Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia 4/2020

16.05.2020 | Original Article

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial

verfasst von: Matsuyuki Doi, Kiyoshi Morita, Junzo Takeda, Atsuhiro Sakamoto, Michiaki Yamakage, Toshiyasu Suzuki

Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This trial was conducted to confirm the non-inferiority of remimazolam versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in surgical patients.

Methods

Surgical patients (n = 375) were randomized to remimazolam started at 6 or 12 mg/kg/h by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion until the loss of consciousness (LoC), followed by 1 mg/kg/h to be adjusted as appropriate until the end of surgery or IV propofol administered as a slow bolus of 2.0–2.5 mg/kg until LoC followed by 4–10 mg/kg/h until the end of surgery. Efficacy was measured via the combined primary endpoint of no intraoperative awakening/recall, no need for rescue sedatives, and no body movements. Adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored for safety.

Results

Efficacy rates were 100% in all treatment groups, and the non-inferiority of remimazolam was demonstrated [95% confidence interval (− 0.0487; 0.0250)]. The time to LoC was longer in the remimazolam 6 (p < 0.0001) and 12 mg/kg/h (p = 0.0149) groups versus propofol. The time to extubation was longer in both remimazolam groups versus the propofol group (p ≤ 0.0001). The incidence of ADRs was similar in the remimazolam groups (39.3% and 42.7%, respectively) compared with the propofol group (61.3%). Decreased blood pressure occurred in 20.0% and 24.0% of patients treated with 6 and 12 mg/kg/h remimazolam, respectively, compared with 49.3% of patients receiving propofol. Injection site pain was reported in 18.7% of propofol patients but not in those receiving remimazolam.

Conclusions

This trial demonstrated that remimazolam was well tolerated and non-inferior to propofol with regard to efficacy as a sedative hypnotics for general anesthesia.

