Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 2/2017

13.05.2016 | Original Article

A comparison between different outcome measures based on “meaningful important differences” in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

verfasst von: Maria M. Wertli, Franziska Christina Buletti, Ulrike Held, Eva Rasmussen-Barr, Sherri Weiser, Jakob M. Burgstaller, Johann Steurer

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are used to measure treatment efficacy in clinical trials. The impact of the choice of a PROM and the cut-off values for ‘meaningful important differences’ (MID) on the study results in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is unclear.

Objective

The objective is to study the consequences of applying different PROMs and values for MID for pain and disability on the proportions of patients with improvement.

Design

Prospective multi-center cohort study.

Methods

Proportions of patients with improvement using established MID cut-off values were calculated and compared for PROMs for pain and disability.

Results

466 patients with LSS completed a baseline and 6-month follow-up assessment and were analyzed. Treatment modalities included surgery (65 %), epidural steroid injections (15 %), or conservative care (20 %). The prevalence of patients fulfilling the criteria for MID ranged from 40 to 70 % across all outcome measures and cut-offs. The agreement of the spinal stenosis outcome measure (SSM) symptom subscale with other pain scales, and the SSM function subscale with other function scales was fair to moderate (Cohen’s κ value between 0.24 and 0.5). Disagreement in the assessment of MID (MID reported by patients in one scale but not the other) was found in at least one-third of the patients.

Conclusion

The MID in outcome scores for this population varied from 40 to 70 %, depending on the measure or cut-off score used. Further, the disagreement between domain specific measures indicates that differences between studies may be also related to the choice of an outcome measures. An international consensus on the use and reporting of outcome measures in studies on lumbar spinal stenosis is needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1996) Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:796–803CrossRef Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1996) Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:796–803CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleland J, Whitman J, Houser J, Wainner R, Childs J (2012) Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The spine journal 12:921–931CrossRefPubMed Cleland J, Whitman J, Houser J, Wainner R, Childs J (2012) Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The spine journal 12:921–931CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A (2002) The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:84–91CrossRef Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A (2002) The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:84–91CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ (1981) Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 10:241–248CrossRefPubMed Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ (1981) Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 10:241–248CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Choinière M, Amsel R (1996) A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity. J Pain Symptom Manag 11:299–311CrossRef Choinière M, Amsel R (1996) A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity. J Pain Symptom Manag 11:299–311CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 8:141–144CrossRef Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 8:141–144CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Exner V, Keel P (2000) Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain—validation of a German version of the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14:392–400CrossRefPubMed Exner V, Keel P (2000) Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain—validation of a German version of the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14:392–400CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10 CrossRef Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31815e3a10​ CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedly JL, Comstock BA, Turner JA, Heagerty PJ, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, Bauer Z, Bresnahan BW, Avins AL, Nedeljkovic SS, Nerenz DR, Standaert C, Kessler L, Akuthota V, Annaswamy T, Chen A, Diehn F, Firtch W, Gerges FJ, Gilligan C, Goldberg H, Kennedy DJ, Mandel S, Tyburski M, Sanders W, Sibell D, Smuck M, Wasan A, Won L, Jarvik JG (2014) A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 371:11–21. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1313265 CrossRefPubMed Friedly JL, Comstock BA, Turner JA, Heagerty PJ, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, Bauer Z, Bresnahan BW, Avins AL, Nedeljkovic SS, Nerenz DR, Standaert C, Kessler L, Akuthota V, Annaswamy T, Chen A, Diehn F, Firtch W, Gerges FJ, Gilligan C, Goldberg H, Kennedy DJ, Mandel S, Tyburski M, Sanders W, Sibell D, Smuck M, Wasan A, Won L, Jarvik JG (2014) A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 371:11–21. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1313265 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Nakagawa Y, Hashizume H, Iwasaki H, Tsutsui S (2015) Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 24:396–403. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3599-x CrossRefPubMed Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Nakagawa Y, Hashizume H, Iwasaki H, Tsutsui S (2015) Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 24:396–403. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3599-x CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3115–3124CrossRef Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3115–3124CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268PubMed Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Core Team R (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: Core Team R (ed) R Foundation for statistical computing. R Core Team, Vienna Core Team R (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: Core Team R (ed) R Foundation for statistical computing. R Core Team, Vienna
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker SL, Adogwa O, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Anderson WN, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ (2012) Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Spine J 12:1122–1128. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006 CrossRefPubMed Parker SL, Adogwa O, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Anderson WN, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ (2012) Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Spine J 12:1122–1128. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2012.​10.​006 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Munting E, Roder C, Sobottke R, Dietrich D, Aghayev E, Spine Tango C (2015) Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry. Eur Spine J 24:358–368. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3349-0 CrossRefPubMed Munting E, Roder C, Sobottke R, Dietrich D, Aghayev E, Spine Tango C (2015) Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry. Eur Spine J 24:358–368. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3349-0 CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Wertli MM, Mattle M, Nauer S, Kleinstuck FS, Jeszenszky D, Haschtmann D, Becker HJ, Porchet F, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Outcome Study Group (2015) Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:710–718. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000751 CrossRef Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Wertli MM, Mattle M, Nauer S, Kleinstuck FS, Jeszenszky D, Haschtmann D, Becker HJ, Porchet F, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Outcome Study Group (2015) Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:710–718. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000751​ CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pincus T, Santos R, Breen A, Burton AK, Underwood M, Multinational Musculoskeletal Inception Cohort Study Collaboration (2008) A review and proposal for a core set of factors for prospective cohorts in low back pain: a consensus statement. Arthritis Rheum 59:14–24. doi:10.1002/art.23251 CrossRefPubMed Pincus T, Santos R, Breen A, Burton AK, Underwood M, Multinational Musculoskeletal Inception Cohort Study Collaboration (2008) A review and proposal for a core set of factors for prospective cohorts in low back pain: a consensus statement. Arthritis Rheum 59:14–24. doi:10.​1002/​art.​23251 CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gum JL, Glassman SD, Carreon LY (2013) Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:564–568. doi:10.3171/2013.8.spine12804 CrossRefPubMed Gum JL, Glassman SD, Carreon LY (2013) Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:564–568. doi:10.​3171/​2013.​8.​spine12804 CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Blood EA, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Weinstein JN (2011) Effects of viewing an evidence-based video decision aid on patients’ treatment preferences for spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1501–1504. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182055c1e CrossRef Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Blood EA, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Weinstein JN (2011) Effects of viewing an evidence-based video decision aid on patients’ treatment preferences for spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1501–1504. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3182055c1e​ CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:Cd001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4 Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:Cd001431. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001431.​pub4
Metadaten
Titel
A comparison between different outcome measures based on “meaningful important differences” in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
verfasst von
Maria M. Wertli
Franziska Christina Buletti
Ulrike Held
Eva Rasmussen-Barr
Sherri Weiser
Jakob M. Burgstaller
Johann Steurer
Publikationsdatum
13.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4587-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

European Spine Journal 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.