To further test if our M1-cre can truly target CA2 region, serial sections were collected and thoroughly investigated 3–4 weeks after the stereotaxic coinjections of AAV9/M1-Cre & AAV9/EF1α-DIO-EGFP (or EF1α-DIO-mcherry, AAV5/EF1α-DIO-EGFP) mixture performed as before in dorsal CA2 (Fig.
2A). And RGS14 was used as a CA2 marker to delineate this region. Our results displayed that GFP was efficiently and accurately expressed through dorsal CA2 without leakage by M1 driven Cre expression (Fig.
2B1–B5). Again, the non-CA2-specific promoter hSyn or CMV driven Cre was used as a control. The same dosage of AAV9/hSyn-Cre & EF1α-DIO-EGFP co-injection led to a broader nonspecific expression beyond CA2 region. The expression of non-specific EGFP could be pervasively detected in CA1, CA3 and DG (Fig.
2C1–C5, D1–D5). Contrarily, RGS14 could be much better colocalized with M1-driven EGFP expressed cells (the percentage of EGFP
+RGS14
+ cell is ~ 48% of total RGS14
+ cells) in CA2 (Fig.
2G) but much less overlapped with CMV (the percentage of EGFP
+RGS14
+ cell is ~ 13% of the total RGS14
+ cells) or hSyn driven EGFP expressed cells (the percentage of EGFP
+RGS14
+ cell is ~ 3% of the total RGS14
+ cells) (Fig.
2G). In conclusion, there are much less viral expressing cells outside of CA2 regions when applying M1 instead of nonspecific promoters to drive GFP expression (Fig.
2G). And over 95% of these M1-driven EGFP expressed cells are not colocalized with the interneuron markers (Fig.
2F1–F4, I) which means most M1-driven EGFP expressed cells are pyramidal neurons. Moreover, 84.7% of M1-driven EGFP pyramidal neurons in CA2 region receive the projections from Calbindin positive (CB
+) mossy fibers from dorsal dentate gyrus (Fig.
2F5, J) which was consistent with the phenomenon observed in PCP4
+ pyramidal neurons in dorsal CA2 [
18]. One thing surprising for our immunofluorescence results is that a considerable number of M1 expressing cells does not colocalize with RGS14 (Fig.
2E1–E4). The ratio of EGFP
+RGS14
− cells within RGS14 stained region (~ 16% of the total RGS14
+ cells) for M1-Cre treatment (Fig.
2G) to EGFP
+RGS14
+ cells within the same region (~ 48% of the total RGS14
+ cells) (Fig.
2G) is around 1:3, which means around 25% of M1 expressing cells does not express RGS14. This is different with the reported result showing almost 100% coexpression of STEP, PCP4 and RGS14 within CA2 region [
18], and the result in another previous study showing ~ 97% overlapping between RGS14 and Amigo2 positive cells in this region [
13].