Introduction
Increasing evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of enhancing ketone availability during critical illness [
1]. Whereas ketone bodies may serve as vital and more energy-efficient energy substrate than glucose or fatty acids, ketones may also exert signaling functions leading to anti-inflammatory effects and activation of recovery processes such as muscle regeneration and autophagy [
2]. In line with this, studies performed in animal models of sepsis and brain injury have demonstrated protective effects of providing ketones or ketogenic diets [
3,
4]. However, human evidence remains scarce, with only a few small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggesting improved blood glucose control by ketone supplementation or ketogenic diets [
1].
Although ketogenesis has traditionally been reported to be blunted in critical illness [
5‐
7], a recent pilot crossover RCT revealed that four hours of full fasting significantly increased blood ketone concentrations in long-stay critically ill patients [
8]. Moreover, we recently demonstrated that withholding parenteral nutrition during the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hereby temporarily accepting insufficient enteral nutrition, significantly increased ketogenesis in critically ill children and adults [
9,
10]. Activation of ketogenesis by such virtual fasting early during critical illness was most pronounced in children, in whom increased ketone availability also statistically mediated part of the outcome benefit of the intervention [
9].
A second metabolic intervention that may affect ketone availability during critical illness is tight glucose control with insulin therapy [
6,
11], although the net impact of the intervention on ketone concentrations has not been well documented. Indeed, although insulin is a known suppressor of ketogenesis [
11‐
13], critical illness is characterized by profound insulin resistance in the liver–a major site of ketone production–, and in contrast to peripheral insulin resistance, hepatic insulin resistance is difficult to overcome with insulin therapy [
14]. Moreover, elevated glucose concentrations may suppress lipolysis and subsequent ketogenesis, whereas lowering blood glucose concentrations could reduce suppression of ketogenesis [
6,
11]. In this regard, a pilot crossover RCT in critically ill adults found activated ketogenesis by lowering blood glucose with insulin therapy [
15]. However, in this crossover study, patients received significantly less feeding in periods on tight glucose control, which may have confounded the results. Hence, these findings require confirmation by larger RCTs with equal nutritional intake in both groups.
Our research group previously demonstrated that lowering blood glucose concentrations to the healthy, age-adjusted fasting range significantly improved morbidity and mortality of critically ill children and adults receiving early parenteral nutrition, as compared to tolerating stress hyperglycemia [
16‐
18]. We hypothesize that part of the outcome benefit with tight glucose control in this context may have been mediated by increasing availability of ketone bodies through a mechanism primarily driven by lowering glucose concentrations in the setting of hepatic insulin resistance. We investigated this hypothesis in a secondary analysis of the original RCTs.
Discussion
In this secondary analysis of three RCTs on the impact of tight glucose control in critically ill children and adults receiving early parenteral nutrition, we found no impact of the intervention on circulating ketone concentrations. Indeed, regardless of randomization, 3HB concentrations decreased from ICU admission until day 1 to very low levels and remained suppressed until day 3 in ICU. These data suggest that the protective effects of tight glucose control in these RCTs were not mediated by increased ketone availability.
The data contrast with a previous pilot crossover RCT performed in critically ill adults, which found increased ketone concentrations by tight glucose control [
15]. However, in this crossover RCT, patients received significantly less nutritional intake while receiving tight glucose control, which may have confounded the results. In the current study, nutritional intake was comparable in tight and liberal glucose control patients, as all patients received early parenteral nutrition as part of the contemporary standard of care. Interestingly, the observed suppression of ketone concentrations in both critically ill children and adults from day 1 in ICU onward mirrors the suppression observed earlier by providing early parenteral nutrition as compared with no parenteral nutrition during the first week in the ICU [
9,
10]. The powerful suppression of ketogenesis by providing early full nutritional support may be difficult to counter by lowering glucose concentrations with insulin. It currently remains unclear whether tight glucose control in the absence of early parenteral nutrition affects ketogenesis, and whether this is associated with clinical benefit, which needs to be investigated [
21]. Nevertheless, the current study suggests that the protective effects of tight glucose control in the context of providing early parenteral nutrition are mediated by other pathways than activation of ketogenesis. In this regard, previous studies have put forward prevention of intracellular glucose toxicity and hereby avoidance of mitochondrial damage in vital organs as potentially protective pathways activated by blood glucose lowering [
22].
As in previous studies, upon ICU admission 3HB concentrations were higher in children than in adults [
9,
10]. Also in health, the ketogenic response is known to be more pronounced in children [
23]. Although we do not have data on pre-admission nutritional intake, most patients were presumably fasted prior to ICU admission. Hence, the significant decline in 3HB concentrations soon after ICU admission is likely explained by the initiation of early nutritional support. Alternatively, ketogenesis could be suppressed by even small doses of insulin initiated after ICU admission [
23], also in liberal glucose control patients. However, in such case, one would have expected a less powerful or temporary suppression of ketogenesis in patients receiving liberal glucose control, since the administered insulin dose was significantly lower, with a considerable number of patients requiring no or only temporary insulin treatment.
This study was performed on prospectively collected samples obtained in the context of 3 large RCTs that showed benefit of tight glucose control in the ICU, which is a strength. This study inherently also has limitations. For feasibility reasons and due to missing samples, we restricted the analyses to a subset of patients at four time points. However, patients were well matched for baseline characteristics, and the outcome differences in the adult cohort mimicked the difference in the total cohort [
20], suggesting the subsets are representative for the total study population. Moreover, the consistent results in both critically ill adults and children corroborate our findings. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that the subset of patients is not fully representative for the total study population, or that the intervention may have affected ketone concentrations at other time points. Second, we cannot exclude potential bias by prolonged storage of samples. However, all samples were stored at -80 °C, and the measured range of ketone concentrations was comparable to the obtained range in more recent patient studies [
9,
10]. Moreover, we previously found no impact of a freeze-thaw cycle and short-term storage at ambient temperature on 3HB measurements [
24]. Hence, we consider artifacts induced by prolonged cold storage unlikely. Third, since a considerable number of samples had results for 3HB below the detection limit of the assay, we cannot exclude a minor effect of the intervention on ketogenesis. However, if present, such a small effect would likely be clinically irrelevant.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.