Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

A high blood endocan profile during COVID-19 distinguishes moderate from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

verfasst von: Tiffany Pascreau, Colas Tcherakian, Benjamin Zuber, Eric Farfour, Marc Vasse, Philippe Lassalle

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 1/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
A comment to this article is available online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13054-021-03838-5.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
ARDS
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
AUC
Area under curve
COVID-19
Coronavirus disease 2019
CRP
C-reactive protein
CT
Computed tomography
ECR
Endocan cleaved ratio
IQR
Interquartile range
Endocan is expressed by the lung endothelial cells and upregulated by pro-inflammatory conditions. Because elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines are hallmarks of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [1], and that the lung is the organ preferentially affected, we measured endocan in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. This retrospective study was conducted between March 12 and April 20, 2020, and approved by the local ethics committee of the Foch Hospital (20-07-15). Seventy-four patients with COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR were enrolled. According to the Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patients were categorized into non-ARDS, mild/moderate ARDS, and severe ARDS. At the admission complete blood count, biochemical and coagulation parameters were measured. Endocan and cathepsin G-cleaved endocan (p14) concentrations were measured on baseline and during the hospitalization. Plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) was calculated as plasma p14/(endocan + p14) ratio. Healthy hospital workers served as group of control. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Patients with ARDS had significantly higher CRP (176 mg/L [IQR: 133–270] vs 141 mg/L [IQR: 88–187], p = 0.0122), and higher d-dimers (1.843 mg/L [IQR: 0.579–7.134] vs 0.771 mg/L [IQR: 0.535–1.374], p = 0.0472), had greater lung parenchyma involvement assessed by the CT score (4 [4, 5] vs 3 [2–4], p = 0.0016) and stay hospitalized for longer than non-ARDS group (25 days [IQR: 14–38] vs 12 days [IQR: 7–17], p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was also higher in patients with ARDS than non-ARDS group (43% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) (Table 1). At admission, endocan levels measured in 59/74 (84%) patients were significantly increased in patients with COVID-19 compared to controls (3.4 ng/mL [IQR: 1.8–7.5] vs 1.6 ng/mL [IQR: 1.0–2.1], respectively, p = 0.0031) (Fig. 1a). There was no significant difference between patients who developed ARDS and those who have not (3.7 [2.8–9.6] ng/mL vs 3.2 [1.5–5.7] ng/mL, respectively, p = 0.2231) (Fig. 1b). Endocan was negatively correlated with the platelets (Spearman's correlation coefficient r = − 0.3681, p = 0.0041). When plasma samples were available in patients with ARDS, endocan concentrations were measured during the hospitalization. Patients with mild/moderate ARDS had a significant increase in endocan levels at days 3–4 (p = 0.0084) and days 5–6 (p = 0.0107) compared to those measured at days 1–2 (Fig. 1c). No increase was observed in patients with severe ARDS (Fig. 1c). This discrepancy was not due to an increase in cleavage of endocan since the ECR remained similar whatever the severity of ARDS or the hospitalization day (not shown). ECR at admission was positively correlated with the Von Willebrand antigen (r = 0.3047, p = 0.0418). ARDS was already present at admission in 15/37 (40%). Twelve (32%) patients developed ARDS within 48 h, whereas 10 (27%) patients developed ARDS between the 3rd and 7th day of hospitalization. After exclusion of patients with ARDS within the first 48 h, the calculated AUC of endocan was 0.7235 (p = 0.1104). Several biomarkers had already been related to the ARDS [2, 3]. In a series of 659 patients with COVID-19, lymphocyte count, creatine kinase, neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio, AST, lactate dehydrogenase, and CRP were all strongly related to the aggravation of ARDS [4]. Few data are available in the literature about endocan in COVID-19. One study observed that endocan levels at the admission were associated with poor clinical outcomes, but the occurrence of ARDS has not been studied [5]. In our series, endocan levels measured at admission could be predictive of ARDS after the 3rd day of hospitalization. During the hospitalization, we observed a lack of increase in endocan levels in patients with severe ARDS which is consistent with the finding that low endocan levels during sepsis may also predict ARDS worsening [6]. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these results on the role of endocan in prediction of ARDS in patients with COVID-19.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics, biological and radiological findings at the admission and clinical outcomes of the patients
 
