Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2011

01.07.2011

A Comparison Between Swedish Midwives and Obstetricians & Gynecologists Opinions on Cesarean Section

verfasst von: Ann Josefsson, Christina Gunnervik, Adam Sydsjö, Gunilla Sydsjö

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To compare Swedish obstetricians/gynecologists and midwives’ attitudes and opinions on different aspects of cesarean section (CS). In total 330 midwives from the south east of Sweden and 1280 Swedish obstetricians/gynecologists were asked to answer a study-specific questionnaire anonymously about their opinions on different issues concerning CS. The majority of obstetricians/gynecologists and midwives had more than 10 years of experience in their professions (75.2% vs. 73.6%). The midwives thought that a reasonable CS rate would be 11.5% whereas the corresponding figures for the obstetricians/gynecologists was 13.8% (P < 0.001). There are differences in opinions and attitudes concerning both CS rates and other aspects in connection with CS. There are evident differences in attitudes towards CS and mode of delivery between midwives and obstetricians/gynecologists. These need to be explored and discussed in relation to state-of-the-art knowledge and should become a part of the curriculum for both groups of professionals both in training as well as on a regular clinical basis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Habiba, M., Kaminski, M., Da Fré, M., Marsal, K., Bleker, O., Libero, J., et al. (2006). Caesarean section on request: A comparison of obstetricians attitudes in eight European countries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 647–656.PubMedCrossRef Habiba, M., Kaminski, M., Da Fré, M., Marsal, K., Bleker, O., Libero, J., et al. (2006). Caesarean section on request: A comparison of obstetricians attitudes in eight European countries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 647–656.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotzias, C. S., Paterson-Brown, S., & Fisk, N. M. (2001). Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: A survey of current opinion. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 97, 15–16.PubMedCrossRef Cotzias, C. S., Paterson-Brown, S., & Fisk, N. M. (2001). Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: A survey of current opinion. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 97, 15–16.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildingsson, I., Radestad, I., Rubertsson, C., & Waldenstrom, U. (2002). Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 618–623.PubMedCrossRef Hildingsson, I., Radestad, I., Rubertsson, C., & Waldenstrom, U. (2002). Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 618–623.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Högberg, U., Lynö, N., & Wulff, M. (2008). Cesarean by Choice? Empirical study of public attitudes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87, 1301–1308.PubMedCrossRef Högberg, U., Lynö, N., & Wulff, M. (2008). Cesarean by Choice? Empirical study of public attitudes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87, 1301–1308.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reime, B., et al. (2004). Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 1388–1393.PubMedCrossRef Reime, B., et al. (2004). Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 1388–1393.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Monari, F., Di Mario, S., Facchinetti, F., & Basevi, V. (2008). Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes towards caesarean section. Birth, 35, 129–135.PubMedCrossRef Monari, F., Di Mario, S., Facchinetti, F., & Basevi, V. (2008). Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes towards caesarean section. Birth, 35, 129–135.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnervik, C., Sydsjö, G., Sydsjö, A., Selling, K. E., & Josefsson, A. (2008). Attitudes towards caesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87, 438–444.PubMedCrossRef Gunnervik, C., Sydsjö, G., Sydsjö, A., Selling, K. E., & Josefsson, A. (2008). Attitudes towards caesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87, 438–444.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnervik, C., Josefsson, A., Sydsjö, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2008) Attitudes towards mode of birth among Swedish midwives. Midwifery. Jul 14 2008. Gunnervik, C., Josefsson, A., Sydsjö, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2008) Attitudes towards mode of birth among Swedish midwives. Midwifery. Jul 14 2008.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuglenes, D., Oian, P., & Kristiansen, I. S. (2009). Obstetricians’ choice of caesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: Is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gyncol., 200, 48. Fuglenes, D., Oian, P., & Kristiansen, I. S. (2009). Obstetricians’ choice of caesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: Is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gyncol., 200, 48.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pakenham, S., Chamberlain, S. M., & Smith, G. N. (2006). Women’s view on elective primary caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 28, 1089–1094.PubMed Pakenham, S., Chamberlain, S. M., & Smith, G. N. (2006). Women’s view on elective primary caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 28, 1089–1094.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett, C. L., Shaw, A. R., Montgomery, A. A., & Murphy, D. J. (2006). Diamond Study group. Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: The role of health professionals and information about health risks. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 1438–1445.PubMedCrossRef Emmett, C. L., Shaw, A. R., Montgomery, A. A., & Murphy, D. J. (2006). Diamond Study group. Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: The role of health professionals and information about health risks. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 1438–1445.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Comparison Between Swedish Midwives and Obstetricians & Gynecologists Opinions on Cesarean Section
verfasst von
Ann Josefsson
Christina Gunnervik
Adam Sydsjö
Gunilla Sydsjö
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0630-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe