minutes, median (IQR)
320 (280–369)
349 (307–405)
300 (270–330)
Lymph nodes removed, median (IQR)
21 (17–24)
21 (17–24)
21 (17–24)
Intraoperative blood loss, ml, median (IQR)
200 (150–300)
200 (150–300)
200 (150–300)
Intraoperative transfusion rate, n
0
0
0
Intraoperative complications, n
0
0
0
Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > II):
   
 Surgery for hemostasis, n (%)
2 (1)
2 (2)
0
 Lymphocele drainage, n (%)
2 (1)
0
2 (2)
Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR)
2 (2–3)
3 (2–3)
2 (2–3)
Duration of catheterization, days, median (IQR)
8 (8–9)
8 (8–9)
9 (8–9)
Legend: Shown are the total number of patients evaluated for each variable, subsequently followed by the corresponding number and percentage of the sub-variable with respect to the parent variable.

Oncological outcomes

Postoperatively, the majority of patients had a PC staged as pT2, 70% in Group A and 60% in Group B. The overall PSM for all pathological T stages (pT) was described in 33% of patients (Table 3). A PSM for pT2 patients was reported in 29% and 27% of Groups A and B, respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients with local advanced tumors (pT3) in Group A (30%) than in Group B (40%) and accordingly, for this stage, the PSM rate was 39% and 44%, respectively. Both were similar in terms of the degree of extensive disease and Gleason score of the surgical margin, pelvic lymph node involvement, biochemical recurrence inferior to 10% at 12 months post-operatively, and the proportion that required adjuvant and salvage treatments (25%).
Table 3
Postoperative pathological evaluation, oncological outcomes and quality of life assessment
Characteristic
Total
Group A
Group B
Patients evaluated, n
208
104
104
Pathological T stage (pT)
   
 pT2, n (%)
136 (65)
73 (70)
63 (60)
 pT3a, n (%)
56 (27)
23 (22)
33 (32)
 pT3b, n (%)
16 (8)
8 (8)
8 (8)
Positive margin according to pT
   
 n (% pT2)
38 (28)
21 (29)
17 (27)
 n (% pT3a)
23 (41)
7 (30)
16 (48)
 n (% pT3b)
7 (44)
5 (63)
2 (25)
Surgical margin
   
 Overall negative, n (%)
140 (67)
71 (68)
69 (66)
 Overall positive, n (%)
68 (33)
33 (32)
35 (34)
 Pattern surgical margin (% of positive margin)
   
 Focal (≤ 3 mm), n (%)
29 (43)
14 (44)1
15 (43)
 Extensive (> 3 mm), n (%)
39 (57)
18 (56)1
20 (57)
Gleason score for the surgical margin (% of positive margin)
   
 3 + 3, n (%)
16 (24)
12 (36)
4 (12)
 3 + 4, n (%)
34 (51)
14 (42)
20 (59)
 4 + 3, n (%)
12 (18)
4 (12)
9 (26)
 4 + 4, n (%)
5 (7)
3 (9)
2 (6)
N stage
   
 pNx, n (%)
116 (56)
56 (54)
60 (58)
 pN0, n (%)
73 (35)
40 (39)
33 (32)
 pN1, n (%)
19 (9)
8 (8)
11 (11)
PSA persistence and recurrence
   
 PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml at 3 months, n (%)
15 (7)
8 (8)
7 (7)
 PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml at 12 months, n (%)
18 (9)
8 (8)1
10 (10)1
Adjuvant and salvage treatments
52 (25)
25 (24)
27 (26)
 Androgen deprivation therapy, n (%)
2 (1)
0
2 (7)
 Radiotherapy, n (%)
38 (8)
19 (18)
19 (18)
 Androgen deprivation therapy + radiotherapy, n (%)
12 (6)
6 (6)
6 (6)
EPIC-26 score, n
136
68
68
 Median (IQR)
82 (74–89)
82 (74–89)
82 (74–89)
Legend: ISUP: International Society of Urological Pathology; PSM: Positive Surgical Margin; PSA: prostate specific antigen; ADT: androgen deprivation therapy; RT: radiotherapy; EPIC-26: Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26. 1: PSA already ≥ 0.2 ng/ml at 3 months for 2 patients in Group A and 3 patients in Group B.

Post-operative functional recovery

Serial longitudinal evaluations obtained from group A (n = 91) and group B (n = 94) revealed that at 12 months, the frequency of continent patients steadily increased to 87% (SE = 4.1) and 92% (SE = 3.3) considering pad use,  and to 78% (SE = 5.7) and 72% (SE = 6.3) considering ICIQ-SF, respectively. Of note, 50% of the patients were continent by 3 months when considering pad use, a value only achieved at 9 months through the ICIQ-SF questionnaire (Fig. 1). Erectile dysfunction was much more frequent than urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, Kaplan–Meier curves projected a steady improvement in erectile function. At 12 months, good erections (SHIM ≥ 22) and erections sufficient for intercourse (SHIM ≥ 17) were reported by 29% (SE = 5.2) and 39% (SE = 5.6) in group A and 33% (SE = 6.3) and 50% (SE = 6.5) in group B, respectively (Fig. 2). None of the included patients required radiotherapy before attaining continence or a SHIM value ≥ 17 or ≥ 22.
EPIC domains were only evaluated in 68/104 patients in each group (Fig. 3). Exclusions from continence and erectile function analysis were due to loss early in follow-up (13 in group A and 10 in group B), radiotherapy treatment (13 in group A and 19 in group B) and absence at the 12 month assessment (10 in group A and 7 in group B). EPIC-26 was significantly associated with pad use and ICIQ-SF (p < 0.001 in both – t test), the latter exerting a superior effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.056 vs 0.973).

Sequential functional outcome comparisons to pre-operative measures

In our series, at 1 year, when compared to pre-operative values, the estimated rate of urinary continence dropped from 99% to 86% (SE = 4.1) (A) and 100% to 92% (SE = 3.3) (B) when obtained through pad use, and from 81% to 78% (SE = 5.7) (A) and 90% to 72% (SE = 6.3) (B) through the ICIQ-SF questionnaire. There was no significant difference between both groups. A sub-group analysis at 12 months was slightly different from the projected continence rates provided by Kaplan–Meier curves after surgery. From the group of pre-surgical continent patients (ICIQ-SF = 0), information was only available from 74% (n = 57) and 66% (n = 60) patients from groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the majority (61%) remained continent (20 patients having been excluded from the analysis at 12 months). Conversely, in Group B, four patients who were incontinent pre-operatively became continent at 12 months (Supplementary Table I).
Regarding erectile dysfunction, when compared to pre-operative values, at 12 months, patients with erection sufficient for intercourse (SHIM ≥ 17) decreased from 73 to 39% (SE = 5.6) (A) and from 67 to 50% (SE = 6.5) (B); the number of potent patients (SHIM ≥ 22) dropped from 43 to 29% (SE = 5.2) (A) and from 40 to 33% (SE = 6.3) (B). Once again, the sub-group analysis at 12 months revealed that information was only available for 74% (n = 51) and 67% (n = 45) of patients in groups A and B, respectively. In the same group order, potency sufficient for sexual intercourse (SHIM ≥ 17) was effectively regained in 41 and 47% (Supplementary Table II).
Overall, the median EPIC-26 score decreased from 86 preoperatively to 82, at 1 year. Taking into consideration the full patient cohort pre-operatively there seemed to be a negative impact in sexual function (Supplementary Fig. 1). However, data was only available for 68/104 patients in each group. Demographic and clinical sub-group analysis for these EPIC-evaluated patients at 12 months showed homogeneity with the original group (Supplementary Table III).

Discussion

As judged by an absence of intraoperative complications and a very low rate of post-operative complications that remained similar, at a value of 2%, in both successive groups of patients, RS-RARP was safely implemented in our medium volume center, in line with recent work [8, 22]. This was accomplished in our patients, despite reservations posed by the known association between high-volume surgeons and centers with lower complication rates and better outcomes [23, 24]. From the first to the second group, there was a clinically significant decrease in median operative time of 49 minutes.
Encountered during the implementation stage of an innovative surgical technique in a medium-volume center, our limitations namely, the small sample size, the 12-month follow-up and drop-out rate as well as the single-center nature of our study, prevented statistical inference for most parameters and evaluation of long-term clinical benefit. Nevertheless, PSM status remains a robust measure of both surgical quality and early adverse oncological outcomes, clearly influenced by the pathological T stage of the tumor and surgical experience, from which we can acknowledge adequate and safe outcomes from RS-RARP introduction in our center. In a recent series of 210 RARPs performed by four consultant surgeons with background experience of 374 LRPs, tumor stage was pT3 in 30% of the patients and the PSM rate was 29.5% [25]. This was the nearest we could find to our study, comparably comprising a similar frequency of pT3 tumors (Group A = 30%; Group B = 40%) with an overall PSM rate of 33% (Group A = 32%; Group B = 34%). Community-based centers also provide baseline data to judge whether our results reflect safe short-term oncological outcomes. At a population audit setting, several studies report PSM rates of 33% [26] and 24% [27] for pT2 disease, standing similar to our overall pT2 PSM rate of 28% (Group A = 29%; Group B = 27%). Polarized results from highly experienced centers, despite a similar frequency of pT3 tumors (24 to 33%), lower the PSM rate to as much as 19% [28] to 21% [29], respectively. Alike a recent study, [30] the biochemical free survival determined by PSA concentration was similar in Groups A and B (92 and 90%),
Given the high survival rates of PC patients, functional results are important clinical endpoints. We chose to collect data regarding safety-pad use per day and ICIQ-SF, bearing in mind that the definition of urinary continence is heterogeneous, and methods used to collect and report data may influence the rate of post-operative incontinence [31]. In our study, Kaplan–Meier curves project a steady rise in post-operative continence rates post-operatively. Considering pad use, less than 10% of the patients are incontinent at 12 months post-operatively. This is in line with a similar study employing RS-RARP [30] and an improvement when compared to an extensive review reporting urinary continence recovery after conventional RARP, where the 12-months incontinence rate ranged from 4 to 31%, with a mean value of 16% using a “no pad” definition [32].
Measured using the ICIQ-SF, there was a similar rise in the frequency of post-operative incontinence in both groups. The preoperative urinary continence rate for our two consecutive groups A and B was 81% and 90%, decreasing to 77% and 72%, respectively, at 12 months post-operatively. Once again, our patients demonstrate major progress in continence rates when compared to recent conventional RARP results where only 31% of the patients returned to an ICIQ-SF score of zero at 1 year after robotic surgery [33]. ICIQ-SF information as regards the actual number of pre-surgical continent patients that remain continent at 12 months was only available for less than two-thirds of the patients. Notwithstanding a higher loss of continence in group B than in Group A at 12 months, four pre-operatively incontinent patients became continent by 12 months in Group B.
Concerning erectile function, in both group of patients, there was a steady recovery of potency and erections sufficient for intercourse as follow-up continued up to 12 months. Considering patients with erections sufficient for intercourse pre-operatively (SHIM ≥ 17), 41% (Group A) and 47% (Group B) had regained baseline sexual function at 12 months, in line with a recent report [34].
The ICIQ-SF was more sensitive (larger effect size) than daily pad count at capturing the impact of incontinence on HRQoL measured by the EPIC-26. The impact on HRQoL, evaluated with EPIC-26 at 1 year of surgery was similar in both groups with a reduction in the urinary incontinence domain of 10%, meeting the lower value of the MID range, in line with the slightly higher increase in post-operative urinary incontinence in Group B.

Conclusion

We present results from 208 PC patients submitted to RS-RARP and analyzed in two consecutive homogenous groups. There was a significant reduction in operating times from the first group to the next. The frequencies of PSM, urinary continence recovery and biochemical recurrence at 12 months were similar in both groups, in line with published RS-RARP series and improved with respect to RARP results. Overall patient QoL was maintained. Our results suggest that RS-RARP may be safely introduced in a medium-volume center, with multisurgeon implementation without previous experience in robotic surgery, hopefully contributing to the generalization of the RS-RARP in community centers in a “real world” setting.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

None.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629CrossRefPubMed Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M et al (2012) High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. BJU Int 109:1794–1800CrossRefPubMed Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M et al (2012) High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. BJU Int 109:1794–1800CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E et al (2005) Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 66:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E et al (2005) Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 66:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485CrossRefPubMed Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649CrossRefPubMed Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A et al (2002) Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569–572CrossRefPubMed Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A et al (2002) Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569–572CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M et al (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with >/= 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64:974–980CrossRefPubMed Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M et al (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with >/= 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64:974–980CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58:457–461CrossRefPubMed Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58:457–461CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dirie NI, Pokhrel G, Guan W, Mumin MA, Yang J, Masau JF et al (2019) Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol 6:174–182CrossRefPubMed Dirie NI, Pokhrel G, Guan W, Mumin MA, Yang J, Masau JF et al (2019) Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol 6:174–182CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Phukan C, McLean A, Nambiar A, Mukherjee A, Somani B, Krishnamoorthy R et al (2020) Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 38:1123–1134CrossRefPubMed Phukan C, McLean A, Nambiar A, Mukherjee A, Somani B, Krishnamoorthy R et al (2020) Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 38:1123–1134CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330CrossRefPubMed Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC (2005) The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM): a 5 year review of research and clinical experience. Int J Impot Res 17:307–319CrossRefPubMed Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC (2005) The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM): a 5 year review of research and clinical experience. Int J Impot Res 17:307–319CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG (2010) Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology 76:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG (2010) Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology 76:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Skolarus TA, Dunn RL, Sanda MG, Chang P, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS et al (2015) Minimally important difference for the expanded prostate cancer index composite short form. Urology 85:101–105CrossRefPubMed Skolarus TA, Dunn RL, Sanda MG, Chang P, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS et al (2015) Minimally important difference for the expanded prostate cancer index composite short form. Urology 85:101–105CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Rabbani F, Gerigk C et al (2003) A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 170:1798–1803CrossRefPubMed Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Rabbani F, Gerigk C et al (2003) A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 170:1798–1803CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cimino S, Reale G, Castelli T, Favilla V, Giardina R, Russo GI et al (2017) Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 51:345–350CrossRefPubMed Cimino S, Reale G, Castelli T, Favilla V, Giardina R, Russo GI et al (2017) Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 51:345–350CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341–349CrossRefPubMed Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341–349CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia L, Sperling CD, Taylor BL, Talwar R, Chelluri RR, Raman JD et al (2020) Associations between hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 203:926–932CrossRefPubMed Xia L, Sperling CD, Taylor BL, Talwar R, Chelluri RR, Raman JD et al (2020) Associations between hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 203:926–932CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, Secco S, Di Trapani D, Petralia G et al (2021) Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy for surgeons in the learning curve: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7:772–778CrossRefPubMed Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, Secco S, Di Trapani D, Petralia G et al (2021) Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy for surgeons in the learning curve: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7:772–778CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinsvik EA, Axcrona K, Angelsen A, Beisland C, Dahl A, Eri LM et al (2013) Does a surgeon’s annual radical prostatectomy volume predict the risk of positive surgical margins and urinary incontinence at one-year follow-up? Findings from a prospective national study. Scand J Urol 47:92–100CrossRefPubMed Steinsvik EA, Axcrona K, Angelsen A, Beisland C, Dahl A, Eri LM et al (2013) Does a surgeon’s annual radical prostatectomy volume predict the risk of positive surgical margins and urinary incontinence at one-year follow-up? Findings from a prospective national study. Scand J Urol 47:92–100CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Leow JJ, Leong EK, Serrell EC, Chang SL, Gruen RL, Png KS et al (2018) Systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 4:775–789CrossRefPubMed Leow JJ, Leong EK, Serrell EC, Chang SL, Gruen RL, Png KS et al (2018) Systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 4:775–789CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berge V, Berg RE, Hoff JR, Wessel N, Diep LM, Karlsen SJ et al (2013) A prospective study of transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes after 36-month follow-up. Urology 81:781–786CrossRefPubMed Berge V, Berg RE, Hoff JR, Wessel N, Diep LM, Karlsen SJ et al (2013) A prospective study of transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes after 36-month follow-up. Urology 81:781–786CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J, Chin JL, Bora B, Hunter A et al (2011) Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 5:161–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J, Chin JL, Bora B, Hunter A et al (2011) Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 5:161–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vesey SG, McCabe JE, Hounsome L, Fowler S (2012) UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database. BJU Int 109:346–354CrossRefPubMed Vesey SG, McCabe JE, Hounsome L, Fowler S (2012) UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database. BJU Int 109:346–354CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HA, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T et al (2013) Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 27:80–85CrossRefPubMed Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HA, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T et al (2013) Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 27:80–85CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, Harmon J, Rozet F, Barret E et al (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 73:127–133CrossRefPubMed Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, Harmon J, Rozet F, Barret E et al (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 73:127–133CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel Raheem A, Hagras A, Ghaith A, Alenzi MJ, Elghiaty A, Gameel T et al (2020) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Minerva Urol Nefrol 72:586–594CrossRefPubMed Abdel Raheem A, Hagras A, Ghaith A, Alenzi MJ, Elghiaty A, Gameel T et al (2020) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Minerva Urol Nefrol 72:586–594CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kadomoto S, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K et al (2016) Investigating urinary conditions prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in search of a desirable method for evaluating post-prostatectomy incontinence. Anticancer Res 36:4293–4298PubMed Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kadomoto S, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K et al (2016) Investigating urinary conditions prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in search of a desirable method for evaluating post-prostatectomy incontinence. Anticancer Res 36:4293–4298PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Kawaguchi S et al (2019) Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form. Neurourol Urodyn 38:726–733CrossRefPubMed Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Kawaguchi S et al (2019) Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form. Neurourol Urodyn 38:726–733CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199:1210–1217CrossRefPubMed Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199:1210–1217CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes
verfasst von
Jorge Fonseca
Maria Francisca Moraes-Fontes
Jorge Rebola
Rui Lúcio
Miguel Almeida
Ciprian Muresan
Artur Palmas
Ana Gaivão
Celso Matos
Tiago Santos
Daniela Dias
Inês Sousa
Francisco Oliveira
Ricardo Ribeiro
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Avelino Fraga
Publikationsdatum
12.01.2023
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01517-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.