Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Das Thema chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen wird im Live-Webinar am 7. Mai von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr aus internistischer, gynäkologischer und psychologisch-neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. Besprochen werden krankheitsbedingte Ursachen, Mechanismen der kognitiven Schmerzmodulation sowie mögliche Therapieoptionen. Die Fortbildung ist mit 2 CME-Punkten zertifiziert. Melden Sie sich jetzt an!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2011

01.09.2011 | Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

A History of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

verfasst von: Evan L. Flatow, MD, Alicia K. Harrison, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 9/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Management of the cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder has long been challenging. Early unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty systems were associated with high complication and implant failure rates. The evolution toward the modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty includes many variables of constrained shoulder arthroplasty designs.

Questions/purposes

This review explores the development of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, specifically describing (1) the evolution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs, (2) the biomechanical variations in the evolution of this arthroplasty, and (3) the current issues relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty today.

Methods

Using a PubMed search, the literature was explored for articles addressing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, focusing on those papers with historical context.

Results

Results of the early designs were apparently poor, although they were not subjected to rigorous clinical research and usually reported only in secondary literature. We identified a trend of glenoid component failure in the early reverse designs. This trend was recognized and reported by authors as the reverse shoulder evolved. Authors reported greater pain relief and better function in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the fundamental change of Grammont’s design (moving the center of rotation medially and distally). However, current reports suggest lingering concerns and challenges with today’s designs.

