nach oben

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Erschienen in:

05.07.2022 | Review Article

Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review

verfasst von: Danni Lip Hansen, Anders Gram-Hanssen, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.

Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G et al (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23:521–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01984-yCrossRef

Qabbani A, Aboumarzouk OM, ElBakry T et al (2021) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 91:2277–2287. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16505CrossRefPubMed

Broholm M, Rosenberg J (2015) Surgical residents are excluded from robot-assisted surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:449–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000190CrossRefPubMed

Kadakia N, Malek K, Lee SK et al (2020) Impact of robotic surgery on residency training for herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy. Am Surg 86:1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964430CrossRefPubMed

Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 73:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46027-5CrossRefPubMed

Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT et al (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2013.09.015CrossRefPubMed

Usui S, Inoue H, Yoshida T et al (2004) Preliminary report of multi degrees of freedom forceps for endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200404000-00004CrossRefPubMed

Herron DM, Marohn M, Advincula A et al (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-007-9727-5CrossRefPubMed

Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M (1999) Immersive surgical robotic interfaces. Stud Health Technol Inform 62:242–248. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-906-6-242CrossRefPubMed

10.

Mustafa S, Handren E, Farmer D et al (2019) Robotic curriculum enhances minimally invasive general surgery residents’ education. J Surg Educ 76:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.020CrossRefPubMed

11.

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C et al (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12874-018-0611-X/TABLES/1CrossRef

12.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169:467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hansen DL, Gram-Hanssen A, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J (2021) Educational level of surgeons performing robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a scoping review. OSF registration. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R2ZAC

14.

Rayyan QCRI. https://rayyan.qcri.org/. Accessed 10 April 2022

15.

Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331:1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Awad MA, Buzalewski J, Anderson C et al (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair outcomes: operative time and cost analysis. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 24:e2020.00058. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058CrossRef

17.

Bellorin O, Senturk JC, Cruz MV et al (2022) A cost analysis of two- versus three-instrument robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with mesh: time is money. J Robot Surg 16:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01250-3CrossRefPubMed

18.

Bilezikian JA, Tenzel PL, Johnson RG et al (2021) A preliminary evaluation of two different meshes in minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery. Surg Endosc 35:1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07512-9CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T et al (2018) Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 12:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F, Kudsi OY (2021) Robotic inguinal hernia repair for incarcerated hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 31:926–930. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0607CrossRef

21.

Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Tache-Leon CA et al (2018) Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Surg Endosc 32:2131–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4CrossRefPubMed

22.

Cuccurullo D, Guerriero L, Favoriti P et al (2020) Robotic-assisted single site (RASS) TAPP: an advantageous choice? Outcomes of single site robotic groin hernia repair. Hernia 24:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02274-8CrossRefPubMed

23.

Dewulf M, Aspeslagh L, Nachtergaele F et al (2022) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 36:2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9CrossRefPubMed

24.

Dickens EO, Kolachalam R, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Does robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) hernia repair facilitate contralateral investigation and repair without compromising patient morbidity? J Robot Surg 12:713–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4CrossRefPubMed

25.

Diez-Barroso R, Palacio CH, Martinez JA et al (2018) Robotic port-site hernias after general surgical procedures. J Surg Res 230:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.032CrossRefPubMed

26.

Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM, Neighorn C et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc 33:3436–3443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9CrossRefPubMed

27.

Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R et al (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:4042–4048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5CrossRefPubMed

28.

Esen E, Aytac E, Ozben V et al (2019) Adoption of robotic technology in Turkey: a nationwide analysis on caseload and platform used. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:e1962. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1962CrossRef

29.

Ebeling PA, Beale KG, Van Sickle KR et al (2020) Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 219:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.014CrossRefPubMed

30.

Edelman DS (2017) Robotic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 83:1418–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481708301229CrossRefPubMed

31.

Edelman DS (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 36:99–104PubMed

32.

Engan C, Engan M, Bonilla V et al (2015) Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes. Hernia 19:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1311-zCrossRefPubMed

33.

Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Prajapati P, Ogola G et al (2018) Surgical training in robotic surgery: surgical experience of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation. J Robot Surg 12:487–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0771-4CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gundogdu E, Guldogan CE, Ozmen MM (2020) Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: robotic TAPP versus laparoscopic TEP. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 31:439–443. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000890CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hey MT, Mayhew MM, Rico S et al (2021) Initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair in the adolescent population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0301CrossRefPubMed

37.

