nach oben

The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Erschienen in:

19.01.2021

A Nonlinear Association between Neighborhood Walkability and Risks of Sarcopenia in Older Adults

verfasst von: J.-H. Park, T.-F. Lai, C.-S. Chang, W.-C. Huang, Jeong Su Cho, Yung Liao

Erschienen in: The journal of nutrition, health & aging | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Neighborhood walkability has been found to be positively related to physical activity and negatively associated with risks of noncommunicable diseases. However, limited studies have examined its association with sarcopenia in older adults. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association between neighborhood walk score and risks of sarcopenia in a sample of older Taiwanese adults.

Design and setting

This study was a cross-sectional investigation using telephone-based survey.

Participants

A nationwide telephone-based survey targeting older adults (≥ 65 years) was conducted in Taiwan.

Measurements

Data on neighborhood walkability (determined by walk score of residential neighborhood), sarcopenia scores (measured by SARC-F), and personal characteristics were obtained. The relationships between walk score and risks of sarcopenia were examined using generalized additive models.

Results

A total of 1,056 older adults participated in the survey. In model 1 (sex and age) and model 2 (full-adjusted model), a nonlinear association between neighborhood walk score and risks of sarcopenia was observed. Results showed that risks of sarcopenia appear to be lower in neighborhoods with a 40-walk score (Car-Dependent; most errands require a car) and an 80-walk score (Very Walkable) and highest in the neighborhood with a 60-walk score (Somewhat Walkable).

Conclusions

The study revealed a nonlinear relationship between neighborhood walkability and risks of sarcopenia in older adults in Asian context. Results provided information to urban designers and public health practitioners that more walkable neighborhood may not necessarily protect older adults from risks of sarcopenia.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Marzetti E, Calvani R, Tosato M, Cesari M, Di Bari M, Cherubini A, et al. Sarcopenia: an overview. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2017;29(1):11–7.CrossRef

Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0169548.CrossRef

Bruyere O, Beaudart C, Ethgen O, Reginster JY, Locquet M. The health economics burden of sarcopenia: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2019;119:61–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.11.003.CrossRef

Wu CH, Chen KT, Hou MT, Chang YF, Chang CS, Liu PY, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia in older Taiwanese living in rural community: the Tianliao Old People study 04. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2014;14 Suppl 1:69–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12233.CrossRef

Wu TY, Liaw CK, Chen FC, Kuo KL, Chie WC, Yang RS. Sarcopenia Screened With SARC-F Questionnaire Is Associated With Quality of Life and 4-Year Mortality. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016;17(12):1129–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.029.CrossRef

Ko PC, Yeung WJ. Contextualizing productive aging in Asia: Definitions, determinants, and health implications. Social science & medicine (1982). 2019;229:1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.016.CrossRef

Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. The American psychologist. 1992;47(1):6–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.47.1.6.

Perdue WC, Stone LA, Gostin LO. The built environment and its relationship to the public’s health: the legal framework. American journal of public health. 2003;93(9):1390–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.9.1390.CrossRef

Renalds A, Smith TH, Hale PJ. A Systematic Review of Built Environment and Health. Family & Community Health. 2010;33(1):68–78. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/familyandcommunityhealth/Fulltext/2010/01000/A_Systematic_Review_of_Built_Environment_and.9.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181c4e2e5.CrossRef

10.

Yen IH, Michael YL, Perdue L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: a systematic review. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009;37(5):455–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.022.CrossRef

11.

Dörrzapf L, Kovács-Győri A, Resch B, Zeile P. Defining and assessing walkability: a concept for an integrated approach using surveys, biosensors and geospatial analysis. 2019;62(1):5. Available from: https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/udi/62/1/article-p5.xml DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2019-0008.

12.

McKinnon RA, Reedy J, Morrissette MA, Lytle LA, Yaroch AL. Measures of the Food Environment: A Compilation of the Literature, 1990–2007. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009;36(4, Supplement):S124–S33. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937970900021X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.012.CrossRef

13.

Frank L, Kerr J, Rosenberg D, King A. Healthy aging and where you live: community design relationships with physical activity and body weight in older Americans. Journal of physical activity & health. 2010;7 Suppl 1:S82–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s82.CrossRef

14.

King AC, Sallis JF, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Cain K, Conway TL, et al. Aging in neighborhoods differing in walkability and income: associations with physical activity and obesity in older adults. Social science & medicine (1982). 2011;73(10):1525–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.032.CrossRef

15.

Van Cauwenberg J, Van Holle V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Dyck D, Deforche B. Neighborhood walkability and health outcomes among older adults: The mediating role of physical activity. Health & place. 2016;37:16–25. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829215001501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.11.003.CrossRef

16.

Besser LM, McDonald NC, Song Y, Kukull WA, Rodriguez DA. Neighborhood Environment and Cognition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. American journal of preventive medicine. 2017;53(2):241–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.013.CrossRef

17.

Berke EM, Gottlieb LM, Moudon AV, Larson EB. Protective association between neighborhood walkability and depression in older men. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007;55(4):526–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01108.x.CrossRef

18.

Koohsari MJ, McCormack GR, Nakaya T, Shibata A, Ishii K, Yasunaga A, et al. Walking-friendly built environments and objectively measured physical function in older adults. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2020. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254620300156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.02.002.

19.

Fogal AS, Pessoa MC, Fernandes Filho EI, Ribeiro AQ. Built urban environment and functional incapacity: enabling healthy aging. Journal of transport and health. 2019;14:e100574–e. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100574.CrossRef

20.

Lai T-F, Liao Y, Hsueh M-C, Lin C-Y. A literature review of Walk Score⋀®: physical activity, walking behavior and risk of chronic diseases. Taiwan Journal of Public Health. 2018;37(4):375–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6288/tjph.201808_37(4).107023.

21.

Liao Y, Lin CY, Lai TF, Chen YJ, Kim B, Park JH. Walk Score((R)) and Its Associations with Older Adults’ Health Behaviors and Outcomes. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019;16(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040622.

22.

Cole R, Dunn P, Hunter I, Owen N, Sugiyama T. Walk Score and Australian adults’ home-based walking for transport. Health & place. 2015;35:60–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.06.011.CrossRef

23.

Chiu M, Shah BR, Maclagan LC, Rezai MR, Austin PC, Tu JV. Walk Score(R) and the prevalence of utilitarian walking and obesity among Ontario adults: A cross-sectional study. Health reports. 2015;26(7):3–10.PubMed

24.

Ida S, Kaneko R, Murata K. SARC-F for Screening of Sarcopenia Among Older Adults: A Meta-analysis of Screening Test Accuracy. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2018;19(8):685–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.001.CrossRef

25.

Woo J, Leung J, Morley JE. Validating the SARC-F: A Suitable Community Screening Tool for Sarcopenia? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2014;15(9):630–4. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861014002655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.021.CrossRef

26.

Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Morley JE. SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2016;7(1):28–36. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcsm.12048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12048.CrossRef

27.

Koohsari MJ, Sugiyama T, Hanibuchi T, Shibata A, Ishii K, Liao Y, et al. Validity of Walk Score(R) as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan. Preventive medicine reports. 2018;9:114–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.001.CrossRef

28.

Lai TF, Lin CY, Huang YH, Liao Y. Validation of walk score® for estimating neighborhood walkability in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Public Health. 2019;38(4):445–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6288/tjph.201908_38(4).108036.

29.

Carr LJ, Dunsiger SI, Marcus BH. Walk Score™ As a Global Estimate of Neighborhood Walkability. American journal of preventive medicine. 2010;39(5):460–3. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379710004307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.007.CrossRef

30.

Health Promotion Administration. The measurement of BMI Taiwan, Taipei: Health Promotion Administration; 2020 [Available from: https://health99.hpa.gov.tw/OnlinkHealth/Onlink_BMI.aspx.

31.

Akaike H, editor. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó; 1973.

32.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Generalized Additive Models. Statist Sci. 1986;1(3):297–310. Available from: https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.ss/1177013604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013604.

33.

Barnett DW, Barnett A, Nathan A, Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E, on behalf of the Council on E, et al. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017;14(1):103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z.CrossRef

34.

Howell NA, Tu JV, Moineddin R, Chu A, Booth GL. Association Between Neighborhood Walkability and Predicted 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: The CANHEART (Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team) Cohort. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;8(21):e013146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.119.013146.CrossRef

35.

Kartschmit N, Sutcliffe R, Sheldon MP, Moebus S, Greiser KH, Hartwig S, et al. Walkability and its association with prevalent and incident diabetes among adults in different regions of Germany: results of pooled data from five German cohorts. BMC endocrine disorders. 2020;20(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0485-x.CrossRef

36.

Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. Neighbourhood walkability and incidence of hypertension: Findings from the study of 429,334 UK Biobank participants. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2018;221(3):458–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.009.CrossRef

37.

Lin C-Y, Park J-H, Hsueh M-C, Lai T-F, Liao Y. Are Area-Level Crimes Associated with Older Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior? Sustainability. 2019;11(9):2454. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2454.CrossRef

38.

Cerin E, Barnett A, Zhang CJP, Lai PC, Sit CHP, Lee RSY. How urban densification shapes walking behaviours in older community dwellers: a cross-sectional analysis of potential pathways of influence. International journal of health geographics. 2020;19(1):14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00210-8.CrossRef

39.

Liao Y, Shibata A, Ishii K, Koohsari MJ, Oka K. Cross-sectional and prospective associations of neighbourhood environmental attributes with screen time in Japanese middle-aged and older adults. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e019608. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/3/e019608.full.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019608.CrossRef

Titel: A Nonlinear Association between Neighborhood Walkability and Risks of Sarcopenia in Older Adults
verfasst von: J.-H. Park
T.-F. Lai
C.-S. Chang
W.-C. Huang
Jeong Su Cho
Yung Liao
Publikationsdatum: 19.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: The journal of nutrition, health & aging / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1279-7707
Elektronische ISSN: 1760-4788
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1588-4

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Design and setting

Participants

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Nutritional Status and Risks of Cognitive Decline and Incident Neurocognitive Disorders: Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies

Challenges Providing Nutrition Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Canadian Dietitian Perspectives

Nutritional Interventions for Early Dementia

Education, Healthy Ageing and Vaccine Literacy

Hopelessness and Depression Predict Sarcopenia in Advanced CKD and Dialysis: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Success of Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale to Predict Mortality among Nursing Home Residents