Conclusions

The history of reverse shoulder arthroplasty involves the designs of many forward-thinking surgeons. Many of these highly constrained systems failed, although more recent designs have demonstrated improved longevity and implant performance. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty requires ongoing study, with challenges and controversies remaining around present-day designs.
Literatur
1.
Ahir SP, Walker PS, Squire-Taylor CJ, Blunn GW, Bayley JI. Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement. J Biomech. 2004;37:1699–1708.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Bankes MJ, Emery RJ. Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jules Emile Pean. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:259–262.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Blauth W, Donner K. Notes on the history of arthroplasty (author’s transl) [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1979;117:997–1006.PubMed
4.
Bodey WN, Yeoman PM. Prosthetic arthroplasty of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:900–903.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:147S–161S.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Brostrom LA, Wallensten R, Olsson E, Anderson D. The Kessel prosthesis in total shoulder arthroplasty: a five-year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:155–160.PubMed
7.
Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, DePalma AF. ‘Floating-socket’ total shoulder replacement: anatomical, biomechanical, and surgical rationale. J Biomed Mater Res. 1978;12:89–114.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Burkhead WZ. History and development of prosthetic replacement of the glenohumeral joint. In: Williams GR, Yamaguchi K, Ramsey ML, Galatz LM, eds. Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:3–10.
9.
Cofield RH. Status of total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Surg. 1977;112:1088–1091.PubMed
10.
Cofield RH, Stauffer RN. The Bickel glenohumeral arthroplasty. In: Morrey BF, ed. Conference on Joint Replacement in the Upper Limb. London, UK: Institute of Mechanical Engineering; 1977:15–25.
11.
Coughlin MJ, Morris JM, West WF. The semiconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:574–581.PubMed
12.
Emery RJ, Bankes MJ. Shoulder replacement: historical perspectives. In: Walch G, Boileau P, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1999:3–9.
13.
Fenlin JM Jr. Total glenohumeral joint replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6:565–583.PubMed
14.
Fenlin JM Jr. Semi-constrained prosthesis for the rotator cuff deficient patient. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:55.
15.
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency: a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1697–1705.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Grammont P, Trouilloud P, Laffay J, Deries X. Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis. Rhumatologie. 1987;39:407–418.
17.
Gristina AG, Webb LX. The Trispherical total shoulder replacement. In: Bayley I, Kessel L, eds. Shoulder Surgery. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1982:153–157.
18.
Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1742–1747.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gutierrez S, Comiskey CAt, Luo ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2606–2615.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;330:3–12.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Katz D, O’Toole G, Cogswell L, Sauzieres P, Valenti P. A history of the reverse shoulder prosthesis. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2007;1:108–113.CrossRef
22.
Kenmore PI, MacCartee C, Vitek B. A simple shoulder replacement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1974;8:329–330.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Kessel L, Bayley I. Prosthetic replacement of shoulder joint: preliminary communication. J R Soc Med. 1979;72:748–752.PubMed
24.
Khazzam M, Fealy S. History and development of shoulder arthroplasty. In: Fealy S, Sperling JW, Warren RF, Craig EV, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2008:1–9.
25.
Kölbel R, Friedebold G. Shoulder joint replacement [in German]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1973;76:31–39.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Lettin AW, Copeland SA, Scales JT. The Stanmore total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:47–51.PubMed
27.
Lettin AW, Scales JT. Total replacement of the shoulder joint (two cases). Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:373–374.PubMed
28.
Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, Garaud P, Mole D, Sirveaux F, Walch G. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:925–935.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Linscheid RL, Colfield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty: experimental but promising. Geriatrics. 1976;31:64–69.PubMed
30.
Lugli T. Artificial shoulder joint by Pean (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;133:215–218.PubMed
31.
Marmor L. Hemiarthroplasty for the rheumatoid shoulder joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;122:201–203.PubMed
32.
Neer CS 2nd. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37:215–228.PubMed
33.
Neer CS 2nd. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1–13.PubMed
34.
Neer CS 2nd. Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990.
35.
Neer CS 2nd, Craig EV, Fukuda H. Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1232–1244.PubMed
36.
Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:319–337.PubMed
37.
Post M. Constrained arthroplasty of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:455–462.PubMed
38.
Post M, Haskell SS, Jablon M. Total shoulder replacement with a constrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:327–335.PubMed
39.
Post M, Jablon M, Miller H, Singh M. Constrained total shoulder joint replacement: a critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;144:135–150.PubMed
40.
Redfern TR, Wallace WA. History of shoulder replacement surgery. In: Wallace WA, ed. Joint Replacement in the Shoulder and Elbow. Oxford, UK: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1998:6–16.
41.
Reeves B, Jobbins B, Dowson D, Wright V. A total shoulder endoprosthesis. Eng Med. 1974;1:64–67.CrossRef
42.
Reeves B, Jobbins B, Flowers F, Dowson D, Wright V. Biomechanical problems in the development of a total shoulder endo-prosthesis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1972;31:425–426.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Severt R, Thomas BJ, Tsenter MJ, Amstutz HC, Kabo JM. The influence of conformity and constraint on translational forces and frictional torque in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;292:151–158.PubMed
44.
Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:588–600.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff: results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:388–395.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Tanner MW, Cofield RH. Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:116–128.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Wall B, Nove-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1476–1485.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1476–1486.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Wierks C, Skolasky RL, Ji JH, McFarland EG. Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:225–234.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Wolff R, Kölbel R. The history of shoulder joint replacement. In: Kölbel R, Helbig B, Blauth W, eds. Shoulder Replacement. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1987:3–13.
51.
Wretenberg PF, Wallensten R. The Kessel total shoulder arthroplasty: a 13- to 16-year retrospective followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;365:100–103.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A History of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
verfasst von
Evan L. Flatow, MD
Alicia K. Harrison, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1733-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

A Radiographic Classification of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Arthritis

Surgical Technique

A Method to Localize The Radial Nerve Using the ‘Apex Of Triceps Aponeurosis’ as a Landmark

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

How Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Works

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Surgical Technique: The Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

50 Years Ago in CORR

50 Years Ago in CORR: Arthrography of the Shoulder Joint Robert L. Samilson MD, Robert L. Raphaël MD, Lawrence Post MD, Charles Noonan MD, Evelyn Siris MD, and Frank L. Raney Jr, MD CORR 1961;20:21–32

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Biographical Sketch: Paul M. Grammont, MD (1940)

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders scheint das auf weibliche Kranke zuzutreffen, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise