nach oben

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2012 | Research article

A cross-sectional and semantic investigation of self-rated health in the northern Sweden MONICA-study

verfasst von: Göran Waller, Peder Thalén, Urban Janlert, Katarina Hamberg, Annika Forssén

Erschienen in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Self-Rated Health (SRH) correlates with risk of illness and death. But how are different questions of SRH to be interpreted? Does it matter whether one asks: “How would you assess your general state of health?”(General SRH) or “How would you assess your general state of health compared to persons of your own age?”(Comparative SRH)? Does the context in a questionnaire affect the answers? The aim of this paper is to examine the meaning of two questions on self-rated health, the statistical distribution of the answers, and whether the context of the question in a questionnaire affects the answers.

Methods

Statistical and semantic methodologies were used to analyse the answers of two different SRH questions in a cross-sectional survey, the MONICA-project of northern Sweden.

Results

The answers from 3504 persons were analysed. The statistical distributions of answers differed. The most common answer to the General SRH was “good”, while the most common answer to the Comparative SRH was “similar”. The semantic analysis showed that what is assessed in SRH is not health in a medical and lexical sense but fields of association connected to health, for example health behaviour, functional ability, youth, looks, way of life. The meaning and function of the two questions differ – mainly due to the comparing reference in Comparative SRH. The context in the questionnaire may have affected the statistics.

Conclusions

Health is primarily assessed in terms of its sense-relations (associations) and Comparative SRH and General SRH contain different information on SRH. Comparative SRH is semantically more distinct. The context of the questions in a questionnaire may affect the way self-rated health questions are answered. Comparative SRH should not be eliminated from use in questionnaires. Its usefulness in clinical encounters should be investigated.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Idler EL, Benyamini Y: Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997, 38: 21-37. 10.2307/2955359.CrossRefPubMed

Jylhä M: What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2009, 69: 307-316. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013.CrossRefPubMed

Manderbacka K, Lundberg O, Martikainen P: Do risk factors and health behaviours contribute to self-ratings of health?. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48: 1713-1720. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00068-4.CrossRefPubMed

Eriksson I, Undén AL, Elofsson S: Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30: 326-333. 10.1093/ije/30.2.326.CrossRefPubMed

Benyamini , Leventhal EA, Leventhal H: Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health. Psychosom Med. 2000, 62: 354-364.CrossRefPubMed

Aittomäki A, Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O: The associations of household wealth and income with self-rated health–a study on economic advantage in middle-aged Finnish men and women. Soc Sci Med. 2010, 71: 1018-1026. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.040.CrossRefPubMed

Snelgrove JW, Pikhart H, Stafford M: A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-rated health: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Soc Sci Med. 2009, 68: 1993-2001. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.011.CrossRefPubMed

Breidablik H-J, Meland E, Lydersen S: Self-rated health during adolescence: stability and predictors of change (Young-HUNT study, Norway). Eur J Public Health. 2009, 19: 73-78.CrossRefPubMed

Kemeney , Taylor , Reed , Bower , Grunewald : Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. Am Psychol. 2000, 55: 99-109.CrossRef

10.

Health Interview Surveys. Towards international harmonization of metods and instruments. Edited by: Bruin A, Picavet HSJ, Nossikov A. 1996, WHO regional publications. European series; No 58

11.

Baron-Epel O, Kaplan G: General subjective health status or age-related subjective health status: does it make a difference?. Soc Sci Med. 2001, 53: 1373-1381. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00426-3.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sargent-Cox KA, Anstey KJ, Luszcz MA: Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: implications for health measurement of older adults. J Aging Health. 2008, 20: 739-761. 10.1177/0898264308321035.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Stegmayr B, Lundberg V, Asplund K: The events registration and survey procedures in the Northern Sweden MONICA Project. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2003, 61: 9-17.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Lyons J: Linguistic semantics: An introduction. 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New YorkCrossRef

15.

Wittgenstein L: Philosophical Investigations. Filosofiska undersökningar. 1953, Basil Blackwell Ltd, Stockholm 1992

16.

Wilkinson R: The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. 2009, Bloomsbury Press, New York, 1 American ed

17.

Marmot M: The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. 2005, Henry Holt, New York, 1 Owl Books ed

18.

Breetvelt IS, Van Dam FS: Underreporting by cancer patients: the case of response-shift. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32: 981-987. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90156-7.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wood JV, Taylor SE, Lichtman RR: Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985, 49: 1169-1183.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Vuorisalmi M, Lintonen T, Jylhä M: Global self-rated health data from a longitudinal study predicted mortality better than comparative self-rated health in old age. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005, 58: 680-687. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.025.CrossRefPubMed

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/154/prepub

Titel: A cross-sectional and semantic investigation of self-rated health in the northern Sweden MONICA-study
verfasst von: Göran Waller
Peder Thalén
Urban Janlert
Katarina Hamberg
Annika Forssén
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: BMC Medical Research Methodology / Ausgabe 1/2012
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-154

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Assessment of public health impact of work-related asthma

Constructing episodes of inpatient care: data infrastructure for population-based research

The selection of search sources influences the findings of a systematic review of people’s views: a case study in public health

Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study

Determination of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with COPD: a comparison of different assays

A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment