Guam parkinsonism–dementia complex (G-PDC) is an enigmatic neurodegenerative disease that affects the Chamorro residents of the Pacific island of Guam. G-PDC is clinically characterized by progressive cognitive impairment with extrapyramidal signs. Pronounced loss of neurons and abundant neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are observed throughout the brain of G-PDC patients [6, 7]. Although several hypotheses have been suggested for the cause of G-PDC, notably genetic predisposition and exposure to neurotoxins (e.g., β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA)), the etiology and pathogenesis remain elusive [10].
A frameshift mutant of ubiquitin, known as ubiquitin-B+1 (UBB+1), was previously found to accumulate in the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease and several other disorders, including tauopathies and polyglutamine diseases [1, 3, 12] (Fig. 1a-b). UBB+1 is a dose-dependent inhibitor of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and its accumulation in cells an indicator of protein quality control failure. Impaired protein homeostasis is a frequent feature of neurodegenerative diseases and we hypothesized that accumulation of UBB+1 might also be observed in G-PDC. To test whether UBB+1 is detectable in G-PDC brains, immunohistochemical analyses were performed on G-PDC post-mortem brain tissue (Table 1). Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of numerous NFTs in G-PDC brains [5] (not shown), as well as other pathology that has been described to occur in G-PDC, i.e., TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-positive inclusions [5] (Fig. 1f-h). Importantly, our results show that UBB+1 is present in G-PDC brains. UBB+1 deposits were found specifically in cytoplasm of pyramidal neurons and glia (astrocytes in the alveus and stratum oriens) in Ammon’s horn, showing a granular and tangle-like pattern of distribution (Fig. 1c-e). UBB+1 was not detected in young control brains (n = 2, non-Guamanian cases, ages: 52 and 59 years old) [8]. Aggregate structures containing distinct components of the UPS, i.e., the deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) [9] (Fig. 1i-k) and the proteasomal ATPase subunit Rpt3/S6b [13] (Fig. 1l-n), were also present in these brains.
Table 1
Description of the subjects
Subject
Sex
Age of death (years)
Age of onset (years)
Disease duration (months)
Brain weight (g)
Post-mortem delay
Cause of death
UBB+1
1
F
51
42
116
850
3 h
perforated gastric ulcer
++
2
M
64
58
72
1275
7 h
pulmonary atelectasis
++++
3
M
52
42
126
1025
4 h
bronchopneumonia
++
4
M
56
46
126
1235
< 10 h
bronchopneumonia
+++
5
F
51
46
59
1135
8 h
bronchopneumonia
++
6
M
84
80
50
1100
14 h
bronchopneumonia
++
×
Anzeige
This demonstration of UBB+1-immunoreactivity and accumulation of particular UPS components in G-PDC brains (n = 6) might have important implications for understanding of the pathological mechanisms underlying the disease. UBB+1 has previously been shown to induce neuronal defects in in vitro and in vivo experimental models: long-term UPS inhibition due to UBB+1 expression causes memory deficits and central breathing dysfunction in mice [4, 8, 11]. In addition, UBB+1 might act as a modifier of other pathology in G-PDC. For example, UBB+1 may enhance the aggregation and cellular toxicity of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 through interfering with its degradation. It is striking that UBB+1 accumulates in glial cells in G-PDC, because similar glial inclusions have been reported in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) [3], a disease that displays some similar topography of neurofibrillary degeneration [10]. Recognition of common mechanistic themes shared by neurodegenerative disorders, such as dysfunctional (ubiquitin-dependent) protein degradation and proteotoxic stress, may help in identifying therapeutic targets that prevent neurodegeneration. It will be interesting to investigate the potential contribution of disrupted proteostasis and UBB+1 to G-PDC in more detail in future studies.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. J.-M. Graïc, J.J. van Heerikhuize and D.F. Swaab (Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NIN), Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for assistance and Dr. R.A.I. de Vos (Laboratory of Pathology, Enschede, The Netherlands) for advice.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethical Committee of Shinshu University School of Medicine (No. 1565).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Anzeige
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.
Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.
Auch ein sehr ausgedehnter ischämischer Schlaganfall scheint an sich kein Grund zu sein, von einer mechanischen Thrombektomie abzusehen. Dafür spricht die LASTE-Studie, an der Patienten und Patientinnen mit einem ASPECTS von maximal 5 beteiligt waren.
Update Neurologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.