Clinical trial registration

This trial is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center - Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI). JapicCTI number: 121973
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chitilian HV, Eckenhoff RG. Anesthetic drug development: novel drugs and new approaches. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4(Suppl1):S2–S10.PubMedPubMedCentral Chitilian HV, Eckenhoff RG. Anesthetic drug development: novel drugs and new approaches. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4(Suppl1):S2–S10.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott RP, Saunders DA. Propofol: clinical strategies for preventing the pain of injection. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:492–4.CrossRef Scott RP, Saunders DA. Propofol: clinical strategies for preventing the pain of injection. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:492–4.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sneyd JR, Rigby-Jones AE. New drugs and technologies, intravenous anaesthesia is on the move (again). Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:246–54.CrossRef Sneyd JR, Rigby-Jones AE. New drugs and technologies, intravenous anaesthesia is on the move (again). Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:246–54.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuk B, van Oostenbruggen MF. Characterization of the pharmacodynamic interaction between parent drug and active metabolite in vivo: midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289:1067–74.PubMed Tuk B, van Oostenbruggen MF. Characterization of the pharmacodynamic interaction between parent drug and active metabolite in vivo: midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289:1067–74.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Saari TI, Uusi-Oukari M. Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:243–67.CrossRef Saari TI, Uusi-Oukari M. Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:243–67.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilpatrick GJ, McIntyre MS, Cox RF, Stafford JA, Pacofsky GJ, Lovell GG, Wiard RP, Feldman PL, Collins H, Waszczak BL, Tilbrook GS. CNS 7056: a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:60–6.CrossRef Kilpatrick GJ, McIntyre MS, Cox RF, Stafford JA, Pacofsky GJ, Lovell GG, Wiard RP, Feldman PL, Collins H, Waszczak BL, Tilbrook GS. CNS 7056: a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:60–6.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnider T, Minto C. Context sensitive decrement times of remimazolam. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:285.CrossRef Schnider T, Minto C. Context sensitive decrement times of remimazolam. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:285.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Upton RN, Somogyi AA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting sedative CNS 7056 in sheep. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:798–809.CrossRef Upton RN, Somogyi AA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting sedative CNS 7056 in sheep. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:798–809.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:274–83.CrossRef Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:274–83.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ihmsen H, Eisenried A. Population pharmacokinetics of remimazolam after continuous infusion in volunteers. Poster 01AP14–1. Euroanaesthesia 2018. Copenhagen, Denmark 2018. Ihmsen H, Eisenried A. Population pharmacokinetics of remimazolam after continuous infusion in volunteers. Poster 01AP14–1. Euroanaesthesia 2018. Copenhagen, Denmark 2018.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiltshire HR, Kilpatrick GJ. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part II. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:284–96.CrossRef Wiltshire HR, Kilpatrick GJ. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part II. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:284–96.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Worthington MT, Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K, Borkett KM, Mitchell MC. A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1093–100.CrossRef Worthington MT, Antonik LJ, Goldwater DR, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K, Borkett KM, Mitchell MC. A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1093–100.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:771–80.CrossRef Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:771–80.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:984–92.CrossRef Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:984–92.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Bhandari R, Desta T, DeMicco MP, Schaeffer C, Etzkorn K, Barish CF, Pruitt R, Cash BD, Quirk D, Tiongco F, Sullivan S, Bernstein D. A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(427–437):e6. Rex DK, Bhandari R, Desta T, DeMicco MP, Schaeffer C, Etzkorn K, Barish CF, Pruitt R, Cash BD, Quirk D, Tiongco F, Sullivan S, Bernstein D. A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(427–437):e6.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pastis NJ, Yarmus LB, Schippers F, Ostroff R, Chen A, Akulian J, Wahidi M, Shojaee S, Tanner NT, Callahan SP, Feldman G, Lorch DG Jr, Ndukwu I, Pritchett MA, Silvestri GA, PAION Investigators. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with placebo and midazolam for moderate sedation during bronchoscopy. Chest. 2019;155:137–46.CrossRef Pastis NJ, Yarmus LB, Schippers F, Ostroff R, Chen A, Akulian J, Wahidi M, Shojaee S, Tanner NT, Callahan SP, Feldman G, Lorch DG Jr, Ndukwu I, Pritchett MA, Silvestri GA, PAION Investigators. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with placebo and midazolam for moderate sedation during bronchoscopy. Chest. 2019;155:137–46.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi M. Remimazolam. J Jpn Soc Clin Anesthesia. 2014;34:860–6 (in Japanese, abstract in English).CrossRef Doi M. Remimazolam. J Jpn Soc Clin Anesthesia. 2014;34:860–6 (in Japanese, abstract in English).CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Probst S, Grossmann E (2014) Phase II study on ultra-short acting remimazolam vs. propofol / sevoflurane in cardiac surgery. Poster presentation. ASA 2014. New Orleans, USA. Probst S, Grossmann E (2014) Phase II study on ultra-short acting remimazolam vs. propofol / sevoflurane in cardiac surgery. Poster presentation. ASA 2014. New Orleans, USA.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat International Conference on Harmonisation. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice: E6(R1). International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Geneva, Switzerland: ICH; 1996:1–59. International Conference on Harmonisation. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice: E6(R1). International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Geneva, Switzerland: ICH; 1996:1–59.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat World Medical Association. WMA declaration of helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: WMA; 2013. p. 1–8. World Medical Association. WMA declaration of helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: WMA; 2013. p. 1–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. 2014. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. 2014.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansen JW. Update on bispectral index monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:81–99.CrossRef Johansen JW. Update on bispectral index monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:81–99.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Brice DD, Hetherington RR. A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1970;42:535–42.CrossRef Brice DD, Hetherington RR. A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1970;42:535–42.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial
verfasst von
Matsuyuki Doi
Kiyoshi Morita
Junzo Takeda
Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Michiaki Yamakage
Toshiyasu Suzuki
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Anesthesia / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02788-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Anesthesia 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

A reply to a letter

Delir bei kritisch Kranken – Antipsychotika versus Placebo

16.05.2024 Delir Nachrichten

Um die Langzeitfolgen eines Delirs bei kritisch Kranken zu mildern, wird vielerorts auf eine Akuttherapie mit Antipsychotika gesetzt. Eine US-amerikanische Forschungsgruppe äußert jetzt erhebliche Vorbehalte gegen dieses Vorgehen. Denn es gibt neue Daten zum Langzeiteffekt von Haloperidol bzw. Ziprasidon versus Placebo.

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

15.05.2024 Fremdkörperaspiration Nachrichten

Wer sich an einem Essensrest verschluckt und um Luft ringt, benötigt vor allem rasche Hilfe. Dass Umstehende nur in jedem zweiten Erstickungsnotfall bereit waren, diese zu leisten, ist das ernüchternde Ergebnis einer Beobachtungsstudie aus Japan. Doch es gibt auch eine gute Nachricht.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.