Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies analysis of a large tertiary center case series

This is a retrospective analysis of a case series of 24 patients with diagnosed or suspected CSP, cervical pregnancy and cornual pregnancy referred to LMU University Hospital, Munich, between April 2015 and May 2020. Clinical and anamnestic data were retrieved from electronic clinical records of the patients. The following eligibility criteria had to be fulfilled: (1) the ultrasound images confirming the diagnosis were available and all structures were visible including embryo, yolk sac, exact localization, myometrium, both ovaries; (2) an adequate follow-up period was documented.

Our study was confirmed by the ethical committee of our University Hospital (Project- No. 23-0111, date: 21.03.2023). All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

The ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound with the following criteria: empty uterine cavity, clear visibility of the ectopic pregnancy as well as the entire uterus with its fundic and cervical contour and ovarian/tubal area of both sides. In one case, MRI was performed in an external hospital to rule out a placenta increta in a cervical pregnancy.

Treatment modalities were as listed below:

The decision about which mode of therapy would be performed, was made after an interdisciplinary discussion. Patients got a detailed information about the various treatment options, including benefits and potential risks, and management of the procedure. Written informed consent was obtained. Patients remained hospitalized until effect of the treatment was proven by an adequate drop in serum βHCG.

Weekly determination of serum βHCG was performed in our hospital for an indefinite period of weeks and bimonthly until the hormone was below the detection limit.

The protocol for follow-up in the MTX-group was in accordance with the in-house standard for ectopic pregnancies, including the determination of serum βHCG, as shown in Fig. 1. Patients returned for a visit in our outpatient clinic.

The data were analyzed in an Excel spreadsheet, and statistical analysis was carried out at the nominal and ordinal levels. It has been calculated using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 29.

CSP occurred in ten patients. The patient’s age ranged from 28 to 42 years. Demographic data are shown in Table 2. Location of the pregnancy is shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Three out of ten cases were twin pregnancies, in two of these one fetus was in the scar and one in the uterine cavity. In all three cases, one fetus showed negative heart action independent of its location.

Six patients (n = 6) initially received a local injection of MTX into the amniotic sac as primary therapy, either guided by transvaginal ultrasound (n = 4/6) or guided by abdominal ultrasound (n = 2/6), those two injections were performed percutaneously (n = 2/6). In four of those six cases (n = 4/6), a simultaneous systemic MTX dose via intramuscular injection (i.m.) was given and in two of those six cases (n = 2/6), additional curettage was performed due to a relevant hemorrhage.

Two other patients (n = 2) received primary laparotomy: in one case because of a thin uterine wall (< 2 mm) in the diagnostic, which was verified intraoperatively as a perforation. In the other patient showed intraabdominal bleeding by diagnosis, which was confirmed as a ruptured uterine scar on MRI. In both cases, the uterine wall was reconstructed after the excision of the scar and pregnancy (Fig. 2).

During follow-up period, four patients expressed no whish for a further pregnancy. Two patients became pregnant again, and in both cases, sonography revealed the presence of at least a minor defect in the myometrium once more. To avoid uterine rupture caesarean section was perfomed as delivery mode (Fig. 3).

Eight patients were diagnosed with cervical pregnancy (n = 8). The patient’s age ranged from 22 to 44 years. Demographic data are shown in Table 2. The documented average size of the amniotic sac was 20 mm. Transfusion was required in one patient with relevant vaginal bleeding. In this case, the performed MRI showed a placenta increta.

In three cases, a Bakri balloon was inserted—in one case as a primary treatment, in one after curettage, and in the third one after the locally administered MTX.

The patient with vaginal bleeding mentioned above had a cervical pregnancy in the 12+2 gestational week of gestation with placenta increta. The patient was presented primarily to another hospital and was transferred to our clinic because of vaginal bleeding at diagnosis and a minimal hemoglobin level of 7.6 g/dl. Therapy included trachelectomy via transverse laparotomy by placenta increta due to emergency situation. Intraoperative cerclage sutures were performed prophylactically. This patient developed stenosis of the remaining cervical rest, which was corrected by conization 2 years later for the reason of a persisting wish to get pregnant. During follow up, one successful pregnancy could be observed in a case after MTX treatment.

The patient with trachelectomy was counseled in the department of reproductive medicine, but no following intervention or pregnancy was documented. One patient was not able to conceive a pregnancy even after laparoscopy performed as part of fertility treatment.

Six patients were diagnosed with cornual pregnancy (n = 6). This is the smallest subgroup in our retrospective analysis. Location of this pregnancy is shown in Fig. 4. The patient’s age ranged from 25 to 47 years. Demographic data are shown in Table 2. This group included one pregnancy after oocyte donation. Only one patient presented with an embryonic structure and a positive heart action in the ultrasound. The amniotic sac was between 9 and 25 mm. One of the cornual pregnancies showed a location in a rudimentary uterine horn of the uterus bicornis unicollis. An other patient showed a trophoblast invasion into the back wall of the uterus.

In this group, local MTX therapy was combined with intramuscular MTX therapy in four cases. Two cases received injections via laparoscopy, two transvaginal. One patient required three additional MTX injections systemically after local treatment. This patient developed a mucositis as a side effect.

Two patients needed extended surgical therapy: one received primary curettage of the pregnancy in the uterine horn. In this case, the pregnancy was in the stump of the.

remaining tube after salpingectomy which was performed due to a previous ectopic pregnancy 3 years prior. During curettage, the uterine wall was perforated. As a result, laparoscopy had to be performed to deal with the complication and and local MTX application and additional tube sterilization.

The other patient who needed surgery required a hemi-hysterectomy. Because of the location of the pregnancy in the left rudimentary uterine horn of a uterus bicornis unicollis, this had to be removed. One patient out of the medical treatment group needed to be controlled after MTX injection for 71 days in our clinic, which is above average.

In the follow-up, one pregnancy after the hemi- hysterectomy was documented. In Tables 3 and 4 you can see an overview of treatment modalities an complications.

In our single-center retrospective analysis, we evaluated the cases of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies treated in our hospital to add evidence to provide a basis for a future standard of care.

Our data show an individual approach depending on the diagnostic outcome and experience. After a primary systemic therapy with MTX, 50–75% of the patients over all groups needed any secondary therapy (MTX i.m. or Bakri-balloon). Especially those without simultaneous local and systemic MTX treatment. In CSP group, 50% needed a secondary surgical therapy. In the case of CSP, a future wish to conceive highly relevant. Regarding a future pregnancy surgical excision, and reconstruction is the safest treatment option for these patients. Cornual pregnancy and cervical pregnancy did not require any secondary surgical treatment after primary MTX. In the group of cervical pregnancy and cornual pregnancy, just one case each required primary surgery (trachelectomy or hemihysterectomy). In our analysis, simultaneous local and systemic MTX therapy appeared to be the most successful treatment. Therapy modalities are shown in Fig. 5. Up to now, 4 of 25 patients successfully got pregnant again.

Overall, complications and side effects were minor. Just one of our patients developed mucositis, after repeated treatment with MTX. Blood transfusion was only indicated for one patient due to bleeding (Fig. 5).

An individual consideration of the patient’s history, risk factors, family planning, and current circumstances should be considered during the process of decision making to find an optimal and safe treatment. However, primarily combined treatment modalities, e.g., local and systemic MTX or MTX and surgery, can help to reduce hemorrhage, the risk of further surgery, and result in an adequate treatment success. In some cases, a multimodaltreatment concept may be necessary to reduce the risk for the patient and optimize the outcome. Also, the patient’s compliance and social factors (e.g., work and family commitments, lack of transportation) [14] must be considered, especially in the outpatient sector since controls must be performed following a strict algorithm. In our cohort, inpatient treatment was preferred because of a lack of experience and standardized recommendations for treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. So far, MTX is the only successful conservative treatment. Several MTX protocols for ectopic pregnancies can be found in the literature. Over all groups, we followed our therapeutic regime with MTX 50 mg/m² BSA.

Surgical treatment is indicated if there is a rupture of the uterine scar or a high risk for uterine rupture, especially in CSP or cornual pregnancy. In some cases, surgical treatment can be safer, e.g., regarding a future pregnancy, as the primary excision of the cesarean scar including the reconstruction of the uterine wall can prevent severe hemorrhage or secondary complications. We recommend laparotomy, because it is important to remove the pregnancy in total and to give the best possibility to reconstruct for example the cesarean scar. This is not a new technique, but it’s our experience we want to share, compared to other studies, who performed laparoscopies. We would like to point out the importance of a guideline concerning this topic.