All (n = 74)
Non-ARDS (n = 37)
ARDS (n = 37)
ARDS vs non-ARDS
Mild or moderate ARDS (n = 12)
Severe ARDS (n = 25)
Non-ARDS vs mild/moderate vs severe ARDS
Male sex, n (%)
59 (80%)
(n = 74)
30 (81%)
(n = 37)
29 (78%)
 > 0.9999
9 (75%)
20 (80%)
0.9008
Age, median [IQR] (years)
64 [55–71]
(n = 74)
65 [51–73]
(n = 37)
62 [56–70]
0.8486
63 [56–76]
62 [55–68]
0.6131
BMI (kg/m2)
26.9 [24.0–31.0]
(n = 53)
26.5 [23.7–30.6]
(n = 30)
27.3 [24.2–31.0]
(n = 23)
0.4355
24.2 [23.4–32.7]
(n = 7)
27.7 [25.4–30.6]
(n = 16)
0.5424
Comorbidities
       
Hypertension n (%)
36 (49%)
(n = 74)
19 (63%)
17 (46%)
0.8163
5 (42%)
12 (48%)
0.8408
Diabetes n (%)
31 (42%)
(n = 74)
14 (47%)
17 (46%)
0.6378
7 (58%)
10 (40%)
0.4450
Biological and radiological parameters at admission
CRP (mg/L)
N < 5 mg/L
155 [109–217]
(n = 70)
141 [88–187]
(n = 34)
176 [133–270]
(n = 36)
0.0122
178 [125–301]
(n = 12)
175 [133–267]
(n = 24)
0.0447
Creatinine (µmol/L)
N 49–90 (F); 64–104 (M) µmol/L
95 [70–131]
(n = 74)
100 [74–132]
(n = 37)
93 [67–141]
(n = 37)
0.4794
98 [65–127]
(n = 12)
93 [68–165]
(n = 25)
0.7714
AST (UI/L)
N 5–34 UI/L
63 [42–88]
(n = 70)
57 [40–84]
(n = 36)
72 [43–98]
(n = 34)
0.1550
65 [39–111]
(n = 10)
77 [45–90]
(n = 24)
0.3262
ALT (UI/L)
N < 55 UI/L
32 [21–52]
(n = 70)
28 [21–50]
(n = 36)
34 [23–53]
(n = 34)
0.4846
40 [12–53]
(n = 10)
34 [23–60]
(n = 24)
0.8455
Ferritin (µg/L)
N 5–204 (F); 22–275 (M) µg/L
1522 [770–2688]
(n = 51)
1183 [574–2291]
(n = 24)
1602 [1068–2704]
(n = 27)
0.1773
1252 [599–2531]
(n = 8)
2064 [1104–4130]
(n = 19)
0.1966
Platelets (109/L)
N 150–450 109/L
189 [143–244]
(n = 73)
186 [143–244]
(n = 37)
191 [142–252]
(n = 36)
0.8242
205 [152–268]
(n = 12)
182 [130–229]
(n = 24)
0.6761
PNN (109/L)
N 1.5–7.5 109/L
6.4 [4.3–8.8]
(n = 73)
6.1[4.1–7.6]
(n = 37)
7.0 [4.5–9.0]
(n = 36)
0.0750
8.1 [4.4–9.0]
(n = 12)
7.0 [4.5–9.5]
(n = 24)
0.1857
VWF antigen (%)
N 50–150%
429 [331–498]
(n = 64)
347 [299–509]
(n = 35)
449 [368–494]
(n = 29)
0.1648
476 [403–546]
(n = 10)
446 [331–484]
(n = 19)
0.2497
Fibrinogen (g/L)
N 1.5–3.5 g/L
6.10 [4.15–6.82]
(n = 52)
5.14 [4.03–6.46]
(n = 28)
6.32 [4.37–7.13]
(n = 24)
0.1056
6.40 [6.14–7.11]
(n = 8)
6.18 [4.24–7.13]
(n = 16)
0.2153
D-dimers (mg/L)
N < 0.500 mg/L
1.079 [0.538–3.607]
(n = 61)
0.771 [0.535–1.374]
(n = 31)
1.843 [0.579–7.134]
(n = 30)
0.0472
1.492 [0.569–3.228]
(n = 10)
1.843 [0.586–17.64]
(n = 20)
0.1207
Initial CT findings (score)*
4 [3–4]
(n = 39)
3 [2–4]
(n = 22)
4 [4–5]
(n = 17)
0.0016
4 [4–5]
(n = 9)
4 [4–5]
(n = 6)
0.0171
Clinical outcomes
Time from illness onset to hospital admission (days)
8 [6–12]
(n = 69)
9 [7–12]
(n = 34)
8 [5–12]
(n = 37)
0.7217
8 [4–10]
(n = 11)
8 [5–12]
(n = 24)
0.5818
Time from illness onset to occurrence of ARDS
10 [8–14]
(n = 32)
8 [5–14]
(n = 9)
11 [8–15]
(n = 23)
0.1711
Hospital stay (days)
16 [10–29]
(n = 73)
12 [7–17]
(n = 36)
25 [14–38]
(n = 35)
 < 0.0001
23 [14–30]
(n = 12)
27 [14–41]
(n = 25)
0.0004
Mortality n (%)
18 (24%)
(n = 74)
2 (5%)
(n = 37)
16 (43%)
(n = 37)
0.0001
3 (25%)
(n = 12)
13 (52%)
0.0002
*Semiquantitative CT score was calculated based on the extent of lung parenchyma involvement (1: 0–10%; 2: 11–25%; 3: 26–50%; 4: 51–75%; 5:  > 75%)
In univariate analysis, we determined the differences in median using unpaired t test (Mann–Whitney U test) for continuous variable and differences in proportions were determined using the Chi-square test or Fischer exact test, as appropriate. Concentrations of endocan were compared between groups (control, non-ARDS, mild/moderate ARDS and severe ARDS) using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s posttest. Bold font indicates statistical significance
AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, PNN polynuclear neutrophils, VWF von Willebrand factor

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Foch Hospital (reference 20-07-15).
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2620–9.CrossRef Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2620–9.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):243.CrossRef van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):243.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaudet A, Parmentier E, De Freitas CN, Portier L, Dubucquoi S, Poissy J, et al. Decrease of the plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio is associated with the hyperinflammatory phenotype of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):252.CrossRef Gaudet A, Parmentier E, De Freitas CN, Portier L, Dubucquoi S, Poissy J, et al. Decrease of the plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio is associated with the hyperinflammatory phenotype of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):252.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu W, Sun N-N, Gao H-N, Chen Z-Y, Yang Y, Ju B, et al. Risk factors analysis of COVID-19 patients with ARDS and prediction based on machine learning. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2933.CrossRef Xu W, Sun N-N, Gao H-N, Chen Z-Y, Yang Y, Ju B, et al. Risk factors analysis of COVID-19 patients with ARDS and prediction based on machine learning. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2933.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Medetalibeyoglu A, Emet S, Kose M, Akpinar TS, Senkal N, Catma Y, et al. Serum endocan levels on admission are associated with worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a pilot study. Angiology. 2021;72(2):187–93.CrossRef Medetalibeyoglu A, Emet S, Kose M, Akpinar TS, Senkal N, Catma Y, et al. Serum endocan levels on admission are associated with worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a pilot study. Angiology. 2021;72(2):187–93.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaudet A, Parmentier E, Dubucquoi S, Poissy J, Duburcq T, Lassalle P, et al. Low endocan levels are predictive of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2018;47:121–6.CrossRef Gaudet A, Parmentier E, Dubucquoi S, Poissy J, Duburcq T, Lassalle P, et al. Low endocan levels are predictive of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2018;47:121–6.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A high blood endocan profile during COVID-19 distinguishes moderate from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
verfasst von
Tiffany Pascreau
Colas Tcherakian
Benjamin Zuber
Eric Farfour
Marc Vasse
Philippe Lassalle
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03589-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Critical Care 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Sechs Maßnahmen gegen Regelschmerzen – von Krafttraining bis Yoga

05.06.2024 Dysmenorrhö Nachrichten

Um herauszufinden, wie gut sich körperliche Übungen dafür eignen, primäre Dysmenorrhö zu lindern, hat eine Studiengruppe sechs verschiedene Verfahren untersucht. Alle wirkten, doch eine Methode war Favorit.

Hereditäres Angioödem: Tablette könnte Akuttherapie erleichtern

05.06.2024 Hereditäres Angioödem Nachrichten

Medikamente zur Bedarfstherapie bei hereditärem Angioödem sind bisher nur als Injektionen und Infusionen verfügbar. Der Arzneistoff Sebetralstat kann oral verabreicht werden und liefert vielversprechende Daten.

Intoxikation ohne Alkoholaufnahme: An das Eigenbrauer-Syndrom denken!

05.06.2024 Internistische Diagnostik Nachrichten

Betrunken trotz Alkoholabstinenz? Der Fall einer 50-jährigen Patientin zeigt, dass dies möglich ist. Denn die Frau litt unter dem Eigenbrauer-Syndrom, bei dem durch Darmpilze eine alkoholische Gärung in Gang gesetzt wird.

Mit dem Seitenschneider gegen das Reißverschluss-Malheur

03.06.2024 Urologische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Wer ihn je erlebt hat, wird ihn nicht vergessen: den Schmerz, den die beim Öffnen oder Schließen des Reißverschlusses am Hosenschlitz eingeklemmte Haut am Penis oder Skrotum verursacht. Eine neue Methode für rasche Abhilfe hat ein US-Team getestet.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.