Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 5/2024

13.03.2024 | Original Research

Adverse Drug Events Observed with the Newly Approved Remimazolam in Comparison to Propofol for General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Lidan Huang, Hong Liu, Xue Zou, Jiawang Ding, Song Tao

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Developments in anesthetic pharmacology have been aiming at minimizing physiological disturbance in addition to maintaining and improving titrateability, recovery profile, and patient experience. Remimazolam, a GABAAlpha receptor agonist, is a new intravenous anesthetic agent which has recently been approved for use. This analysis aimed to systematically compare the adverse drug events reported with the newly approved remimazolam in comparison to propofol for general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing surgery.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched from 15 May to 20 December 2023 for relevant publications which compared the outcomes reported with the newly approved remimazolam versus propofol in patients undergoing surgery. Relevant reported adverse drug events were the endpoints of this study. The statistical analysis was carried out using the latest version of the RevMan software. Data analysis was represented by risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Sixteen studies with a total number of 1897 participants were included in this analysis; 1104 participants received remimazolam and 793 participants received propofol. The risks for hypotension (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.43–0.58; P = 0.00001), hypoxemia (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.99; P = 0.05), bradycardia (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36–0.78; P = 0.001), pain at injection site (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.56; P = 0.01), and total adverse events (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.24–0.47; P = 0.00001) were significantly lower with remimazolam. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66–1.46; P = 0.93), dizziness (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11–1.57; P = 0.20), psychiatric symptoms (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.45–2.67; P = 0.85), and respiratory depression (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.24–2.76; P = 0.74).

Conclusion

Our current analysis showed that the newly approved remimazolam was apparently associated with significantly fewer adverse drug events in comparison to propofol for GA in patients undergoing surgery. Therefore, this new drug should be further studied and more research with larger population sizes should be carried out to confirm this hypothesis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon KKS, Wong SHS. New and developing anesthesia drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18(2):195–204.CrossRefPubMed Poon KKS, Wong SHS. New and developing anesthesia drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18(2):195–204.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim H, Park S-S, Shim J. Differences in midazolam premedication effects on recovery after short-duration ambulatory anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane for gynecologic surgery in young patients: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(47):e23194.CrossRefPubMed Kim H, Park S-S, Shim J. Differences in midazolam premedication effects on recovery after short-duration ambulatory anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane for gynecologic surgery in young patients: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(47):e23194.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong LB, Plummer JL, Waldow WC, Owen H. Timing of midazolam and propofol administration for co-induction of anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28(5):527–31.CrossRefPubMed Ong LB, Plummer JL, Waldow WC, Owen H. Timing of midazolam and propofol administration for co-induction of anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28(5):527–31.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordt SP, Clark RF. Midazolam: a review of therapeutic uses and toxicity. J Emerg Med. 1997;15(3):357–65.CrossRefPubMed Nordt SP, Clark RF. Midazolam: a review of therapeutic uses and toxicity. J Emerg Med. 1997;15(3):357–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Perel A. Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a consensus statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(8):580–4.CrossRefPubMed Perel A. Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a consensus statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(8):580–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemphill S, McMenamin L, Bellamy MC, Hopkins PM. Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):448–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hemphill S, McMenamin L, Bellamy MC, Hopkins PM. Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):448–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Noor N, Legendre R, Cloutet A, Chitneni A, Varrassi G, Kaye AD. A comprehensive review of remimazolam for sedation. Health Psychol Res. 2021;9(1):24514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noor N, Legendre R, Cloutet A, Chitneni A, Varrassi G, Kaye AD. A comprehensive review of remimazolam for sedation. Health Psychol Res. 2021;9(1):24514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee A, Shirley M. Remimazolam: a review in procedural sedation. Drugs. 2021;81(10):1193–201.CrossRefPubMed Lee A, Shirley M. Remimazolam: a review in procedural sedation. Drugs. 2021;81(10):1193–201.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.CrossRefPubMed Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JY, Lee HS, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: a randomized non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2022;82:110955.CrossRefPubMed Choi JY, Lee HS, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: a randomized non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2022;82:110955.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dai G, Pei L, Duan F, et al. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87(10):1073–9.CrossRefPubMed Dai G, Pei L, Duan F, et al. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87(10):1073–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J Anesth. 2020;34(4):543–53.CrossRefPubMed Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J Anesth. 2020;34(4):543–53.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeon Y-G, Kim S, Park J-H, et al. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension in older patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(49): e36440.CrossRefPubMed Jeon Y-G, Kim S, Park J-H, et al. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension in older patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(49): e36440.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuang Q, Zhong N, Ye C, Zhu X, Wei F. Propofol versus remimazolam on cognitive function, hemodynamics, and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in older patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37(10):1996–2005.CrossRefPubMed Kuang Q, Zhong N, Ye C, Zhu X, Wei F. Propofol versus remimazolam on cognitive function, hemodynamics, and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in older patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37(10):1996–2005.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu T, Lai T, Chen J, et al. Effect of remimazolam induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9(5):e00851.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu T, Lai T, Chen J, et al. Effect of remimazolam induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9(5):e00851.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun WLM, Wan J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol in patients undergoing day surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sun WLM, Wan J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol in patients undergoing day surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao Y, Guo J, Yuan J, Zhao E, Yang J. Quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam in patients’ undergoing urologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing remimazolam with propofol. Drug Des DevelTher. 2022;27(16):1199–209. Mao Y, Guo J, Yuan J, Zhao E, Yang J. Quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam in patients’ undergoing urologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing remimazolam with propofol. Drug Des DevelTher. 2022;27(16):1199–209.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto A, Satomi S, Kakuta N, et al. Remimazolam’s effects on postoperative nausea and vomiting are similar to those of propofol after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matsumoto A, Satomi S, Kakuta N, et al. Remimazolam’s effects on postoperative nausea and vomiting are similar to those of propofol after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh EJ, Chung YJ, Lee J-H, et al. Comparison of propofol vs remimazolam on emergence profiles after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023;90:111223.CrossRefPubMed Oh EJ, Chung YJ, Lee J-H, et al. Comparison of propofol vs remimazolam on emergence profiles after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023;90:111223.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato T, Nishiwaki K. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol in anesthetic management for awake craniotomy: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2022;36(1):152–5.CrossRefPubMed Sato T, Nishiwaki K. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol in anesthetic management for awake craniotomy: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2022;36(1):152–5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi Fu, Chen Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhao T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for general anesthesia in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation. Int J Gen Med. 2022;13(15):583–91.CrossRef Shi Fu, Chen Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhao T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for general anesthesia in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation. Int J Gen Med. 2022;13(15):583–91.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang F, Yi J-M, Gong H-Y, et al. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(34):10595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang F, Yi J-M, Gong H-Y, et al. Remimazolam benzenesulfonate anesthesia effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(34):10595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang L, Sun Y, Hao X, et al. Effect of general anaesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic meniscus repair: a randomised clinical trial. BJA Open. 2023;28(8):100237.CrossRef Tang L, Sun Y, Hao X, et al. Effect of general anaesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic meniscus repair: a randomised clinical trial. BJA Open. 2023;28(8):100237.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yue L, Ma X, Li Na, et al. Remimazolam versus propofol in combination with esketamine for surgical abortion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Transl Sci. 2023;16(9):1606–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yue L, Ma X, Li Na, et al. Remimazolam versus propofol in combination with esketamine for surgical abortion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Transl Sci. 2023;16(9):1606–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Zhu S. Application effects of remimazolam and propofol on elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Zhu S. Application effects of remimazolam and propofol on elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu X, Wang H, Yuan S, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in endoscopic sedation-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:655042.CrossRefPubMed Zhu X, Wang H, Yuan S, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in endoscopic sedation-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:655042.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Xueyan Wu, Wang C, Gao H, et al. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023;89(6):553–64. Xueyan Wu, Wang C, Gao H, et al. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023;89(6):553–64.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bo-JyunJhuang B-H, Huang Y-T, Lai P-C. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;27(8):641866.CrossRef Bo-JyunJhuang B-H, Huang Y-T, Lai P-C. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;27(8):641866.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang S, Wang J, Ran R, Peng Y, Xiao Y. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate in hysteroscopy: a randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47(1):55–60.CrossRefPubMed Zhang S, Wang J, Ran R, Peng Y, Xiao Y. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate in hysteroscopy: a randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47(1):55–60.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Li S, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang X, Li S, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Ding B, Shi F, et al. The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus etomidate-propofol in elderly outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:4675–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu X, Ding B, Shi F, et al. The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus etomidate-propofol in elderly outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:4675–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Wang J, Xu X, et al. The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(8):4594–603.PubMedPubMedCentral Chen S, Wang J, Xu X, et al. The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(8):4594–603.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Toyota Y, Kondo T, Oshita K, et al. Remimazolam-based anesthesia with flumazenil allows faster emergence than propofol-based anesthesia in older patients undergoing spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(46):e36081.CrossRefPubMed Toyota Y, Kondo T, Oshita K, et al. Remimazolam-based anesthesia with flumazenil allows faster emergence than propofol-based anesthesia in older patients undergoing spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(46):e36081.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Effect of remimazolam vs propofol on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures: a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023;5(93):111356. Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Effect of remimazolam vs propofol on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures: a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023;5(93):111356.
Metadaten
Titel
Adverse Drug Events Observed with the Newly Approved Remimazolam in Comparison to Propofol for General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Lidan Huang
Hong Liu
Xue Zou
Jiawang Ding
Song Tao
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2024
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02820-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2024

Advances in Therapy 5/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

CAR-M-Zellen: Warten auf das große Fressen

22.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Auch myeloide Immunzellen lassen sich mit chimären Antigenrezeptoren gegen Tumoren ausstatten. Solche CAR-Fresszell-Therapien werden jetzt für solide Tumoren entwickelt. Künftig soll dieser Prozess nicht mehr ex vivo, sondern per mRNA im Körper der Betroffenen erfolgen.

Chronische Verstopfung: „Versuchen Sie es mit grünen Kiwis!“

22.05.2024 Obstipation Nachrichten

Bei chronischer Verstopfung wirken Kiwis offenbar besser als Flohsamenschalen. Das zeigen die Daten aus einer randomisierten Studie, die der Gastroenterologe Oliver Pech beim Praxis-Update vorstellte.

So häufig greift rheumatoide Arthritis auf Organe über

21.05.2024 Rheumatoide Arthritis Nachrichten

Im Verlauf von rheumatoider Arthritis entwickeln viele Patienten extraartikuläre Manifestationen. Schwedische Forscher haben sich mit der Inzidenz und den Risikofaktoren befasst.

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.