Concerning CSP, systemic drug treatment was preferred but in 30% of cases surgery became necessary. Petersen et al. showed, in their systematic review, all kinds of treatments of CSP and the outcome of over 2000 CSP [18]. In cases with CSP, Timor-Tritsch et al. described a splitting of the locally administered MTX. Half of the dose was injected into the fetus and the other half into the placenta site resulting in a reasonable success rate [19]. In addition, locally applied MTX or surgical approaches like surgical aspiration, curettage, hysteroscopy, transvaginal resection, and laparoscopy, and interventional techniques like uterine artery embolization and high-intensity ultrasound were mentioned as therapy options [18]. As in our cohort, primary laparotomy was only performed when necessary due to imminent risk of uterine rupture or bleeding. In the study of Petersen, a secondary treatment was required in 25% of the cases [19], whereas the rate for secondary treatment in our analysis was about 30%. Petersen et al. did not find any correlation or consensus on a treatment strategy in relation to special conditions of CSP, such as thickness of myometrium or relation to bladder. Instead of curettage, surgical aspiration should be considered as a possible gentle option. All in all our finding agrees with the results of other research groups.

Concerning cervical pregnancies, acceptable results could be achieved in 87.5% of our cases with primary MTX treatment with or without secondary treatment independent of size or localization. Other studies showed further approaches and methods. Imai et al. investigated hysteroscopic transcervical resection with a temporarily laparoscopic clipping of both uterine arteries (LUA clipping-TCR) as an effective minimally invasive treatment for the management. They showed that this is an effective management regarding fertility preservation in case of cervical pregnancy [20]. Hosni et al. described several effective conservative managements using MTX and additional potassium chloride. Furthermore, they used local hydrogen peroxide or Mifepristone [21]. Their review further pointed out that the treatment should be performed in a specialized center [21]. We agree that treatment of such ectopic pregnancies should be bundled in clinical centers to optimize the outcome for the patients and gain more experience. LUA clipping TCR seems to be an interesting alternative or additional treatment option. Here a guideline that specifies which procedure is when indicated would be helpful.

Cornual pregnancies showed a good outcome after conservative treatment (primary and secondary) without any need of surgery. Concerning cornual pregnancy, Mao et al. reported that the risk of persistent ectopic pregnancy is higher in multipara, if the maximum diameter of the lesion is smaller than 1.5 cm and if the dilation and curettage is not assisted by ultrasound guidance. The group of Mao recommend cornostomy or cornectomy for patients with cornual pregnancy. If curettage is performed or the location of pregnancy can be better reached from the abdomen, laparoscopic monitoring or injection from the abdomen should be performed. If a positive result of surgical therapy is to be expected, this should be preferred They do not recommend using MTX as a routine method at all [22]. We see the difficulty choosing good criteria to decide whether surgery or medical treatment will be successful. Therefore, drug therapy should be attempted in our opinion first. If surgery is the primary therapy, localization should be known exactly, especially before curettage. As we have noticed the high risk of iatrogenic perforation of the uterus. Stationary monitoring seems reasonable. Because of the small number of cases, no correlation of the size of the lesion and the therapeutic approach could be found.

Finally, we evaluated our cases of ectopic pregnancies in rare sites to establish a standardized treatment. In our cohort of 24 cases, we determined that a combination of different therapy modes based on systemically administered MTX led to an acceptable outcome and could prevent further surgery. Simultaneous intramuscular and local injection of MTX was applied in most of the patients under MTX treatment. Because of the small sample size due to these rare diagnosis, no significant correlations could be found. This is a weak point in our single-center study. However, βHCG blood levels and the size of the amniotic sac could be assumed to be important factors in decision making regarding therapy and outcome concerning our study and based on literature research.

In conclusion, treatment strategies were based on the individual risk and history of the patient, localization, and size of the ectopic pregnancy as well as βHCG levels. Exact ultrasound diagnostics are mandatory. Treatment modalities, and individual risk of the patient should be considered. Contraindications should be considered before starting drug treatment. The simultaneous injection of MTX locally and intramuscularly is a successful therapeutic approach of our data, which shows the main point of this study and to avoid surgery. A repeated application or secondary surgery can become necessary to optimize the outcome.