Aghayeva A, Aytac E, Dinc T et al (2020) Learning curve analysis of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 16:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2150CrossRef

38.

Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4954-2CrossRefPubMed

39.

Holleran TJ, Napolitano MA, Sparks AD et al (2021) Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3CrossRefPubMed

40.

Huerta S, Timmerman C, Argo M et al (2019) Open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair: outcomes and predictors of complications. J Surg Res 241:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046CrossRefPubMed

41.

Huynh D, Fadaee N, Al-Aufey B et al (2020) Robotic iliopubic tract (r-IPT) repair: technique and preliminary outcomes of a minimally invasive tissue repair for inguinal hernia. Hernia 24:1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02259-7CrossRefPubMed

42.

Iraniha A, Peloquin JAI (2018) Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 12:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8CrossRefPubMed

43.

Janjua H, Cousin-Peterson E, Barry TM et al (2020) The paradox of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia repair in the inpatient setting. Am J Surg 219:497–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.012CrossRefPubMed

44.

Janjua H, Cousin-Peterson E, Barry TM et al (2020) Robotic approach to outpatient inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 231:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.031CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kakiashvili E, Bez M, Abu Shakra I et al (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is it a new era in the management of inguinal hernia? Asian J Surg 44:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015CrossRefPubMed

46.

Khoraki J, Gomez PP, Mazzini GS et al (2020) Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 34:3496–3507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8CrossRefPubMed

47.

Kosturakis AK, LaRusso KE, Carroll ND, Nicholl MB (2018) First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital. J Robot Surg 12:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0812-7CrossRefPubMed

48.

Aghayeva A, Benlice C, Bilgin IA et al (2020) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: assessment of short- and long term outcomes. Int J Med Robot 16:e2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2111CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kudsi OY, Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F (2021) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kudsi OY, McCarty JC, Paluvoi N, Mabardy AS (2017) Transition from laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s experience. World J Surg 41:2251–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3CrossRefPubMed

51.

LeBlanc K, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2020) Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study. Hernia 24:1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02224-4CrossRefPubMed

52.

Maas MC, Alicuben ET, Houghton CC et al (2021) Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted groin hernia repair. J Robot Surg 15:547–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01140-0CrossRefPubMed

53.

Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG et al (2017) Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res 213:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.052CrossRefPubMed

54.

Morrell ALG, Morrell Junior AC, Mendes JMF et al (2021) Robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 97 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir 48:e20202704. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202704CrossRefPubMed

55.

Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Kyle-Leinhase I et al (2018) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic groin hernia repair: observational case–control study on the operative time during the learning curve. Surg Endosc 32:4850–4859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6236-7CrossRefPubMed

56.

Muysoms F, Vierstraete M, Nachtergaele F et al (2021) Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study. BJS Open 5:zraa046. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa046

57.

Oviedo RJ, Robertson JC, Alrajhi S (2016) First 101 robotic general surgery cases in a community hospital. JSLS 20:e2016.00056. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Pereira X, Lima DL, Friedmann P et al (2022) Robotic abdominal wall repair: adoption and early outcomes in a large academic medical center. J Robot Surg 16:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01251-2CrossRefPubMed

59.

AlMarzooqi R, Tish S, Huang L-CC et al (2019) Review of inguinal hernia repair techniques within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Hernia 23:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01968-yCrossRefPubMed

60.

Pini R, Mongelli F, Proietti F et al (2021) Suture and fixation of the transversalis fascia during robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair to prevent seroma formation after direct inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 28:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620960976CrossRefPubMed

61.

Pokala B, Armijo PR, Flores L et al (2019) Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review. Hernia 23:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01934-8CrossRefPubMed

62.

Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W et al (2020) Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Proietti F, La Regina D, Pini R et al (2021) Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 35:6643–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08165-4CrossRefPubMed

64.

Quilici PJ, Wolberg H, McConnell N (2022) Operating costs, fiscal impact, value analysis and guidance for the routine use of robotic technology in abdominal surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 36:1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08428-8CrossRefPubMed

65.

Ramser M, Baur J, Keller N et al (2021) Robotic hernia surgery I. English version. Chirurg 92:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01446-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Rose ED, Modlin DM, Ciampa ML et al (2019) Evaluation of operative waste in a military medical center: analysis of operating room cost and waste during surgical cases. Am Surg 85:717–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500729CrossRefPubMed

67.

Saito T, Fukami Y, Uchino T et al (2020) Preliminary results of robotic inguinal hernia repair following its introduction in a single-center trial. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4:441–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB et al (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Sheldon RR, Do WS, Weiss JB et al (2019) Sage wisdom or anecdotal dictum? Equivalent opioid use after open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 217:839–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.022CrossRefPubMed

70.

Al-Naami M, Anjum MN, Aldohayan A et al (2013) Robotic general surgery experience: a gradual progress from simple to more complex procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:486–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1521CrossRef

71.

Tam V, Rogers DE, Al-Abbas A et al (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: a large health system’s experience with the first 300 cases and review of the literature. J Surg Res 235:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070CrossRefPubMed

72.

Tatarian T, Nie L, McPartland C et al (2021) Comparative perioperative and 5-year outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair: a study of 153,727 patients in the state of New York. Surg Endosc 35:7209–7218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08211-1CrossRefPubMed

73.

Vossler JD, Pavlosky KK, Murayama SM et al (2019) Predictors of robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 241:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.056CrossRefPubMed

74.

Waite KE, Herman MA, Doyle PJ (2016) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 10:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1CrossRefPubMed

75.

Yu C-C, Lo C-W, Chen Y-T et al (2020) Novel robot-assisted laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal repair with primary fascial closure plus pre-peritonea mesh for large groin defects. Int J Med Robot 16:e2052. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2052CrossRefPubMed

76.

Zayan NE, Meara MP, Schwartz JS, Narula VK (2019) A direct comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hernia repair: patient-reported outcomes and cost analysis. Hernia 23:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01943-7CrossRefPubMed

77.

Kolachalam R, Dickens E, D’Amico L et al (2018) Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study. Surg Endosc 32:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5665-zCrossRefPubMed

78.

Angus A, DeMare A, Iacco A et al (2020) Evaluating outcomes for robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in males with prior urologic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis from a national database. Surg Endosc 35:5310–5314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08020-6CrossRefPubMed

79.

Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O et al (2016) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: technique and early experience. Am Surg 82:1014–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481608201035CrossRefPubMed

80.

Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E et al (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32:2106–2113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5908-zCrossRefPubMed

81.

Tang JB, Giddins G (2016) Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur 41:365–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416641590CrossRef

82.

Massel DH, Lezak BA, Summers SH et al (2020) Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications. J Hand Surg Eur 45:904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420932517CrossRef

83.

Yakkanti RR, Massel DH, Lezak BA et al (2021) Surgeon level of expertise in adult reconstruction: a brief communication regarding the need for reporting the level of expertise. Arthroplast Today 8:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTD.2020.12.011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Christophersen C, Fonnes S, Andresen K et al (2022) Lower recurrence rate after groin and primary ventral hernia repair performed by high-volume surgeons: a systematic review. Hernia 26:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4CrossRefPubMed

85.

Christophersen C, Baker JJ, Fonnes S et al (2021) Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study. Hernia 25:1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02400-0CrossRefPubMed

86.

Lederhuber H, Hanßke B, Dahlstrand U (2021) Impact of trainee participation on inguinal hernia repair outcome: a study based on the swedish hernia register. Ann Surg 274:e62–e69. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003497CrossRefPubMed

87.

Köckerling F (2018) What is the influence of simulation-based training courses, the learning curve, supervision, and surgeon volume on the outcome in hernia repair? A systematic review. Front Surg 5:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00057CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

88.

Zhao B, Hollandsworth HM, Lee AM et al (2020) Making the jump: a qualitative analysis on the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon in robotic surgery training. J Surg Educ 77:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2019.09.015CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review
verfasst von: Danni Lip Hansen
Anders Gram-Hanssen
Siv Fonnes
Jacob Rosenberg
Publikationsdatum: 05.07.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01440-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Impact of robotic surgery on patient flow and resource use intensity in ovarian cancer

Consensus-led recommendations defining practical principles of achieving optimal surgical outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery in the Asia–Pacific region

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review

Status of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) and the effects of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on RAS in the Department of Defense (DoD)

Robotic radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the soft coagulation scissors technique

Clavien–Dindo classification and risk prediction model of complications after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Update Chirurgie